Category: Main Issues

  • Turkey Faces New Challenges  Over Cyprus

    Turkey Faces New Challenges Over Cyprus

    A protester yells at policemen during a protest by employees of soon-to-close Cyprus Popular Bank, the island’s second-largest lender, outside the Parliament in Nicosia, March 21, 2013. (photo by REUTERS/Andreas Manolis)
    Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/03/cyprus-gas-reserves-negotiation-moscow-concern-turkey.html#ixzz2ONezxHc0

    By: Semih Idiz for Al-Monitor Turkey Pulse

    Normally, an article on Cyprus would stir little excitement despite that UN peace keepers have been stationed between the Turkish North and Greek South of the Island for nearly forty years, and a formal peace has not been declared. Cyprus is not, after all, an active conflict zone, and has not been since the present status quo was established in 1974.

    About This Article

    Summary :

    Negotiations between Nicosia and Moscow over gas reserves off the southern Cyprus coast are being watched with concern by Ankara, which does not accept Nicosia’s claim to full sovereignty over these reserves, writes Semih Idiz.

    Author: Semih Idiz

    That was the year when Turkey invoked its “rights of guarantee” under international agreements and invaded Cyprus, following an Athens-led coup by Greek Cypriots aiming for union with Greece, which has been a historic red line for Turks.

    Today, however, eyes are focused on the Island and it has nothing to do with Turkey or Turkish Cypriots. By a strange quirk of history, it is the European Union that is being vilified by Greek Cypriots this time, as the ogre out to impoverish and destroy their nation.

    In fairness to them, few nations have been asked to swallow the kind of pill that they are asked to swallow. Imagine 10% of your savings being scooped off by the government against your will in order to get billions in assistance from the EU to prevent a collapse of the economy.

    What compounds the “Greek tragedy,” however, is that Greek Cypriots are damned if they do, and damned if they don’t. If they swallow the pill, they will be poorer than they were a few weeks ago. If they don’t, their economy faces total meltdown. It would be easy to surmise that there is an element of schadenfreude among Turkish officials observing these developments.

    But not all Turks feel that way. Besides Turkish officials are also following developments in Cyprus with growing concern. There are a number of reasons for this which could force the Cyprus problem to the top of the international agenda again, resulting in headaches for Ankara, too.

    One potential source of trouble is Russia, whose citizens have parked billions of Euros in offshore accounts in Greek Cyprus over the years, and who are now crying foul because they risk loosing large amounts of money. Moscow is angry at the EU and Nicosia for coming out with a bailout package behind its back, even though the matter involves the interests of tens of thousands of Russians.

    Meanwhile, the rejection of the EU’s bailout plan by the Greek Cypriot parliament has left Prime Minister Nicos Anastasiades with no choice but to turn to Moscow, “begging bowl in hand,” as some analysts are putting it, to try and secure the necessary funds from Russia for the EU’s bailout plan to come into force.

    EU officials also say Moscow has to contribute to saving the Greek Cypriot economy seeing as Russians have billions of Euros invested there. There is of course an irony here of epic proportions. The EU is relying on a non-EU power, with which it has economic and political rivalries on a number of levels, to save one of its own members.

    Ordinary Greek Cypriots must be wondering why they joined the EU if it is not there to help them on such a day, relying instead on Russia to do it. But more than one analyst suggested at the time that Greek Cypriots, who already had a relatively high standard of living, only joined the EU in 2007 because of the leverage they believed this would provide over Turkey.

    The assumption, according to these analysts, was that Ankara’s great desire for EU membership would place Nicosia in a position to dictate its terms for a settlement to the Cyprus problem. Whatever the merits of this argument, Ankara’s desire for EU membership did not make it “pliable” in the manner Greek Cypriots would have liked.

    On the other hand, while Turkey’s path to the EU may be blocked today due to the Cyprus problem, this has not prevented Turkey’s own economic take-off from happening over these past ten years. In fact, many Turks who look at Greece and Greek Cyprus today are wondering why Turkey should still push for membership in a union that is no longer enriching its members, but impoverishing them instead.

