Category: News

  • The Annual Ataturk Lecture by Professor Heath Lowry

    The Annual Ataturk Lecture by Professor Heath Lowry

     

     

     

     

    Turkish Embassy Lecture Series

    PLEASE RSVP TO ambassador@turkishembassy.org
    Please note the change in RSVP address

    The Embassy of Turkey
    & The American Friends of Turkey

    cordially invite you to

    A Special Lecture By Professor Heath Lowry

    “WERE ATATURK ALIVE TODAY”
    In commemoration of the 70th anniversary of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s passing
    November 10, 2008 – 6.30 pm

     

    COMMEMORATION OF ATATURKOver the years, the Turkish nation has immortalized Atatürk through impressive development and far-reaching reforms along his dynamic principles. 

    Every year we commemorate this great leader, a towering figure in world history, by remembering aspects of his achievements and fulfilling his dreams.

    DR. HEATH LOWRYDr. Heath W. Lowry is a Mustafa Kemal Ataturk Professor of Ottoman and Modern Turkish Studies at the Department of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University. 

    His most recent publications include a series of three books on early Ottoman history: The Nature of the Early Ottoman State. Albany (SUNY Press), 2003; and Ottoman Bursa in Travel Accounts. Bloomington (Indiana University: Ottoman and Modern Turkish Studies Publications), 2003.

     

    2525 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C.
    Please RSVP at (202) 387 3200 or at ambassador@turkishembassy.org
    ID required at entrance

    Embassy of the Republic of Turkey
    2525 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20008
    Phone: (202) 612-6700
    Fax: (202) 612-6744
    Contact us via e-mail

    Click here to unsubscribe.

     

  • Turkey: AK Party Deputy Resigns

    Turkey: AK Party Deputy Resigns

    November 7, 2008

    Dengir Mir Mehmet Firat, deputy chairman of Turkey’s Justice and Development (AK) Party and one of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s closest advisers, resigned from his post, according to Nov. 7 media reports that cited an AK Party member. Firat was replaced

  • The right man at the right time

    The right man at the right time

    TDN den bir alinti,


    Thursday, November 6, 2008

    MUSTAFA AKYOL
    WASHINGTON – On the very last night of his tireless, 21-month-long campaign for the presidency, Senator Barack Obama, who is now appropriately termed “President-elect,” spoke to a huge crowd in Manassas, Virginia. In a vast open field, he found almost 100,000 people who had been waiting for hours to hear his voice. And I was among them.
    Manassas is just an hour drive from the U.S. capital. But that day, it took me five hours to get there and three hours to come back. It must have been the same for all those Obama sympathizers who hit the jam-packed road to see the most stellar American politician in decades, the night before his very likely victory. What made all this even more remarkable is that Virginia has been a “red state,” one that votes repeatedly Republican, for almost 40 years. But it was time for change for Virginia, like several other formerly red states that have gone “blue” and embraced the Democratic candidate.

    The Obama nation:

    “Change” and “hope” have been the two major themes of Obama’s campaign. These are very relevant mottos, first of all, the current situation of the United States. Eight years of Republican rule has left behind a disastrous war, an irritated world and a ruined economy. President Bush turned out to be one of the least popular presidents of all time. So, in one sense, it was only natural for Americans to look for a new direction.

    But Obama did a great job in channeling that search into mass support for his campaign. In other words, his personal qualities have played a major role in the spectacular rise of the “Obama nation,” as one harshly critical book title named it. First, he is a man of charisma. His face and posture have iconic-like features that one can clearly see in the countless numbers of Obama pins, t-shirts and posters these days on American streets. His language is not just intellectually sound but also popularly accessible. He knows how to create simple mottos to promote complicated policies. “We do not need a big government or a small government as it is endlessly debated,” he said to the Virginian crowd Monday night. “That is an old debate.” What Americans need, he argued, was “smart government, effective government.”

