Category: Culture/Art

  • Honorary Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons was awarded to MEHMET HABERAL

    Honorary Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons was awarded to MEHMET HABERAL

    News from the Clinical Congress

    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
    2010 Clinical Congress
    October 3–7, 2010
    CONTACT: Sally Garneski
    312-202-5409
    or Cory Petty
    312-202-5328
    E-Mail: pressinquiry@facs.org
    EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE:
    Monday, October 4, 12:01 a.m. (EDT)

    HONORARY FELLOWSHIP IN THE
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
    IS AWARDED TO SIX PROMINENT SURGEONS

    WASHINGTON, DC—Honorary Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons was awarded to six prominent surgeons from Turkey, France, England, India, Brazil, and China last night during Convocation ceremonies that preceded the official opening of the College’s annual Clinical Congress. The granting of Honorary Fellowship is one of the highlights of the Clinical Congress—one of the largest international meetings of surgeons in the world. The recipients were as follows:

    Mehmet A. Haberal, MD, FACS, FICS (Hon)
    Professor Haberal, Ankara, Turkey, is a renowned surgeon and humanitarian. In 1975, he performed the first living-related kidney transplant in Turkey. In the ensuing years, he has distinguished himself as a surgeon, educator, author, and humanitarian. Among his many accomplishments, he established the journal Dialysis, Transplantation and Burns, organized the first Turkish Transplantation Society meeting, was founder of the Mediterranean Burns Club, established the Middle East Dialysis and Organ Transplantation Foundation, and has built 10 hospitals in Turkey. He is being awarded Honorary Fellowship in absentia due to his detention in Turkey for more than one year on allegations of anti-government activities. Professor Haberal is being recognized as an Honorary Fellow in acknowledgement of his unselfish devotion to his patients, medical science, and educational processes, all of which have led to improvement of the welfare of citizens in his country and throughout the Middle East.

    Bernard Launois, MD, FACS
    Professor Launois, Rennes, France, is a professor of surgery at Université de Rennes. After visiting the U.S. in the late 1960s, Professor Launois returned to France and established one of the first liver transplant centers in that country, eventually performing more than 1,200 liver replacements prior to retiring from surgical practice. He also has been widely recognized for his contributions in hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and esophageal surgery, including his work in the first randomized trials of preoperative radiotherapy for cancer of the esophagus and his first-of-its-kind report on the surgical management of duct cell carcinoma in the hepatic hilum in 1979. While serving as president of the Académie Nationale De Chirurgie, he created a paid fellowship that allows young American surgeons to spend one year in residence at the Collège de Médecine des Hôpitaux de Paris. For his contributions to the science of surgery, his work as an educator and as a prolific author, and his collaborative efforts on behalf of surgical patients around the world, Professor Launois is being awarded Honorary Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons.

    Ralph John Nicholls, MA, MB, MChir (Cantab), FRCS (Hon Eng, Glas), EBSQ (Coloproctology), FRCP (Hon Lon), FASCRS (Hon)
    Professor Nicholls, London, England, is an emeritus consultant surgeon, St. Mark’s Hospital, London; visiting professor of colorectal surgery, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, London; civilian consultant advisor in general surgery to the Royal Air Force; Editor, Colorectal Disease; and Consultant Surgeon, Colorectal Eporediensis Centre, Vercelli, Italy. He is being awarded Honorary Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons because of his wide-reaching influence on the field of colon and rectal surgery. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Professor Nicholls collaborated with Sir Alan Parks to pioneer the restorative proctocolectomy for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. For more than 30 years, he has held the position of consultant surgeon at St. Mark’s Hospital, an institution that is widely recognized as a center of groundbreaking activity in colon and rectal surgery. Professor Nicholls’ strong devotion to providing information that will further the science of surgery has led him to publish 204 peer-reviewed papers, 48 book chapters, and four surgical textbooks. His editorship of Colorectal Disease, formerly known as the International Journal for Colorectal Disease, has lasted 12 years.

    Tehemton E. Udwadia, MBBS, FACS
    Professor Udwadia, Mumbai, India, has made an incomparable impact on the care of surgical patients in his native country. One of his main areas of focus has been breaking through socioeconomic factors in order to provide laparoscopic surgery in a cost-effective manner to patients regardless of their ability to pay. In the early 1970s, Professor Udwadia began using and teaching the use of laparoscopes for both diagnoses and treatment, well in advance of the video endoscopic revolution in general surgery. A champion for the disadvantaged, he began traveling to rural villages throughout India to perform laparoscopic surgery and to train rural surgeons in its use. Employing reusable equipment, Professor Udwadia facilitated the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a cost of approximately $20 per patient. Also a strong proponent of the dissemination of knowledge, he serves as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Minimal Access Surgery and a former editor-in-chief of the Indian Journal of Surgery. Professor Udwadia has authored or coauthored nearly 100 articles in peer-reviewed journals, and consistently has been an in-demand guest lecturer and presenter around the world. Currently an emeritus professor of surgery at the Grant Medical College and J. J. Hospital, Mumbai, he is being awarded Honorary Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons in recognition of his humanitarian instincts and personal dedication to the care of patients regard-less of means and his efforts to transform surgical care in the second largest country in the world.

    Dario Birolini, MD, FACS
    An internationally renowned trauma surgeon and critical care specialist in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Professor Birolini has concentrated his efforts on specialized care of the critically ill and injured from the time he completed his surgery residency. While he has shown tireless devotion to his home country, Professor Birolini’s work has impacted trauma patients around the world, and he is widely recognized as a major force in the worldwide advancement of trauma management, emergency surgery, and critical care. For more than 25 years, Professor Birolini led “The Annual Course of Urgency Surgery” every weekend for physicians and surgeons throughout Brazil to learn about urgent and emergency care. Furthermore, he has established management algorithms and protocols for Brazil after testing them in his own hospital and reviewing the outcome database prior to proposing them as national standards. Professor Birolini’s work in furthering the care of injured patients has led to numerous awards, including the Advanced Trauma Life Support® (ATLS®) Meritorious Service Award given by the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons and being chosen to be the Scudder Orator for the 93rd Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons. In acknowledgment of Professor Birolini as a consummate teacher, investigator, and master surgeon, he is being awarded Honorary Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons.

