Category: Culture/Art

  • Can Istanbul Save Damien Hirst? (Can Damien Hirst Save Istanbul?)

    Can Istanbul Save Damien Hirst? (Can Damien Hirst Save Istanbul?)

    Is there life after Gagosian?

    For Damien Hirst, there may be. The answer will come momentarily, with the first-ever exhibition of his work in Istanbul, opening this Friday at Portakal Art and Culture House.

    Not that the artist himself will benefit from the exhibition – the show of 31 spin paintings is entirely secondary market, culled from clients in London and Switzerland, according to Maya Portakal, great-granddaughter of the company’s founder, Yervant Portakal, who established the company as an auction house in 1914. (Portakal now also offers private sales and stages the occasional sales exhibition, such as this one.)

    Neither Hirst nor Gagosian was involved in creating the upcoming show, though Maya Portakal is quick to assure that most of the paintings come originally from Gagosian or White Cube, Hirst’s London gallery before it folded last year. Indeed, a Gagosian spokesperson said that the gallery only heard about the exhibition yesterday – five days before the scheduled opening.

    In a city where works by internationally-recognized artists are rare and, for the most part, take place only in museums, not commercial spaces, news of the Hirst event has received widespread attention – and equally as much speculation. Some dealers, already nervous about the infiltration of the Turkish art market by foreign giants like Marlborough and Lehmann-Maupin, have feared that the exhibition signaled the first footsteps of a Gagosian invasion (they’ll be pleased to learn otherwise). And Turkish art critics, attending a recent congress of the International Association of Art Critics, ridiculed not just Hirst, but his admirers along with him. Even more, when asked for her views on the exhibition, Milliyet art critic Aysegul Sonmez, replied, “That the pieces are on display in an auction house gallery is really very convenient for Hirst, who as an artist is the symbol of the current cruel culture industry, of how art is more attached and addicted to speculation and auction houses.”

    Ouch.

    Collectors, for their part, also seem skeptical: said one – among the few Turkish collectors who also buy non-Turkish art — “I’m not even planning to attend the show, darlin’.” Can Elgiz, however, owner of the Museum Elgiz and the first Turkish collector to buy international contemporary art on a large scale, does plan to stop by and have a look, says his wife, Sevda. But Can Elgiz can rarely be kept away from an exhibition of this magnitude, wherever it takes place. Whether he will buy or not is an entirely different question.

    But at least one dealer (who asked not to be named) thinks the show will be popular among Turkish art lovers – if not actual collectors. “Turkish people love kitsch,” she said.

    Ouch again.

    So whether, in other words, Istanbul can save the Hirst market – with or without a Gagosian connection – remains unclear, at least until the show ends; but what is certain is that a Damien Hirst exhibition in Istanbul may in some ways save the Turkish art market. Far too long confined to its own production, provincialized as much by galleries as by museums, Turkey’s art scene has only recently started to branch out to explore and embrace international contemporary art. It often strikes me that the vast majority of the country’s artists have never actually seen a Warhol, a Hirst, a Rothko, let alone a Picasso, a Titian, a Rembrandt. (Not only does the art not come here to Turkey, but artists themselves have a difficult time obtaining visas to Europe to view the collections of museums there.) Is it any wonder, then, that much of the art here (though certainly not all) is purely decorative and often gimmicky, having little to do with what the artist Richard Hambleton once brilliantly termed “the continuum of art history”?

    Collectors, naturally, have similarly suffered – despite the fact that, by and large, they have an easier time traveling abroad, able as they are to demonstrate a reliable source of income on visa applications (something artists can rarely provide); occasional travel abroad isn’t really quite enough. The result is a simplicity in the art scene here, where both the collections and the art itself largely lack the depth and complexity – for better and for worse – one finds in America and Europe. It is entirely localized, with rules and values and aesthetics of its own.

    For a while, it worked; but it’s now straining at the seams, bursting to find new ground and to become part of the larger, more adventurous and multifarious world of international art. If this exhibition – alluring as much in aesthetics (what’s not to like about spin paintings?) as in market cachet – can help open minds and doors and talents among Turkey’s artists and collectors, then all the better for it.

    Tags: Aysegul Sonmez, Damien Hirst, Gagosian, Istanbul, Istanbul Art Scene, Maya Portakal, Portakal, White Cube

    via Can Istanbul Save Damien Hirst? (Can Damien Hirst Save Istanbul?) | Cultural Affairs | ARTINFO.com.

