Category: Culture/Art

  • Ottoman Decadence on TV Irks Turkey’s Erdogan

    Ottoman Decadence on TV Irks Turkey’s Erdogan

    By Emre Peker

    suleimanISTANBUL–Ottoman palace intrigues, tales of harem lust and a dash of foreign conquests make for a compelling cocktail, as producers of the television series “Magnificent Century” profitably realized. Yet despite dominating ratings in Turkey and being broadcast in numerous countries, the serving isn’t quite to Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s taste.

    The show chronicles the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent, whose 46-year rule ended 1566 and is seen as the pinnacle of the Ottoman Empire. Attracting a third of the prime-time audience every night it’s on air, and broadcasting to 150 million people in 22 countries from the Czech Republic to Japan, the series is a sure hit for Tims Productions, the Istanbul-based firm behind some of the most successful series and movies in the past decade.

    But the decadent representation of Suleiman’s life, hinting that the sultan known as “the Lawgiver” was given to alcohol and promiscuity, also drew widespread criticism from conservatives.

    On Sunday, Prime Minister Erdogan joined the chorus.

    His intervention came in response to criticisms from Turkey’s main opposition party that the ruling Justice and Development Party’s reorientation of foreign policy towards the Middle East has made the country less secure. Mr. Erdogan said that under his leadership, Turks would go everywhere their ancestors roamed on horseback during the Ottoman Empire—a vast territory which stretched across three continents from the Adriatic to the Caspian Sea and encompassed much of the modern-day Middle East.

    In a rhetorical flourish that rallied his supporters but baffled many commentators, the prime minister then meshed his defense of government policy with a salvo against the “Magnificent Century,” arguing for active international engagement by deriding the limited scope of the opposition’s stance and the show’s limited focus the luxuries of the palace.

    “That’s not the Sultan Suleiman we know, that’s not the Lawgiver we know, 30 years of his life was spent on horseback, not in a palace like you see in TV shows,” Mr. Erdogan told a cheering crowd of thousands at an airport opening ceremony in the western province of Kutahya on Sunday.

    “I publicly condemn the directors of those shows and the owners of the television station. We have warned the authorities on this matter and await a decision by the judiciary. We can’t have this sort of an understanding, the nation needs to give the appropriate lesson, within the confines of the law, to those who play with the people’s values,” the prime minister said.

    Sunday’s intervention isn’t Mr. Erdogan’s first foray into social matters. In May, the premier declared that abortion is murder and vowed to fight it. At the time, Mr. Erdogan also said he doesn’t like Caesarian sections, and the Health Ministry swiftly pushed through a law limiting the procedure to medical necessities. The government, however, took no steps to limit Turkish womens’ right to abortion. In July, Mr. Erdogan, a pious Muslim educated in a vocational school for religious studies, attacked universities for serving alcohol on campus grounds.

    As with his previous statements on social issues, the prime minister’s criticisms of “Magnificent Century” also proved divisive.

    One of Turkey’s most successful shows, the production has also been equally polarizing. The country’s broadcasting watchdog received a record 140,000 complaints on grounds that the series disparaged Turkey’s Ottoman past, a source of great pride at its peak. As a result, “Magnificent Century” received a warning from the authorities.

    Yet Turkey’s most popular show also has its supporters, from artists to columnists and fans, who speculate that Mr. Erdogan’s swipe is only an attempt to draw attention away from current matters.

    “I don’t understand why this came up on the agenda when there are so many problems in the country,” Nebahat Cehre, who played the part of Suleiman’s mother in the show’s first season, said in a statement published online by Hurriyet newspaper. “In the end, this is a scenario based on historic events. Also, in the beginning, it’s stated that the show is a work of fiction. I think the purpose is to change the agenda.”

    The opposition party said the Prime Minister’s intervention was symptomatic of the government’s intensifying effort to meddle in people’s daily lives.