    Just like that, Obama discharges deep-seated frictions in U.S. politics and takes people to a whole new, and different level. One thing he did was to move beyond poisonous partisan politics that his opponents, and most notably the often clueless Sarah Palin, have used. Obama was labeled by them as “a friend of terrorists,” a “radical socialist” and a collaborator with enemies of United States. Yet he did not return the disfavor. As he emphasized in the Virginia rally, although his campaign strongly criticized the Republicans, it never lowered the tone to the level of insult and libel. He did not even hesitate in acknowledging the virtues of his rival. “In the previous years Senator McCain has differed from George Bush on issues such as torture and global warming,” Obama said. “He deserves credit for that.” But the Republican candidate, he added, was as wrong as President Bush on his economic policies.

    Obama also rejected the red states/blue states division that has characterized American politics for decades. “There is no red America, or blue America,” he declared to enthusiastic Virginians. “There is only the United States of America!”

    The president of the world

    Apparently, Obama’s presidency will be a fresh start for Americans. It will be good for them to get out of the economic crisis and build some consensus on social issues. What I am more interested in, though, is how it will be for the world.

    I have hope that his presidency will allow us to build a reconnection and reconciliation between America and the rest of the globe. This is much needed, because the unilateralist, militarist, you-are-either-with-me-or-against-me- years of Bush, have created a deep rift between the two. Yet with the rise of Obama, who promised a much more sensible approach in foreign policy, the world found a hope. As polls show, he has gained an impressive popularity among the world’s nations. If he had run in Europe, he probably would have won any election he entered. He is popular even in the Muslim world.

    If McCain were elected, he would be the president only of America. And perhaps even only red America. But now Obama has the chance to be the president of the world.

    This is really an opportunity that he should not miss and the rest of us should help him succeed. Whether we like it or not, we non-Americans have to live with the United States, because it is the only superpower in our increasingly troubled planet and whether they like it or not, Americans have to live with the rest of the world, because they cannot design it in the way they wish. What we need is dialogue instead of conflict, and hope instead of fear, which Obama genuinely promises. He simply is the right man at the right time.

    © 2005 Dogan Daily News Inc. www.turkishdailynews.com.tr

    __._,_.___

  • Turkey, Azerbaijan Discuss Karabakh

    Turkey, Azerbaijan Discuss Karabakh

    AFP

    The leaders of Turkey and Azerbaijan revived efforts Wednesday to resolve entangled conflicts in the volatile Caucasus region also involving Armenia.

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul hailed Azeri-Armenian talks in Russia last week as “the beginning of a new era”, boosting hopes of securing peace and stability in the region.

    “Turkey supports this process and hopes that it will continue,” Gul said after talks with Azeri counterpart Ilham Aliev. “We have begun to handle the problems in the Caucasus together and with courage.”

    Hosted by Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev, Aliev and Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian met near Moscow Sunday and signed a joint declaration asserting their desire to find a political settlement to the Nagorny Karabakh conflict.

    Aliev voiced hope the talks with Armenia would result in a settlement “through gradual ways” and thanked Turkey for its peace efforts in the Caucasus, which Ankara wants to crown with a regional cooperation pact, involving also Georgia and Russia.

    Turkey is eager for progress on the Nagorny Karabakh conflict in the hope of advancing its own reconciliation bid with Armenia, its eastern neighbor with which it has refused to establish diplomatic ties. In a show of support for Azerbaijan, a close ally with which it shares ethnic roots, Turkey shut its border with Armenia in 1993, dealing a heavy economic blow to the impoverished ex-Soviet nation.

    Gul became the first Turkish head of state to visit Armenia when he traveled to Yerevan in September to watch a World Cup qualifying football match between the two countries on the invitation of Sarkisian. Turkish officials have said the reconciliation process with Armenia would be advanced mostly through “silent” diplomacy.

  • TURKEY SUPPORTS PAKISTAN IN OPPOSING U.S. CROSS-BORDER STRIKES

    TURKEY SUPPORTS PAKISTAN IN OPPOSING U.S. CROSS-BORDER STRIKES

    By John C. K. Daly

    Wednesday, November 5, 2008

     

    Many analysts have commented on Turkey’s increasingly innovative and confident foreign policy initiatives, most recently its Caucasian Stability and Cooperation Platform to defuse tension in a region recently torn by armed conflict between Georgia and Russia. Ankara is now using its good offices in an attempt to quell violence in another volatile region, the Pakistani-Afghan border, where recent U.S. aerial attacks into Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) bordering on the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) have led to rising tension between Islamabad and Washington. The raids have killed dozens of Pakistanis whom Islamabad claims were civilians, adding stress to the two allies in the war on terror.

