Category: News

  • Russia and Turkey tango in the Black Sea

    Russia and Turkey tango in the Black Sea

    By M K Bhadrakumar

    Amid the flurry of diplomatic activity in Moscow last week over the Caucasus, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov took time off for an exceptionally important mission to Turkey, which might prove a turning point in the security and stability of the vast region that the two powers historically shared.

    Indeed, Russian diplomacy is swiftly moving even as the troops have begun returning from Georgia to their barracks. Moscow is weaving a complicated new web of regional alliances, drawing deeply into Russia’s collective historical memory as a power in the Caucasus and the Black Sea.

    German poet and playwright Bertolt Brecht would have marveled

    at Lavrov’s diary, heavily marked with “Caucasian chalk circles” through last week, with intertwining plots and sub-plots – an Extraordinary European Council Meeting taking place in Brussels; a meeting of the foreign ministers of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in Moscow; three foreign counterparts to be hosted in Moscow – Karl de Gucht of Belgium, Franco Frattini from Italy and Azerbaijan’s Elmar Mamedyarov; visits by the presidents of the newly independent republics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia; and consultations with the visiting United Nations secretary general’s special representative for Georgia, Johan Verbeke.

    Asia Times Online :: Central Asian News and current affairs, Russia, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan.

  • Possibilities for improving Azeri-Armenian relations

    Possibilities for improving Azeri-Armenian relations

    By JOHN C.K. DALY

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 11 (UPI) — Last month’s military conflict between Russia and Georgia over South Ossetia has cast a harsh spotlight on Western assumptions about exporting Azeri oil through neighboring Georgia and Turkey.

    While the military confrontation focused Western media attention on tensions between Russia and Georgia, Azerbaijan itself remains gripped by a “frozen conflict” dating back to even before the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union. Azerbaijan’s clashes with Armenia over the enclaves of Nagorno-Karabakh and Nakhchivan broke out in February 1988; by the time a cease-fire was signed in May 1994 ending active hostilities, thousands had been killed and wounded, while hundreds of thousands of refugees were created on both sides and the Armenian armed forces were left occupying swaths of Azeri territory, including Nagorno-Karabakh and seven neighboring districts. The volatility of the situation was instrumental in the eventual decisions of the Western consortium members to build their proposed export pipeline for Azeri oil through Georgia rather than utilize a shorter route transiting Armenia.

    Now, however, there are some indications that there might yet again be movement toward a resolution of the issue. On Wednesday, after meeting with Turkish President Abdullah Gul, Azeri President Ilham Aliyev expressed hope that the Nagorno-Karabakh issue eventually could be settled. Gul’s comments had a strong economic undertone, as he told reporters, “If we settle this conflict, which I hope we will manage to do, all countries of the region will develop much faster.”

    A resolution of the disputes between Azerbaijan and Armenia could give Western investors yet another export route for Caspian energy, an issue of growing concern among Western investors because of Russia’s increasing assertiveness in the region, combined with the fragility of export routes through Georgia, as demonstrated by the recent conflict. The prize is certainly tempting: The Caspian’s 143,244 square miles and attendant coastline are estimated to contain as much as 250 billion barrels of recoverable oil, boosted by more than 200 billion barrels of potential reserves, quite aside from up to 328 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas. From the outset Washington’s policy has been to construct, if possible, multiple export pipeline routes, bypassing both Russia and charter “axis of evil” member Iran.

    Because of the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, however, export routes to Armenia were never considered as a viable option in 1994 after then-Azeri President Geidar Aliyev signed the “Contract of the Century” with Western energy concerns to develop Azerbaijan’s Caspian Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli fields. Consequently, the first Western export oil pipeline not under Russian control went westward through Georgia. In 1999 Baku’s export options broadened with the opening of the $600 million, 515 mile, 100,000-barrel-per-day Baku-Supsa pipeline. Azerbaijan was finally able to free itself completely from reliance on Russian export pipelines when, in May 2006, the $3.6 billion, 1,092-mile, million-barrel-per-day Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline opened.