    Meanwhile, the Turkish government is following the discussions between Moscow and Nicosia with some consternation. The reason is that Nicosia appears prepared to transfer the lion’s share of the rights over the vast gas reserves said to exist off the southern coast of Cyprus to Russia, in return for financial assistance to overcome its economic crisis.

    Ankara, however, rejects sole Greek Cypriot sovereignty over these reserves, arguing that Turkish Cypriots also have a stake in them; not to mention Turkey’s own economic interests in the Eastern Mediterranean. Turkish officials have even suggested that if the Greek Cypriot administration insists on grabbing these reserves for itself, then Turkey will intervene militarily.

    What is certain, however, is that there will be complications for Turkey if Russia gains control over these reserves, leaving Ankara and Moscow at loggerheads. It is intriguing that while there is much reporting about the talks between Russia and Nicosia, few seem to be focusing on this very real problem.

    Meanwhile there are reports that Russia is not satisfied with just a share of the gas reserves, but has also asked Nicosia for military bases on the Island in order to bolster its presence in the Eastern Mediterranean, which has been weakened with the crisis in Syria, where Moscow has military bases.

    Turkish officials are said to be concerned with this prospect, too, given that Moscow has traditionally supported the Greek Cypriots at the Security Council when it comes to efforts at solving the Cyprus problem. It is unlikely, however, that Nicosia will, or even can, grant this request given that it is an EU member with links to NATO, not to mention the British sovereign bases that already exist on the Island.

    There are also those who argue that whatever Moscow’s interest in Cyprus may be, it has no interest in upsetting its ties with Turkey given the vast economic cooperation between the two countries, valued at tens of billions of dollars,  which are set to increase further and include the strategic field of energy.

    In the meantime it must be grating on the already frayed nerves of the Greek Cypriot to hear Western experts argue that succor for them may lie in Ankara, and not Moscow. Writing for the Financial Times (March 21) Timothy Ash, who is the head of emerging markets research at Standard Bank, had this to say: “Greek Cypriots must be thinking that with friends like these, (the EU and Russia, both seeking to extract their pound of flesh for any bailout) who needs enemies? Well, what if Cyprus begins to think outside the box, and what if it goes to its erstwhile enemy, Turkey, for assistance?”

    Ash suggests Turkey could provides 7 billion Euros [about $9 billion] in exchange for Greek Cyprus agreeing to the terms of the Annan peace plan for the unification of the island, which was also supported by the EU at the time, but which Greek Cypriots rejected overwhelmingly in a referendum in 2004. Turkish Cypriots had accepted the plan in their separate referendum.

    “Peace and unification on the island could then perhaps open up the energy reserves south of the island for joint exploration by Cypriot (Turkish and Greek) and Turkish companies” Ash says. This is an intriguing but highly unlikely prospect given deep rooted anti-Turkish sympathies embedded in the Greek Cypriot psyche.

    But who knows? Existential crises have concentrate minds in the past, forcing people to think in novel ways.  It is a slim possibility, but the same might happen in Cyprus, although no one should hold their breath.

    Semih İdiz is a contributing writer for Al-Monitor’s Turkey Pulse. A journalist who has been covering diplomacy and foreign-policy issues for major Turkish newspapers for 30 years, his opinion pieces can be followed in the English language Hurriyet Daily News. He can also be read in Taraf.

    Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/03/cyprus-gas-reserves-negotiation-moscow-concern-turkey.html#ixzz2OMv3e7Jn

  • Turkey May Block Use of Natural Gas for Cyprus Bailout

    Turkey May Block Use of Natural Gas for Cyprus Bailout

    Turkey could challenge any move by Cyprus to speed up offshore natural gas exploration as a way of attracting desperately needed investment to save its teetering economy, senior Turkish officials said Thursday.

    The European Union has given Cyrpus until Monday to raise the billions of euros it needs to clinch an international bailout or face the collapse of its financial system and likely exit from the euro currency zone.

    Cyprus is in talks with Moscow over possible Russian investments. Cypriot Finance Minister Michael Sarris has identified the divided island’s offshore gas riches as one area in which Russia could invest.