    On October 27 Pakistan’s Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani began a four-day official visit to Turkey. In Ankara Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan welcomed Gilani with full military honors at the Prime Ministry (Hurriyet, October 28). During meetings with Erdogan and President Abdullah Gul, Gilani discussed myriad matters of mutual interest, agreeing to sign framework agreements for cooperation in science and technology. Economic issues were also high on the agenda; the two prime ministers agreed to increase bilateral trade from its current level of around $700 million to $1 billion as soon as possible and to fast-track negotiations for a Preferential Trade Agreement. After three days Gilani flew to Istanbul to attend the World Economic Forum (WEF) (www.pakwatan.com, October 30).

    Economic issues aside, however, Gilani’s greatest accomplishment was to persuade Erdogan to agree to use the Turkish government’s good offices to endeavor to rein in U.S. aerial raids into Pakistani territory. Gilani’s press secretary, Zahid Bashir, confirmed to the Pakistani media that Turkey had informed Pakistan that it would use its “influence” as a NATO member and U.S. ally to attempt to persuade Washington to stop the U.S. incursions into Pakistan’s territory (The News International, November 2).

    Not wanting to lose momentum from the commitment, Gilani dispatched Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani to Turkey for further discussions. According to the Pakistani Armed Forces (PAF) Inter Services Public Relations, on November 4 Kayani flew from the PAF’s Chaklala Base, where he was seen off by the Turkish ambassador Engin Soysal, for an official visit to Turkey and Saudi Arabia (Inter Services Public Relations Press Release, No/2008-ISPR, November 4).

    While attending the WEF in Istanbul, Gilani used the occasion to press home the fact that Pakistan was, in fact, deeply committed to combating terrorism. He told journalists, “We have the will and ability to control and fight extremist terrorism, but the world should also understand that although it is fighting under NATO with very sophisticated weaponry, in Afghanistan they have not achieved desired results” (Turkish Daily News, Oct.31).

    Gilani also continued his discussions in Istanbul with Erdogan, where they joined Afghan President Hamid Karzai. Following the discussions, the three leaders subsequently issued a joint declaration that lauded “their comprehensive, cordial, and useful meeting on regional and international issues” and “reiterated their pledge to cooperate towards promoting peace, security, stability and economic development in the region” as it reinforced their commitment to cooperation in counterterrorism efforts (ARY OneWorld, October 31).

    As the three leaders conferred, Turkey’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs posted the 17-article Turkiye-Pakistan Ortak Bildirisi, Ankara, 27-31 Ekim 2008 (“Pakistan-Turkey Joint Statement, Ankara, 27-31 October 2008”) on its website (www.mfa.gov.tr/turkiye-pakistan-ortak-bildirisi_-ankara_-27-31-ekim-2008.tr.mfa). Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs also posted the Pakistan-Turkey Joint Statement on its website (“Pakistan-Turkey Joint Statement,” October 31, www.mofa.gov.pk/).

    While the joint statement does not explicitly mention the Turkish commitment, Article 12 underlined Turkish support for Pakistani territorial integrity, stating:

    “Turkey expressed full solidarity and support for Pakistan’s sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity. Turkey also expressed support for the efforts of Pakistan to combat the menace of terrorism and extremism. Both sides decided to increase their cooperation in security and counterterrorism” (www.mfa.gov.tr/turkiye-pakistan-ortak-bildirisi_-ankara_-27-31-ekim-2008.tr.mfa).

    Both Turkey and Pakistan have had significant disagreements with the Bush administration about its actions in the war on terror, while the United States’ NATO allies have been under pressure to accede to U.S. wishes on everything from increasing their troop commitments in Afghanistan to Washington’s insistence during the April NATO summit in Bucharest on admitting Georgia and Ukraine into the alliance.

    Ankara’s discreet criticism of U.S. military operations in Afghanistan would carry some weight, inasmuch as Turkey has been involved in efforts to pacify Afghanistan since November 2001, when it sent about 100 troops for International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) operations. Turkey currently has approximately 750 peacekeepers stationed in and around Kabul.