    The Armenians and Azeris sought to influence Washington’s decisions on the region; political agitation by the Armenian-American lobby resulted in the inclusion in 1992 of Section 907 in the U.S. Freedom Support Act, which banned any direct U.S. aid to the Azerbaijani government as punishment for its blockade of Armenia. It was only in January 2002 that President George W. Bush waived the legislation as a reward for Azeri support of the United States following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

    The Bush administration, in one of its first foreign policy initiatives, attempted to break the diplomatic impasse between the two Caucasian nations. In April 2001, even before the waiver of Section 907, Secretary of State Colin Powell’s first major foreign initiative was to try to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute during a summit in Key West, Fla., where he met with Azeri President Geidar Aliyev and Armenian President Robert Kocharyan. But the meetings, which were held by the Office for Security and Cooperation in Europe Minsk Group co-chairs France, Russia and United States, proved fruitless.

    There now seems to be a genuine chance for breaking the diplomatic logjam, especially as Turkey and Armenia are slowly edging toward restoring relations, as well, in the wake of last week’s “soccer diplomacy,” which saw Gul fly to Yerevan to attend a Turkish-Armenian football match, where he held talks with Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

    Gul is convinced that new opportunities have opened for settling the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute. He pragmatically informed journalists that a resolution of the issue could allow all countries of the region to get involved in major energy transportation projects, noting, “If the mood of cooperation prevails in the region over hostility, it will serve the interests of all countries in the Caucasus.” Ankara is certainly thinking big; Turkish Minister for Energy and Natural Resources Hilmi Guler, currently in Baku to attend a conference on “oil and gas potential in Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan” organized in Azerbaijan, held out optimism that one of the West’s most cherished projects, the Nabucco pipeline to bring Azeri natural gas westward, would go forward, telling reporters, “Turkey will definitely finalize the Nabucco project.”

    Turkey is also pressing to resolve the Russian-Georgian dispute; on Sept. 2 Gul telephoned Bush, whom he informed about Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s proposal for a Caucasus Stability Platform to restore peace and stability to the region. Rather than unilaterally pushing military aid to Georgia, Washington ought to listen closely to Turkey’s diplomatic initiatives, especially if it wants to prevent any further checkmates to its policies of developing Caspian energy projects: The Kremlin is less likely to feel threatened by a friendly soccer match than U.S. naval warships sailing in the Black Sea.

  • How do Azerbaijani political scientists value Turkey’s recent initiatives for solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict?

    How do Azerbaijani political scientists value Turkey’s recent initiatives for solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict?

     [ 11 Sep 2008 16:02 ]

    Baku. Elnur Mammadli–APA. “The Minsk Group says for years that Nagorno Karabakh problem is resolved, only details remain, but 17 years later it is clarified that there is no any agreement, it was imitation only. How we can believe that we will not lose another 17 years with Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s initiative”, said political scientist Vafa Guluzadeh in his interview to APA about his reaction to Turkey’s recent initiative for solution of Nagorno Karabakh problem. In his opinion Abdullah Gul said nothing concrete except common words. “Gul did not say that he talked with Sargsyan and Armenian troops would leave the occupied regions. There were no such talks. Therefore these ideas are only the words”.
    Guluzadeh said the Minsk Group was not working and even if its composition changed it would give nothing to Azerbaijan. “There is one question. These lands will be liberated when Russia falls. It is only imitation to establish groups or to organize meetings in Paris, Brussels and other places”.

    Political scientist Rustam Mammadov also said that Russia had a key of Nagorno Karabakh problem. “The foreign forces, who intend to interfere it face with Russia’s dissatisfaction and military force. Both Europe and the United States make step back before this force. It was observed during the Georgian events. I do not believe that Armenia will make steps toward the solution of the problem at Turkey’s direction, because Armenia directly connects with Russia. Armenia will do that what Russia orders”. Mammadov said Turkey also understood that and it made efforts to solve problems with Armenia only. The scientist said he did not expect the elimination of the Minsk Group, “because the countries represented in the Group tried to carry out their interests here”.