  • Ihsanoghlu brags about the “Istanbul Process” and how he bamboozled Shrillary to sign article 16/18

    Ihsanoghlu brags about the “Istanbul Process” and how he bamboozled Shrillary to sign article 16/18

    Ihsanoghlu brags about the “Istanbul Process” and how he bamboozled Shrillary to sign article 16/18

    by sheikyermami on January 8, 2013

    Not sure whether he really had to ‘bamboozle’ her. Huma Abedin, Shrillary’s lesbian lover who is said to hold ‘Svengali’-like powers over her, would have already taken care of that.

    Ihsanoghlu’s Katzenjammer gets results. Western polit-props are buying brown lipstick like never before:

    OIC SG Ihsanoglu: Religious Intolerance Unaccaptable (sic)

    Sounds like “we have ways to make you like Islam”….

    Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said that no one bothered to admit that it was a wrong behavior when arrogant cartoons were published in 2005 and 2006.

    Ihsanoghlu

    ISTANBUL — Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu on Monday said that no one bothered to admit that it was a wrong behavior when arrogant cartoons were published in 2005 and 2006.

    Delivering the opening remarks of a meeting on “religious intolerance” in the north-western province of Istanbul on Monday, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu underlined that the same countries reacted very differently in the light of recent cartoons and (an anti-Islam) movie.

    “They apologized. They stressed that the movie was an exploitation of freedom of expression. They underlined that they would not accept such a movie. It is highly important to come to this point in eight years,” Ihsanoglu indicated.

    (Invest in brown lipstick, people! There is no end to this cocksuckery!)

    “This meeting of ours in Istanbul is a crucial milestone of a multifaceted, multisided, diplomatic and legal process against Islamophobia, and on the campaign initiated against Islam and its prophet,” Ihsanoglu noted.

    Related:

    OIC top dog fulminates against new Muhammad cartoons as “abuse of freedom of expression”

    “Since the first day I assumed office, we have been able to see the adoption of resolutions defending Islam and condemning the attacks against Islam at the United Nations General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva,” Ihsanoglu said.

    “Such resolutions were adopted with our own votes and with the support of friendly countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, as well as with the support of countries such as Russia and China,” Ihsanoglu stated.

    “European countries and the United States did not accept this and they took different decisions. In order to avoid polarization, we assumed a different attitude and I offered a new plan with eight articles in a speech delivered at the UN Human Rights Council in 2010 to reach a consensus,” Ihsanoglu reminded.

    “The plan was firstly accepted by the U.S. government and later by the European governments. The UN Human Rights Council in Geneva adopted the 8-article plan unanimously and the same resolution was adopted at the UN General Assembly six months later,” Ihsanoglu said.

    “In July 2011, we began the meeting named ‘Istanbul Process’ with the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The meeting aimed to give political support to the 8-article plan known as “16/18″,” Ihsanoglu expressed.

    “The ‘Istanbul Process’ took place in Washington and was held in London last month and continued,” Ihsanoglu stated.

    “As the international community, we study the eight articles. Our successful process was a diplomatic one and a diplomatic victory. Political support came after that. It is getting stronger with time. The issue to be discussed today by the wisemen is how “16/18″ will be implemented. We will discuss the sanctions from the view of international law…what would happen when arrogant cartoons get drawn or a movie gets shot,” Ihsanoglu said.

    “The decisions to be taken are not binding. However, they will have significance at an international political level,” Ihsanoglu also said.

    You bet.

    via Ihsanoghlu brags about the “Istanbul Process” and how he bamboozled Shrillary to sign article 16/18 — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami.

  • Turkey lifts ban on thousands of books

    Turkey lifts ban on thousands of books

    ISTANBUL – From communist works to a comic book, thousands of titles banned by Turkey over the decades were taken off the restricted list Saturday, thanks to a government reform.

    In July, the parliament adopted a bill stipulating that any decision taken before 2012 to block the sale and distribution of published work would be voided if no court chose to confirm the ruling within six months.

    The deadline came and went Saturday and no such judicial decisions were recorded, the head of Turkey’s TYB publisher’s union, Metin Celal Zeynioglu, said.

    “All bans ordered by (the courts in the capital) Ankara will be lifted on Jan. 5,” city prosecutor Kursat Kayral confirmed.

    Kayral had announced last month that he would let lapse every ban in his jurisdiction, a decision that cleared 453 books and 645 periodicals in that area alone.

    Among them were several communist works such as the “Communist Manifesto” written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, as well as writings by Soviet tyrant Joseph Stalin and Russia’s revolutionary leader Vladimir Lenin.