    “The prime minister doesn’t want a second sultan on the screens, he’s jealous of the ratings. I suspect the only prime minister to tussle with television shows in the world is ours,” said Muharrem Ince, deputy chairman of the main opposition Republican People’s Party.

    The prime minister’s speech will no doubt receive a warm reception from some conservatives who see the show as denigrating Turkey’s Ottoman history. But the intervention does come at an interesting time.

    From the Syrian conflict that’s spilling over the border to last week’s Israeli-Gaza conflict, Mr. Erdogan has been very active in trying to shape international developments in the region.

    Meanwhile, the prime minister has also been waging a campaign against credit-rating firms that won’t rank Turkey investment-grade. Domestically, Mr. Erdogan is attacking his secularist domestic opposition and separatist Kurds.

    Mr. Erdogan is also pursuing ambitious infrastructure projects while seeking to achieve high levels of sustainable economic growth. The premier has his eyes set on a goal worthy of Ottoman sultans: to triple Turkey’s $780 billion gross domestic product and join the world’s top-10 economies by 2023, the republic’s centenary. Indeed, Mr. Erdogan doesn’t mince words when staking his claim: “My brothers, we’re acting with an understanding of the spirit that established the Ottomans.”

  • AMC/Sundance Pushes Into Turkey

    AMC/Sundance Pushes Into Turkey

    redford aJemal Countess/Getty Images

    The pay TV carriage deal marks the first time a local version of the Sundance Channel will be available in Turkey.

    LONDON – AMC/Sundance Channel Global has sealed what it is calling a landmark carriage deal to take a local version of its Sudance Channel into Turkey.

    our editor recommends

    Robert Redford-Founded Sundance Channel Expands in Spain, Romania With New Carriage Deals

    SUNDANCE 2012: AMC/Sundance Channel Celebrate Global Expansion

    The network is launching on Digiturk in Turkey marking the first time the Sundance Channel will be available in the country.

    AMC/Sundance also said it will push out the channel via Cyfrowy Polsat and Toya in Poland.

    AMC/Sundance Channel Global president Bruce Tuchman said: “Our partnership with these major platforms is a significant achievement in expanding Sundance Channel’s presence and audience throughout the globe. We continue to experience strong demand for Sundance Channel’s distinctive HD film and TV programming.”

    Sundance Channel will launch on Digiturk, Turkey’s largest direct to home platform, as a locally versioned 24/7 offering, accompanied by a video-on-demand (VOD) service.

    In Poland Cyfrowy Polsat, the country’s largest DTH platform, will get a locally versioned 24/7 channel while cable operator Toya takes a locally versioned 24/7 channel and a VOD offering.

    The latest additions to the territory roster for AMC/Sundance follows a slew of pay TV deals across territories including France, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Portugal, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Korea, Thailand and Taiwan.

    Sundance Channel was founded by Robert Redford and aims to showcase independent films.

    via AMC/Sundance Pushes Into Turkey – The Hollywood Reporter.

  • Book Review: Istanbul Passage

    Book Review: Istanbul Passage

    By Pramod K Nayar | Agency: DNA

    Book: Istanbul Passage

    Author: Joseph Kanon

    Publisher: Simon and Schuster

    Pages: 401

    Price: Rs499

    istanbul passage review 320Istanbul: a city of domes, minarets and romance. Also of espionage, betrayal and mystery, if Kanon is to be believed. Set in the years right after the end of World War II, Istanbul Passage is the story of Leon Bauer, a do-anything-and-everything American on the side of the Allies. Known tobacco trader, shadowy businessman, devoted husband, amoral spy and sympathetic Samaritan, Leon helped Jews and other refugees reach England, Europe or America during the war years. Leon’s wife, Anna, is now virtually a vegetable — though not comatose — in a hospital in Istanbul. She has been reduced to this state after seeing a ship full of illegal immigrants whom she had helped put on board, including several children, drown off the coast of Istanbul.