    William I. Wei, MBBS, FACS, FRCS (Edin, Eng), FRACS (Hon)
    Known as the leading head and neck surgeon in Asia, Professor Wei, Hong Kong, China, started the first academic otolaryngology and head and neck unit in South East Asia at Queen Mary Hospital and the University of Hong Kong. His efforts have turned the unit into a large academic department which has been responsible for teaching most of the academic head and neck otolaryngologists in Asia. A dedicated researcher, Professor Wei has an international reputation for his basic and clinical research into the diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, an often fatal disease that is prevalent in Asia. His research has led to new techniques for the reconstruction of previously nonresectable nasopharyngeal cancers using a maxillary swing approach to the central skull base. A prolific author and speaker, Professor Wei has published 200 articles in international peer-reviewed journals, has written 25 book chapters, and has made more than 150 presentations to international surgical and medical societies. Professor Wei has also worked and traveled extensively for the past 15 years to provide head and neck surgeons throughout mainland China with up-to-date education and has devoted him-self to helping patients who have undergone total laryngectomy to speak again through the New Voice Club of Hong Kong, the leader in speech rehabilitation for China. In recognition of the work he has done to greatly improve the care of patients with head and neck cancer through innovative research and his dedication to the education of patients, students, fellows, and practicing otolaryngologists, Professor Wei is being awarded Honorary Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons.

    Presenting the Honorary Fellowships on behalf of the College were: Andrew L. Warshaw, MD, FACS, Boston, MA; Thomas E. Starzl, MD, PhD, FACS, Pittsburgh, PA; Stanley M. Goldberg, MD, FACS, Minneapolis, MN; John G. Hunter, MD, FACS, Portland, OR; L. D. Britt, MD, MPH, FACS, Norfolk, VA; and Richard J. Finley, MD, FACS, FRCSC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

    Fellowship in the American College of Surgeons is awarded during the ceremonies to surgeons whose education and training, professional qualifications, surgical competence, and ethical conduct have passed a rigorous evaluation and have been found to be consistent with the high standards established and demanded by the College. During the College’s Convocation ceremonies this year, 1,467 surgeons from around the world were admitted into Fellowship.

    With a membership of more than 77,000, the College is the largest organization of surgeons in the world.

    Sir Rickman Godlee, President of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, was awarded the first Honorary Fellowship in the College during the College’s first Convocation in 1913. Since then, 424 internationally prominent surgeons, including the six chosen this year, have been named Honorary Fellows of the American College of Surgeons.

    # # #

    Note: For further information, contact the College’s Office of Public Information, 633 N. Saint Clair St., Chicago, IL 60611-3211; Phone: 312-202-5328; E-mail: pressinquiry@facs.org.

    =========================================================================

    Mehmet Haberal’ın çok ilginç portresi… Mehmet Haberal'ın çok ilginç portresi...

    13 Nisan 2009 13:40


    Ergenekon’da bugün gözaltına alınan Prof. Haberal’in çok ilgin bir geçmişi var. 10. Cumhurbaşkanımız olması direkten dönen Haberal’ın bir de Ecevit olayı var ki…

    Ergenekon operasyonu kapsamında bugün gözaltına alınan Başkent üniversitesi Rektörü Prof. Dr. Mehmet Haberal kamuoyunun yakından tanıdığı bir isim. 2000 yılında ismi Cumhurbaşkanı adayları arasında geçen Haberal Ergenekon tutuklularıyla yaptığı toplantılarla da biliniyordu.

    AZ DAHA CUMHURBAŞKANI OLACAKTI

    9. Cumhurbaşkanı Süleyman Demirel’in görev süresinin dolduğu günlerde bugün Ergenekon terör Örgütü kapsamında ev ve işyerlerinde arama yapılan Başkent Üniversitesi Retrökü Mehmet Haberal az daha Türkiye’nin 10. Cumhurbaşkanı oluyordu. DSP, MHP ve ANAP koalisyon hükümetleri döneminde Başbakan Bülent Ecevit tarafından Haberal’ın ismi cumhurbaşkanlığına aday olarak gösterilmişti. Ancak koalisyon ortakları isim üzerinde anlaşamayınca Haberal’ın cumhurbaşkanlığı kapısı kapanmıştı.Ancak adaylığı gündemden düşse de ismi kamuoyunun sürekli gündeminde yer aldı.

    BAŞKENT HASTANESİ’NDEN KAÇAN ECEVİT EVİNDE İYİLEŞTİ

    Bülent Ecevit hastalanınca Başkent Hastanesi’ne yatmayı tercih etmişti. Ecevit’in burada iken sağlığının gittikçe kötüleşmesi üzerine Rahşan Ecevit eşini kaçırırcasına eve götürmüş ve Ecevit’in sağlığında kısa sürede düzelme görülmüştü. O günlerde bunun nedeni anlaşılamamıştı.

    Ancak sonrasında ortaya çıkan bilgi ve belgeler Ergenekon’un bu işte parmağı olduğunu gösterir nitelikteydi. Amaç Bülent Ecevit’e “iş göremez” raporu vererek yeni oluşuma ve yeni isimlere yol açmaktı.

