Category: Main Issues

  • Returning Churches, Restoring Rights: An Interview with Aram Hamparian

    Returning Churches, Restoring Rights: An Interview with Aram Hamparian

    The Armenian Weekly conducted an interview today with the ANCA executive director Aram Hamparian. The interview focuses on H.Res 306, the Return of Churches resolution, introduced today. Below is the interview.

    Aram Hamparian

    Alongside the Armenian Genocide Resolution, there was a new resolution recently introduced in the House of Representatives calling upon Turkey to respect the rights of Christians and to return their stolen churches. Can you tell us more about it?

    Well, to begin with, we’re very encouraged by the introduction H.Res. 306—the Return of Churches resolution—by two of the most senior members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Ed Royce and Howard Berman, and gratified by the broad, bipartisan support it has garnered.

    This religious freedom measure was launched with several dozen original cosponsors, including the co-chairs of the Human Rights, Hellenic, and Armenian caucuses, and, notably, Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

    A reading of the resolution’s text shows that it calls, very simply, upon the government of Turkey to honor its international obligations to return confiscated Christian church properties and fully respect the rights of all Christians, among them, of course, Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, Pontians, and Arameans (Syriacs) who have lived for thousands of years in what is present-day Turkey.

    This legislation speaks to us powerfully as Americans—committed, as we are, to the principle of religious liberty; as Christians—who seek for ourselves and all people the right to worship in freedom; and as Armenians—who are working for a truthful and just resolution of the Armenian Genocide that morally and materially makes whole the victim of this horrific crime. There’s no better place to start this long overdue process than with Turkey returning stolen churches.

     

    Why this resolution now?

    This measure is urgently needed to confront—and eventually reverse—the vast destruction visited upon religious sites during the Armenian Genocide as well as Turkey’s official and ongoing, post-genocide destruction of church properties, desecration of holy sites, discrimination against Christian communities, and denial of rights to Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, Chaldeans, Pontians, Arameans (Syriacs), and others.

    It’s adoption would add the powerful voice of the U.S. Congress—and the full moral authority of the American people—to the international defense of religious freedom for the Christian nations residing within the borders of present-day Turkey.

     

    Can you briefly describe the communities and churches this legislation seeks to protect?

    Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, Pontians, and Arameans (Syriacs) have long lived in what is present-day Turkey. Many thousands of years before the establishment of the Ottoman Empire, these nations gave birth to great civilizations and established a rich civic, religious and cultural heritage. They were, upon these biblical lands, among the first Christians, dating back to the time of the travels through Anatolia by the Apostles Thaddeus and Bartholomew. Armenia, in 301 A.D., as is well known, became the first nation to adopt Christianity as a state religion.

    As students of religion worldwide know, the territory of present-day Turkey is home to many of the most important centers of early Christianity—most notably Nicaea, Ephesus, Chalcedon, and Constantinople. These lands contain a remarkably rich legacy of Christian heritage, including thousands of religious sites.

    And, of course, the Armenian Genocide nearly wiped out these Christian nations.

    It’s true. The Armenian Genocide of 1915 and, more broadly, Ottoman Turkey’s genocidal drive to eliminate its entire Christian population, represents a terrible watershed in the histories of the Christians of these lands, marking, as it does, a genocidal shift from the Turkish leadership’s ongoing policy of violence and oppression to one of an outright, systematic, intentional and state-implemented campaign of race extermination.

    And so, during the World War I-era, after centuries of growing intolerance and persecution, Ottoman Turkey perpetrated a government-sponsored campaign of genocide against its Armenian and other Christians subjects, resulting in the murder of over 2,000,000 Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, Pontians, Arameans (Syriacs), and the exile of hundreds of thousands others from their homelands of thousands of years.

    The Republic of Turkey, heir to the Ottomans, continued these genocidal policies against the remaining Christian population, through ethnic-cleansing, organized massacres, destruction of churches and religious sites, illegal expropriation of properties, discriminatory policies, restrictions on worship, and other means. As a result only a small fraction of the vast Christian population that once populated Anatolia remains today in modern Turkey.

     

    What is the situation today of remaining Christians within Turkey?

