Young people likely to challenge Islam and see themselves as less religious than previous generations
Bethan McKernan Turkey and Middle East correspondent
Twenty-two-year old Esra, from Mersin, is even more bored than usual this Ramadan. Universities are shut and Turkey has taken the unusual step of placing under-20s, as well as over-65s, under a curfew, because many Turkish families live in intergenerational households.
As a result, Esra can’t see any of her friends. And a few days into the Muslim month of fasting, like many young people, she is now feeling even more suffocated by the religious restrictions imposed by her pious parents.
“They normally don’t know how I dress when I’m not there but even in the house now wearing tight jeans bothers them and they’re commenting on it,” she said. “They think I am fasting but I’m not. I have water in my room.”
Despite more than a decade of efforts by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s ruling Justice and Development party (AKP) to mould a generation of pious Turks, the country’s youth appears to be turning away from religion.
Turkey’s founder, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, banished religion from public life, creating a secular, pro-western republic that broke with the Ottoman past. One hundred years later, Erdoğan has put Turkey back on a more religious and socially conservative path, aiming to create a “religious generation” that will “work for the construction of a new civilisation”. Some members of the opposition nickname him the “caliph in waiting”.
The president has trebled the number of religious İmam Hatip high schools in the country, steadily increased funding for Turkey’s religious affairs directorate and increased the powers of local muktars, or community leaders, who are usually pious men.
Yet a study by Sakarya university and the ministry of education from earlier this year looking at religious curricula in Turkey’s school system found that students are “resisting compulsory religion lessons, the government’s ‘religious generation’ project and the concept of religion altogether”.
Almost half of the teachers interviewed said their students were increasingly likely to describe themselves as atheists, deists or feminists, and challenge the interpretation of Islam being taught at school.
Polling by the agency Konda in 2019 also found that people aged 15-29 described themselves as less “religiously conservative” than older generations, and less religious than the same age group a decade earlier – respondents said they did not necessarily cover their hair, pray regularly or fast during Ramadan.
The overall drop in people who described themselves as religiously conservative was 7%, down from 32% in 2008, and those who said they fast during Ramadan declined from 77% to 65%.
The shift away from religion among Turkey’s younger generation follows a trend seen in many industralized countries. But some wonder if it is also a backlash to almost two decades of the AKP’s pushy brand of political Islam.
The 2019 survey only revealed a slight drop in religiosity overall. In a country where around half of the 82-million-strong population is under 30, however, even small societal attitude changes could have a dramatic impact on Turkish politics in future.
President Trump has sparked concerns about politicizing the IRS by putting his name on the coronavirus relief checks and letters sent to Americans informing them of their payments.
The moves are seen as a way for Trump to take credit for the pandemic aid that households are receiving just months before an election where his handling of the outbreak and the economic damage it has caused will play a prominent role.
While presidents regularly tout their economic policies, critics say Trump’s actions unnecessarily inject partisanship into a government agency that should be viewed as nonpartisan. And they argue his move could backfire politically.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Americans interact with the IRS more than any other federal agency. It’s critical that the agency not be perceived as partisan and working on behalf of the president’s reelection campaign,” Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said Friday in a statement to The Hill. “Putting the president’s name on economic impact payment checks and his signature on direct deposit notification letters undermines that nonpartisan reputation.”
The direct payments to Americans are a key component of the record $2.2 trillion coronavirus relief package Trump signed into law on March 27. The law provides for one-time payments of up to $1,200 per adult and $500 per child.
The IRS is also required to send letters to taxpayers within 15 days of making a payment, informing them of the amount and how it was transmitted and giving them a phone number for reporting any missing payments.
More than 130 million payments have been delivered, the IRS said this week.
Trump did not sign the checks, but they include his name on the memo line. The letters are signed by Trump and come on letterhead indicating they’re from the White House, even though the IRS is mailing them out.
