Category: News

  • Turkey, Europe and the Islamic World

    Turkey, Europe and the Islamic World

    HE Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Prime Minister of the Republic of Turkey will deliver a lecture on

    “Turkey, Europe and the Islamic World”

    Date: Thursday, 2 April 2009
    Time: 17:30 pm

    Venue: University of Oxford,
    Sheldonian Theatre
    Broad Street,
    Oxford,
    OX1 3AZ

    Entry is by ticket ONLY. Please register your interest via our website to obtain your ticket.
    www.pronet.org.uk/turkishpm.html

    Media enquires please contact ali.arslan@biznet-uk.org.

    Please note this event is organised by the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies.

  • Hope for opening borders

    Hope for opening borders

     
     

    [ 25 Mar 2009 14:25 ]
    Yerevan-APA. Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian took positive position in the settlement of the relations with Turkey, APA reports quoting Novosti Armenia.

    The Minister stated that they had conducted many negotiations to open the borders between the two countries and normalize the relations.
    “I hope that we will regulate the relations, establish diplomatic cooperation and open the borders soon,” he said.
    There is not any diplomatic relation between the two countries at present and the borders have closed since 1993.
    Progress in the relations between the sides started after the visit of Abdullah Gul to Yerevan for watching the match between Armenian and Turkish football teams on September 6, 2008.

  • President Points To Progress on Economic Efforts

    President Points To Progress on Economic Efforts

    obama2He Says Budget Is Key to Recovery

    slideshow topVideoPH2009032402942Full News Conference: ObamaPresident Obama held a prime-time news conference Tuesday addressing the economic recession, his administration’s recovery strategy, and other current events during the first 60 days of his presidency. » LAUNCH VIDEO PLAYERslideshow bot

    By Michael D. Shear and Scott Wilson Washington Post Staff Writers
    Wednesday, March 25, 2009; Page A01

    President Obama sought to reassure Americans last night that his administration has made progress in reviving the economy and said his $3.6 trillion budget is “inseparable from this recovery.”

    After sprinting through his first months in office, Obama is now facing heightened criticism from Republicans, who have called his blueprint irresponsible, and from skeptical Democrats who have already set about trimming back his top budget priorities.

    Obama came into office amid lofty expectations and the worst economic crisis in generations, and he succeeded in pushing through a $787 billion stimulus and launching expensive plans to revive the banking system.

    Last night, against a backdrop of a broad national anxiety that the economy may still be failing, he attempted to recalibrate the high hopes to more closely fit the challenges he said lie ahead.

    Although he spoke sharply once in response to Republican criticism, Obama struck a tone of common purpose throughout his second prime-time news conference, urging the country to be patient as he works on issues as divergent as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the malign impact of lobbying in Washington.

    “We haven’t immediately eliminated the influence of lobbyists in Washington,” he said from the East Room of the White House. “We have not immediately eliminated wasteful pork projects. And we’re not immediately going to get Middle East peace. We’ve been in office now a little over 60 days.

    “What I am confident about is that we’re moving in the right direction.”

    Throughout the evening, Obama returned repeatedly to his belief that patience and determination will win out, declaring that the “whole philosophy of persistence, by the way, is one that I’m going to be emphasizing again and again in the months and years to come as long as I’m in this office. I’m a big believer in persistence.”

    Asked about congressional efforts to chip away at his main facets of his agenda, Obama gave no indication that he would need to abandon core principles.

    “We never expected, when we printed out our budget, that they would simply Xerox it and vote on it. We assume that it has to go through the legislative process. . . . I have confidence that we’re going to be able to get a budget done that’s reflective of what needs to happen in order to make sure that America grows.”

    During the 55-minute news conference, Obama faced no questions about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden, or terrorism. Instead, the president focused consistently on his administration’s efforts to boost the economy, presenting his first budget proposal as the critical and most far-reaching step in that process.

    In a statement earlier in the day, House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said Obama’s budget “may be the most irresponsible piece of legislation I’ve seen in my legislative career. It’s an irresponsible plan that only makes the crisis we’re in worse. But when it’s all said and done, I think it’s time for a do-over.”

    Responding with his most partisan comment of the evening, Obama said his Republican critics should look to their own history with the federal budget, accusing them of having “a short memory” when it comes to deficits.

    “As I recall, I’m inheriting a $1.3 trillion annual deficit from them,” he said.

    Obama’s appearance came on the same day that lawmakers grilled Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke for hours about their knowledge of the AIG bonus payments and lectured the officials for not preventing them.

    And shortly before the president took to the lectern, Democrats in Congress were preparing to make sharp cuts to the budget plan he was seeking to rally Americans to support.

