Category: News

  • Young Scholar Award Nomination Deadline is Rapidly Approaching

    Young Scholar Award Nomination Deadline is Rapidly Approaching

    a5348cb7 c8a7 41e6 a7cb 9dc0a5c89ad0

    Call for Nominations: 
    TASSA Young Scholar Awards
    Nomination Deadline: February 1st, 2016
    Following its successful launch at the 2014 TASSA Annual Conference, we are now announcing the 2nd TASSA Young Scholars Award program to recognize the achievements of young Turkish American scholars, as part of the upcoming 2016 TASSA Annual Conference.
    You are invited to submit a nomination (including self-nominations) for these prestigious awards.
    1. All the nominees from US institutions must be younger than 35 years old at the time of the nomination.
    2. The nomination package should include the nominee’s latest CV along with one article (already published in the literature or a working manuscript) that exemplifies the best work of the nominee. Please also specify which area best fits the nominee’s your scholarly work among:                                                           i. Natural Sciences, ii. Health and Biomedical sciences, iii. Engineering and Applied Sciences, iv. Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities
    3. Graduate students, postdoctoral scholars/researchers (including from academia and industry), and junior faculty (e.g., instructors, assistant professors) are eligible for this award and the nominees will be considered in these three “separate” categories.  The conference committee plans for at least 2 awards at each category (i.e., graduate student, postdoctoral scholar/researcher and junior faculty).
    The nomination email for this award should read “TASSA Young Scholar Awards” in the subject line with two PDF attachments, one for the CV and the other for a representative manuscript of the nominee’s best work. Submission of more than one publication per nominee is not permitted and would be deleted.
    The nomination deadline is February 1, 2016, 5pm EST.
    Each winner will receive an Award Certificate at the conference, and is expected to deliver a short, “elevator-pitch” style, oral presentation during the TASSA Annual Meeting, to be held at the University of Chicago, on April 2,3, 2016.  Hotel accommodations of the award recipients will be covered by TASSA.
    Please note that those who are not selected for the awards will be assigned a poster presentation during the TASSA Annual Meeting, giving them an opportunity to present and discuss their scholarly contributions at the conference. Previous winners of the TASSA Young Scholar Awards are not eligible to apply.
    All nominations should be emailed to awards@tassausa.org before the submission deadline, February 1, 2016, 5pm EST. In the e-mail content, please indicate the full name, affiliated organization, age, and the science category that best fits the research interests of the nominee.
    2016 Committee Members

    Esen Ercan Alp, Argonne National Laboratory 
    Bülent Basol, EncoreSolar Inc.
    Murat Günel, Yale University
    Ayse İmrohoroğlu, USC
    Banu Onaral, Drexel University
    Aydogan Özcan, UCLA (Committee Chair)
    Feryal Özel, University of Arizona
    Dani Rodrik, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton
    Mehmet Toner, Harvard Medical School
    Haluk Ünal, University of Maryland (TASSA President)
    Paul Weiss, UCLA
  • Oscars 2016: The Only Nominated Female Director Talks

    Oscars 2016: The Only Nominated Female Director Talks

    Oscars 2016: The Only Nominated Female Director Talks

    Deniz Gamze Ergüven, the director of Mustang, on being the only female director up for an award for a narrative film.

    • | by Fan Zhong
    For a long time, it seemed like Mustang was a film that would never be made. Set in a lush Turkish village on the Black Sea, the five youthful, wild sisters at its heart have as much of a hold on the local boys as the Lisbon girls do in The Virgin Suicides. And, though it is no fault of their own, their allure becomes the sisters’ downfall in their conservative Muslim society. The controversial story and its message of freedom made it even harder for first-time filmmaker Deniz Gamze Ergüven, a woman director working in Turkey, to pull off. Partly raised in Paris, Ergüven learned today that Mustang was nominated for a Best Foreign Language Film Oscar, as France’s entry.Congratulations! Are you in Paris right now?
    Yes.

    So you didn’t get to wake up to good news, only to anxiety.
    No, I didn’t. I’ve only had like 16 heart attacks since last night. I’ve been completely awake. It’s an absolute honor, and the nomination gives us resonance that is extremely powerful. The reception of the film is very … muscular in its homeland, Turkey. There is this strategy to undermine our legitimacy by depicting us as just six girls talking lightly about freedom. This nomination gives us some backup power and strength.

