Category: Main Issues

  • Union of Enlighteners of Turkic World Established

    Union of Enlighteners of Turkic World Established

    Kazakhstan, Almaty, 11 July /corr. Trend News R.Mashadihasanli / Constituent conference of Union of Enlighteners of Turkic World took place in Almaty.
    The conference was attended by the representatives of Turkey, Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkish Republic of North Cyprus. Academician Haji Kheyrulla was elected as the Chairman of the Union, and the professor of Gazi University of Turkey, Ismet Chetin, candidate of philological sciences, editor-in-chief of the newspapers TURKEL and Veten, Ramiz Mashadihasanli and professor Murat Tuzunkhan ( Turkish Republic of North Cyprus) were elected deputy chairman.

    The goal of establishing the Union of the Enlighteners of Turkic World is to combine world-known people, being engaged in history, literature, science and skill, to strengthen relations between the Turkic-speaking states.

    The correspondent can be contacted at: trend@trend.az

    Source: trendaz.com, 11.07.08

     

     

  • Dashnaks Leader Uneasy Over Armenian Overtures To Turkey

    Dashnaks Leader Uneasy Over Armenian Overtures To Turkey

    Rustamian

    By Anna Saghabalian

    A leader of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun) reiterated on Wednesday his party’s misgivings and unease about President Serzh Sarkisian’s diplomatic overtures to Turkey.

    Armen Rustamian warned that Turkish President Abdullah Gul will face street protests by Dashnaktsutyun if he accepts Sarkisian’s invitation to visit Yerevan and watch the first-ever match between the two countries’ national soccer teams to be played on September 6.

    “We must not allow Turkey to create an illusion about the existence of relations [with Armenia,]” he told journalists. “This is all it wants.”

    Rustamian said Dashnaktsutyun, which is a junior partner in Armenia’s governing coalition, would “remind” Gul of the 1915 Armenian genocide and other problems existing between the two nations. “We have the right to express our protest within the civilized norms,” he said. “We are currently thinking about what forms it could take.”

    The Armenian and Turkish governments raised new hopes for the normalization of the historically strained relations between their nations shortly after Sarkisian took over as Armenia’s new president in April. Official Yerevan responded positively to Ankara’s offer of a “dialogue.” As well as inviting Gul to pay a first-ever visit to Armenia by a Turkish head of state, Sarkisian signaled last month his government’s readiness to agree, in principle, to the creation of a Turkish-Armenian commission of historians that would study the mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire.

    Sarkisian’s predecessor, Robert Kocharian, rejected the idea floated by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in 2005, saying that the highly sensitive issue must be addressed by the two governments, rather than historians. In an interview late last month, Kocharian faulted Sarkisian for extending the extraordinary invitation to Gul welcomed by the United States.

    Rustamian agreed with Kocharian’s stance, while playing down the significance of the invitation. “If I were the president I wouldn’t invite him,” he said.

    Rustamian, who also chairs the Armenian parliament’s foreign relations committee, insisted at the same time that there are no “strategic differences” within Armenia’s leadership on how to improve relations with Turkey.

    Successive Armenian governments have stood for an unconditional normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations, saying that the two countries should establish diplomatic relations and open their border before tackling their outstanding problems. Dashnaktsutyun has traditionally favored a harder line that makes Turkish recognition of the genocide a necessary condition for a Turkish-Armenian rapprochement.

    (Photolur photo: Armen Rustamian.) 

    Wednesday 23, July 2008

  • FLORIDA UNFLORIDA UNIVERSITESI OGRENCILERI WEB SITESINDE YUSUF HALACOGLU

    FLORIDA UNFLORIDA UNIVERSITESI OGRENCILERI WEB SITESINDE YUSUF HALACOGLU

    Bu Güzel Sohbeti Dinlemek İçin

    FLORIDA TURK RADYOSU bugun onemli bir ismi Türk Tarih Kurumu Başkanı VE Turkish Forum danisma kurulu Uyesi Prof.Dr.Yusuf Halaçoğlunu agirladi.

    Bu programla Amerikadaki sessiz yaz sezonu aniden canlandi..!