    Repeating that he, too, was angry about the bonuses, Obama tried to tamp down the populist anger that has consumed much of Washington in the past 10 days.

    “The rest of us can’t afford to demonize every investor or entrepreneur who seeks to make a profit,” he said. “. . . When each of us looks beyond our own short-term interests to the wider set of obligations we have to each other — that’s when we succeed.”

    Obama’s comments last night — delivered in a calm and measured tone — were a departure from his emotional declarations of outrage last week that helped speed anti-AIG legislation through the House. He called on the public to “look toward the future with a renewed sense of common purpose, a renewed determination.”

    Asked why he waited several days to publicly express his frustrations after finding out about the AIG bonuses, he coolly said: “It took us a couple of days because I like to know what I’m talking about before I speak.”

    The White House announced yesterday that the president will meet with the leaders of some of the nation’s largest banks Friday. A White House official said Obama will “reiterate his belief that getting the economy back on track will require an understanding that each of us must look beyond our own short-term interests.”

    During the news conference, Obama defended his efforts, announced by Geithner earlier in the day, to seek broad new authority to oversee companies like AIG in the same way that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. can take control of struggling banks.

    “It is precisely because of the lack of this authority that the AIG situation has gotten worse,” he said.

    The question-and-answer session also served to continue Obama’s direct-to-the-public lobbying effort on behalf of his budget. He will take his case to Capitol Hill today when he meets with Democratic senators.

    The news conference was the culmination of more than a week of aggressive public outreach for his policies. Last week, Obama traveled to California for two town hall meetings aimed at persuading Americans to support his plans. He also appeared on “The Tonight Show With Jay Leno.”

    “We’ve put in place a comprehensive strategy designed to attack this crisis on all fronts,” Obama said last night. “It’s a strategy to create jobs, to help responsible homeowners, to restart lending and to grow our economy over the long term. And we are beginning to see signs of progress.”

    Obama said that “almost every single person” who has examined the nation’s long-term budget problem has concluded that the government must find a way to reduce health-care costs. He argued that his proposal will cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term.

    “This is hard,” he said later. “The reason it’s hard is because we’ve accumulated a structural deficit that’s going to take a long time. . . . The alternative is to stand pat.”

    Most of the questions focused on the economy. But Obama also waded briefly into foreign policy just days before his first trip to Europe as president.

    Referring to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he said: “The status quo is unsustainable.” Binyamin Netanyahu, the incoming Israeli prime minister, has been deeply skeptical of the idea of creating a Palestinian state, but Obama indicated that the administration will press him to rethink that position. “We are going to be serious from Day One in trying to move the parties,” he said.

    On a day that his secretary of homeland security announced tougher measures aimed at enhancing security along the border with Mexico, Obama pledged to monitor the increasing drug violence in that country that threatens to spill into the southwestern United States.

    “If the steps that we have taken do not get the job done, then we will do more,” he pledged. In addition to securing the border against incoming threats, he also promised to work hard to “make sure that illegal guns and cash aren’t flowing back to these cartels.”

    Asked whether race had played a role in public policy discussions during his first months in office, he said the novelty and “justifiable pride” among Americans from his being the first black president had lasted only a day.

    “Right now, the American people are judging me exactly the way I should be judged,” he said, offering as examples his efforts to improve lending, increase jobs and get the economy working again.

    Asked about stem cell research, Obama acknowledged the need for moral and ethical standards to guide scientific issues and said he is satisfied that his new rules allowing greater research are consistent with such standards.

    But he said he would be willing to shift his views if scientists determine that adult stem cells can be as useful as those created from embryos.

    “I have no investment in causing controversy,” he said. “I am happy to avoid it if that’s where the science leads us.”

    Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton each had four prime-time news conferences from the East Room during their eight years in office, according to Martha Joynt Kumar, a professor of political science at Towson University. Obama has already held two in little more than two months in office.

    Obama has been criticized for relying heavily on a teleprompter, even for short speeches and brief appearances. Last night, the teleprompter was moved to the back of the room, out of sight of the cameras.

    Staff writers Michael A. Fletcher, Karen DeYoung and Glenn Kessler contributed to this report.

  • Now ‘Big Brother’ targets Facebook

    Now ‘Big Brother’ targets Facebook

    Minister wants government database to monitor social networking sites

    By Nigel Morris, deputy political editor

    Wednesday, 25 March 2009

    Millions of Britons who use social networking sites such as Facebook could soon have their every move monitored by the Government and saved on a “Big Brother” database.

    Ministers faced a civil liberties outcry last night over the plans, with accusations of excessive snooping on the private lives of law-abiding citizens.

