Category: News

  • Erdogan’s Outburst Could Damage Turkey’s International Standing

    Erdogan’s Outburst Could Damage Turkey’s International Standing


    February 01, 2009
    By Abbas Djavadi
    Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
    Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s fiery exchange with Israeli President Shimon Peres on January 29 at the World Economic Forum in Davos may earn him votes in Turkey’s March local elections or sympathy on the “Arab Street.”

    But it could well harm Turkey’s role as a bridge between the West and the Muslim world and as a would-be mediator between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Moreover, it won’t help Ankara’s relations with Washington or the country’s EU membership bid.

    Thousands gave Erdogan a hero’s welcome at Istanbul airport, hailing his pro-Palestinian outburst, and chanting: “Turkey is proud of you!” Turkey’s pro-government newspapers, as well as much of the Arab and Iranian media, reported positively on Erdogan’s appearance.

    But other commentators — including some in the Turkish media — are wondering how Erdogan’s outburst will affect Turkey’s international and regional standing.

    There have been attempts at damage control: Peres called Erdogan to say that, regardless of the dispute, he admired Turkey and the prime minister.

    And Erdogan reiterated that he stood by his criticism of the Gaza assault, but that he respected the Jewish people and his comments should not be interpreted as “anti-Semitic.” But the damage may be hard to reverse.

    Traditionally, Turkey has maintained good relations with both Israel and the Arab world. Last year, Ankara successfully tried to mediate Israeli-Syrian peace talks, despite a cool approach by the Bush administration.

    Turkey’s efforts under Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) to liberalize the economy and make legislative reforms has earned it positive feedback from Brussels, which is considering Turkey’s EU membership, and from Washington, which is keen to see the success of a moderate and democratic Muslim country.

    Move Toward Muslim World

    But last year, Turkey took steps that many analysts saw as a shift away from the West and toward closer ties with the Muslim world and Russia.

    While freezing the internal reform process, Ankara reacted rather passively in criticizing Russia’s offensive in Georgia last summer and campaigned for a Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Pact, which had not been coordinated with the West and would include Russia.

    Erdogan himself called off Ankara’s mediation efforts in talks between Israel and Syria. He pointedly did not visit Israel as part of his Middle East visit in recent weeks.

    Resisting the overwhelming Western approach to consider Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist organizations, Ankara has argued that these groups represent parts of the Arab world that must be reckoned with and talked to instead of isolating and antagonizing them.

    On January 29, Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan reiterated his government’s position that Ankara is critical of Hamas but says it should be included in peace talks.

    Turkey was the first pro-Western Muslim country to invite a delegation of Hamas for an official visit to Ankara in 2006. And according to Murat Yetkin, writing in the liberal “Radikal” newspaper, Erdogan met with foreign journalists ahead of the Davos debate with Peres and noted that U.S. President Barack Obama would be better advised to redefine terrorist organizations in the Middle East and follow a new policy based on those new definitions.

    It appears, though, that Erdogan’s outburst was about more than just political calculation and perhaps reflected his bossy and undiplomatic style, triggered by his anger over Gaza.

    Turkish journalists close to the AKP report that Erdogan has been boiling with anger since Israel’s Gaza offensive. “I have been watching Erdogan since the late 1980s,” wrote Turkish analyst Rushen Chakir in the daily “Vatan,” “seeing him angry many times.” “From the point of diplomacy, I was certainly surprised. But [the fiery appearance at Davos] was typically Erdogan as I know him.”

    In his Davos outburst, the Turkish prime minister used the informal form of the word “you” (sen) instead of the more respectful “siz,” something he does when addressing the opposition in the Turkish parliament.

    His style of talking loudly, in a bossy and didactic tone, with little respect for the political opponent, has been a subject of both concern and humor among the Turkish people. Some critics refer to him as the “cowboy of Kasimpasha,” the area of Istanbul where Erdogan grew up. His style is shared by Erdogan’s main political opponent, Deniz Baykal, who heads the opposition and secular Republican People’s Party in parliament.

    But in a time of economic crisis, ever-less-promising talks on EU accession, a shaky relationship with Washington, and an increasing need and opportunity for a negotiated peace in the Middle East under President Obama, Turkey cannot afford such emotional outbursts.