    The endangered Christian communities within Turkey’s present-day borders, in addition to all the crimes visited upon them and their holy sites throughout their histories, continue, to this day, to endure oppressive restrictions imposed by the government of Turkey on their right to practice their faith in their historic places of worship. These endangered sites are, nearly all, still today in Turkish hands as a direct result of genocide.

     

    What does the U.S. government—Turkey’s ally—have to say about religious freedom in Turkey?

    The State Department, which often goes to great and frequently unreasonable lengths to excuse Turkey’s conduct, has criticized the persecution of Christians in Turkey, including the improper confiscation of their properties.

    The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, established by Congress, recently designated Turkey as one of a handful of countries on its watch list for a third consecutive year.

    All this reflects the sad reality faced by the remaining Christians in Turkey. They are, all too often, prevented from praying in their historic churches, which have been desecrated, sometimes used as storage sheds—and in some cases, even turned into barns. In very rare instances—such as the Akhtamar Church—Turkey has undertaken repairs, but refused to these return religious properties to their rightful church owners, instead converting them into museums, where prayer, as a rule, is prohibited.

     

    Has Congress taken action on these types of religious freedom issues in the past?

    The United States, as a nation that was, quite literally, founded upon a belief in religious liberty, has a long and proud tradition of actively promoting and defending freedom of faith around the world.

    Our own Bill of Rights safeguards religious freedom for Americans, and our longstanding leadership in championing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international covenants has helped protect freedom of faith across the globe.

    America’s enduring commitment to religious freedom was powerfully reaffirmed in the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, and has been underscored in countless pieces of specific legislation. Here are a few examples:

    • Just last year, the U.S. House passed H.Res.1631, which called for the protection of minority religious communities and places of worship in the illegally-occupied portion of Cyprus.
    • S.Res.705, adopted by the U.S. Senate during the 110th Congress, reaffirmed U.S. support for the preservation of religious and cultural sites, and, in particular, called upon the government of Lithuania to halt and, if necessary, reverse the desecration of a Jewish cemetery located in the Snipiskes area of Vilnius.
    • H.Res.562, passed by the House during the 105th Congress, cited the confiscation of property by foreign governments as a means of victimizing minority populations, and, specifically, urged foreign governments to return wrongfully expropriated properties to religious communities.
    • H.Res.191, which was adopted by the U.S. House during the 109th Congress, called upon the government of Romania to provide fair, prompt, and equitable restitution to all religious communities for church properties that had been previously stolen by the government.
    • H.R.3096 from the 110th Congress, put the U.S. House on record pressing the government of Vietnam to respect freedom of religion and to return properties confiscated from churches.
    • H.Con.Res.371, passed by the House during the 110th Congress, called on foreign governments to return looted and confiscated properties to their rightful owners or, where restitution was not possible, to pay equitable compensation, in accordance with principles of justice and in an expeditious manner that is just, transparent, and fair.

     

    What type of opposition do you expect to this resolution?

    Sadly, if history is any guide, we can look to the Turkish government to stridently oppose this effort to end faith-based discrimination, promote religious tolerance, and secure the rightful return of Christian churches.

    This bipartisan measure speaks openly and honestly about the real situation in Turkey today, which inevitably runs up against the many Ottoman and Kemalist myths about Turkey as a model of tolerance and pluralism. So, we’re likely to hear that this measure is unnecessary or even counter-productive given all the great strides that the Turkish government is supposedly making. I wouldn’t be surprised to hear the Turkish Embassy trying to spin that its adoption would somehow upset the fragile Turkey-Armenia Protocols process.

     

    What can our readers do to help move this legislation forward?

    The quickest and easiest first step is for folks to send a free ANCA WebMail asking their U.S. Representatives to support the Return of Churches resolution (H.Res.306) and work for its adoption.

    Another great way to help is to spread the word to friends, family, work colleagues, and people you know who attend churches, mosques, synagogues, and other places of worship – basically anyone concerned about religious freedom and human rights. Send them the link www.anca.org/return or just explain in your own words what this effort is all about.

    There are so many ways to engage, from getting involved with your local ANCA chapter and visiting with your local legislators to meeting with the editors of your community newspapers, volunteering for supportive candidates, and building coalitions with friendly groups.

    There are as many ways to help as there are people who want to be helpful. If people need a hand, we’re here for you. Just send us an email, call, or post a note to our Facebook page.