    Political scientist, MP Aydin Mirzazadeh is dissatisfied with activity of OSCE MG and noted that it was impossible to establish the best group than it. MP supports Turkey’s mediation and added that Turkey’s mediation in MG would be good step.
    “Co-chairs have been elected with agreement of the conflict parties. There is need for mediation of Turkey. Armenia has rejected it every time. If Armenia wants mediation of Turkey, Azerbaijan will agree to it. All efforts should be made to solve Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

    Political scientist Gabil Huseynli noted that withdrawal of Russia from OSCE MG was on the agenda today. To him, the US pursues policy in this direction.
    “Turkey wants to substitute MG with Caucasus Platform. Though International actors, states defining world policy attach importance to the role of Turkey in the region, they will not allow official Ankara to enter OSCE MG. Change of format is real. If Azerbaijan insists on the issue, probably Turkey can enter the group”, he said. To him, Turkey’s mediation in MG will have considerable influence on the solution to the problem.

    Political scientist, Head of Political Innovation and Technology Center Mubariz Ahmadoglu positively assessed Turkey’s initiatives for mediation. Moreover, he did not think that MG could be withdrawn from the process.
    “The relations between the US and Russia are tense and I cannot imagine that their representatives will sit around the same table soon. I do not think that MG can be collapsed. The group will function inactively. It is understood in Turkey as well. I suppose to Turkey’s mediation seriously. Armenian side is not expected to agree to it”, he said.

  • Turkish Minister of Energy and Natural Resources says no electricity agreement signed with Armenia

    Turkish Minister of Energy and Natural Resources says no electricity agreement signed with Armenia

     [ 11 Sep 2008 16:05 ]

    Ankara–APA. Turkey’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Hilmi Guler said they had not signed any agreement to purchase electric energy from Armenia. Guler said some private companies negotiated this issue with Armenia, but no documents were signed, APA quotes the Turkish news agencies.

    Armenia’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisyan said they would sell electric energy to Turkey beginning from 2009. He said during President Abdullah Gul’s visit to Armenia they had signed agreement about the export of electricity from Armenia to Turkey via Gars.

  • Armenia to Supply Electricity to Turkey

    Armenia to Supply Electricity to Turkey

     

     

     

     

     

    By Ruben Meloyan

    A senior government official has confirmed that Armenia will start exporting electricity to neighboring Turkey by the end of this year.

    Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisian told RFE/RL on Thursday that an agreement on that had been reached “at the high level” and that he expects no “political obstacles” to the project that he says will be of a long-term nature.

    The announcement of the deal came days after the first-ever visit of a Turkish head of state to Armenia. While in Yerevan last Saturday Turkey’s President Abdullah Gul and his Armenian counterpart Serzh Sarkisian discussed possibilities of normalizing bilateral ties between the two countries with historically strained relations.

    Representatives of the UNIT Company engaged in importation and distribution of high-voltage electricity in Turkey also reportedly attended the visit of President Gul to Yerevan.

    Minister Movsisian said Armenia’s energy infrastructure is mostly ready to start supplying electricity to Turkey but added that some work still needs to be done by the Turkish party before the deliveries can begin.

    “The lines on our side are mainly ready. We only have to do an overall check. The Turkish party has asked for four months to complete their part of the work, after which we will start electricity supplies for a few days experimentally and then on a regular basis,” Movsisian said, adding that electricity supplies are expected to be on a year-round basis rather than have a seasonal nature.

    “It is a long-term and quite a serious program,” Movsisian said. “I can not say what part of Turkey will the imported electricity be used for, but since Turkey experiences a shortage of electricity, the volume of supply will be quite sizable, and I think it will tremendously ease their problems.”

    According to Movsisian, the price of supplied electricity will be economically effective and will depend on thermal energy and gas prices. According to current estimates, it may make 5.7 cents per kilowatt.

    Armenian Nuclear Power Plant Director-General Gagik Markosian also considers the deal to be lucrative.

    “I think it is very lucrative as an energy project. As all know, Armenia has a lot of untapped capacities and this potential that we have is not being used either,” Markosian said. “We have stations, specialists, personnel. And in all cases, exporting electricity is a very profitable deal for Armenia.”

    The nuclear station in Metsamor currently produces an average of 2.5 billion kilowatt per hour of electricity a year, according to its head manager.

    Markosian says the preliminarily agreed volume of annual electric power supplies to Turkey estimated at 1.5 billion kilowatt/hour with a possibility to grow up to 3.5 billion is a “very serious figure.”

  • Nabucco Gets A Boost In Baku

    Nabucco Gets A Boost In Baku

    September 10, 2008
    By Bruce Pannier

     

    Turkey’s Hilmi Guler (left) says his country backs Nabucco.