“As we wage total war on this invisible enemy, we are also working around the clock to protect hardworking Americans like you from the consequences of the economic shutdown,” Trump writes in the letters. “We are fully committed to ensuring that you and your family have the support you need to get through this time.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The president adds that the March 27 law that created the direct payments was passed with large bipartisan support, and he praises Congress for acting quickly.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has said it was his idea to put Trump’s name on the checks.
“He is the president, and I think it’s a terrific symbol to the American public,” Mnuchin said in a CNN interview last month.
The administration has also said that putting Trump’s name on the checks did not result in any delayed payments.
Trump spoke about the letters during a press briefing last week, saying they fulfill the requirement for notification in the coronavirus relief law.
This is believed to be the first time that a president’s name has appeared on a check from the Treasury Department. But there is a history of administrations highlighting economic proposals they enacted.
“Being political itself and boasting about stimulus programs is not unheard of,” said Julian Zelizer, a history professor at Princeton University.
Under former President Obama, signs were posted at certain construction sites indicating the projects were funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act — a 2009 law Obama enacted. Those signs, which states posted after being encouraged to do so under Obama administration guidance, didn’t include the president’s name.
Letters giving Americans advance notice of direct payments during George W. Bush’s presidency mentioned that the payments were established under legislation signed by the president, but the letters were on IRS stationary and did not include Bush’s signature.
Republicans argue that the Trump administration’s actions are consistent with what has been done in the past.
Michael Zona, a spokesman for Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), said that adding Trump’s name to the stimulus checks “has a negligible expense,” unlike the signs promoted by the Obama administration.
“It says a great deal that these Democratic naysayers never questioned these costly expenditures but are complaining now,” Zona said.
Others familiar with past economic relief efforts say the Trump administration’s actions are unique in how prominently they link a president to economic aid.
Jack Smalligan, a senior policy fellow at the Urban Institute who worked on relief programs at the Office of Management and Budget during the Bush and Obama administrations, said he couldn’t “think of any kind of comparable action by those presidents to associate themselves so overtly with what is essentially government assistance.”
Some experts view Trump’s name on the checks and letters as damaging the ability of the IRS to be viewed as nonpartisan.
“It is exactly what you don’t want the tax agency to be linked to,” said Nina Olson, the former national taxpayer advocate who is now executive director of the Center for Taxpayer Rights. “You do not want it to be viewed as a partisan tool.”
The checks are being issued and the letters are being sent out just six months before Trump faces reelection. Both Republicans and Democrats have said Trump’s move is designed to ensure voters give him credit for the payments.
Republican strategist Ron Bonjean told The Hill that “it can only help to have his name associated with money that voters can take to the bank.”
But Craig Holman, a government affairs lobbyist at the left-leaning consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, argued Trump could end up hurting himself through his actions related to the checks because they are politicizing the coronavirus pandemic.
“This is so vulgar that I think it’s going to backfire for Trump,” he said.
Zelizer said he thinks the election implications of Trump’s name on the letters and the checks will depend on the state of the economy in the fall.
“It will only be part of the bigger economic story,” he said.
A campaign linked to Russia aims to manipulate this year’s elections in the United States and Europe. Trump needs to let the intelligence professionals do their work.
By Spencer P. Boyer
|
The public debate over COVID-19 has been dominated, understandably, by the pandemic’s impact on public health and the economy. However, there is a third impact that is dramatically underappreciated: the danger to democracy posed by pandemic-related disinformation, whether it is used to weaken democratic checks on power or interfere with elections. Disinformation—including by foreign state actors such as Russia—threatens to interfere with elections scheduled to take place in 2020 in Europe and the United States. Effectively countering these attempts requires strong trans-Atlantic policy and intelligence cooperation. U.S. President Donald Trump should abandon his dysfunctional approach to Europe and let the career professionals do their work.We know that Russia was already attempting to influence the 2020 election prior to the coronavirus pandemic by causing confusion and division.