    The country deserves leaders who care not just about getting votes domestically but can also regain diplomatically the international support the AKP received when it was elected in 2007.

    Abbas Djavadi is associate director of broadcasting at RFE/RL. The views expressed in this commentary are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL

  • ASURE (NOAH’S PUDDING) -AND-  FETULLAH GULEN’S DIALOG FOUNDATIONS

    ASURE (NOAH’S PUDDING) -AND- FETULLAH GULEN’S DIALOG FOUNDATIONS

    Pudding for peace

    Noah’s Pudding

    Photograph by: Pierre Obendrauf, The Gazette

    If a total stranger offers you a cup of pudding in the next few weeks, don’t be surprised.

    Members of the local Turkish community are distributing 5,000 servings of Noah’s pudding, a traditional treat they trace all the way back to the biblical story of Noah’s ark.

    This is more than a random act of dessert.

    Organizers hope the offerings will promote peace and heal rifts between different faiths and cultures.

    A tall order for a cup of pudding, but then, this is no ordinary dessert.

    Noah’s pudding is one of the world’s oldest recipes.

    According to Turkish tradition, it originated when Noah’s ark landed on Mount Ararat after the great flood recounted in the Book of Genesis.

    The story goes that food was running short on the ark and Noah told the survivors to contribute whatever they had left to celebrate their safe arrival. The result was a sweet porridge of wheat, chickpeas, dried beans, apricots, raisins, orange peel and sugar.

    In Turkey, people offer the pudding to friends, neighbours and the poor during Muharrem, the first month of the Islamic calendar.

    In recent years, Turkish Muslim organizations across North America have transplanted the tradition as a way to reach out to the wider community.

    “Our aim is to get people from different faiths, bring them together on a common platform of love and tolerance and build understanding,” said Fehmi Kala, executive director of the Dialog Foundation, a non-profit organization founded three years ago (By Fetullah Gulen) to build bridges between different religious and cultural groups.

    Montreal’s Turkish community numbers 10,345, according to the 2006 census. Kala said most live in Montreal North, St. Michel and St. Laurent.

    Nezihe Tekin, 27, was one of a dozen women preparing thousands of portions of pudding last week in the Communauté

    Islamique Turque du Québec, a community centre in the St. Michel district.

    Turkish cuisine is known for its desserts, said Tekin, as she stirred a huge stockpot.

    “We have a saying, ‘let’s eat sweets and speak sweetly,’ ” she said.

    The most famous, of course, is Turkish delight, a confection served to guests with Turkish coffee.

    Rice pudding is a popular summer dessert, while baklava is mostly eaten during the winter, Tekin said.

    Noah’s pudding is traditionally cooked on the 10th day of Muharrem to commemorate Noah’s landing, but it is also eaten at other times of year in Turkey.

    The pudding is surprisingly delicious, considering its eclectic ingredients, said Tekin.

    It is an apt symbol of diversity, she said. Just as each of the ingredients contributes its own flavour, different faiths and cultures enrich society.

    “When you put it all together, you can make something nice, no matter what colour or religion.”

    Kala said Turkey has been a cultural crossroads since antiquity because of its strategic location as a land bridge between Europe and Asia and its proximity to Africa.

    He grew up in Antioch, formerly a great city of the ancient world and a cradle of Christianity.

    “My friends were Armenian, Kurdish, Shiite, Sunni, Christian and Jewish,” said Kala, 30, who was a history teacher until immigrating to Canada six years ago. “We all got along well.”

    When Tekin came to Montreal eight years ago as a 19-year-old newlywed, she didn’t know anyone in the Turkish community, so she cooked Noah’s pudding for her Italian landlord in the St. Michel district.

    “He liked it and my husband said, ‘Cook it for all the neighbours.’”

    The pudding has endless variations, some calling for as many as 40 ingredients.

    Some versions use barley instead of wheat, or a mixture of wheat and rice. Milk is optional. Many recipes call for rose water or orange flower water.

    It is garnished with nuts, pomegranate seeds and sometimes cinnamon.

    Variations exist throughout the Mediterranean world. Armenians serve a similar pudding at Christmas and Sephardic Jews have a tradition of preparing the pudding at Tu Bishvat, a holiday associated with the planting of trees.

    The idea of distributing Noah’s pudding to the wider community in different North American cities is credited to Fethullah Gülen, a Turkish Muslim cleric living near Philadelphia.