    Western hopes for Caspian gas that doesn’t arrive via Russia are alive and well.

    The future of the Nabucco natural-gas pipeline project have appeared to be in serious jeopardy since war broke out between Russia and Georgia.

    Some export routes leading to the planned pipeline would run through Georgia, where Russian forces remain entrenched in unilaterally declared buffer zones nearly a month after an EU-brokered cease-fire.

    Of course, Nabucco’s viability also hinges to some extent on gas supplies from Caspian countries Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan, all of whom have been courted by Russia’s Gazprom, which recently offered to purchase all of the three countries’ gas.

    But at a “strategic-cooperation conference” in Baku this week, there was broad support for participation in the Nabucco project.

    “Azerbaijan is not giving up on the Nabucco project,” Azerbaijani Industry and Energy Minister Natiq Aliyev vowed. “This is a project that has a future.”

    Turkish Energy Minister Hilmi Guler also seized on the opportunity to pledge his country’s support for Nabucco. “Nabucco will work. We will implement it,” he said. “The Nabucco project will strengthen not only Turkey’s energy security, but Europe’s too. No one should doubt it.”

    The Nabucco plan calls for a 3,300-kilometer pipeline that will transport 31 billion cubic meters of gas to Europe every year once it is fully operational.

    Crucially for Western backers like the European Union and the United States, Nabucco’s route avoids both Russian and Iranian territory entirely.

    Importance Of Diversity

    “The cooperation between these two countries [Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan] and others such as Kazakhstan to create a diversity of export possibilities helps ensure each country’s independence and economic strength,” said U.S. special representative to the EU Boyden Gray, who was at the Baku conference.

    “In addition, there is strength in numbers and in cooperation. These countries in this region are stronger and more influential acting in concert than individually,” he added. “This is especially the case given the closed nature of the Caspian. If they are united on energy issues, these countries can better promote diversification and competition for their exports and, also, over the long haul promote the diversification of their economies through expanded regional and world trade.”

    Gray noted that the United States will not benefit directly from Nabucco but that Washington hoped “that the [Caspian] region and Europe both benefit and that we, as a trading nation, will also indirectly benefit and we very much want for [Europe] to have a strong independent existence to promote your own economies to their fullest potential.”

    Despite having no “direct” interest in the Nabucco project, the United States has been engaged in substantial lobbying for the project in the Caspian region. U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney was in Azerbaijan last week to promote diversification of energy export routes.

    The Nabucco pipeline itself would start from the Georgian-Turkish and/or Turkish-Iranian borders and run to Austria. Nabucco project head Reinhard Mitschek told RFE/RL earlier this year that Nabucco does not contract for gas supplies, it is only an energy import route for Europe. It is up to shareholders in the project and other companies to arrange the purchase of gas and feed it into the Nabucco pipeline.

    But without gas from Caspian countries such as Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan it could be difficult to fill the pipeline, so the participation of those countries in Nabucco is vital.

    Enough Gas?

    The progress in Baku does not yet mean that Nabucco’s problems are all settled. Charles Esser, an energy analyst with the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, points out that Azerbaijan’s participation alone does not remove all the obstacles to Nabucco.

    “The Azeri minister was tentative in his support because he said certainly Nabucco is still on track, he said, though, that ‘we in Azerbaijan don’t have enough gas to, by ourselves, supply [Nabucco] so it will require other sources.’ [Without other sources] he was doubtful that [Nabucco] would happen,” Esser says.

    Turkmen officials at the Baku conference have not yet said what level of participation, if any, Turkmenistan would have in Nabucco. Furthermore, Turkmenistan has committed itself to pumping more gas to Russia and China in recent weeks. And Esser notes that the Russia-Georgia conflict is still fresh in the minds of many and will play a role in how Nabucco fares in the coming weeks.

    “I think there’s a renewed political push for Nabucco; however, at the same time I think commercial risk has increased,” Esser says. “There is no way around it and because of that risk investors will want guarantees. I think we’ll have to see whether the increased political will for Nabucco translates into guarantees and perhaps subsidies.”

    Nabucco is planning to hold a meeting of shareholders, potential investors, and potential suppliers in Budapest next month to discuss the pipeline project’s future.

    RFE/RL Azerbaijani Service Director Kenan Aliyev contributed to this report