In the United States, voters are understandably concerned about the health risk of entering crowded public polling stations. Election workers, many of whom are elderly volunteers, are rightly reluctant to perform their important responsibilities. Many U.S. states have postponed their presidential primaries until May and June, hoping that the coronavirus danger will have subsided by then. States that have barreled ahead with primary contests, such as Wisconsin, have experienced political, logistical, and legal chaos
In Europe, various elections in France, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, North Macedonia, and elsewhere have been postponed because of the threat of infection. Other political contests in Iceland, Belarus, Austria, Bosnia, the Czech Republic, Ukraine, and other countries that are set to occur later this year could also be impacted if the pandemic has not significantly receded. Poland, which intends to move forward with a presidential election in May, is one of the few countries defying calls to postpone business as usual. (Postponing elections is not to be done lightly, of course, and in some cases—such as the U.S. presidential election—they cannot be moved at all.)
This emergency situation has created an inviting environment for the spread of both misinformation, which is simply inaccurate information, and disinformation, which is deliberately false and intended to disrupt, cause confusion, and suppress the vote.
The pandemic feeds into the existing threat to Western democracies from foreign actors, notably Russia. For many years now, the Kremlin has been actively interfering in democratic elections around the world. Its techniques include hacking political targets to steal sensitive information, selectively releasing that information to the public, supporting preferred candidates, and propping up destabilizing or extremist political movements. And, of course, it has spread disinformation through a combination of state-run propaganda outlets and fake online personas on social media as well. A recently released three-year review by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee unanimously found that the U.S. intelligence community’s joint assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election was sound and apolitical.
We know that Russia was already attempting to influence the 2020 election prior to the coronavirus pandemic by causing confusion and division. The latest Kremlin efforts have included hacking targets related to presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, advancing conspiracy theories to counter established facts regarding Russian meddling in the 2016 election, and even providing support to far-right organizations in an effort to incite white nationalist violence in the United States. In the fall of 2019, posts on Instagram appeared using strategies and tactics very similar to those of the Internet Research Agency, a Russia-based purveyor of online influence operations that has been linked to the Kremlin, and which was a key disinformation player in 2016. Facebook, which played a key role in enabling Russian disinformation in 2016, subsequently announced that it had taken down tens of thousands of posts across 50 IRA-linked accounts from Facebook and Instagram.
On top of that, the European Union’s External Action Service, which investigates and combats disinformation online, has documented numerous cases of disinformation about the coronavirus pandemic linked to pro-Kremlin media, and it found that a significant disinformation campaign by Russian state media and pro-Kremlin outlets is ongoing.The European Union’s External Action Service has found a significant, ongoing disinformation campaign by Russian state media and pro-Kremlin outlets. The U.S. State Department’s Global Engagement Center has issued similar warnings.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, China has also been in the coronavirus disinformation game. While some of the objectives of Russia and China might differ—the Kremlin is focused on undermining confidence in Western governments and institutions, while China seems to be more concerned with reshaping the narrative about its role in the pandemic—both countries’ efforts could have a negative impact on Western democracy. Furthermore, China has learned a great deal from the Kremlin’s tactics. Both countries have been pressuring the West to soften its criticism of disinformation, often by claiming a false equivalence between Western media reporting and targeted, state-sponsored influence campaigns.
Social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter have, of course, increased the scale of these problems by providing poorly controlled and easily manipulated platforms, and they should be more active in solving them. But to mount a true defense, governments must be active players.
There are three steps the Trump administration should immediately take to help protect the 2020 U.S. elections from disinformation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.
First, in order to ensure widespread participation in the elections, the administration should work with the U.S. Congress to provide funding for state and local education efforts about voting during the pandemic. Russia will be seeking to exploit fears and confusion around the voting process, as it did in 2016 with social media posts falsely telling people they could text in their vote. Voter education campaigns in multiple languages should inform citizens about the steps that have been taken to ensure public health during the election process, best practices for safe and healthy voting, relevant rule changes, and the availability of mail-in and absentee voting. This will go a long way in ensuring the security of America’s vote.