    Nor is Ankara’s intention to use its influence with Washington to ameliorate its “hot pursuit” policy of targeting terrorists in FATA the only international support that Islamabad has received. Another high profile U.S. NATO ally has also recently expressed mounting concern over the U.S. strikes into Pakistan. Britain’s Secretary of State for Justice Jack Straw said in an interview with Pakistan’s ARY OneWorld on October 31 that his government opposed any strikes inside Pakistan that did not have the government’s consent, and he urged the U.S. to respect the sovereignty of its allies (Associated Press of Pakistan, October 31).

    In the first seven months of this year there were five aerial violations of Pakistani territory by U.S. unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Predator aircraft equipped with missiles. It is clear that the tempo has been increasing, as there have been 14 more since July.

    In the most recent incident, on October 31, 17 people died and several others were injured in two missile attacks by U.S. UAVs in the North and South Waziristan agencies. Pakistani private television channels put the death toll far higher at 32 (The News International, November 1). The encounters are not without risk: on September 24 Pakistani forces reportedly fired on two U.S. American Kiowa OH-58 reconnaissance helicopters, forcing them away from the frontier. Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari strove to downplay the incident, saying that his forces had only fired flares as a way “to make sure that they know that they crossed the border line,” adding, “Sometimes the border is so mixed that they don’t realize they have crossed the border” (Dawn, Sept. 25).

    Pakistani objections to the raids have been unavailing. In a recent BBC interview, security correspondent Frank Gardner asked U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates whether Islamabad had authorized the cross-border air strikes. Gates replied, “I wouldn’t go in that direction,” adding, “I would just say that we will take whatever action necessary to protect our troops” (BBC, September 18).

    The issue of U.S. military operations in both Afghanistan and Iraq will doubtless be deeply affected by the election of Barack Obama as America’s next President. In contrast to the current administration’s “go it alone” policy, Obama pointedly referred in his victory speech to “alliances to repair.” Such an environment will doubtless allow the concerns of vital allies such as Pakistan and Turkey, as well as NATO, to receive a more sympathetic hearing. Its attempts to promote peace in the NWFP adds another element to Turkey’s efforts to promote diplomacy over conflict, in keeping with the dictum of its first president, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, who said, “Yurtta Sulh, Cihanda Sulh” (“Peace at Home, Peace in the World”).

  • Turkey sees ‘parallels’ with U.S. foreign policy, awaits next U.S. president

    Turkey sees ‘parallels’ with U.S. foreign policy, awaits next U.S. president

    By BEN LANDO, UPI Energy Editor

    ANKARA, Turkey, Nov. 5 (UPI) — Barack Obama wasn’t the Turkish leadership’s top choice for next U.S. president; John McCain was seen here as superior in the foreign affairs arena and the more pro-Turkish of the two candidates.

    But President-elect Obama is considered the best person to repair the world’s image of the United States, they say, an important issue for politicians here. Only 12 percent of Turks had a favorable view of the United States, according to a June Pew Global Attitudes Project poll.

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s advice to Obama is to get “objective” briefings on Turkey, a dig at the lobbying efforts aimed at U.S. recognition of the alleged Turkish genocide of Armenians.

    “I would also tell him that Turkey and the United States and the work we do is very important for the region, for stability in the region but also stability in the world,” he said. “I would say that we’ve done good things together so far, and I would say, let’s continue to work together.”

    Turkey’s president was asked recently by a colleague about his foreign policy priority list. Mid-answer, he was interrupted: “Are you the United States?”

    “If you should list the issues, foreign policy issues, that Turkey and the United States follow and the aims that we pursue,” said Gul, recounting the conversation, “if you list that with Turkey on one side and the United States on the other side, you’d be amazed at how much overlap, how much parallel there is, how these issues are almost entirely identical.”

    The geopolitical agenda of the next U.S. president is shared by Turkey, insist government and business leaders here — from Iraq to Middle East peace to energy security.

    “I don’t believe there are similar nations where such parallels could be drawn,” Gul told a handful of American reporters, bloggers and think-tankers in a conference room in his office.

    With a foot in Europe, a foot in Asia, and the Muslim connection with the Middle East, Turkey says its strategic position is like no other.