    “This resource belongs to two communities, and the future of this resource can’t be subject to the will of southern Cyprus alone. (We) may act against such initiatives if necessary,” one of the Turkish officials told Reuters.

    “The exclusive use of this resource … by Southern Cyprus is out of question … and unacceptable.”

    Cyprus has been divided between the Greek Cypriot south and Turkish north since a Greek coup d’etat followed by a Turkish army invasion in 1974. Efforts to reunite the island have repeatedly failed, and Turkey is the only nation to recognize the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

    Cypriot efforts to monetize as yet undeveloped offshore gas fields and position them as a vital source of energy for Europe have raised tensions with Turkey, which demands a joint approach and a share of the revenue.

    “We are discussing all legal means. … We could take the case to the European Union, but we will use all political and legal channels,” the official said without elaborating.

    Moscow would tighten its grip on European supplies if it invested in natural gas fields in the Mediterranean south of Cyprus as part of a deal to solve the island’s financial crisis.

    So far, some 200 billion cubic meters of natural gas worth $80 billion at current prices have been discovered in the Aphrodite gas field in Cypriot waters, although the figures still have to be audited.

    That would be enough to cover around 40 percent of the European Union’s annual gas consumption.

    Cyprus hopes to start exporting in 2018, but energy analysts say extracting the gas will prove costly and slow, and Cypriot supplies may run into a global glut, with shale gas plentiful by then in North America, Russia and even Europe.

    via Turkey May Block Use of Natural Gas for Cyprus Bailout.

  • Guest post: Turkey to the rescue?

    Guest post: Turkey to the rescue?

    By Timothy Ash of Standard Bank

    Greek Cypriots must be thinking that with friends like these (the EU and Russia, both seeking to extract their pound of flesh for any bail-out), who needs enemies?

    Well, what if Cyprus begins to think outside the box, and what if it goes to its erstwhile enemy, Turkey, for assistance?

    How about this: Turkey provides €7bn in assistance, saving Cypriot savers from the chop in exchange for Cyprus agreeing to the terms of the 2004 Annan peace plan for the unification of the island.

    In return for its cash, Turkey would get agreement on the peace plan it backed back in 2004 and which was supported then by two thirds of Turkish Cypriots in an island-wide referendum. Admittedly, it was rejected by three quarters of Greek Cypriots but this was in no small part due to the intransigence of the then Papadopoulos administration.

    By so doing, Turkey would save a very big chunk of the substantial aid (and significant military spending) it pumps into northern Cyprus every year, and the north would gain access to EU structural funds. Turkey would also remove a big Achilles heel in terms of its own EU accession bid, stalled by disagreement over the divided island.

    Turkey would win huge international kudos for doing the right thing by helping a neighbour in need. And it would send a clear message to some of its foes in core continental Europe that Turkey has indeed matured and is worthy of a place at the heart of Europe – though after developments this week I am not sure that Europe would be worthy of Turkey.

    Any financial assistance could be backed by stakes in the Cypriot banks – although, as the Russian banks seem to be indicating, these may offer little value given the holes in their balance sheets.

    Peace and unification on the island could then perhaps open up the energy reserves south of the island for joint exploration by Cypriot (Turkish and Greek) and Turkish companies. Remember here that perhaps Turkey’s biggest current strategic priority is to reduce its dependency on energy imports, which cost the country around $55bn a year, and in 2012 came in larger than the country’s current account deficit (equal to 6 to 7 per cent of GDP).

    For Turkey, €7bn is relatively small change, equivalent to just over 1 per cent of GDP, especially when set against the “peace dividend” which could come with the unification of the island, progress on EU accession and the associated “feel good factor” for the economy and business more generally, alongside the potential energy dividend. The Turkish treasury has ample funds in its cash reserves and could easily tap markets for an injection into Cyprus, perhaps borrowing under a new Cyprus-Turkey friendship bond programme, for which the likely cost would be only 4 to 4.5 per cent at most. The US would no doubt be happy, as it would remove one further regional dispute in a tricky region, and it would also counter talk of Russia moving its naval base in Syria to Cyprus in exchange for a bail-out.