    Have you talked to your five stars yet?
    Yes. [laughs] We have this messaging group that is just continuous. So we were just sending each other pictures; I don’t know how may good luck charms I got. And this time, unlike the Globes, when we were the fourth film announced in our category—which to be honest my heart is weaker for—this time we were second. So it came quite fast. Now I am completely unaware of the other films on the list. [laughs]

    The film came out here in the U.S. almost immediately following the Paris bombings in November. Considering the year France has had, it seems a very strong choice as their Oscars entry not just artistically but politically.
    Yes. Well, the thing is since October there have also been bombings in Ankara, in Paris, in Beirut. There was another bombing in Istanbul just yesterday. [There was also an assault on Jakarta today.] I don’t yet have an articulate point of view other than just being appalled and frightened and in despair at these events. In Turkey, where they are trying to sign a petition for peace, you are told that to express yourself is to make a mistake.

    You’ve said that the election of President Erdoğan was on your mind when you were writing the film.
    Yes, I did! After I said that to the New York Times, I had many unsympathetic threats on the Internet. [nervously laughs] Maybe I shouldn’t say that every day, but yes. It’s a moment in Turkey where the debate is very saturated. Anybody who thinks or questions is attacked. Can Dündar, the editor of Turkey’s biggest newspaper, is in jail. It’s very dark days.

    Do you know how the film’s nomination is being received in Turkey?
    Honestly, I’ve been on the phone since I saw the news so I don’t know. But it was strongly attacked in the beginning. And every time we gained some momentum, it was discredited. They don’t attack you on any specific points; it’s an attack that is aimed to de-legitimize anything you say. For example, Can Dündar has been called every possible name: a terrorist, an enemy of the nation. And he’s probably the journalist with the most moral backbone. Turkey is the country with the most journalists imprisoned in the world, even more than China. And Erdoğan said in a speech this very week how journalists are important to democracy, how we should let them speak! It’s like we’re walking on our heads.

    So there was no way in the world that exists today that Turkey could’ve claimed this film as their own?
    No, it didn’t happen that way. The feeling there has been uneasy to this point: It’s like, “Okay, we’re not going to do anything against the film, but we’re not fine with it, either.”

    On the other hand, it’s a strong statement for France, especially right now.
    Yes it is. There are some baffling ideas in Europe right now, some right-wing ideas that prevail, and standing behind this film is a way of saying France stands behind what it is today with our diversity.

    On the subject of diversity, you are the only female narrative director nominated this year. [Lis Garbus’ What Happened Miss Simone? was nominated in the Best Documentary category; Nomi Talisman, Courtney Marsh, Dee Hibbert-Jones, and Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy were among the nominees for Best Documentary Short-Subject]
    It’s true it feels a little lonely. It’s not just the selection committee; it’s a product of our time. We’ve come a long way, but I still have a hard time gaining anyone’s trust as woman director. I’ve been on a lot of panels lately leading up to the Globes and the Oscars with my fellow male directors. I adore them, but they are very male, with dominant body language: legs spread, hands behind their heads. I don’t have that. I have a soft voice, clothes with flowers. It gives this idea of fragility that is not true. I’m strong, but you might not imagine that at face value.

    They might have a better idea if they knew what you went through to get the film made.
    Yeah, honestly it was quite a fight.

    Not just as a woman filming in Turkey, but a pregnant woman.
    Yes! The producer dumped the film three weeks before shooting. I had found out I was pregnant just one week before that.

    She dumped it because she thought a pregnant woman shouldn’t be out of the house?
    Yeah. She sent a letter to everyone on the film saying that I was pregnant. And she’s a woman!

    I imagined you already had a speech prepared from when Mustang was nominated at the Globes. Are you basically going to just use that one since you didn’t get to deliver it?
    No. From where we stand in the world, the Oscars is the one and only universal tribute. Along with Cannes.

    Will the five girls be attending?
    Of course! I was very alone at the Globes, but we’ll be all together at the Oscars.

    I predict they will rule the red carpet.
    They are a riot. They’ve internalized the values of the film as their own. They act like hardened criminals of an elementary school. Wherever they go, on the red carpet they climb on top of each other, they race. They are quite untameable.