    ERGENEKON SANIKLARIYLA TOPLANTILAR YAPMIŞ

    Bülent Ecevit’e, “İş göremez” raporu vermek isteyen Başkent Üniversitesi Hastanesi’nin başhekimi Prof. Dr. Mehmet Haberal’ın ismi, Ergenekon Terör Örgütü zanlılarıyla anılıyor. Ergenekon tutuklusu Ferit İlsever, İstanbul Terörle Mücadele Şube Müdürlüğü’nde verdiği ifadede; Prof. Dr. Mehmet Haberal’ın, Ergenekon Terör Örgütü soruşturmasında tutuklanan emekli Orgeneral Şener Eruygur, emekli Orgeneral Hurşit Tolon, İşçi Partisi Genel Başkanı Doğu Perinçek ile eski Milletvekili Kamran İnan, eski Bakan Ufuk Söylemez ve ADD Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi Dursun Ali Ercan ile Milli Egemenlik Hareketi toplantısına katıldığını söylemişti. Sabah Gazetesi Yazarı Yavuz Donat’ın ifadeleriyle amaçlarından biri de “AKP karşıtlarını bir araya getirme” olan hareketin ilk toplantıları Kent Otel’de yapılıyordu. Ancak daha sonra bu toplantılara ev sahipliğini Başkent Üniversitesi Gölbaşı tesisleri ile Haberal’ın sahibi olduğu Patalya Otel yapmaya başladı.

    Milliyet gazetesi, Başkent Üniversitesi Rektörü Mehmet Haberal, eski Bakanlar Kamran İnan, Ufuk Söylemez, Şükrü Sina Gürel, emekli orgeneraller Hurşit Tolon, Tuncer Kılınç gibi isimlerin de aralarında bulunduğu Diyalog Grubu’nun, Milli Egemenlik Hareketi adı altında yeni bir oluşum için nabız tutmaya başladığını, AK Parti’den ayrılan Abdüllatif Şener’in yeni oluşum arayışları içinde lider adayı olarak öne çıktığını yazmıştı.

    HABERAL: AKP’NİN OYUNU DÜŞÜRECEK HER P…ŞTLUĞU YAP

    Başkent Üniversitesi Rektörü Mehmet Haberal’ın televizyonu Kanal B’de seçim skandalı yaşanmıştı. Sunuculuğunu Kanal B Genel Müdürü Nahit Duru’nun yaptığı programın reklam arasında Duru’nun programa konuk olarak katılan Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu’na Mehmet Haberal’ın kendisine “Bunların (Ak Parti) oylarını azaltacak her türlü p..ştluğu yap” dediğini söylemişti. Bu sözler internete düşmüş bir çok gazetede yayınlanmış ancak Haberal’dan herhangi bir yalanlama gelmemişti.

    HAZİNEDEN BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE USÜLSÜZ KREDİLER

    Mehmet Haberal’ın Başkent Üniversitesi’ne verilen kredilerde 27 milyon dolarlık usulsüzlük tespit edildi. Avrupa Sosyal Kalkınma Fonu kredisini Euro olarak geri ödeyen devlet, Haberal’dan TL tahsil edince, 27 milyon dolarlık fark Hazine’nin üstüne kaldı.

    Ulusalcı çevrelere ve siyasetteki yeni oluşumlara öncülük etmesiyle gündeme gelen Prof. Dr. Mehmet Haberal’ın hızlı yükselişi, Hazine kontrolörleri raporuna yansıdı.

    Üç yıl önce hazırlanan ve Aksiyon’un ele geçirdiği Hazine Müsteşarlığı’nın 26 Temmuz 2005 tarihli ve 71-8 sayılı inceleme raporuna göre, Haberal’ın sahibi ve rektörü olduğu Başkent Üniversitesi ile Hastanesi için Hazine’den verilen kredilerde usulsüzlük yapıldığı belirlendi. Raporlar, 1995-1996 yıllarında Başkent Üniversitesi’nin iki ayrı projesine (hastane ve kampus) dönemin iki bakanının onayı ile usulsüz kredi kullandırıldığını ortaya koyuyor.

    (Zaman Online)

  • Blame Nobel for crisis, says author of “Black Swan”

    Blame Nobel for crisis, says author of “Black Swan”

    taleb

    By Adam Cox

    STOCKHOLM (Reuters) – Did the Nobel prize help trigger the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression?

    Nassim Taleb, who shot to fame with his ideas about risk in the book “The Black Swan,” believes the economics award and the theories it celebrates deserve their share of blame.

    “I want to remove the harm from these economic models. And the Nobel is not helping. They should be held partly responsible, if not largely responsible, for the crisis,” Taleb told Reuters by telephone.

    The first of the Nobel awards will be announced next Monday, with the economics prize due a week later on Oct 11.

    According to Taleb, there are a number of mistaken ideas about forecasting and measuring risk, which all contribute to events like the 2008 global crisis. The Nobel prize, he says, has given them a stamp of approval, allowing them to propagate.

    Taleb is a former trader who took advantage of the mispricing of derivatives to make his fortune in the years before the crisis. He published “The Black Swan” in 2007 and went on to make millions more during the upheaval.

    He rattles off a list of Nobel prize winners who make his blood boil. They include: Harry Markowitz, William Sharpe, Robert Merton, Myron Scholes, Robert Engle, Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller — a virtual “Who’s Who” of the economic world.

    Merton and Scholes, for instance, were recognized for their work in valuing derivatives. Modigliani and Miller are known for a theory which some have argued promotes financing by debt.

    Taleb attacks their works for how they are constructed and what they lead to. “There is no world in which these ideas can work mathematically,” he said.

    Forecasting methods, which he discusses in detail in his book, create a false sense of security or, worse, send people in the wrong direction. Universities then compound the problem by teaching these Nobel-approved ideas as orthodoxy.

    His conversation is peppered with metaphors. “If I give you a map of Sparta when you’re in Johannesburg, you will definitely have a problem,” he says of the tools used in modern finance.

    Taleb said he has met with the King of Sweden and suggested he do something about the economics prize, which was an addition in the 1960s to the roster of prizes awarded since 1901 for science, literature and peace.

    “HE CRASHED THE PLANE”

    But if he is unable to make headway in Stockholm, does Taleb believe his new influence can help him change the practices of important policy makers? He will be the first to say that his blunt, uncompromising manner make that highly unlikely.