  • Government ready to adopt zero problem relationship with Turkey

    Government ready to adopt zero problem relationship with Turkey

    By Stefanos Evripidou Published on June 15, 2011

    THE GOVERNMENT is ready to develop a “zero-problem” relationship with Turkey, and calls on Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to take the necessary steps towards a Cyprus solution following his victory in Sunday’s general elections.

    Government spokesman Stefanos Stefanou said Erdogan won a “big victory”, even if it came short of giving them a free hand in reforming the constitution.

    He said Erdogan now faced “serious problems” like the Kurdish issue, and democratic reforms which the political leadership “needs to deal with as an integral part of its EU accession course”.

    Linked with Turkey’s EU accession was the Cyprus problem, “to which Turkey should finally demonstrate a constructive approach,” said Stefanou.

    “The elections are over and Turkey must prove that it works in favour of a solution based on UN resolutions, and take the necessary actions that the European Council has called on it to do,” said Stefanou.

    “The Republic of Cyprus is ready to build a zero-problem relationship with Turkey, and have a special relationship with both Turkey and Greece. This presupposes Turkey cooperates in achieving a just, viable and functional solution on the basis of a bizonal bicommunal federation, which will restore the country’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, as well as the human rights and fundamental liberties of all people, both Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots,” he added.

    Stefanou also called on Turkey to “review the arrogant positions and policies being implemented on Turkish Cypriots”.

    Foreign Minister Marcos Kyprianou yesterday highlighted the importance of Erdogan’s next steps regarding the formation of coalitions to pass reforms as well as moves towards EU accession.

    He said if Erdogan allied with the extreme right party in Turkey, this could mean a more nationalist approach to Cyprus. At the same time, “if he wants to approach the Kurds, he may take harder steps on other issues like the Cyprus problem”.

    “Watching his first speech after the elections, we see a greater emphasis on Turkey’s leading role in the Islamic world rather than on EU issues, which shows the role he wants to play in the region, what his foreign policy priorities are,” said Kyprianou, adding that loss of interest in the country’s EU prospects was more worrying for developments in the Cyprus problem.

    President Demetris Christofias’ advisor on Turkish affairs, Nicos Moudouros yesterday highlighted that “in the last few years in Turkey, the EU’s image has been turned on its head”.

    He pointed out in 2002, Erdogan’s party was using the EU as a tool to legitimise efforts to modernise Turkey, take steps on the Cyprus problem, or even isolate the military.

    “At this moment, the truth is this tool no longer exists,” he said, adding that Turkey’s interest has shifted away from EU accession.

    With few if any accession chapters available for negotiation, due to the large number frozen, Moudouros said he expected Erdogan to take steps to rejuvenate this process.

    Meanwhile, opposition DISY leader Nicos Anastassiades took the opportunity of the Turkish elections to have a dig at the government’s policy on the Cyprus problem.

    “I have to say as long as Turkey is kept away from the dialogue, as long as we stick to and insist on the doctrine that the dialogue is supposedly Cypriot-owned, then so much will Turkey be exonerated and find ways to avoid taking on its responsibilities regarding the Cyprus problem,” he said.

    Spokesman of ruling party AKEL, Stavros Evagorou, replied: “Not true. Cypriot ownership of the talks is what acts as a bulwark against any attempt to repeat past scenarios regarding arbitration or artificial timetables, which our side does not accept.”

    via Government ready to adopt zero problem relationship with Turkey – Cyprus Mail.

  • Objectives for Turkey’s new government post elections

    Objectives for Turkey’s new government post elections

    By Hugh Pope Published on June 14, 2011

    Based on Crisis Group’s four years of reporting in Turkey, here are 10 outstanding diplomatic and political tasks we think should be tackled with determination by the new Turkish government, following the parliamentary election victory of Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) on Sunday.

    Firstly, relaunch Turkey’s EU accession process. The EU’s internal divisions, and some European politicians’ hostility to Turks joining the club, have harmed the EU’s appeal in Turkey. But some four million people of Turkish origin live in Europe, half of Turkey’s trade is with Europe, most tourists to Turkey come from Europe, NATO is the cornerstone of Turkish defence and two-thirds of Turkey’s foreign investment comes from EU states. The new Turkish government must proactively find a way to allow lifeblood back into the relationship.