===========================================
Read More
How Will the Coronavirus Pandemic Reshape the U.S. Election?
A major outbreak and looming recession in the United States has transformed the 2020 campaign—and could have major consequences for the future of great power politics.
It’s Debatable |
Emma Ashford, Matthew Kroenig
Truth Has Become a Coronavirus Casualty
From Beijing to Washington, governments have been muzzling scientists, inflating the success of their containment efforts, and discrediting valid reporting. Citizens have to fight back.
Argument |
Suzanne Nossel
Second, Trump needs to stop issuing misleading and overly optimistic assessments about the disease. In any crisis, one of the most important services a government can provide is a steady stream of reliable and trusted information. This is even more critical when foreign adversaries are seeking to exploit weaknesses and undermine trust. If citizens believe the head of state is manipulating information for political advantage, it creates a dangerous level of distrust that can be exploited.
Third, the president needs to change completely his uncooperative attitude toward Europe. At a time when the trans-Atlantic relationship should be a source of strength in combating the coronavirus—especially through ramped-up information-sharing and the coordinated development of treatments and vaccines—the administration’s tendency to go it alone on global affairs and treat the European Union and key members such as Germany with hostility has weakened collective defenses against pandemic-driven falsehoods.Trump’s tendency to treat the European Union and key members such as Germany with hostility has weakened collective defenses against pandemic-driven falsehoods. Trump’s initial move to cut off travel from Europe to the United States without even consulting with U.S. allies (as generations of presidents would have done before him), and without evidence that such a ban would be effective, was just one example of his reflexively anti-EU approach, even in the middle of a catastrophic public health crisis.
The United States must be a driver of cooperation within NATO, and between NATO and the EU, on these new threats that Western democracies are jointly facing. Better cooperation, including the sharing of best practices between the U.S. government and the EU’s External Action Service (and similar agencies at the national level in Europe), will be critical for staying ahead of Russian disinformation efforts now seeking to use COVID-19 to undermine and influence elections.
Spencer P. Boyer directs the Washington office of the New York University School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice. He was a deputy assistant secretary of state in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs and a national intelligence officer for Europe in the Obama administration. Twitter: @spencerboyer
===========================================
Salma Hayek’s Daughter Is Probably The Most Pretty Woman Ever ExistedLawyersFavorite
Play this for 1 minute and see why everyone is addictedVikings: War of Clans
Online Degrees In Turkey – The Cost May Surprise YouOnline Degrees | Search Ads
Netflix/Streaming Users – Access Hundreds of New Titles Using This ToolTheTopFiveVPN
When Putin met Reagan?
The Curious Case of the Maybe Dead Dictator
Russia Knows Just Who to Blame for the Coronavirus: America
Russia’s Next Land Grab Won’t Be in an Ex-Soviet State. It Will Be in Europe.
===========================================
Latest
Trump Is Dangerously Predictable With China
In Poland, Abortion Access Worsens Amid Pandemic
U.S. Intelligence Says Coronavirus Isn’t Manmade. Trump Isn’t So Sure.
The Coronavirus Is Creating a Crisis on Europe’s Borders
A Coronavirus Mystery: Why Are There So Few Cases in South Asia?
A Coronavirus Mystery: Why Are There So Few Cases in South Asia?
Washington’s Anti-Huawei Tactics Need a Reboot In Europe
Here We Go Again: Russia Gears Up to Interfere in 2020 Election With Coronavirus Disinformation
===========================================
Voices
Forget Washington and Beijing. These Days Global Leadership Comes From Berlin.
Elisabeth Braw
The Future Is Asian—but Not Chinese
James Traub
Don’t Bash Globalization—It Will Rescue Our Economies After the Pandemic
A truck explosion led to more than 50 deaths Tuesday in Turkish-controlled Afrin, Syria.