    He says he walked out of a meeting that included Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and other luminaries and wouldn’t feel comfortable shaking their hands.

    Federal Reserve Governor Ben Bernanke he calls “a true charlatan,” arguing his idea of a “Great Moderation” made the world more dangerous because it masked underlying risks.

    “He got us here. He crashed the plane,” Taleb said. “I say it literally, he doesn’t know what’s going on.”

    In Europe, Taleb’s ideas have found more favor. He spent time with British Prime Minister David Cameron and said the new leader’s policies are visibly influenced by “The Black Swan.”

    Asked if he would accept a Nobel prize himself if selected, Taleb is uncharacteristically hesitant. People might think he had sold out, he worries. But he concludes: “If it would help society that I got something like that, I probably would.”

    For now, Taleb is content to write books and try to advance his ideas. He says he has given up trading, but has a clear purpose for all the profits he made. “I’m using the money now to finance the destruction of the economic establishment.”

    , Sep 28, 2010

  • Survivor tells the real story behind shocking cinema classic Midnight Express

    Survivor tells the real story behind shocking cinema classic Midnight Express

    IT’S one of the most famous and shocking films ever made.

    But according to the man who lived through the real story of Midnight Express, the true story behind it is even more sensational.

    And drug smuggler turned author Billy Hayes has told the Sunday Mail how delighted he is to be telling the true story on screen for the first time – 40 years after he made a dramatic escape from a Turkish prison by crossing open seas and minefields.

    Billy, now 63, was caught smuggling hash out of Istanbul to the US in 1970 and thrown in a hellish jail.

    After his escape four years later, he told his story in the best-selling book Midnight Express, which Oliver Stone and Alan Parker turned into an Oscar-winning film starring Brad Davis as Hayes.

    Full of killings and sexual assault, the film became one of the biggest hits of the 70s.

    But according to Billy, who has always admitted his crimes, the film is nothing like the hell he endured in jail.

    He says scriptwriter Stone invented most of the violence and the rape scenes but missed out on the most exciting part of his story – a daring escape from an island prison and the murder of a close friend who was trying to break him out.

    Billy is getting the chance to retell his story now in a documentary for the National Geographic Channel as part of the Banged Up Abroad series.

    He said: “As much as I like the film, I’ve always had problems with it and I’m so delighted to finally get the chance to really tell my story, my way, with my words.

    “My mum, who could only watch the movie once, likes the new programme.

    “The only thing for me was going back to the story and revisiting all the pain I caused my family – that’s the worst part of it all and the bit that still comes back to me every day. The pain still feels as fresh as the day it happened.”

    Billy’s story began in the 1960s, when he discovered marijuana and decided to make some money by smuggling it in from Turkey.

    But he was caught on his fourth trip and got a four-year sentence.

    He said: “I was so stupid. I felt like I was a swashbuckling pirate, James f***ing Bond, an international man of intrigue. Everything was easy until the sky fell on my head. I soon realised that my actions had consequences.

    “Not only had I screwed up my own life but was causing my parents so much pain.”

    During his first night in the Sagmalcilar jail, 23-year-old Billy tried to steal a blanket and was hauled in for punishment by a sadistic guard called The Bear, who tied him up by the feet and battered his soles with a stick.

    In the film, it’s a terribly violent beating, with the implication the guard then sexually assaulted him.

    But in reality, the foot smacking was an example of falaka, a light beating, and there was no sex attack.

    Billy said: “They cane your feet and to outsiders it seems like a horrible thing but it’s not that bad.

    “At the time, I thought it was killing me, but I soon discovered that it wasn’t a bad beating. Later on, I discovered what a bad beating was – they would break bones if they thought you had hash or information they wanted.”

    While the film is full of violence, including the fictional scene where the Billy character bites the tongue of a prison trustee and kills a guard, most of it never happened and the worst thing about it was boredom.

    “Prison was mostly endless boredom, punctuated by moments of sheer terror.

    “The hardest thing for me was having to write the first letter home to my folks.”

    Being incarcerated himself was one thing, but it was hurting others that was the worst part of his ordeal – and that only got worse when he enlisted childhood New York friend Patrick to secure false passports and documents to help him flee the country.

    While dealing with underworld figures to buy the false ID, Patrick was murdered, leaving Billy distraught.

    “Yeah, that was very bad. I’d already screwed up my own life, but then to have him die because of me was pretty much the low point and everything changed.

    “I decided I just needed to do my time. I went to see his folks when I got back and that was very difficult.

    “His mum was very happy to see me but they were shattered, how could you not be? I felt so bad, I told her that and she said she was fine because I’d have done it for him.

    “He is with me every single day. I’m always thinking about him in so many ways.”

    After he shelved his escape plans, Billy was dealt a hammer blow 54 days before his sentence was due to end, when the authorities changed his sentence to life in prison.

    Facing the rest of his days in jail was too much and he soon started thinking about freedom again.

    Transferred to Imrali, an island prison, he started work on his escape, which sounds like the plot of a movie in itself.

    The facility was serviced by supply boats, which would always return to the mainland and never remain moored on the island. But one night, a storm left one vessel, which had a rowing boat tied to its bow, stuck at the island – so Billy took his chance.

    He swam to the boat, then rowed for hours across the ocean to get to the mainland.

    He said: “It was all or nothing and I was totally all in. I realised I would either make it or be caught and possibly killed, one way or another I would be free.”

    He spent three days in Turkey, hiding out and dying his hair black, and then made a break for the Greek border. He crossed a minefield at the Turkish border and swam across the Maritsa river, where he was apprehended by Greek soldiers.

    “The Greeks asked me everything I knew about Turkish military intelligence from what I’d seen in my escape, and then deported me.

    Billy’s dad met him in an emotional reunion at New York’s JFK airport.

    He wrote up his experiences in the book Midnight Express, which was then adapted into the movie in 1978. At the Cannes premiere of the movie, Billy met his wife Wendy and they have been together ever since.