    Secondly, fix Cyprus. Ankara must refocus on the strategic goal it set itself in 2004: removing the Cyprus problem from the international agenda through achieving the reunification of the island. An easy first step is to implement the Additional Protocol, namely, opening Turkey’s ports and airports to Greek Cypriot traffic, a commitment Ankara formally signed in 2005 as a condition for starting EU negotiations. The EU could have helped by allowing direct, preferential trade to Turkish Cypriots, but it did not, and Turkey must now help itself. The new government would also do well to start a real, structured dialogue with Greek Cypriot officials to give a new impetus to ongoing talks to solve the Cyprus problem.

    Thirdly, undertake broad, inclusive constitutional reform. The AKP has promised a reformist, inclusive new constitution. Changes must first reduce sources of domestic conflict, before trying potentially divisive new ideas like moving to a new presidential system. At a minimum, any marks of ethnic discrimination should be removed and freedom of expression further anchored.

    Fourthly, broaden and deepen reforms to solve the Kurdish problem. The AKP’s reaching out to Turkey’s approximately 15 per cent Kurdish community, helped put a long-term settlement of the Kurdish problem within reach. The new government must broaden and deepen this initiative, offering permission to towns and villages to revert to their original names, more local government, and the right to bilingual education.

    Fifthly, sustain Turkey’s engagement in the Middle East. The revolts in the Arab world set back Turkey’s hopes of rapid progress to a more stable, prosperous neighbourhood, but Ankara should continue to work towards Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s ”zero problem” foreign policy goals: a better-governed, more interdependent region with more efficient borders, integrated infrastructure, visa-free travel and free trade.

    Sixthly, seek opportunities to normalise relations with Israel. A voyage planned by a new international flotilla to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza at the end of June will pose an early test for the new government, given that several Turkish NGO members will be among those sailing. Turkey should seek chances to normalise relations with Israel in the consciousness that its international leverage is most effective when it has productive ties with all parties in the region.

    Seventhly, seize any chance to normalise relations with Armenia. Two ground-breaking protocols signed between Turkey and Armenia in 2009 on normalizing relations have floundered on a Turkish condition that Armenia first withdraw from at least some Azerbaijani territory occupied around Nagorno-Karabakh. The new Turkish government should seize on any breakthrough to find ways to implement the protocols on re-opening the Armenian border and establishing diplomatic relations.

    Eighthly, finesse the Aegean Sea dispute to resolve Turkey’s 40 year-old territorial disputes with neighbouring Greece over the Aegean Sea. Ankara and Athens have done much to consolidate normalisation since 1999. Turkey’s new government can help by preparing the rhetorical ground for compromise, and, more practically, by eliminating Turkish military flights over inhabited Greek islands, demonstrating that theoretical Aegean disputes can be talked about rather than fought over.

    Ninthly, seek long-term domestic improvements. In the first two terms in office, the AKP government registered remarkable progress. Torture almost disappeared from Turkish jails, single-party government brought more policy consistency and better municipalities have brightened the face of most Turkish cities. The new government must now prioritise reform of the judiciary, the education system, women’s rights and freedom of expression.

    Tenthly, continue to widen democratic participation. The democratic legitimacy of Turkey’s elections make it the stand-out country in the region. Now, political parties need to move to a system that is more bottom-up and less top-down, ending the scandalously low participation of women in politics, and encouraging more youth to join parties and work their way up them. Finally, parliamentary regulations need to be reformed to allow more efficient legislation drafting and to win greater public trust in the assembly’s workings.

    Hugh Pope is Turkey/Cyprus Project director for the Crisis Group. You can read the full version of this editorial here: .

  • Uproar as Turkey bans students from Cyprus

    Uproar as Turkey bans students from Cyprus

    turkish cypriot children4A TURKISH decree banning Turkish Cypriot students who study at schools in the government controlled areas from applying to universities there was yesterday slammed by local educationalists.

    “Students who study in the south will definitely not benefit from this new ruling,” the north’s ‘education minister’ Kemal Durust said, adding: “It was already one of our aims to discourage students from going to schools in the south”.

    However, head of the Turkish Cypriot teachers union (KTOS) Sener Elcil slammed the ruling as “racist and discriminatory”.