Civil defense members work to extinguish a fire after a truck bombing in Afrin, Syria, on April 28, 2020. Photo by Photo by White Helmets / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images.
Apr 29, 2020
Syrian Kurdish groups have condemned Tuesday’s bombing in Turkish-controlled Afrin and denied responsibility after Turkey accused them of carrying out the attack that killed more than 50 people.
Mazlum Kobane, the commander of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), called the event a “terrorist act” and blamed Turkish-backed forces for it.
“What happened in Afrin yesterday was a condemnable terrorist act resulting in the loss of innocent lives,” Kobane posted in Arabic on Twitter today. “This criminal act is the result of the policy of destruction carried out by the Turkish occupation and its mercenaries.”
On Tuesday, an explosives-laden fuel truck blew up in Afrin in northern Syria, leading to at least 52 deaths, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. There were fighters, as well as civilians and children, among the dead, the observatory said. The blast caused a massive fire in the area of the explosion that engulfed nearby vehicles and structures.
The Kurdish group the People’s Protection Units (YPG) took control of Afrin, which has a mixed Kurdish and Arab population, in 2012. Turkey considers the YPG an offshoot of the Kurdistan Workers Party in Turkey that has long fought the Turkish state. The United States backed the YPG in its fight against the Islamic State, and Turkey grew anxious as the YPG took control of much of Syria’s border area with Turkey and established autonomous rule there. In 2015, the YPG joined with Arab and Christian groups to form the US-backed SDF to continue fighting in IS. YPG commanders lead the SDF, though it is a multi-ethnic force.
Turkey and rebels it supports in the Free Syrian Army took Afrin from the YPG in 2018, causing Kurds to flee. The Turkey-YPG conflict continued in October 2019 when Turkey invaded northeast Syria, taking more areas from the western parts of SDF territory as part of Operation Peace Spring.
Following Tuesday’s explosion, the Turkish Defense Ministry blamed the YPG for the attack.
The YPG issued a statement saying claims of its involvement in the attack are “removed from the truth.”
“Some of the parties that occupied Afrin attributed responsibility to the People’s Protection Units (YPG) before confirming that,” the statement read. “We have no connection to what happened.”
The Syrian Democratic Council, which is the SDF’s political wing, likewise condemned the attack. “We in the Syrian Democratic Council condemn and denounce this cowardly terrorist act that targeted innocent civilians,” the statement read.
The council also called on the international community to remove Turkish-backed forces from Afrin and other parts of Syria. “We also call upon the international community to carry out its responsibilities towards the Syrian issue and work to end the Turkish occupation of the city of Afrin and all other areas that it occupied,” the statement read.
Major hostilities between Turkey and the YPG ended in November of last year. Some fighting continues, however.
A personal letter from President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was delivered today to his counterpart Donald Trump as part of Turkey’s COVID-19 relief package for the United States.
“I hope that in the upcoming period, with the spirit of solidarity we have displayed during the pandemic, Congress and the US media will better understand the strategic importance of our relations,” Erdogan wrote in the letter, released today.
Why it matters: Turkey has used personal protective equipment exports to 55 countries as part of a diplomatic charm offensive while it seeks to cope with more than 118,000 coronavirus cases of its own. The US Embassy in Turkey praised the shipment, which includes more than 500,000 masks, 4,000 overalls, 2,000 liters (528 gallons) of disinfectant, 1,500 goggles and 500 face shields.
However, Congress has taken a more antagonistic approach than Trump in the face of myriad challenges between the two NATO allies.
The US president has so far refused to implement legally mandated sanctions on Ankara for purchasing the Russian S-400 missile defense system. But the House overwhelmingly passed a broad Turkey sanctions bill 403-16 after Trump’s withdrawal of US forces at the Turkish-Syrian border paved the way for Erdogan’s offensive against the Syrian Kurds last year. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has refused to put the sanctions bill on the floor, but Congress did pass legislation in December to lift the Cyprus arms embargo — a move vociferously opposed by Turkey. And for the first time in US history, both chambers passed resolutions last year recognizing the Ottoman Empire’s massacre of more than 1 million Armenians beginning in 1915 as a genocide.