    In times of crisis, you really find out who your friends are. The hope is that the neighbours will rally around. On the Kurdish problem, prime minister Erdogan seems willing to take a (huge) gamble for peace. The current crisis in the Republic of Cyprus could present a similar opportunity for peace and prosperity for both sides.

    Timothy Ash is head of emerging markets research ex-Africa at Standard Bank. A version of this post was issued as a note to clients on Thursday.

    via Guest post: Turkey to the rescue? | beyondbrics.

  • Cyprus Crisis And Russia Turkey Tensions

    Cyprus Crisis And Russia Turkey Tensions

    Moscow and Cyprus are still negotiating terms of a potential bailout.

    crimean-war

    Most will hail the crisis’s receding if a deal is reached.

    But for Turkey, seeing Cyprus and Russia growing even closer together could revive age-old hostilities between Moscow and Istanbul.

    Depending on how far back you want to go, the love between the two was first lost upon Mehmed II’s sacking of Constantinople — capital of Christian Orthodoxy — in 1453.

    Then came the Crimean war in the 1850s, which pitted Russia against the Ottoman Empire (as well as France and Britain) over the rights of Christians in the Middle East.

    And during the Cold War, Turkey became a staunch ally of the U.S.

    Relations have improved more recently, especially under President Medvedev.

    Google MapsBut the conflict that engulfed Cyprus in the ’70s — which saw Turkey invade the island to prevent it from coming under Orthodox Greece’s influence — has never actually ended.

    To this day, a small enclave calls itself “The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus” and is recognized by Turkey (though they’re the only ones who do so). As recently as 2001, Turkey was threatening to annex the north if Cyprus joined the EU.

    We already know Russians do a lot of business on the island, so any more intimate relations between the two countries — like a naval base — shouldn’t really come as a surprise.

    But that kind of move will not likely sit well in Istabul.

    via Cyprus Crisis And Russia Turkey Tensions – Business Insider.

  • STATE OF TENNESEE RECOGNIZED THE KHOJALY MASSACRE

    STATE OF TENNESEE RECOGNIZED THE KHOJALY MASSACRE

    THANK TENNESSEE STATE LAWMAKERS FOR HOUSE RESOLUTION 48
    Commemorating the 21st anniversary of the Khojaly Massacre
      

    Click to send your Pax Turcica Capwiz letter in less than a minute

    We are pleased to inform that on March 18, 2013, the U.S. State of Tennessee legislature adopted House Resolution 48 introduced by Representative Joe Towns, Jr. to commemorate the 21st anniversary of the Khojaly tragedy. Previously, this horrific 1992 massacre of Azerbaijani civilians by Armenian forces was recognized by legislatures in Massachusetts, Texas, Georgia, New Mexico, Arkansas and Oklahoma. The full text of Tennessee HR 48 is available on the State House of Representatives website.

     

     

    Take less than a minute of your time to send a Pax Turcica thank you letter to the people of Tennessee addressed to State Representative Joe Towns, Speaker Beth Harwell, and the State House Democratic and Republican leadership.

  • ETHIOPIA: THE FIRST CHRISTIAN NATION? (NOT ARMENIA) ANOTHER ARMENIAN LIE WAS EXPOSED

    ETHIOPIA: THE FIRST CHRISTIAN NATION? (NOT ARMENIA) ANOTHER ARMENIAN LIE WAS EXPOSED

    Ethiopians now also challenge the bogus Armenian claim to being the first nation to accept Christianity (in fact, the first one was the Kingdom of Edessa / Osroene, a Syriac state in the present-day Southeastern Turkey).

    habesisitan

    By Brendan Pringle
    International Business Times | March 04 2013 10:19 AM
    For centuries, historians have widely accepted the argument that Armenia was the first Christian nation. This important claim has become a source of national pride for Armenians and has remained virtually undisputed for centuries — until now.