    The idea to police MySpace, Bebo and Facebook comes on top of plans to store information about every phone call, email and internet visit made by everyone in the United Kingdom. Almost half the British population – some 25 million people – are thought to use social networking sites. There are already proposals under a European Union directive – dating back to after the 7 July 2005 bombs – for emails and internet usage to be monitored and added to a planned database to track terror plots.

    But technology has moved on in the past three years, and the use of social networking sites has boomed – so security services fear that that has left a loophole for terrorists and criminal gangs to exploit.

    To close this loophole, Vernon Coaker, the Home Office minister, has disclosed that social networking sites could be forced to retain information about users’ web-browsing habits. They could be required to hold data about every person users correspond with via the sites, although the contents of messages sent would not be collected. Mr Coaker said: “Social networking sites, such as MySpace or Bebo, are not covered by the directive. That is one reason why the Government are looking at what we should do about the intercept modernisation programme because there are certain aspects of communications which are not covered by the directive.”

    In exchanges with the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Tom Brake, he insisted: “I accept this is an extremely difficult area. The interface between retaining data, private security and all such issues of privacy is extremely important. It is absolutely right to point out the difficulty of ensuring we maintain a capability and a capacity to deal with crime and issues of national security – and where that butts up against issues of privacy.”

    Facebook boasts 17 million Britons as members. Bebo, which caters mainly for teenagers and young adults, has more than 10 million users. A similar number of music fans are thought to use MySpace.

    Moves to include the sites in mass surveillance of Britons’ internet habits has provoked alarm among MPs, civil liberties groups and security experts.

    Mr Brake said: “Plans to monitor our phone and email records threaten to be the most expensive snooper’s charter in history. It is deeply worrying that they now intend to monitor social networking sites which contain very sensitive data like sexual orientation, religious beliefs and political views. Given the Government’s disastrous record with large IT projects and data security, it is likely that data will leak out of every memory stick, port and disk drive when they start monitoring Facebook, Bebo and MySpace.”

    Isabella Sankey, policy director at Liberty, said: “Even before you throw Facebook and other social networking sites into the mix, the proposed central communications database is a terrifying prospect. It would allow the Government to record every email, text message and phone call and would turn millions of innocent Britons into permanent suspects.”

    Richard Clayton, a computer security expert at Cambridge University, said: “What they are doing is looking at who you communicate with and who your friends are, which is greatly intrusive into your private life.”

    Chris Kelly, Facebook’s chief privacy officer, said yesterday that it was considering lobbying ministers over the proposal, which he called “overkill”.

    A Home Office spokeswoman said the Government was not interested in the content of emails, texts, conversations or social networking sites. She added: “We have been clear that communications revolution has been rapid in this country and the way in which we collect communications data needs to change so law enforcement agencies can maintain their ability to tackle terrorism and gather evidence.”

    The Independent

  • The great wheel of China

    The great wheel of China

    Nov 19th 2008
    From The World in 2009 print edition
    By Nicola Bartlett

    Mine’s bigger than yours

    Originally designed to last for a year, the London Eye, like that other “temporary” attraction, the Eiffel Tower, is not going anywhere. Instead, with over 3.5m visitors a year London’s Ferris wheel has paved the way for other cities hoping to cash in on the effect. In 2009 Chicago, the original home of the Ferris, will upgrade its Navy Pier wheel to double its original size, to over 91 metres (300ft), and Berlin’s wheel, around 50 metres higher than its 135-metre London rival, will be the tallest in Europe at almost 185 metres.

    But China will set the world record with its 208-metre Beijing wheel. It will take over from Singapore’s 165-metre wheel. Beijing’s Great Observation Wheel, as it is formally known, is a government-sponsored project set in Chaoyang park. With 48 air-conditioned capsules, each weighing 18 tonnes and containing 40 people, its maximum capacity of 1,920 people per rotation will dwarf the London Eye’s 800.

    Dubai, if its spending spree lasts, launches its 185-metre wheel as part of the Dubailand theme park. But things won’t stop there. World Tourist Attractions, the company behind wheels in York, Manchester and Brisbane, will open its first Indian wheel in the southern city of Bangalore in April, and in 2010 the Great Wheel Corporation (responsible for the ones in Singapore, Berlin and Beijing) plans to open the Orlando wheel in Florida, standing at 122 metres and with panoramic views stretching 25 miles (40km).

    With violence seemingly on the wane, Baghdad’s authorities are beginning the tough sell of tourism in the Iraqi capital, having recently launched a design competition for a Baghdad wheel. Although details of the wheel, even its location, are sketchy, a municipal spokesman has confirmed that it will reach 198 metres into the sky and carry some 30 capsules. It may be just over a century since G.W. Ferris designed his attraction, but it seems no modern city skyline can be complete without a wheel—and the bigger the better.