    Now that the war is over, Leon has very little to do. But then, his contact at the American consulate, Tommy, gives Leon one final assignment. Leon has to bring in a man called Alexei and ensure his safe passage out of Istanbul. Leon’s collaborator and co-worker, Mihayi, recognises Alexei as a German officer responsible for horrific butchery in Poland. But Leon is committed to the commission and committed to the task he’s been given.

    A shootout at the time of Alexei’s arrival kills Tommy and immediately, Leon is in trouble. Suspicion falls on him. Alexei becomes his sole responsibility with both the Russians and the Americans after him. Diversion comes in the form of Kay Bishop, the wife of an American diplomat. Leon and Kay have a brief affair but when another dead body is added to the pile and the Turkish secret police join the gang hunting Leon and Alexei, Kay decides to leave Leon. Dogged by all these people, Leon manages to get Alexei close to the border. Here things go wrong again, with betrayals and shootouts in which Alexei is killed and Leon, injured. Spoiler alert: Leon recovers and continues to stay in Istanbul, hoping that one day Anna will recover and they will be able to return to the USA.

    Kanon’s novel seeks to build on the tradition of the spy-thriller and action tale, but fails in both genres. The intrigues that characterise the former are toned down and the action element is minimal. Istanbul itself does not come alive, despite the enormous possibilities the city holds (most recently explored wonderfully by Elizabeth Kostova’s The Historian). Leon’s moral dilemma — vis a vis Kay — is set up well, but tapers out. A greater moral crisis is hinted at in terms of his questionable commitment to securing Alexei’s freedom. Should one aid a war criminal responsible for the slow, torturous deaths – the massacred Poles were executed by being taken through the meat-packing process an`d impaled, sliced and butchered — of innocents? Or is it that once you have taken responsibility for somebody — no matter what their history — you must fulfil your obligations? The sense of unquestioning hospitality that Leon exhibits towards Alexei seems bewildering ethically and philosophically. However — and this is interesting — we discover that Leon’s determination to help Alexei escape has more to do with Alexei’s potential as a bargaining chip for Leon and Anna.

    The real failings of Istanbul Passage are the tepid prose and the plodding plot. Read it if this is the only book you have not read in the airport bookshop.

    via Book Review: Istanbul Passage – Lifestyle – DNA.

  • Metro bridge construction threathens İstanbul world heritage status

    Metro bridge construction threathens İstanbul world heritage status

    In a meeting with UNESCO representatives last week, the İstanbul Metropolitan Municipality argued that the bridge will not negatively affect the skyline of the historical peninsula.

    World Bulletin / News Desk

    erdo halic

    A report drafted by the Turkey branch of the International Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) states that İstanbul is increasingly at risk of being dropped as a UNESCO world heritage city due to the ongoing construction of a metro bridge over the Golden Horn.

    İstanbul has long been facing the threat of losing its status in the UNESCO World Heritage List, and the report, which the organization is taking seriously, means that warning bells are ringing loudly.

    In the report, experts suggest that the metro bridge be demolished and built all over again despite the financial loss that will incur, saying the damage caused by the bridge, currently under construction, cannot be eliminated by any means, according to the Taraf daily.

    The report states that it is impossible not to see the negative impact of the bridge on the view of İstanbul’s historical peninsula. The report rules out suggestions by the İstanbul Metropolitan Municipality on coloring and illumination of the bridge as a means to eliminate the negative impact on the view.

    In a meeting with UNESCO representatives last week, the İstanbul Metropolitan Municipality argued that the bridge will not negatively affect the skyline of the historical peninsula.

    The metro bridge project has come under increasing criticism from experts. There were earlier concerns that UNESCO would consider putting İstanbul on its list of “world heritage in danger” due to the effect of the bridge on the city’s skyline, although UNESCO approved the construction in 2011.

    ICOMOS Turkey also issued a warning about the renovation projects to be carried out in the Ayvansaray and Balat quarters of İstanbul, saying the result of these projects must not resemble that of Sulukule. In Sulukule, Roma residents were removed from their old houses and new residences were constructed in the area to house wealthy elites.