    Gülen is the leader of a global movement that reconciles Islamic mysticism with modern education and tolerance of other faiths. The author of more than 60 books, Gülen is responsible for the creation of a worldwide network of schools, universities, media outlets and community organizations. He has condemned Islamic terrorism and has also spoken out against the Israeli offensive in Gaza.

    Local Turkish businessmen and other members of the community underwrote the costs of the Noah’s pudding distribution, said Kala.

    The Dialog Foundation started distributing the pudding three years ago. It also holds Turkish arts festivals, intercultural dinners and interfaith conferences throughout the year.

    Last week, volunteers distributed the pudding to 1,500 worshippers at St. Joseph’s Oratory.

    The foundation will hold distributions at churches, university campuses, schools, nursing homes and homeless shelters in the coming weeks.

    On Feb. 17, volunteers will cook Noah’s pudding with students at Concordia University. The cooking session will provide an opportunity to talk with students from a wide spectrum of religious and cultural backgrounds, he said.

    Other pudding distributions will take place at the following locations:

    St. John Brébeuf Parish, 7777 George St., LaSalle: Sunday at 9 a.m. and 11 a.m.

    Montreal North, door to door distribution: Sunday and Monday, after 5 p.m.

    Montreal Police Station 39, Montreal North: Feb. 3 at 11 a.m.

    McGill University: International Student Network potluck dinner at Gert’s, 3480 McTavish St., Feb. 4, 6:30 to 7:30 p.m.

    The Church of St. James the Apostle, 1439 Ste. Catherine St. W.: Feb. 8 at 11 a.m.

    Dans la Rue: Volunteers will ride in the van to share Noah’s Pudding with street youth. Feb. 8 and 9 at 8 p.m. and 10 p.m.

    École Sogut (a Turkish private school): Feb. 9 at noon.

    Université de Montréal, 3200 Jean Brillant St.: Feb. 10, 10 a.m to 2 p.m.

    Montreal Unitarian Church, 5035 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W.: Feb. 15, 11 a.m to 1 p.m.

    Concordia University, Multi-faith Chaplaincy Services, 2090 Mackay St.: Feb. 17, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.

    © Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette

    Noah’s Pudding: The recipe

    Esem Baran (left), Risele Alper (centre) and Demex Kesmen pour cooked Noah’s Pudding in a cooling vat at the Turkish Cultural Centre on January 17, 2009.

    Photograph by: Pierre Obendrauf, The Gazette

    There are endless versions of this nutritious pudding. Feel free to experiment with other grains, fruits and nuts or to substitute honey for the sugar. If desired, you may flavour it with rosewater or orange flower water after the pudding is cooked.

    The recipe calls for white pearl wheat. Pearl wheat resembles pearl barley but is lighter in colour. White wheat is a whole grain that has a paler colour than the more common red wheat. It is available at Middle Eastern groceries, bulk stores and health food stores. This version is made with milk but you may substitute water.

    Noah’s Pudding

    Serves 10

    3⁄4 cup (175 mL) white pearl wheat

    * 1⁄4 cup (50 mL) dried white beans

    * 1⁄4 cup (50 mL) dried chickpeas

    1⁄3 cup (75 mL) golden raisins

    1⁄3 cup (75 mL) whole, blanched almonds

    4 dried apricots, diced in 1/4-inch (6 mm) pieces

    ** 1 tablespoon (15 mL) fresh orange rind, chopped in 1⁄8-inch (3 mm) dice

    2 cups (500 mL) sugar

    4 cups (1 litre) of water, plus additional water for soaking and cooking

    2 cups (500 mL) of whole milk (you may substitute water)

    To garnish: shelled pistachios, chopped walnuts, pomegranate seeds and/or cinnamon

    * You may substitute 1/3 cup each of canned beans and chickpeas.

    ** Use a sharp knife or vegetable peeler to remove the zest (orange-coloured skin) of the orange. You can include a thin sliver of the white pith. Use a sharp knife to chop the zest.

    Rinse the wheat, white beans and chickpeas several times. Place each in a separate saucepan and add water to cover generously. Bring each to a boil, then simmer for 15 minutes. Cool and leave to soak overnight in the refrigerator.