    Armenians will likely be up at arms when they learn that a new book — “Abyssinian Christianity: The First Christian Nation?” — is challenging their claim, presenting the possibility that Abyssinia (modern-day Ethiopia and Eritrea) was the first Christian nation.
    To be sure, the book doesn’t conclusively assert that Ethiopia was the first nation to adopt Christianity as its state religion. However, it will surely challenge the confidence of modern Church historians with groundbreaking evidence.

    The Weakness of Armenia’s Claim
    Armenia’s claim on this meaningful title is primarily based upon the celebrated fifth century work of Agathangelos titled “The History of the Armenians.” In it, he says as an eyewitness that after the Armenian King Trdat III was baptized (c. 301/314 A.D.) by St. Gregory the Illuminator, he decreed Christianity was the state religion.
    The truth is that we have no solid proof to support this account. We are forced to rely solely on the authenticity of Agathangelos and his contemporaries. These historians try to liken the conversion of Trdat III to that of Constantine’s, even though the baptism of Constantine is questionable, as was his own personal “conversion.”
    Michael Richard Jackson Bonner, a linguist at Oxford University, contends that Agathangelos had a clear agenda. He “wished to stress the independence and uniqueness of the Armenian church … [and The History] is a tendentious compilation, which has expanded and elaborated earlier traditions … and greatly increased the prestige of the See of the patriarchs of the fifth century.”
    In addition, recent studies date “The History of the Armenians” to c. 450 A.D., making it impossible for Agathangelos to have been an eyewitness. If Armenia’s claim is based on nothing more than oral history, how can it hold any more credibility than Ethiopia’s own Christian legends?
    As for the spread of Christianity in Armenia, historian Peter Brown argued that “Armenia became a nominally Christian kingdom” after the king’s baptism. The Armenian people in fact “did not receive Christianity with understanding … and under duress.”
    Where Ethiopia Differs
    The Acts of the Apostles describe the baptism of an Ethiopian eunuch shortly after the death of Christ. Eusebius of Caesaria, the first church historian, in his “Ecclesiastical History,” further tells of how the eunuch returned to diffuse the Christian teachings in his native land shortly after the Resurrection and prior to the arrival of the Apostle Matthew.
    Before the Ethiopian king Ezana, (whose kingdom was then called Aksum) embraced Christianity for himself and decreed it for his kingdom (c. 330 A.D.), his nation had already constituted a large number of Christians.
    During the persecutions of Diocletian (284-305 A.D.), commerce ports like Adulis, along the Red Sea, served as a sanctuary for Christians in exile and the Christian faith began to grow rapidly in these areas. Pagans still comprised the religious majority at this time, but as historian Kevin O’Mahoney argued, the Christian faith first took root in “the upper social classes and gradually spread downwards to become the religion of the people.”
    Such was the religious climate that St. Frumentius faced when his ship was pillaged by the native Ethiopians at the start of the fourth century A.D. The Ethiopian king spared his life, and Frumentius received a place of honor at the royal court. In this position, he nourished the Christian faith by locating Christians and helping them find places of worship. He also educated the king’s heir, Ezana, and converted him to Christianity.
    For this people, Ezana’s conversion became a public conversion for Aksum, and Christianity continued to serve as a point of reference for the nation. Unlike the case of Armenia, we have tangible proof of this conversion:
    Historians have uncovered a public acknowledgement of the Christian faith from Ezana. Also, coins bearing Ezana’s image depict the cross after his conversion.
    As the authors of “Abyssinian Christianity” conclude, “the promotion of the new faith developed into the single point of personal and public identification and unity for Abyssinians.” Christianity became the centralizing force behind the Ethiopian empire, which endured through 1974, despite religious and political threats from all sides.
    Can a nation only become Christian if there is an official decree from its sovereign? If that were the case, then the Kingdom of Edessa would be the first Christian city-state (in modern terms) in c. 218. As we see with Abyssinia, and Israel before it, a nation isn’t confined to political boundaries. Rather, it is defined by a group of people who share a common heritage.
    For the Ethiopians, this shared heritage was Christianity.
    Brendan Pringle is a graduate of the National Journalism Center and the editor of “Abyssinian Christianity: The First Christian Nation?” For more details about the book, visit www.bp-editing.com.