    A planned filling of the sea in the Yenikapı neighborhood and a planned highway along the southern part of the historical peninsula are also likely to spoil the silhouette of the city.

    The report also criticizes the authorities for not including civil society organizations and the public in the projects.

    via Metro bridge construction threathens İstanbul world heritage status: report | Art & Culture | World Bulletin.

  • King Croesus’s golden brooch to be returned to Turkey

    King Croesus’s golden brooch to be returned to Turkey

    Lydian Hoard treasure in shape of winged seahorse, sold to pay gambling debts and replaced with a fake, to be taken home

    Constanze Letsch in Istanbul

    guardian.co.uk, Sunday 25 November 2012 13.45 GMT

    The original left and the 005

    The original, left, and the fake golden brooch in the shape of a winged seahorse

    The original, left, and the fake golden brooch in the shape of a winged seahorse from the Lydian Hoard in Turkey.

    For thousands of years it lay underground, part of the buried treasure of the legendarily wealthy King Croesus. But since being illegally excavated in the 1960s, it has been stolen, replaced by a fake, sold to pay off gambling debts and has allegedly brought down a curse on its plunderers.

    Now the 2,500-year-old golden brooch is to be returned home to Turkey, where it will be given a special place in a new national museum.

    The Turkish culture minister, Ertugrul Günay, has announced that German officials have agreed to return the missing artefact, a brooch in the form of a winged seahorse, possibly as early as this year.

    The brooch is part of the Lydian Hoard, known in Turkey as the Karun Treasure, which was looted from iron-age burial mounds in western Turkey in 1965. The artefacts were sold on, eventually to be exhibited in the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art in the 1980s.

    After a six-year legal battle that reportedly cost Turkey £25m, it was repatriated in 1993 and went on display in the Usak museum. But in 2006, after an anonymous tipoff, the brooch on show was discovered to be a fake, with the original missing again.

    After an investigation the director of the museum, Kazim Akbiyikoglu, who had been instrumental in recovering the artefacts from the US, was arrested with 10 others. Akbiyikoglu admitted selling museum treasures to pay off gambling debts and was jailed for 13 years. He blamed his misfortune on an ancient curse said to afflict those who handle the treasure.

    Popular rumour has it that all seven men involved in the illegal digs of the burial mounds died violent deaths or suffered great misfortune.

    Although the details of the brooch’s latest recovery are unclear, Turkish officials are delighted. “I am very happy to hear that the piece will finally return home,” said a culture and tourism official, Serif Aritürk, who is responsible for the museum in Usak. “Since I was in office in 2005 and 2006 I felt personally responsible for the theft ; our directorate came under a lot of pressure.” He added that he had never doubted the brooch would reappear. “No collector would have dared to acquire such a well-known artefact, it was clear that the thieves would not find a buyer easily.”

    Journalist and archaeology expert Ömer Erbil, who investigated the brooch’s theft in 2006, agreed: “For the past three years the ministry of culture has exerted great pressure to retrieve stolen artefacts from Turkey. Museums and collectors are increasingly hesitant to buy them. It is partly due to the ministry’s efforts that we were able to find the brooch relatively fast,” he said.

    Turkey has recently launched what some call “an art war” to repatriate antiquities from museums around the world that it says were stolen and smuggled out of the country illegally. According to official numbers, 885 artefacts were returned in 2011 alone.

    Critics argue that foreign museums helped to preserve countless historical treasures from destruction or theft.

    However, according to Erbil, the 2006 heist marked a crucial turn: “Attitudes to cultural treasures and museums underwent a revolutionary change in Turkey. The ministry of culture works relentlessly to protect artefacts and to make sure that they are properly and safely displayed.”

    The Archaeological Museum in Usak is only able to display 2,000 of its 41,600 historical objects. A larger museum, to open in December 2013, is being built to house the 450 pieces of the Lydian collection in its entirety. With the retrieval of the hippocamp brooch, Aritürk hopes the treasure’s curse has finally been lifted. “The piece will receive a place of honour in the new museum. Once it returns home, I am sure tourists and those that appreciate history and art will follow.”

    via King Croesus’s golden brooch to be returned to Turkey | World news | guardian.co.uk.