    Billy moved to Hollywood and found work as an actor, writer and director, but his ordeal remains a central part of his life.

    He said: “I got myself busted but I got myself out, and in that way, I got my life back and my sense of self. In the end we always get what we deserve, and that’s a frightening thought.”

    Banged Up Abroad, The Real Midnight Express, is on the National Geographic Channel tomorrow night, at 9pm.

    I said sorry to Turkey

    BILLY Hayes spent 30 years of his life trying to deal with the repercussions of the movie Midnight Express.

    Eventually, he returned to apologise.

    He was a huge fan of Turkey and the people, having made several trips there before he was arrested.

    But the film’s violent and backward portrayal of the country saw a 90 per cent drop in tourism upon its release.

    Although his own book is an honest account, the film shows the country in a terrible ligh.

    He said: “I always did get on really well with the Turks and Istanbul is a fascinating city but they have a lot of issues to deal with and they don’t need my Midnight Express stuff on top of that. “The bottom line is the prisons suck, the legal systems suck but you could fill in the blanks of that with any almost country in the world. I was happy to go back there and say all this stuff again.”

    The Turks invited Billy to Istanbul three years ago to tell the truth about the film and his opinions about their country.

    While he admits to a paranoid fear he was going to be banged up again, Billy knew he had to do the right thing. He said: “I was aware I was not a well-liked guy in Turkey. “But I got a chance to say how much I like Turkey and how well I had got on with the Turks. “It worked, and I now feel I have made my balance with the Turks.”

    Users’ Comments (1)

    Jeepers wrote:

    There has been a deep prejudice against Turks for centuries, since the days they served as a powerful force threatening Christian Europe. As finely crafted a film as “Midnight Exprress” is, rare has been the Hollywood film that has demonized a people and culture as completely as this film has, where everything Turkish and every Turk was depicted as either ugly or corrupt, or without any redeeming values to speak of. Oliver Stone was rewarded with an Academy Award for his screenplay and, unlike the director (Alan Parker), has — sadly — expressed little or no contrition for the great damage he has caused. The interesting point, however, is that few have acknowledged the deep racism of this film, and all of the hatred against Turks that it has caused, and this disturbing fact still points to the atmosphere of prejudice against Turks that exists today. Although the effect is perhaps not as powerful as when the film first came out (when the film influenced ignorant folks who knew nothing about Turkey), with each airing, “Midnight Express” still wreaks its campaign of hatred against Turks, and many still view it foremost as a respectable film and a “classic.”

    Even in this article, we get the feeling that the author, Brian Mciver, would barely have shed the small light that he has on the racist harm this film has caused, which would probably be unlikely if the victims were any other ethnic group. Billy Hayes deserves credit for expressing his regret for his hand in demonizing a country and people, but in other articles he has gone much farther. For example, as much as prisons are not fun no matter what country they derive from, as Hayes laudably reminds us here, he has mentioned that there was more humanism in the way his prison was run than what he has heard about the typical dehumanization in American prisons.

    It is time that responsible people shed their bigotry or ignorance, and stress the evil in the heart of “Midnight Express,” rather than strictly remember it fondly, as the effective thriller that the film happens to be — as most people would, if they were dealing with any other movie that displayed an entire group of humans as ones to be despised.

    , Oct 3 2010

  • Azerbaijani Armenians in the US

    Azerbaijani Armenians in the US

    By Aram Arkun
    Mirror-Spectator Staff

    Newly-arrived Baku Armenians worshipping in New York

    BROOKLYN, N.Y. — Hundreds of thousands of Armenians fled Azerbaijan in the early 1990s. The collapse of the Soviet Union, the Karabagh conflict and  violence against Armenians in Azerbaijan culminated in pogroms in Sumgait in February 1988, in Kirovabad (Ganja) in November 1988 and Baku in January 1990. It has been roughly 20 years now that members of this unique group of immigrants have lived in the United States. The purpose of this article is to examine how they have fared in the United States. This is admittedly an unscientific survey based on interviews of only a handful of individuals either involved professionally with this community, or active members of this community.

    Most Armenians from Azerbaijan came to the US from roughly 1989 to 1996. The first wave came after the US agreed to give them refugee status. Before this time,  it was very hard for Soviet Armenians except for repatriates (who came to settle in Armenia from outside the USSR in earlier years) and political dissidents to emigrate from the Soviet Union.

    Armenians were settled in nearly every state of the US. The government divided them up between different non-profit American organizations located in different states.  Sometimes there were not many American-Armenians at their destinations, which included far flung places like Fargo, ND and Boise, Idaho. In 1994, for example, seven families were sent to Alaska. Michael Guglielmo, who was director of the Social Services Department of the Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern) from 1992 to 1997, remembered that an old Armenian woman would call occasionally from Idaho. She had lived in large cities like Baku and Moscow all her life, and now, stuck in the boondocks, she would wake up and see elks. She was depressed.

    The largest groups ended up in Brooklyn and adjacent parts of New York, though substantial communities also settled in Los Angeles and parts of New England. The Congressional program allowing visas for Azerbaijani Armenians ended around 1994. By the late 1990s it became much harder to come to the US. Those who had initially come to Russia could no longer show any immediate threat to themselves because they were no longer in Azerbaijan.

    Armenians from Baku and Azerbaijan are still trying to come to the US for family reunification, but it is very hard because of the limited numbers of visas available — 25,000 per year for people throughout the world with family in the US.

    The khachkar in front of St. Vartan Cathedral dedicated to the pogroms in Baku

    There is no reliable estimate as to how many Armenians from Azerbaijan now live in the United States. Three different State Department agencies were contacted while this article was being researched, and none of them had access to the necessary information.  Neither did a number of Armenian-American organizations. Individual Azerbaijani-Armenian informants have given estimates ranging from around 10,000 to as high as 100,000. It should be kept in mind that there were approximately 400,000 Armenians in Azerbaijan, which included around 150,000 in Nagorno-Karabagh, in 1989, and most of those outside of Karabagh went to Armenia and Russia.