Never miss another story
What’s next: Earlier this month, Turkey once again postponed activating the Russian S-400 system. The timing coincides with Ankara’s request to organize a currency swap with the US Federal Reserve.
Know more: Want the full story behind Turkey’s personal protective equipment shipment to the United States? Amberin Zaman has it covered here.
More from Al-Monitor Staff
Syrian Kurdish groups deny responsibility for bloody Afrin bombing
Apr 29, 2020
Saudi Arabia eases anti-virus measures
Apr 29, 2020
Egypt forcibly disappears two women amid coronavirus crackdown: Rights group
Fatih Mehmet Kaya, interested in Turkish historyUpdated Apr 20 Why were the Ottoman Turks so prepared and victorious at Gallipoli?
When the British and French battleships were seen from the Turkish mainland in Gallipoli in 1915, it was not the first time of such an invasion of Turkey or a threat to the Turkish Straits. The Brits had already previously tried to invade the Turkish Empire from Dardanelles in 1807, a century before the WWI during the Napoleonic Wars but failed. The Turks had existing plans to defend the Dardanelles and they had placed artillery batteries at two sides of the strait.
Placement of the Turkish artillery batteries prior to the Naval Wars of Gallipoli. Image from Google
The geography of the region was also challenging for an invasion. The strait was too narrow for the battleships to cross and successfully threaten the Turkish capital, Istanbul. More importantly, the Turks were also not willing to give up. Aside from the batteries, they installed naval mines through the Dardanelles Strait. On March 18th, 1915, the battleships of the Entente powers had a humiliating defeat imposed by Turkish batteries and mines. Bouvet, HMS Irresistible and HMS Ocean were sunk, Gaulois, HMS Inflexible and other smaller ships were heavily damaged.
Battle positions of the British and French ships and Turkish defensive artillery. Also showing Turkish naval mine emplacements
March 18th, 1915 marked the end of the Dardanelles naval campaign of the joint Franco-British armada. The main objective of the armada was to occupy Istanbul, then capital of the Turkish Empire
The second chapter of the Gallipoli campaign was constituted by land battles. Entente ministers including Lord Kitchener decided to support naval operations by an invasion of the Gallipoli peninsula. This time the British, French and Anzac (combined Australian-New Zealand colonial forces) troops carried out a landing operation in the peninsula. The combined forces were commanded by Sir Ian Hamilton.
The Turkish troops were initially not fully ready for a land attack. However they had valuable military officers such as the famous paşa from Yanina, Gen. Esat Bülkat and Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, who was a lieutenant colonel at the time (He was promoted to the rank of colonel during the Gallipoli campaign). A famous instance showing Mustafa Kemal’s accuracy in predicting the shape of the enemy invasion occured on June 2nd; Mustafa Kemal correctly calculated the exact preferred position of the second wave of an Allied invasion around the vicinities of Arıburnu and Suvla bay. The Turkish forces successfully defended the area from the British IX Corps.
August 9th, 1915 at 0600 hours, Colonel Mustafa Kemal, commanding his troops at Anafarta
Mustafa Kemal contributed most parts of the Turkish victory in the land battles of the Gallipoli campaign. This also increased his public image and contributed much to his leadership during the Turkish War of Independence, four years later. During the fiercest moments of the battle, he often encouraged and inspired his soldiers and led them into a lethal bayonet charge against the Anzacs.
As Sir Ian Hamilton, the British commander of the Allied invasion forces writes on his diary:
“We are up against the Turkish Army which is well commanded and fighting bravely.”
Conclusion
The Turks were prepared and victorious for several reasons including
their experienced military leadership and correct calculations on the enemy invasion
their unwillingness to give up and their motivation to defend their lands
geographical restrictions against a successful invasion for the Allies