    Others included a comic book, an atlas, a report on the state of human rights in Turkey and an essay on the Kurds.

    But the books under Kayral’s jurisdiction make up only a fraction of all the titles affected, a total of up to 23,000 works according to Zeynioglu, who said he learned the number from the justice ministry.

    The ministry did not immediately confirm the total, a number that Zeynioglu added was hard to nail down.

    “These bans weren’t implemented in a centralized fashion: they were ordered by different institutions in different cities at different times,” he said.

    “Besides, most have been forgotten over the years and publishers have resumed printing the banned books.”

    As an example, the complete works of Turkish poet Nazim Hikmet, who died in exile in Moscow in 1963, had already been stocked in libraries for years despite the ban.

    The reform is thus largely symbolic, and some are skeptical of whether it reflects any true change within the Turkish state.

    “The mindset hasn’t changed and people (in the administration) will continue to do whatever they think is right,” said Omer Faruk, a former head of the Ayrinti publishing house. – AFP

    via Saudi Gazette – Turkey lifts ban on thousands of books.

  • Orthodox Believers Celebrate Epiphany 2013 With Icy Dip Seeking Crucifix

    SOFIA, Bulgaria — Thousands of young men leapt into icy rivers and lakes across eastern Europe on Sunday to retrieve crucifixes cast by priests in ceremonies commemorating the baptism of Jesus Christ.

    By tradition, a wooden cross is cast into the water and it is believed that the person who retrieves it will be freed from evil spirits.

    In the central Bulgarian city of Kalofer, 350 men in traditional dress waded into the icy Tundzha River with national flags. Led by the town’s mayor and encouraged by a folk orchestra and homemade plum brandy, they danced and stomped in the rocky riverbed.

    In the Romanian Black Sea port of Constanta, some 3,000 Orthodox believers turned out to watch priests hurl three crosses into the icy sea. Dozens_ some wearing diving suits_ dived into the waters to retrieve the crosses.

    “We the people are so like the sea,” said Romanian Orthodox Archbishop Teodosie Tomitanul. `’We hope that, as the sea has been calm until now this year, our souls will be just as calm.”

    Some Orthodox Christian churches, including those in Russia, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon, follow a different calendar, and Sunday was Christmas Eve, with Epiphany on Jan. 19.

    via Orthodox Believers Celebrate Epiphany 2013 With Icy Dip Seeking Crucifix (PHOTOS).

  • Postcard from Istanbul: Objects of desire

    Lindy Percival

    In the first of an occasional series from afar, Lindy Percival enters Orhan Pamuk’s literary labyrinth.

    Objects of desire

    Orhan Pamuk and his objects. Photo: Refik Anadol and Innocence Foundation

    IN A city of dizzying contrasts – where East straddles West, past collides with present, and Christianity and Islam maintain an uneasy truce – Istanbul’s newest museum teeters on the altogether more intriguing divide between truth and fiction.

    The Museum of Innocence, which opened in April 2012, is the physical manifestation of the celebrated 2008 novel of the same name by Nobel prize-winning Turkish author Orhan Pamuk.

    The novel, set in 1970s Istanbul, charts the ill-fated love affair between its narrator, Kemal B – a wealthy businessman – and Fusun, a distant relative with whom he becomes infatuated. A tale of obsessive longing, the novel – and the museum that bears its name – explores the city’s history via objects collected by Kemal to remind him of his beloved, a young woman whose fate is sealed when she defies social mores by taking a lover out of wedlock.

    Pamuk documents his extraordinary parallel endeavour – collecting objects for his museum that will inform the lives of his imaginary characters – in his subsequent, non-fiction book The Innocence of Objects, now available locally.

    Advertisement

    The Innocence of Objects follows Pamuk as he scours the city’s junk shops, all the while searching for the ideal building to house both his fictional heroine and his mounting collection. When he at last finds ”a dainty building worthy of Fusun”, he decides: ”Yes, Fusun had certainly lived here; I was sure of it.”

    In this enchanting place where Pamuk’s imagination makes its leap from page to physical reality, an elaborate literary adventure unfolds. Inside a narrow, five-storey house in a backstreet of the increasingly fashionable Beyoglu district, the museum’s rusted keys, black-and-white photographs, stopwatches and film clips evoke a glamour and gentility far removed from the bustling metropolis that is modern-day Istanbul.

    ”Putting these things together in a box,” Pamuk writes in The Innocence of Objects, ”measuring every centimetre, and making the slightest change in search of a particular harmony, made me feel as if I were building a world – just as I do when I write a novel.”