    The decree by the Turkish Higher Education Authority (YOK) in Ankara was issued on May 25, but was only announced by the north’s ‘education ministry’ earlier this week. According to the ruling, if the student is a ‘citizen’ of the ‘TRNC’ but has passed his or her exams in the government-controlled areas of Cyprus, their application will not be accepted.

    On a more positive note, students who have passed British GCEs and A levels will, for the first time, be formally accepted by 79 state-run universities across Turkey. Previously, students were required to have taken the centralised Turkish university entrance exams.

    “By making it a condition that students study in the north, they are discriminating against students who choose to study in the south,” Elcil said, adding that the ruling was part of Turkey’s “colonialist” approach to the north.

    “Turkey is setting up its schools here and taking over ours; the intention is clear”.

    Former head of educational planning in the north Hasan Alicik also attacked the ruling by saying, “Are children who study in the south not our citizens? How can we discriminate against our own people in such a way?”

    Alicik added that many valuable members of the Turkish Cypriot community were graduates of the English School in Nicosia and other educational establishments in the south. He asked under what rationale Turkish universities could accept a Greek Cypriot with A levels from a school south of the Green Line, but not a Turkish Cypriot one.

    “This ruling is purely political,” he concluded.

    Parent of a former Turkish Cypriot student at the English School in south Nicosia Hilmi Cavli told the Cyprus Mail he found the ruling “inhumane”.

    “If they are going to strip people of their rights in this way, they should relieve them of their responsibilities such as national service,” he said. “This is unfair and a double standard”.

    Cavli added that the reason he sent his son, who now studies at Oxford University, to the English School was that he was a former student of the school and because he believed it offered a high quality of education.

    “It was expensive and problematic to send our son to school in the south, but there simply isn’t a school of that caliber in the north,” he said, adding: “If they want to stop children going to schools in the south they would do better to open high quality schools in the north, rather than trying to do it with discriminatory laws”.

    via Uproar as Turkey bans students from Cyprus – Cyprus Mail.

  • On the Beach in Cyprus and Turkey – UK Travel Deals

    On the Beach in Cyprus and Turkey – UK Travel Deals

    News from one of Britain’s leading seaside getaway OTA’s, On the Beach, reveals Cyprus beaches as one of this Spring’s most popular attractions for UK travelers. According to figures from Cyprus, some 200,000 people bathed in the azure waters off Cyprus in April alone.

    Le Fleuri Restaurant at Le Meridien Limassol Spa & Resort, CyprusLe Fleuri Restaurant at Le Meridien Limassol Spa & Resort, Cyprus

    Cyprus Looking Good

    A significant rise in overall tourism were up as well, but UK, German, and Russian travelers made up the lion’s share of visits. Alistair Daly, Marketing Director of On the Beach, had this to say about the stats:

    “During the winter and spring holiday seasons we saw a large number of Brits book holidays to Cyprus. This destination is always quite popular, yet it has certainly seen a surge in 2011, which we expect to continue throughout the summer. Indeed, our customers continue to place Cyprus at the top of their wish lists.”

    Sparkling SeaSparkling Sea at Cyprus – Courtesy Charles Pieters

    Cyprus is emerging as yet another developed destination for those seeking not only sun and fun, but the nightlife the jet set have become addicted to at places like Ibiza and others around the Med. Set amid the ruins of antiquity, and add in a “newness factor” for many travelers, and Cyprus clearly represents a fresh take on beach combing frolic.

     

    Spa at Gold City Tourism ComplexSpa at Gold City Tourism Complex – Courtesy the hotel

    Argo Quick Deals

    For more information about On the Beach and this news, consult the original press release here. And if you are interested in more information about travel to the wonderful Island of Cyprus, we recommend you check out the official Cyprus tourism site here. By way of an Argo spotlight of On the Beach deals, we did an Argo quick booking test for Turkey. The result for On the Beach was actually fairly amazing considering we chose 5 star luxury and full board and flight. £917.25 is an astonishing deal for two people to take off for Antalya for a week. We include images from the hotel, the Gold City Tourism Complex.

     

    Lagoon Pool of Le Meridien Limassol by Smolyarchuk IrinaLagoon Pool of Le Meridien Limassol by Smolyarchuk Irina – hotel photo contest image

    And for a sure enough 5 star luxury getaway, we put together a Cyprus vacation at Le Meridien Limassol Spa and Resort, everything included (just bring the flip flops) for £2,438.78 – all things considered, dirt cheap for a serious pampering.  We suggest you do your own research and comparisons at On the Beach and elsewhere of course, but as a last minute booking destination, this service seems top notch.