  • Meet China’s Killer Drones

    Meet China’s Killer Drones

    From Iraq to Nigeria, countries looking for cheap, armed drones are increasingly turning to China — and leaving the United States behind.

      • By Adam Rawnsley

    Iraqi officials revealed last weekend that one of their armed drones carried out an airstrike which mistakenly killed nine members of a Shiite militia near Tikrit in a friendly fire incident. The news came as a surprise, mostly because many people didn’t know Iraq had armed drones.

    Iraq, for the record, very much does. And so do a number of countries, especially in the Middle East, thanks to the rise of China as a prolific developer and no-questions-asked exporter of armed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Chinese exports are now helping to loosen the door policy of the once-exclusive club of countries with drones capable of destroying targets on the ground. Unmanned Chinese aircraft like the armed Caihong, or “Rainbow,” series of drones are fast becoming the Kalashnikovs of the drone world — entry-level alternatives for countries eager to achieve a basic unmanned strike capability quickly and cheaply.

    Turns out there are a lot of eager buyers. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt have bought armed Chinese drones, as have Pakistan, Nigeria, and Iraq. Actually using the robotic aircraft hasn’t always gone smoothly: Nigeria’s armed CH-3, short for “Caihong-3,” drones first became public when one of them surfaced in photos of a crash in the northeastern part of the country, though it’s unclear whether the aircraft went down due to technical problems or ground fire. Two CH-4 drones also reportedly crashed in Algeria while undergoing testing by the Algerian military, which has been weighing a purchase.

    Those countries are turning to Chinese drones because they’re easier to buy — and much cheaper — than their American counterparts.

    Washington has strict limits on which countries can buy U.S.-made armed drones. China is willing to sell them to anyone with cash to spend.

    Washington has strict limits on which countries can buy U.S.-made armed drones. China is willing to sell them to anyone with cash to spend.

    China’s drone marketing revolves around a three-pronged strategy of “price, privacy, and product,” according to Ian Easton, a research fellow at the Project 2049 Institute, an Arlington, Virginia, think tank focused on Asian security issues.

    On the product side, armed drones had been the almost exclusive and rarely exported preserve of Western countries like the United States and Israel. But China has spent years working to develop its own UAV industry to catch up with the United States, in part to ensure it could keep pace with American military technology in the event of a future conflict between the two superpowers.

    “This is a sector they’ve been investing in heavily since just after 2000. There are anywhere between 75 [and] 100 UAV-related companies, both private and state-owned, building things out to meet demand,” says Richard Fisher Jr., a senior fellow on Asian military affairs at the International Assessment and Strategy Center, a think tank in Alexandria, Virginia, focused on international security issues. “The Chinese government gives them all lunch money, and they just work building new things. Sometimes the government will buy them. Sometimes they’ll let these companies export them.”

    That investment has helped the Chinese drone industry market cheaper, albeit somewhat less capable, versions of the iconic American Predator and Reaper drones to a wide international market — all without forcing buyers to jump through the political and regulatory hurdles that exist in the United States. In addition to U.S. national arms export regulations, the United States abides by the voluntary international Missile Technology Control Regime, which asks members to apply a “strong presumption of denial” to exports of drones that can carry a 1,100-pound payload more than 185 miles.

    Chinese drone companies also spare buyers some of the controversy associated with armed drones by making the actual transactions as opaque as possible. Easton says Chinese drone makers are protective of their clients’ privacy, revealing little about buyers or prices.

    Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE have reportedly bought the armed GJ-1 variant of the Wing Loong drone, developed by Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group.

    Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE have reportedly bought the armed GJ-1 variant of the Wing Loong drone, developed by Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group. But it’s the CH-3 and CH-4B armed drones, made by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corp. (CASC) and marketed by Aerospace Long-March International Trade (ALIT), that appear to be the most popular models so far.

    A number of countries began adding those drones to their fleets in 2015. The Nigerian Air Force showed off its own CH-3 during a visit from its chief of air staff in July. Pakistan’s Burraq drone, reportedly based on the CH-3, carried out its first strike in September. Iraq revealed itself as a CH-4B customer in October, and in December IHS Jane’s published an analysis of satellite imagery which appeared to point to a CH-4B on the runway at Saudi Arabia’s Jizan Regional Airport.