    “The Caucasus, Central Asia, NATO, Russia, Iraq, Iran, it’s a player in all these issues. It’s not simply anymore a defender of the southern flank against Russia,” said Morton Abramowitz, U.S. ambassador to Turkey from 1989 to 1991. “As the world has changed and the politics and problems have changed, Turkey’s positions, its strength, its dynamism, its size, its military forces, have become a regional player.”

    FOREIGN POLICY FRIENDS

    Ankara has been mediating secret talks between Syria and Israel, and is engaged in Afghanistan-Pakistan dialogue. Last year the Israeli and Palestinian presidents were his guests, riding in the limousine together and addressing the Turkish Parliament. A Turkish-led Israeli-Palestinian industrial zone in the West Bank is under way as well.

    “We worked very hard to keep peace in this region,” Gul said. “And we do take concrete steps to find resolution to the conflicts here.”

    Turkish officials are wary of a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq that would embolden internal strife or allow too much Iranian or Saudi influence or greater Kurdish autonomy. But despite the 2003 domestic political hiccup preventing U.S. forces from using Turkish bases, Ankara backs U.S. policy in Iraq. As one senior Foreign Ministry official put it: “The failure of the U.S. in Iraq is the failure of Turkey too.”

    Turkey also wants to enhance its position as an energy hub, creating interdependence between European consumers and Middle Eastern and Asian energy producers — largely without Russia, a key U.S. strategy for isolating the Eurasian power while increasing the supply of oil and gas.

    “A positive and westward-leaning, democratic Turkey is built into all our calculations,” said Abramowitz, now senior fellow at The Century Foundation. “If Turkey were to depart from that — and I don’t think it will — and become more oriented toward the Islamic world or Russia, that would involve a major change in perception on how we have to deal with that world. (Turkey’s) alliance with the West has been a critical part of our thinking for years.”

    GROWING PAINS

    Turkey’s geopolitical power is less reliant on U.S. “parallels” as it becomes more independent, though.

    Despite criticism from the United States, Ankara ensures economic ties with countries like Russia and Iran — major trade destinations and routes — while engaged in their diplomatic rows and has always maintained direct contact with Syria.

    “Just because Turkey doesn’t take a hard-line position doesn’t mean we are going to go dancing with the devil,” said Cem Duna, a former top official in the Foreign Ministry and an adviser to the Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association.

    The Russia-Georgia fighting in August prompted international condemnation, adding to criticism that Russia is attempting to corner the world’s oil and gas supply chain. Turkey refrained from blaming Moscow publicly.

    Iran’s natural gas is crucial for Turkey’s domestic energy demands, but its nuclear program is freezing economic progress. Turkey is increasing trade talks with Iran but is not on the sidelines in the nuclear dispute, Gul said. He says relations with Iran — including the ability to have “a very frank, very sincere, very open discussion” with visiting Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad recently — are crucial to solving the problem.

    Turkey “ruffles feathers” sometimes, a result of its new role in the world, said Meliha Altunisik, chairwoman of Middle East Technical University’s department of international relations. But she says this independence only strengthens its pull with countries that its ally, the United States, does not have.

    THE ECONOMIC TIES THAT BIND

    One “parallel” Turkey is keen on avoiding is the economic meltdown seen as having started in the United States and exported to the world.

    “Intervention by the United States has been delayed,” said Rifat Hisarciklioglu, president of the powerful Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey, adding U.S. policymakers have been distracted by elections.

    “No one can see the darkness of this crisis,” Hisarciklioglu said. “Right now we have a panic environment.”

    Turkey has had its share of economic disasters, most recently in 2001 when banks lost tens of billions of dollars. Officials say the resulting tightened regulation and fiscal guidelines will protect the financial sector, but the real economy is at risk.

    Turkey was banking on steady economic growth, but unemployment will likely rise upon the expected surge of youth entering the workforce, funding for major projects will dry up and demand from export markets such as Europe will drop.

    “Whatever happens in the whole world happens here,” said Cuneyd Zapsu, an adviser to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

    Turkey’s political and business leaders tout this marriage of U.S.-Turkish interests as proof the next president must enhance relations with Ankara, regardless of who is elected. “It’s not only the president of the United States, it’s like electing the president of the world,” said Hisarciklioglu, joking, “Everyone in the world should be able to vote.”

    (e-mail: blando@upi.com)