  • İstanbul and Constantinople

    İstanbul and Constantinople

    When I was young, we lived in a “Greek house.” With its iron shutters, iron gate and high-rise ceiling, our house was different from those in its vicinity.

    I also remember seeing some female Greek tourists clinging to the walls of some houses in Çeşme, where we would go in the summer. Seeing those Greek women crying, my mother would also burst into cries. For many years, I have been unable to give any meaning to those tears. Our non-Muslims had melted into thin air, leaving behind their houses, streets, churches, fountains and other “remnants,” they have always continued to be part of our lives like some sinister ghost that we cannot ward off. Despite our history textbooks that carefully avoid any mention of them and despite their names erased meticulously from every place, it seemed, they have left some sort of tiny “reminders” across the country.

    After many years, I started to ponder the country’s matters and issues, and I came to realize that the problem was a “social earthquake” that was far bigger than I as a kid could perceive. If the pre-1915 demographic percentages still applied to today’s Turkey, there would be 18 million non-Muslims living in the country. Just try to visualize 18 million non-Muslims, consisting mainly of Greeks, Armenians and Jews, living in Turkey. What sort of Turkey would it be?

    We would presumably be more self-confident. We would have non-Muslim deputies in Parliament, just as was the case with the Ottoman Assembly of Deputies (Meclis-i Mebusan). And we would not have the Kurdish issue whatsoever. We wouldn’t be a society that has lost its memory.

    For instance, we would not hang a placard reading “İstanbul since 1453” during a soccer match between Turkish and Greek national teams. My friend, Bekir Berat Özipek, who related this incident to me, said: “In essence, this placard gives the following message to Greek fans: ‘We don’t feel like we belong to this city. This city is yours, but we have just captured it’.” I don’t think there will be a better sentence that can explain gracefully the “mood” for carefully hiding Byzantine remnants and refraining from exhibiting them on the streets.

    If we had not banished non-Muslims and if we had had the courage and honesty to face the misty passages of our history, we would surely not have taken offense from writing “Constantinople” beneath the signboard for “İstanbul.” We would have found the creative courage to re-open the Hagia Sophia (Ayasofya) as a church/mosque where Christians and Muslims can worship together and in peace. We would commemorate İstanbul’s Armenian architects with gratitude. We would refer to Sinan the architect, who gave so many magnificent works to the Ottoman Empire, with his original name that proves his Armenian roots, namely Armen Sinanyan. And we would bow in front of this great master respecting his real identity, and we would contemplate with ecstasy under this dome of nations where a myriad of races and religions have intermingled.

    If we did not have such complexes, we would not have discussed whether the current successor of the Greek patriarch, whose autonomy Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror revived, is ecumenical or not, and we would be boasting with the fact that our country is hosting the leader and institution of the second largest sect of Christianity. If we really had had self-confidence, we would not have denied anything about our past, and we would have taken pride in both the Muslim and Christian identities of our country. We would not attempt to love only the physical beauty of İstanbul after denying its past. Our love wouldn’t be like the adoration a crude man feels toward the physical body of a woman.

    If we had been honest, we would have more authentic knowledge about ourselves and our past, and our intelligence sharpened with honesty and self-awareness would make us give everyone their due place. We would not see murderers as heroes and true heroes as traitors.

    If all this had happened, the heterogeneous texture coming from a diversity of religions, languages and races would be a great asset for us. Turkey would become an island of peace in its region. Do you think we can do it from now on?

    Can we overcome the pestilence of nationalism that haunted us coming from the Balkans? Can we feel in our hearts the sorrows the Muslims of the Balkans and the Christians of Turkey suffer from this pathological nationalism? Can we get over the damage done to us by pathological nationalism and love İstanbul as Constantinople? What do you think?

    Orhan Kemal Cengiz

    Todays Zaman