    Objects are arranged in wood cabinets – or ”vitrines” – that correspond to chapters in the novel.

    Chapter one is represented by the butterfly earring that falls from Fusun’s ear as the couple make love for the first time. The death of Kemal’s father in chapter 47 is told through a crowded display of coins, cufflinks and ties. Across an entire wall, lipstick-stained cigarette butts smoked by Fusun between 1976 and 1984 are pinned down like a collection of exotic insects. Pamuk’s accompanying caption reads: ”Kemal was proud of his 4213 cigarette butts, and whenever he brought them out he would tell me their stories. He carefully dated each one, making additional notes here and there, some of which I used in the novel. Here you will find the relevant notes under each cigarette butt, written out in my own handwriting, as Kemal requested.”

    Like the poetic assemblages of American artist Joseph Cornell, each cabinet invites the viewer on an intriguing visual journey whose destination is never clear.

    Pamuk playfully offers up the ”evidence” of his characters’ lives: newspaper clippings, a dress worn by Fusun during her nerve-racked driving lessons, even her driver’s licence, albeit with face blurred. In one cabinet, a map of Istanbul charts the scenes of key events in the novel as if they really happened. Newspaper photographs of ”fallen” women, their eyes covered by black bands, speak of polite society’s unforgiving nature.

    ”Because the press used the same device in photographs of adulteresses, rape victims and prostitutes,” Pamuk writes, ”the photographs of women with black bands over their eyes were so numerous that reading a Turkish newspaper in those days was like wandering through a masquerade.”

    The novel traces the beginning of Fusun’s own fall to her entry in a local beauty pageant, an event captured in a newspaper clipping of a swimsuit-clad beauty in vitrine No.36.

    Amid so many intriguing falsehoods, the visitor can only guess at where storytelling begins and history ends. The museum’s lovingly displayed objects reveal themselves as props in an elaborate game, a series of puzzles that can never be solved. As a fellow visitor commented: ”It’s really cheeky.” Cheeky indeed, but also undeniably poignant.

    In the tiny upstairs bedroom where Kemal ends his days, surrounded by a tricycle, suitcase, bedside table and slippers, Pamuk writes: ”Between 2000 and 2007, Kemal Basmaci lived in this room, where Orhan Pamuk sat and listened to his story. Kemal Basmaci passed away on 12 April 2007.” Nearby, pages from the novel’s original manuscript, written between 2002 and 2008, along with empty pen cartridges and sketches showing how items should be displayed in the museum, point once again to the nature of obsession, both Kemal’s and his creator’s.

    Surrounded by crumbling houses and the usual rubble of Istanbul’s streets, the Museum of Innocence stands as a lovely curio and elaborate love letter to a time of beauty and hope.

    Its cabinets demand order from the ephemera of the city’s history, corralling the discarded and apparently meaningless into a universal tale of yearning and loss. As though the scattered lines of history have been picked up and rearranged into visual poetry.

    ■ The Museum of Innocence is open Tues-Sun. Free entry with a copy of The Museum of Innocence.

    The Innocence of Objects by Orhan Pamuk, is published by Abrams, $45.

    Read more:
  • Turkey bans headscarves at schools, public offices

    Turkey bans headscarves at schools, public offices

    A controversial ban on hijab has outraged Turkey’s Muslim population. The Islamic hijab is a form of Muslim women’s dress code, which allows them to exercise modesty by covering their hair with a piece of headscarf.

    The hijab has been banned by Turkish governments since the creation of Republic of Turkey in 1923.

    According to polls 97.8% of the Turkish population is Muslim. Despite the fact that it’s an obligation in Islam to wear the hijab, Turkish citizens say the majority of the population is not allowed to exercise their religious freedoms.

    The headscarf is banned in the public sector and work places. Women who work in hospitals, schools and public offices are strictly forbidden from wearing the Hijab.

    University students were also banned from wearing Hijab. However the government was forced to be more lenient with Universities, as many Turks were fleeing the country seeking a state where they could exercise their right of religious freedom.

    You will also not see any Muslim headscarves on Elementary and high schools. Parents are allowed to pick their children up while wearing Hijab but children may not wear it unless they are in private religious schools.

    There are only about 2,000,000 girls who study at religious schools in Turkey. That means Turkish laws force around 7,000,000 girls across the country not to wear their Muslim head scarf at schools.

    via PressTV – Turkey bans headscarves at schools, public offices.