    Late summer sun at GirneLate summer sun at Girne – Courtesy Ulrich Kersting

  • Israel may recognise Ottoman Armenian genocide

    Israel may recognise Ottoman Armenian genocide

    TEL AVIV // A plan by Israel’s parliamentary speaker to move the country closer to recognising the 1915 killing of Armenians by Ottoman forces as genocide worries foreign ministry officials because it threatens to worsen ties with Turkey.

    Members of the Jerusalem Armenian community hold placards as they march during commemorations for the 96th anniversary of mass killings of their ancestors under the Ottoman Empire, at Jaffa Gate in Jerusalem's Old City. Gali Tibbon / AFP Photo
    Members of the Jerusalem Armenian community hold placards as they march during commemorations for the 96th anniversary of mass killings of their ancestors under the Ottoman Empire, at Jaffa Gate in Jerusalem's Old City. Gali Tibbon / AFP Photo

    The decision by Reuven Rivlin, a member of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party, is a break with the years-long Israeli policy to take no stance on the massacre.

    On Monday, Mr Rivlin said that the 120-member parliament will begin holding an annual session to mark the massacre.

    “It’s my duty as a Jew and an Israeli to recognise the tragedies of other nations,” said Mr Rivlin, in an indirect reference to the Holocaust. “Diplomatic considerations, as considerable as they are, will not allow us to deny the catastrophe of others.”

    Israel, like the US, has never acknowledged that the massacre of up to 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Turks was genocide, saying that the historical dispute should be settled between Turkey and Armenia. Its long-held view, however, is widely attributed to its desire to maintain good relations with Turkey, which has vehemently denied that genocide had taken place.

    The Israeli stance has been supported for years by pro-Israel Jewish organisations in the US, which have pressured the US Congress and successive presidents to defeat congressional resolutions marking the killing of the Armenians. Turkey is a key ally that has supported the US in confrontations from Afghanistan to Iran.

    Mr Rivlin’s move to conduct an event that would publicly question Turkey’s denial is probably a result of the deteriorating ties between Israel and Turkey.

    The allies’ relations have suffered amid Turkey’s growing condemnation of the Jewish state’s approach towards the Palestinians and after Israeli commandos’ killing of nine Turkish activists aboard a Gaza-bound flotilla last year.

    Yossi Sarid, a former education minister, said the parliament’s approval of Mr Rivlin’s initiative was due to Israel’s anger at Turkey’s support of an upcoming international aid flotilla that aims to break Israel’s blockade of Gaza’s airspace, territorial waters and all but one of its border crossings.

    “The Israelis no longer favour the Turks and are willing to give up the charms and temptations of Antalya,” he wrote in the Haaretz newspaper yesterday, referring to the Turkish resort city that in the past was a major tourism destination for Israelis.

    Mr Rivlin’s announcement has also stirred speculation in the Israeli and Turkish press that Israel intended to pressure Turkey to stop the Gaza-bound flotilla expected as soon as this month.

    On Monday, a coalition of 22 activist groups aiming to take part in the new flotilla said at a news conference aboard the Turkish-flagged Mavi Marmara, the ship on which last year’s confrontation took place, that 15 ships would be in the new convoy.

    Their briefing came a day after Turkey’s foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, warned Israel against launching another raid of the aid flotilla. “We are sending a clear message to all those concerned: the same tragedy should not be repeated again,” he told the Reuters news agency.

    Muslim Turkey accepts that as many as 1.5 million Christian Armenians were killed by Ottoman forces but denies the act amounted to genocide, a term employed by many Western historians and some foreign parliaments.

    The Israeli government has expressed opposition to Mr Rivlin’s initiative, with Danny Ayalon, deputy foreign minister and a member of the ultranationalist Yisrael Beitenu party, saying this week it was “impossible” for Israel to officially recognise the genocide.

    Mr Rivlin’s announcement comes after the parliament’s vote last week to hold an open, public debate on the Armenians’ massacre.

     

    [email protected]

    via Israel may recognise Ottoman Armenian genocide – The National.