    Soak the almonds overnight in cold water. Soak the raisins and apricots in water overnight or for at least two hours.

    The next day, drain the wheat, reserving the soaking water, and place it in a medium saucepan with 4 cups (1 litre) of water. (Use the soaking water). Bring to a boil, then lower the heat and simmer for one and a half hours, stirring occasionally, until the wheat is soft and plump. (Add extra water if needed.)

    Meanwhile, in separate, small saucepans, bring the beans and chickpeas to a boil and simmer until tender but not mushy, about one hour. (The cooking time can vary, depending on how fresh the beans and chickpeas are.) Squeeze the outer skins from the chickpeas and skim off any skins that float away from the beans .

    Drain the soaked almonds, raisins and apricots. Drain the cooked beans and chickpeas.

    Place the cooked wheat with its liquid in a large stock pot or the top of a double boiler. Add the milk. Partially purée the mixture by buzzing it with a hand blender for about 10 seconds. (Alternatively, use a potato masher.)

    Add the drained fruit and almonds, drained, cooked beans and chickpeas and the sugar to the wheat-milk mixture.

    Simmer for 30 minutes, stirring frequently, until the pudding thickens to the consistency of an Indian-style rice pudding. (You can adjust the consistency by adding extra milk or water or by increasing the cooking time.)

    Cool. Spoon into one large or several small bowls. Garnish with shelled pistachios, walnuts and pomegranate seeds or sprinkled with cinnamon.

  • Would ‘Washington Post’ writer David Ignatius put his arm on President Obama during a debate?

    Would ‘Washington Post’ writer David Ignatius put his arm on President Obama during a debate?

    Phil Weiss

    […]

    And yes, while Ignatius has been forward-thinking/realist since, he can be justly scored, I think, for putting his hand on the Turkish Prime Minister to stop the debate so everyone could go to dinner the other night at Davos. It’s easy to say this in retrospect, but there was no sense on Ignatius’s part of the Moment. Ignatius should have extended the time to let both men finish their points, Peres and Erdogan. Let the stomachs grumble. As it is, he appeared to dis the P.M.–and as we see, appearance is everything in these matters–and failed to recognize that when you give a stage to a man defending the slaughter of 450 children, the placement of the salad fork should not be the highest concern, a structural problem with the Establishment, in my humble opinion.

    […]

    …and I'm to blame?

    Source: www.philipweiss.org

  • “A New World Leader”

    “A New World Leader”

    Yet Another Crisis in Turkey-Israel Relations

    Emrullah Uslu

    In an earlier EDM analysis it was observed that since Israel’s Gaza offensive began, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s harsh criticism of the operation has made him the champion of the man in the street in the Muslim world (see, EDM, January 7, 15). Despite the fact that Turkish diplomats and ministers have tried in the last three days to repair the “Gaza damage” (see, EDM, January 27), Erdogan condemned Israeli policies in Gaza in the presence of Israeli President Shimon Peres in a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 29. In response, Peres raised his voice, pointed his finger at Erdogan, and fiercely defended his country’s incursion into Gaza:

    What would you do if rockets were fired at Istanbul every night? …Do you understand the meaning of a situation where hundreds of rockets are falling a day on women and children who cannot sleep quietly, who need to sleep in shelters? What is the matter with you? You don’t understand, and I am not prepared for lies (Jerusalem Post, January 30).

    Erdogan wanted to respond to Peres but the moderator unsuccessfully tried to end the panel. Erdogan, however, had a minute of response in which he slammed Peres back by saying:

    You are raising your voice, because I know it is a sign of expressing a guilty feeling. When it comes to killing, you know very well how to kill. I know very well how you killed children on the beaches. Two of Israel’s Prime Ministers personally told me—if asked I could reveal their names—that they feel happy when they enter into Gaza… (“The Great Game Revisited,” , January 29).

    After he left the panel Erdogan said that his anger was toward the moderator but he did not step back from his remarks on Israeli policies on Gaza. Later it was reported that Peres phoned Erdogan and apologized about raising his voice and explained that “I raised my voice because I am told that it was difficult to hear if you do not speak loudly” (Yeni Safak, January 30).