    Iraq’s CH-4B rollout ceremony in October:

    Thus far, though, Pakistan and Iraq are the only two countries with confirmed airstrikes carried out by Caihong drones, with Iraq launching its first reported CH-4B strike in December.

    A December CH-4B strike in Iraq: 

    Kelvin Wong, an Asia-Pacific analyst for IHS Jane’s, has seen both CH-3 and CH-4B drones up close at international airshows, where CASC and ALIT company officials have been happy to talk up their products, often to curious delegations from Middle Eastern countries.

    The CH-3 debuted in 2008, followed by the CH-4B later in 2012, and Wong says that in the years since, CASC “has continued to improve [its] features as well as develop new and compatible sensor and weapon payloads since those were publicly introduced.”

    The CH-3A, an updated variant, is a smaller, tactical drone. Its official specifications list an ability to carry just over 130 pounds of missiles and bombs on the two hardpoints under its wings. However, Wong has seen the drone displayed with two of China’s roughly 100-pound AR-1 missiles, a sign that the actual payload capacity might hold a heavier load of weapons than the specifications suggest. The small size of the CH-3A comes at the cost of a shorter endurance, however, with the ability to loiter in the air for just around six hours.

    By contrast, the CH-4B is a larger drone that closely resembles the bulb-nosed, V-tail, American MQ-9 Reaper. The CH-4B’s larger size gives it the ability to carry more missiles and bombs and stay in the air over targets for up to 40 hours. In addition to making it available for export, China has also integrated the CH-4B into its own People’s Liberation Army Air Force.

    It’s the added loitering time and armaments capability that make the CH-4B an attractive purchase; the drone can carry both AR-­1 laser-guided missiles and FT-9 guided bombs. The AR-1 is “the Chinese equivalent of the ubiquitous [American] Hellfire air-to-ground missile” seen on the Predator and Reaper drones, Wong said.

    The weapon can pierce through about 40 inches of armor, making it an effective weapon when used on certain structures or lightly armored vehicles. The 110-pound FT-9 is a small precision bomb that can find targets either through satellite navigation systems like GPS or be guided to them by a laser and clocks in at a little heavier than the 99-pound AR-1 missile.

    In November, CASC also teased the debut of another armed Caihong drone, the CH-5, with a small model at a defense industry conference in Shenzhen, China. The CH-5 is reportedly designed to carry a larger payload of weapons and will reportedly be available for export alongside its predecessors.

    Model of a CH-5 (photo credit to China Daily):

    Specific pricing information for China’s armed drones is hard to come by, but experts believe the aircraft are much cheaper than their Western counterparts. The Wing Loong, an apparent copy of the U.S. Predator drone, reportedly costs as little as $1 million per UAV, whereas an actual Predator has a $4 million unit cost. CASC literature advertises its armed drones as “affordable for small to medium countries” and available for just the price of “a modern main battle tank.”

    There are some hints that the relatively cheap price for China’s armed drones comes at the cost of less capability or even perhaps quality. Jeremy Binnie, an IHS Jane’s analyst focused on the Middle East, notes that while pictures of Iraq’s CH-4B sitting in a hangar first leaked in mid-March 2015, Iraqi officials didn’t officially announce the purchase until October. “It seems a bit surprising to me that the Iraqis took so long to get their [drone] operational,” says Binnie. “That suggests to me that there are some teething problems.”

    Leaked photo of Iraq’s CH-4B (photo credit to Iraqimilitary.org): 

    Other incidents could point to reliability issues with the Caihong drones. Nigeria’s armed CH-3 first became public when one of them surfaced in photos of a crash in the country’s northeast. Two CH-4 drones also reportedly crashed in Algeria during tests by the Algerian military, though the incidents may not have dampened the country’s enthusiasm for a purchase. Algeria is also rumored to have expressed interest in purchasing an armed CH-4 to help in its war against domestic al Qaeda-linked militants.

    Wong also points to China’s historic struggles with self-sufficiency in engine technology as a sign that it may not have yet reached complete parity with the United States. “I was told that the current turboprop engine installed in the CH­-4 is a ‘mature and reliable’ indigenous design, but I have my doubts about this claim.”