     

    Nicola Bartlett: editorial assistant, The World in 2009

    Economist

  • Significance of Gul’s Iraq visit

    Significance of Gul’s Iraq visit

    VISITS abroad by heads of state are different to those by heads of government. They are a symbolic endorsement of good relations between countries; prime ministerial visits are about the nitty-gritty of politics — trade, military agreement, and foreign policy decisions. That is as true for Turkey as any other country. The visit to Iraq by its president, Abdullah Gul, is therefore something of a landmark. No Turkish head of state has visited Baghdad in over 30 years, although Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was there for talks with his Iraqi counterpart Nuri Al-Maliki last July.

    That, however, was a political initiative and even then the Kurdish issue ensured that relations between the neighbors remained fraught. A year ago, Ankara dispatched thousands of troops into northern Iraq to crush militants from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) who used it as a base for their campaign of violence against Turkey — a campaign that over the past 25 years has resulted in 40,000 people killed. Since the offensive, there have been other Turkish raids.

    Although the Kurdish issue is far from resolved, President Gul’s visit is a clear indication of warming relations. It is a change based on mutual need. Even though a few months ago, Turkey still felt that Iraq was failing to stop the PKK, it knows that with American troops preparing to leave, it has to cooperate with Baghdad if the PKK is to be neutralized. Likewise, Iraq knows that it has no chance of normality if the PKK continues to threaten Turkey and the Turks respond with cross-border attacks. The stability of Iraq requires good relations between Baghdad and Ankara — and will require it all the more when US troops leave.

    Turkey has other concerns, not least the well-being of the Turkmens of northern Iraq. It is complex situation. That the government of one country should see itself as the protector of a community in the country next door has obvious dangers; local disputes could end up poisoning national policies — and in the case of Iraq, the Kurds and the Turkmens are anything but friends. Kirkuk, one of the main centers of the Turkmen population but which the Kurds want in their autonomous region in a new federal Iraq, could be such a poison.

    Turkey, not least because the city is also the center of northern Iraq’s oil wealth, does not want to see it fall into Kurdish hands. But then neither does Prime Minister Al-Maliki who is busy building alliances to ensure a strong central government following parliamentary elections later this year.

    His vision ties in neatly with Turkey’s that likewise sees a strong central government in a united Iraq as the best guarantee of dealing with the PKK and lowering Kurdish ambitions. But that is not certain and elections are still some way off. All eyes in Ankara (and Baghdad) will, therefore, be on the much-talked about grand Kurdish conference expected soon in northern Iraq at which the PKK will be asked to end its violence against Turkey. If it does so, it would spell a much-needed end to the troubles in southeast Turkey. It would also remove any impediment to normal relations between it and Iraq.

    That is what President Gul’s visit seems to herald.

    US striking new tone with Tehran

    THE West’s overarching aim of preventing Iran acquiring an atomic bomb is best achieved by a “grand bargain”, offering Iran security but making it part responsible for the security and stability of the region, said the Financial Times in an editorial yesterday. Excerpts:

    Barack Obama’s overture to Iran, delivered by video on the eve of Monday’s Iranian New Year, is a smart move, tone-perfectly delivered, and a clear departure not just from George W. Bush’s bellicose attitude but the visceral animosity that has bedeviled relations between Washington and Tehran since the Islamic Revolution of 30 years ago.

    His use of the formal title of Islamic Republic implies US recognition of the revolution and abandonment of regime change. The emphasis on rights and responsibilities — the sort of discourse tailored for, say, China — suits Iran’s sense of entitlement and ambition to be acknowledged as a regional power. The address is well aimed, furthermore, not just at Iran’s leaders but at the Iranians.

    The more recent history, in which Iranians feel under US and Western siege, has enabled the theocrats to consolidate their puritan hegemony and their dense network of material interests. But this artificial national unity cracks and debate flourishes when Iranians sense the West is willing to engage with them. Not for nothing were the mullahs discomfited by the advent of Obama: He faces them with choices.

    But the US and Europe, as well as Israel and the Arabs, face choices too. After the enlargement of Iranian influence that followed the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s regime, the resolution of most conflicts in the region — Iraq itself, Afghanistan, Israel-Palestine and Lebanon — needs at least Tehran’s quiescence. The West’s overarching aim of preventing Iran acquiring an atomic bomb is best achieved by a “grand bargain”, offering Iran security but making it part responsible for the security and stability of the region. If we ever reach that point — a big if — the US and its allies will have had to decide if they can accept that Iran has reached technological mastery of the full nuclear fuel cycle.