    The heated debate in Davos immediately resonated in Turkey. The people of Turkey, who had already demonstrated their anger toward Israel over the Gaza crisis (see EDM, January 7), showed their support for their prime minister. Within a few hours, 97.5 percent of the respondents (36344 votes) to an opinion poll in the Internet said they supported Erdogan, while only 1.7 percent (620 votes) said that Erdogan’s response was not right (www.haber7.com, January 29). Thousands of people went to the airport to welcome Erdogan when he arrived in Istanbul at 2:20 AM in the morning. TV channels began live broadcasting upon his arrival. Erdogan said at a press conference that:

    I do not want to be a leader who made his decision on Turkish-Israeli relations at a time of anger. We should know that Turkey should not determine its policies with the attitude of who says what. The other side should think “what happens if we lose Turkey?” Turkey is a big country and should act with this perspective (NTV, January 30).

    After his press conference Erdogan delivered a speech to thousands of joyful people carrying signs saying “welcome conqueror of Davos” and “a new World leader.” Erdogan told them that “I understand the feelings of you who came here in the middle of the night. Turkey should not make its decisions on the basis of who says what if Turkey takes this step or that step. The other sides should think about what happens if they lose Turkey” (NTV, January 30). While Erdogan was outlining Turkish-Israeli relations on the basis of the idea that “the other side [Israel] should think what happens if it loses Turkey,” an Israeli official outlined Israel’s position: “Erdogan’s actions in Davos show that he doesn’t want to miss an opportunity to further harm Turkish-Israeli relations. …Israel’s strategic relationship with Turkey is important to us, but it is no less important to Turkey.” The official warned that Israel was growing increasingly tired of Erdogan’s tirades, and was unlikely to make any more efforts to “chase after the Turks” (Jerusalem Post, January 30).

    Political observers in Turkey and around the world wonder why Erdogan stormed off the stage. The first reason may be found in his psychological makeup. Even he himself admits that he is not one to use diplomatic language. When he feels he is being attacked, he responds fiercely. Second, and more important, if Erdogan had not responded to Peres’s “loud and finger-pointing response,” it could have meant his political demise in Turkey. Not only would the opposition parties use Peres’s angry response against him but majority of his admirers, who see him as a straight- talking, fearless leader, would abandon him permanently. Erdogan’s strident criticism of Israel may have put him in a situation from which he cannot step back. An opinion poll by the Genar poling company from January 9 to 19 showed that 71.9 percent of the respondents approved of Erdogan’s stance toward Israel; 59 percent supported the idea of sending Turkish troops to Gaza for a peace-keeping mission; 59.4 percent felt that volunteers should be allowed to go to Gaza; and 63.2 percent of those who approved of the volunteers wanted to go Gaza themselves (www.haber7.com, January 30).

    It will be interesting to see how Turkish and Israeli diplomats will manage to normalize relations again, but on the domestic level, Erdogan has become a hero of the masses. With this popularity one can assume that Erdogan is already assured of victory in the municipal elections in March.

    On the international level, Erdogan’s condemnation of Israel may harm Turkish foreign policy positions, but in the streets of the Arab world Erdogan is becoming a “new Nasser.” A Turkish TV channel reported that Palestinians would organize rallies after Friday prayers to show their appreciation for what Erdogan said (Ulke TV, January 30).

    Source:  Eurasia Daily Monitor, The Jamestown Foundation – January 30, 2009 — Volume 6, Issue 20

  • ESREF ARMAGAN: THE BLIND TURKISH PICASSO

    ESREF ARMAGAN: THE BLIND TURKISH PICASSO

    Give yourself a uniquely uplifting, thought provoking, and inspiring gift today. Click on this link to watch an extra-ordinary artist at work:

    An artist that helped recreate concepts like vision, perspective, and light in concert with scientists from Harvard University and the University of Toronto.

    A 42 year old blind Turkish painter that outdid the renaissance master Filippo Brunelleschi (1377 – 1446), one of the most important architects of the Italian Renaissance, the creator of the concept of perspective, in a test in Florence, Italy, conducted by J. M. Kennedy, Professor of Perception Psychology at the University of Toronto.

    Sitting on the steps of the cathedral of Florence and looking at the Baptistery, an octagonal Roman building, just like Brunelleschi did 600 years earlier, Armagan recreated perspective of the building, using only finger touch, no vision.