    China’s drones may be cheap, capable, and discrete, but they still owe much of their market share to the tight restrictions that the United States, an early developer and prolific user of armed drones, has placed on exporting UAVs. While the United States has sold armed Reaper drones to countries like Britain, even close NATO allies like Italy have found that adding an armed capability to their unarmed Reaper drones can entail a lengthy and difficult approval process. In the process, the United States has been mostly left out of the global armed drone market, which represents a slice of the international military drone market expected to be worth up to $10 billion by 2024.

    In a recognition of mounting frustration among American allies and defense contractors, the State Department announced last February that it would relax some export restrictions on U.S. drone sales. But in November, outgoing Air Force acquisition chief William LaPlante noted that American allies at the Dubai Airshow were still grumbling that Chinese weapons, including drones, were a preferable option because of the difficulty in getting American sales approved.

    The U.S.-based Textron Systems has been working on an armed version of the Shadow UAV, which may pique the interest of international buyers and offer a less sensitive export option than American Reaper or Predator drones. In a statement to Foreign Policy, Textron’s senior vice president and general manager of unmanned systems, Bill Irby, writes that the company has “tested the Shadow® Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System (both M2 and V2 variants) with Textron Systems Weapon & Sensor Systems Fury lightweight precision-guided weapon successfully,” noting that any exports of weapons, data link, and sensor technology would be subject to government approval.

    Aside from the United States and China, not many other countries have jumped headlong into the armed drone export market. South Africa’s Denel has floated the prospect of selling an armed Seeker 400 drone for export. And Israel, a world-class drone producer, has offered its Heron TP drone, which can carry arms, to India and Germany. Nonetheless, Israel’s frosty relations with Arab countries make it an unlikely producer to meet the growing Middle Eastern UAV demand.

    “The popularity of the CH-4 system demonstrates that UAVs are less likely to be a flash in the pan than a relevant part of national military capabilities around the world moving forward,” said Michael Horowitz, a political scientist at the University of Pennsylvania who studies U.S. drone export policy.

    And that means more and more countries like Iraq are likely to be shopping around in the global UAV marketplace — and finding Chinese drones to fit their needs instead of American ones.

    Top photo credit: Screengrab from YouTube

  • The Islamic State Hits Turkey Where It Hurts

    The Islamic State Hits Turkey Where It Hurts

    The terror group is ramping up its fight against Ankara. Its latest battleground: the Turkish economy.

      • By Piotr Zalewski

    ISTANBUL — Turkey has been no stranger to attacks by the Islamic State. The jihadi group committed the single deadliest attack in the country’s history in October, when a pair of suicide bombers killed 102 people in the capital city of Ankara. In July, another suicide attack by a homegrown Islamic State militant killed 33 people near the border with Syria.

    However, the Tuesday, Jan. 12, bombing that took the lives of 10 people, all of them German tourists, in the historical center of Istanbul may signal a shift in the Islamic State’s strategy — in Turkey and elsewhere. To the Ankara government, the attack, the first to deliberately target the country’s tourism industry, signals that the group has opened a new front inside Turkey. Paired with attacks that followed only days later in downtown Jakarta, Indonesia, it also suggests that the jihadis are systematically stepping up terrorism operations abroad.

    Whether the timing of the Istanbul and Jakarta attacks was coincidental or not, says Gulnur Aybet, of Istanbul’s Bahcesehir University, is a matter of speculation. Islamic State cells’ heightened activity, however, suggests that the group is more committed than ever to exporting terrorism. “The more they are squeezed in Iraq and Syria,” said Aybet, “the more aggressive they will become on the regional and global front.”

    In previous attacks across Turkey, the Islamic State had mostly targeted activists allied with the Kurdish nationalist cause, including sympathizers of the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP). Those attacks stoked the flames of Turkey’s long-running conflict with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in the country’s southeast. A group linked to the PKK killed two Turkish policemen in what it called retaliation for the July attack near the border with Syria, and the region has spiraled into violence ever since.

    In Tuesday’s attack, however, the Islamic State did not target civilians opposed to the current government, but the country’s economy. By killing foreigners under the shadows of the country’s most iconic landmarks, the group has dealt Turkey’s $30 billion-per-year tourism industry a severe blow. The sector, already reeling from the impact of unrelenting clashes in the southeast, last year’s terrorist attacks, and strained relations with Russia, appears poised for further setbacks

    Turkey welcomed more than 4 million German visitors last year, more than any other country.