    Guglielmo explained that there were several ways that Armenians from Azerbaijan came into the US.  People involved in politics came to the US directly with tourist visas,  and then applied here for asylum status as political refugees. The majority were already recognized as refugees however even before coming to the US.  The United States government worked with nonprofit resettlement organizations, and it was the latter, which could choose the people they wanted, and where they wanted to settle them. These organizations were largely religious in nature, and included Catholic services, Church World Service, Lutheran Services and Catholic Migration.

    Anna Baghdassarian, who was involved in helping refugees from Azerbaijan in the 1990s, and now works at the Interfaith Refugee and Immigration Service, explained how the process worked with the Church World Service program in Los Angeles. At that time, they brought roughly 800-900 people annually from various countries like Azerbaijan, Iran and Africa. The Armenians included Pentecostals as well as members of the Church of Armenia. Those who came to Los Angeles, “had to have a relative to meet them at the airport. We did the rest of the work. The relative would take them to find an apartment, but we assisted with furniture, objects for daily living, health exams, social security cards and employment services.  If they could not find work, they went on welfare. Welfare would provide assistance for nine months for single people, and several years for families. Then we would do follow-ups with 30-day home visits to see if there were any other needs.”

    Once the refugees received their residency papers and became US citizens, they were on their own.

    The Social Services Department of the Armenian Diocese was the main Armenian organization in the United States providing assistance to the newcomers. Most of them had no financial means. In the New York area some had friends or family who helped them until they found jobs paying cash. The Diocese gave some food or clothing as direct help initially through a small fund, and helped do visa paperwork, if necessary. Guglielmo traveled to other parishes in the Diocese to try to help, as well as to get these local parishes to also participate in the effort. At that time, many Armenian-Americans still felt the refugees should have settled in Armenia but there was no light or heat there, and these people were traumatized after massacres.

    Guglielmo pointed out that “in New York there were a lot more of the asylees. There was the crazy situation of people who were intermarried. They had no religious identity before 1989 and now it meant everything. Where were they going to go? Sometimes they themselves were already half-Jewish, half- Armenian, and were married to spouses who were half-Azerbaijani and half-Russian.”

    When the asylees got here, they had to make their case to the government. Guglielmo stated that “proving Jewish ancestry helped, or if you were actually injured there in a pogrom and could prove it, that led to asylum.” The Diocese had a pro bono network of lawyers who assisted individuals, a Hebrew service and some committees of human rights lawyers.  However, some people had no documents or proof, and could not prove their case. Many of these stayed illegally, without papers, or married an American citizen.

    The immigrants themselves also made at least one attempt to organize in order to help one another.  A group in Rhode Island, supported by Guglielmo and the local Diocesan priest, created the Armenian Refugee Social Economical [sic] Development Association.  Garen Bagdasarian, who was a founder of this organization, described its work: “The main goal was to have a representative like a non-profit organization in Congress to act like our lawyer.  Every year in Congress, there are debates over which groups will receive priority, or continue to receive priority, as refugees permitted to enter the US. It is necessary to explain why a particular group or nationality is in danger in a country.” At the time, a nonprofit group in Colorado that lobbied on behalf of Russian Jews was willing to help the Armenians, but asked for around $30,000. This group would have represented the Armenians to a committee of seven national organizations that helped refugees. The Armenians attempted to raise money through parties and other efforts, but it did not succeed. The main problem apparently was that the Armenian-American community at large felt that Armenians from Azerbaijan should go to Armenia, not America. Meanwhile, the Congressional program allowing Azerbaijani Armenians to receive a priority refugee status expired by the mid-1990s.  The organization still exists, but only in Rhode Island and it chiefly helps local Armenians. For example, it provides assistance for the burial of needy Armenians.

    Brooklyn and the New York Metropolitan Area
    The New York City metropolitan area, and Brooklyn in particular, contains one of the largest communities of Azerbaijani-Armenians in the US. It is difficult to make an estimate of its Azerbaijani-Armenian population precisely because of its largeness. Fr. Mardiros Chevian, Dean of St. Vartan Armenian Cathedral in Manhattan, estimated that there are several thousand in New York City and New Jersey.

    Dr. Svetlana Amirkhanian, chairwoman of the St. Gregory the Illuminator Mission Parish Council, felt it was not possible to give an accurate number. There were approximately 400 families on the parish mailing list, but it was unclear what percentage of the total population of Azerbaijani-Americans this represents. The majority were in Brooklyn, but some moved out to Manhattan, Bronx, Queens and New Jersey, as their economic circumstances improved. They arrived at different times.

    Angela Kazarian, treasurer of the same mission parish, had heard a figure of 5,000 bandied about for the NY metropolitan area.

    Marina Bagdasarova, vice chair of the Brooklyn mission Parish Council and Armenian school principal, pointed out that the first wave of immigrants were those with some connections. They moved first to Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Greece and even Argentina, and from there came to the US. Some had money to go on their own. However, the majority came in the second wave, which began in 1993-4, but the biggest wave was in the spring of 1995, because it was done on a governmental level. More than 90 percent of the second wave came to Brooklyn originally and only moved out later.

    They came from different places in Azerbaijan, chiefly Baku, Sumgait and Kirovabad. At the beginning of the second wave of immigrants, Bagdasarova related, Lutheran and other Christian churches and organizations provided help, but when the numbers became huge, it was very difficult. She said, “Although people had been in Russia a few years by then, they had to start from scratch. I myself only had $100 in my pockets.” In addition, before and after the Diocese had its Social Services Department, Jewish community centers filled the void and Armenians got pulled into their world of activities.

    New immigrants still keep arriving via Russia or Armenia every year. Some manage to come through their relatives here, while others win green cards in the lottery.

    Chevian pointed out that most of them initially connected with the Diocese for a variety of reasons, including the larger complex and resources of the Diocese, its direct affiliation with Echmiadzin, about which they would have at least some knowledge, and the fact that the Diocese was fairly tolerant of their not speaking Armenian. Individually, of course, some refugees also did join Prelacy-affiliated churches.