    “ Mr. Armagan is an important figure in the history of picture-making, and in the history of knowledge. His work is remarkable. I was struck by the drawings he has made as much as by his work with paint. He has demonstrated for the first time that a blind person can develop on his or her own pictorial skills the equal of most depiction by the sighted. This has not happened before in the history of picture-making.” said John M. Kennedy, Professor, Perception/Cognition Psychology, University of Toronto at Scarborough, to describe Armagan’s role in revolutionary redefining of picture, not as the sole product of vision, but also a product of touch.

    Esref Armagan , born without eyes due to a genetic mutation, in Ankara, Turkey, has taught himself to write and print. He draws and paints better than most sighted people by using his hands and primarily oil paints. He wants to be remembered, not as a blind man who could paint, but as a great artist with unique works of art who happened to be blind. (For his biography, click: )

    Until Armagan came along, science has assumed that picture was a product of vision only. After all, how could a person, having never seen light in his life, draw objects in proper colors, place shadows on them, give the correct scale, and show all in perspective? Impossible.

    A battery of tests changed all that. First, a team of Harvard neurologists scanned Armagan’s brain while he was drawing, only to be stunned by the results that those areas in a human brain associated with vision that were supposed to be dormant for a blind man were actually lighting up like Christmas trees! That changed all previous assumptions, information, and beliefs.

    Then came the mother of all tests: could a blind man, solely relying on the sense of touch, recreate perspective of an object he has never seen or known about, under the watchful eyes of scholars in a meticulously designed test? (And for good measure, don’t tell the blind man that the test is of historic proportions as it recreates the invention of perspective during the Renaissance, pitting him against the Italian master Filippo Brunelleschi, the inventor of perspective in 1413, on the exact same location in Florence and the drawing same object.)

    I will not steal the video clip’s thunder on how the test was conducted and what the results were. I took the time to bring it to your attention. Now you should take the time to see the phenomenal video. You’ll be thanking me that you did.

    A Turkish artist’s revolutionary and multi-faceted contributions to science and art:

    1- Picture is not solely the product of vision, but also of touch.

    2- A blind man can beat his visual challenge to become a great artist and a painter.

    3- There is really no limit to human achievement!

  • New Resist of Turkish Outlook

    New Resist of Turkish Outlook

    After the Belfour Declaration Turkey shared a new strong hand on Middle East.

    Turkish Prime Minister R. Tayyip Erdogan told Peres that “you must feel guilty to be so strong in your words,” referring to the president having raised his voice loudly during his address.

    For first time a man told about Israeli realities : “You killed babies and women. God says that “don’t kill” in Torah.”

    It is original access to share Middle Eastern fortune as referring to massacre mind of Shimon Peres, Ariel Sharon and other Israeli person in charge who are originally military base. “You have prime ministers who had said they felt quite happy when they entered in Palestine on tanks.”

    Today Menahem Begin and Ariel Sharon can not see new balances which are made by Muslim Turkey. Israel must understand that Muslim people can create riots if Turkey wants. Also they know Ottoman resist against to Jewish invasion on Middle East. New Hava Nagila sing will appear for Muslims as happiness in region.

    Turkey’s historical feelings will keep situations among Muslim nations.

    In 1901 the Jewish representatives of Ottoman parliament went to Sultan Abdulhamid the II and offered to pay tremendous amount of money to keep the Islamic State for Palestine. Sultan Abdulhamid the II replied:


    I am not going to give one inch of Palestine to the jews as Palestine is not mine give but it belongs to the Ummah and Ummah have shed blood to defend this land but if one day the Islamic State falls apart then you can have Palestine for free but as long as I am alive I would rather have my flesh be cut up then cut out Palestine from the Muslim land I will not allow any carving up while we are alive!

    Turkey says to stop Israeli massacre and invasion today with its empire heritage.

    The premier then walked out saying Peres had spoken for more than twice as long as he was given.Also Turkey understand that western world will not give right to speak for Turkey.  Peres received 25 minutes, Erdogan 12.

    Western world created a cold diplomatical, academical feelings. And their demands are about opposition of other’s interest.

    Today Greeks are defending their Cyprus massacres, but they sued Atilla Olgac because of war actions. But Greek side don’t talk about Israeli slaughter.

    We will see new political attacks by big powers about just and unjust states.

    Mehmet Fatih ÖZTARSU