    Turkey welcomed more than 4 million German visitors last year, more than any other country. Russians trailed closely behind. Those numbers are likely to drop in 2016. Despite assurances by Germany’s interior minister, who advised his compatriots to continue visiting Turkey, some tourists have already begun heading back. Two leading German tour companies have offered clients free cancellations.

    The Islamic State appears to have planned other strikes against high-profile targets in Turkey. On the day of the Istanbul bombing, police in Ankara detained 16 suspected militants from the group believed to have been preparing attacks against government buildings. Operations in Izmir, Sanliurfa, Mersin, Kilis, and Adana yielded dozens of other arrests. Overall, roughly 70 people have been detained.

    Haldun Solmazturk, director of the 21. Century Turkey Institute, also believes that the Istanbul attack highlights the jihadis’ recognition that Turkey is now serious about clamping down on their activities. “Until recently, the government was sitting on the fence, paying lip service to anti-ISIS operations,” Solmazturk says. “Now it is clearly taking part in the coalition.… ISIS no longer hopes [Turkey] will change its stance.”

    Remarkably, however, the Turkish government appears reluctant to hold the extremists directly responsible for Tuesday’s attack.

    Speaking on Wednesday, Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu suggested that “secret actors” were to blame for the bloodshed in Istanbul. He referred to the Islamic State as a “subcontractor” for another party — and to make sure the allusion was not lost on his audience, he went on to imply that the militants were being provided air cover by Russia.

    “Certain foreign powers have an obstructing stance against Turkey’s airstrikes on Daesh targets,” he said, referring to the group by its Arabic acronym.

    The recent attack, however, could signal a dangerous new trend for Turkey. According to a brief by the Soufan Group, a security consultancy, the Islamic State appears to be on the verge of a transformation. Facing losses in Syria and Iraq, the brief says, the group is likely to “slowly and painfully shed its proto-state façade and revert to its origins as a terrorist insurgency.”

    Attacks against “soft targets,” primarily tourist destinations, are likely to grow increasingly frequent, the group warns. “Turkey, given its shared border with Syria, is particularly vulnerable.”

    CAN EROK/Getty Images

     

     

  • Turkish prosecutors to investigate academics over Erdoğan petition

    Turkish prosecutors to investigate academics over Erdoğan petition

    4330

    Turkish prosecutors to investigate academics over Erdoğan petition

    All Turkish nationals named in the protest, which was also signed by foreign intellectuals including Noam Chomsky, could face jail if convicted

    Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
    Recep Tayyip Erdoğan had been urged to abandon a military crackdown against Kurdish separatists. Photograph: Kayhan Özer/AP

    Turkey has launched an investigation into academics who signed a petitioncriticising the military’s crackdown on Kurdish rebels in the south-east that angered President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

    More than 1,200 academics from 90 Turkish universities calling themselves “Academicians for Peace”, as well as foreign scholars, signed the petition last week calling for an end to the months-long violence.

    Entitled “We won’t be a party to this crime”, the petition urged Ankara to “abandon its deliberate massacre and deportation of Kurdish and other peoples in the region”.

    Kaynak: Turkish prosecutors to investigate academics over Erdoğan petition | World news | The Guardian

  • Deniz Gamze Ergüven – Director of Mustang

    Deniz Gamze Ergüven – Director of Mustang

    Deniz Gamze Ergüven (born 4 June 1978) is a Turkish-French film director best known for her debut film Mustang.

    Early life and education

    Ergüven was born in Ankara, Turkey but emigrated to France in the 1980s. She grew up and went to school in France. She attended La Fémis and graduated in 2008.

    DenizFilm career

    In 2011 Ergüven was invited to attend the Cannes Film Festivals Atelier to help develop her project,The Kings. While there she met fellow director Alice Winocour who was there to develop her first feature film Augustine. After Ergüven was unable to find financing for her film Winocour suggested she write a more intimate piece leading the two to begin work on the script for Mustang.

    Her debut film Mustang premiered in the Directors’ Fortnight section at the 2015 Cannes Film Festival where it won the Europa Cinemas Label Award. It later played in the Special Presentations section of the 2015 Toronto International Film Festival. The film was selected as the French entry for the Best Foreign Language Film at the 88th Academy Awards.

    Personal life

    Ergüven was pregnant while filming Mustang and gave birth to her son on February 11, 2015.