    After the Department of Social Services of the Diocese was closed in 1997, some of the Azerbaijani Armenians were already attached to the Diocese, and made the cathedral their place of worship. There is no physical church in Brooklyn closer to them.

    The Diocese soon intensified its efforts on behalf of the new group. A mission parish in Brooklyn had already been established with a visiting pastor. Then in 2000, the last Primate of Azerbaijan, former Archbishop Anania Arabajyan, came to the US, and focused his energies on the immigrants. For three years, through 2002, Arabajyan performed the Divine Liturgy monthly in Brooklyn in a rented church. The weekend school for the new immigrants was moved from St. Vartan to Brooklyn too. Arabajyan frequently traveled to other parts of the Eastern Diocese where there were communities of Azerbaijani-Armenians. These places included Hartford, Philadelphia, Nashville, Providence, Charlotte (North Carolina), Greenfield and Lansing (Mich.), Erie (Penn.), Columbus (Ohio), Syracuse (NY), Richmond (Va.), Kansas City (Missouri) and Jacksonville (Fla.).

    In hopes of attracting more Russian-speaking Armenians to church, Arabajyan began a primarily Russian-language magazine (with several pages in Eastern Armenian) called Vera Nadezhda Lyubov/ Havadk hoyser, which was published for several years. After this was halted, he translated the Armenian Church periodical into Russian for several years. Arabajyan also translated various booklets about prayer and the church into Russian. His Russian translation of the Armenian Divine Liturgy was published in 2002.

    In recent years, as there is no permanent priest for the Brooklyn mission parish, occasionally Chevian went to Brooklyn for sacraments and pastoral work, while Deacon Sebuh Oscherician visited the school to help with religious instruction. Oscherician exclaimed, “The kids are wonderful! They are learning Armenian, and recite without papers — unlike many Armenian-American children.”

    At present, the Armenian School of Brooklyn is the main institution in the area for Azerbaijani-Armenians. The school was initially established at the Diocesan complex in Manhattan in 1995. Bagdasarova, the present principal of the school, explained that it was difficult for the parents who largely lived in Brooklyn to bring their children each week to Manhattan. It later was moved to Brooklyn, and then stopped for two or three years. Afterwards, it was revived, and worked  continuously for the last eight years.

    When Amirkhanian became involved in the administration of the school in 2001, there was barely a student. By the end of that year, there were 20, and soon the total number reached 40 to 50. “We teach Armenian history, music, dance and religion. There are English language classes for parents. I hope that we will have computer classes for adults this year.”

    Bagdasarova explained that it took place on Sundays from noon to 6 p.m. There are now five teachers, including three for Armenian language (one also teaches kindergarten-age children), one for Armenian music and recitation, and one for traditional Armenian dance. The afternoon begins with Armenian language classes, then music, and finally dance. The children range in age from 2 ½ to 14-years-old, and are largely from Azerbaijan, though there are some from Armenia who are largely the newest arrivals in the area, as well as a few from other Soviet countries.

    The children are grouped by age, but a complication is that some already have learned to speak some Armenian at home (though they don’t know how to read or write), while others do not know any Armenian at all. Textbooks are brought from Armenia and copied here, while Gilda Kupelian, Armenian Studies coordinator at the Diocese, provides some other materials.

    The children are taught some of the major events in and issues of Armenian history, ranging from Vartanants to Sardarabad, and including tragedies like the pogroms in Sumgait and Baku, the Armenian earthquake of 1989, and the Genocide, all presented in a manner appropriate for children. They are also taught some of the basics of Christianity — some prayers and how to participate in services, when Chevian comes to Brooklyn. For example, the Divine Liturgy was conducted in the church whose rooms they are renting. They learn the anthem of the Republic of Armenia, and the meaning of its flag.

    One of the unique things about the school is that it is the first school in the tri-state area to teach the Yerevan dialect of Eastern Armenian. Bagdasarova explained that “many of the children would speak the Karabagh dialect at home, like a lot of Armenians from Azerbaijan [whose roots are in Karabagh]. However, there are no textbooks and teaching materials for the latter. In addition, we thought that it is best for children to learn the language of the [Armenia] state, as it is the standard one.”

    Bagdasarova stated that the school officially was part of the St. Gregory the Illuminator mission parish, and as such, was supervised by the Diocese. However, financially it is independent and always had to raise its own revenue for renting its hall weekly and paying the teachers a modest salary. Bagdasarova donates her own salary back to the school because the needs are so great and funds are always in short supply. The school organizes fundraising events and tries to get donations through mailings in the tri-state area.

    Amirkhanian explained that the school and the mission parish did more than just school work: “We help preparing applications for green cards and other issues for no charge, so we are like a social services organization. We work with adults, as well as children.” Bagdasarova added that “We help newcomers with their English, and with American history. We do as much as we can to help with arranging things like insurance. We can’t help financially since all the money we raise goes to the school. We think that this is the most important thing, to keep our language and heritage alive.”

    According to Amirkhanian, “the school participates in all the local Russian festivals and events, thus showing our existence and placing us on the map as an Armenian community. It participates in festivals organized by Jewish organizations with performances wearing Armenian costumes.” This participation is not important solely from a cultural point of view. In the local Russian-speaking world of New York, Armenians face an aggressive effort at propaganda by Brooklyn Azerbaijanis. Urged on by their consulate in the UN, they arrange for shows on Russian television programs which are broadcast throughout the world. On these shows they claim that Armenians were the aggressors who harmed them greatly and committed massacres. Amirkhanian pointed out that “this affects the newcomers who live in this Russian-language environment and makes them feel bad. We are not able to show information on Sumgait or Baku the way they [the Azerbaijanis] do. It is a matter of money, since we have to buy the television time. So our voices are cut off and we are forced to be on the defensive. We have to justify ourselves — it should be the opposite.”

    Amirkhanian added, “The parents now are very enthusiastic and themselves have changed. They came from various places, but see the school now as a cultural center for them. We organize family evenings, celebrate various holidays, the children make friends. It is an important environment. Even my own grandchildren living in Baltimore are members of our parish.”

    The Brooklyn Armenians feel that they could accomplish more with more resources. Amirkhanian felt that: “the parents are not that well off financially, being the first generation of immigrants here.” Furthermore, there was a different mentality in the USSR, where the government did everything. Thus, the immigrants are not used to paying money, or working as a community. In addition, “They see that Jewish centers provide services for free. They ask why the Armenian community or the church does not do the same. They don’t understand the way things work here.” She felt that hopefully the next generation will be in a better position to be helpful to the community, “but meanwhile more financial or administrative support would lead to even more successes. A cultural center would be helpful, with perhaps a chapel. This would be the permanent site of the school. We need the Church and cultural organizations to help us.”

    Hartford, Conn.

    Hartford was one of the smaller places on the East Coast which became a settlement site for Azerbaijani-Armenians. They largely came from the beginning of the 1990s to 1995, initially via Armenia and later through Russia, and were often settled through Church World Services or Catholic Charities.

    Fr. Tateos Abdalian, now director of the Department of Mission Parishes for the Diocese, but the pastor of Hartford’s St. George Armenian Church from 1993 to 1999, declared that mostly families, some two or three generational, came to Hartford. There were roughly thirty to forty families in all. They were political asylees. According to Karine Abalyan, who came to Hartford with her family from Baku via Armenia as a young girl, there were as many as one hundred families in the Hartford and New Britain areas (there is another Armenian church in New Britain).

    The people in Hartford welcomed the newcomers. They found them apartments, jobs, and schools for their children. They took them to doctors. Abdalian continued, “In exchange, the people that came from Baku stayed in the Hartford church community. They took positions in the church. They took over from the Armenian-Americans. They reenergized the community.”

    Slowly they got involved. They helped out in the bazaars and picnic functions, sang in the choirs, and began to come to church regularly. Abdalian understood that “they had a simplicity of faith. They knew that there was a God. They did not know who he was, or anything about Trinitarian formulas, but they knew God was with us. I always found them to be really good people.” He felt that they struggled mightily to keep their identity while living in a Turkic land which was part of the Soviet Union: “I would refer to them as the heroes of our people. They kept whatever they were taught by their parents and grandparents as Armenians in their hearts and minds. They had no radio or television programs in Armenian, or books, but transmitted whatever they could to their children.”

    Karine Abalyan, today working at the Diocese as coordinator of public relations, left Baku with her family in the fall of 1988. They were assigned to Hartford upon arrival in the US in 1992. Catholic Charities provided initial assistance and job placement.] She thought that one of the greatest unifying factors for the Armenians from Azerbaijan was the church — St. George of Hartford — which organized clothing drives and help for the newcomers. They established an unofficial school in our church club in the first few years where kids would recite poetry, sing songs, and act in plays, all in Russian. Then people developed their own friendships and networks. Most of the families stayed in the area, though they moved from the inner city to the suburbs and purchased homes.” Some children took Armenian lessons on weekends at the parish school, “but it is hard to get fluent with once-a-week classes.”

    (Part 2 will appear next week, on Baku Armenians in the US.)

    , Sep 6, 2010

  • Turkish classical pianist wins top prize in Germany

    Turkish classical pianist wins top prize in Germany

    Elif Sahin
    Turkish pianist Elif Şahin

    German-based young Turkish classical pianist Elif Şahin and her counterpart won the top prize at this year’s Hugo Wolf International Competition for Lied in Germany, news agencies reported this week.

    The duo made up of Şahin and soprano Annelie Sophie Müller came in first among the 12 finalists in the 2010 competition’s finals, held from Sept. 14 to 19 at the State College of Music and Performing Arts in Stuttgart.

    Şahin and Müller, who are both studying at the Stuttgart State College of Music, were selected for the finals from among 114 entrants in this year’s competition, whose jury was chaired by famous German mezzo-soprano Brigitte Fassbaender, the Anatolia news agency reported.

    Austrian soprano Birgid Steinberger, Dutch bass-baritone Robert Holl, Swiss baritone Kurt Widmer and pianists Wolfram Rieger from Germany and Graham Johnson from Britain were the other members of the judging panel.

    The Şahin-Muller pair won a cash prize of 20,000 euros and was invited to give a concert at the Stuttgart-based International Hugo Wolf Academy, which is organizing the competition.

    Held every three years, the Hugo Wolf International Competition for the Art of Lied is dedicated to a different composer in each edition. This year’s competition was dedicated to Robert Schumann, Hugo Wolf and Gustav Mahler, all of whom have an anniversary in 2010.

    The competition is aimed at “discovering and promoting young Lied artists — singers and pianists — as well as arousing the interest of a new audience into Lied as an art form,” as the organizers put it on the academy’s website, www.hugo-wolf-akademie.de.

    , 24 September 2010

  • Turkish government condemns alleged conservative Muslim attack on Istanbul art gallery

    Turkish government condemns alleged conservative Muslim attack on Istanbul art gallery

    By The Associated Press (CP)

    ISTANBUL — Turkey’s Islamic-rooted government has condemned an attack allegedly by conservative Muslims on people drinking cocktails outside an Istanbul art gallery, calling for understanding and respect for one another’s way of life in this largely Muslim but secular country.

    Culture Minister Ertugrul Gunay said Thursday his government will seek the heaviest punishment for the culprits who beat and slightly injured five guests drinking in the street outside the gallery in Istanbul’s Tophane district on Tuesday evening. Alcohol is forbidden in Islam.

    Gunay called on the gallery to respect family values of the neighbourhood while also urging respect for different lifestyles and their right to be and work in that area.

    Turkey is aspiring to become the first Muslim member of the European Union.

    , 24 sept 2010