    Sayin Halacoglu ile birebir konuşmadan önce okadar çok telefonlar ve mesajlar aldımki işin doğrusu program öncesi biraz tedirgindim, bu programi Doğukan Manço ile birlikte sunmaya karar verdik ve karşımıza okadar mütevazı o kadar hoş bir insan çıktı’kı, benim tarihten bu yana büyük hayranlık duyduğum bazı isimler vardır bu isimlere bugün bir isim daha eklendi “Yusuf Halaçoğlu”

    Program ilerledikçe sayın Halaçoğlu’nun rahmetli Barış Manço ile yakın görüştükleri ortaya çıktı ayni zamanda Turk tarihini incelemek uzere 63 ayri ulkede film cekimleri yapmayai planladiklarini fakat Baris Manco’nun vefati ile bu projenin rafa kaldirildigini ogrendik, Doğukan Manço Yusuf Halaçoğlu’nu, çocukluk yıllarından hatırladı ve cok guzel bir ani paylasimi yaşandı.

    Sayın Halaçoğlu beklediğimizin dışında o kadar hoşgörü sahibiymiş ki sonradan farkettik kendisine biraz da çekinerek bir soru sorduk, “size sivri dilli diyenler var, öyle misiniz?” sorumuza..! bulundugum mevki tamamen dogrulari soylememi gerektiren bir mevki, buda bazen bu soylentilere sebep olabiliyor, diye cevap verdi. Sözde Ermeni Sorunu’ ile ilgili konuşmasından sonra ise espriyle karışık “fazla mı ciddi oldum yine yoksa” şeklinde nükte yapmaktan da kendini alamadı.

    Pogram sirasinda Ermeni olaylarinin kabul edilmesi durumunda nelerle karsilasabiliriz sorusuna “bu soruyu akliniza bile getirmeyin boyle birsey asla soz konusu degil” diye cevap vermesi cok guzledi.

    Sevgili okurlar, Türkiye’de, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’ün aslında tam da bu karanlık günlerde bize ışık tutması için kurduğu en önemli kurumun TTK’nın başında en güvenilir bilim adamlarından birisi bulunuyor. Prof. Dr. YUSUF HALACOGLU, bunu düşününce bile içimiz rahatlıyor

    Bu degerli konugumuzdan sonra bu hafta 20 Temmuz pazar gunu aksam 7 de FLORIDA TURK RADYOSU’nda yine cok onemli bir konuk agirlanacak bu onemli konugumuz Turk Dil Kurumu Baskani Prof.Dr.SUKRU HALUK AKALIN

    Pazar gunu bu guzel programla FlORIDA TURK RADYOSU’nda hepbirlikte olmak dilegi ile…….

    www.floridaturkradyosu.com

    Sevi
    sevisari@yahoo.com

  • Can Football Diplomacy Lead To Peace?

    Can Football Diplomacy Lead To Peace?

    Can Football Diplomacy Lead To Peace?

     

    Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian

    July 16, 2008
    By Brian Whitmore

     

    Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian has decided to try a little “football diplomacy” to defuse longstanding tensions with neighboring Turkey.

    During a visit to Moscow in June, Sarkisian made waves by publicly announcing that he would like his Turkish counterpart, Abdullah Gul, to come to Yerevan to watch a World Cup qualifying soccer match between the two countries in September.

    The Armenian leader repeated the invitation in a commentary titled “We Are Ready To Talk To Turkey,” published in the U.S. daily “The Wall Street Journal” on July 9.

    “There is no real alternative to the establishment of normal diplomatic relations between our countries,” Sarkisian wrote. “It is my hope that both of our governments can pass through the threshold to this new open door.”

    The Turkish Foreign Ministry says it is “studying” the proposal.

    The sports element lends Sarkisian’s overture a tantalizing historical appeal, evoking memories of the “ping-pong diplomacy” of the 1970s — when an exchange of table-tennis teams helped set the stage for eventual rapprochement between the United States and China.

    But what caused many observers to wonder aloud whether the current initiative might just lead to something serious was Russia’s apparent willingness to throw its diplomatic weight behind the idea — and grab the mantle on an issue where U.S. diplomats have, until now, played the leading role.

    “Russian diplomats have been given the task of moving beyond the American initiative to normalize Armenian-Turkish relations,” David Hovhannisyan, a former Armenian diplomat and Yerevan-based political analyst, says.

    Hovhannisyan adds that it is highly unlikely that Sarkisian would have made his dramatic gesture in Moscow without his host’s consent. Moreover, just a week after Sarkisian’s visit to Moscow, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov traveled to Istanbul, with the Armenia issue reportedly part of his agenda.

    Adding to the air of anticipation, Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian flew to Washington for an official visit this week.

    “Moscow has developed a good relationship with Ankara, and being able to continue to develop that relationship, without complications emanating from its support for Yerevan, would be something that I think the Russian government would welcome,” says Bulent Aliriza, director of the Turkey Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

    Mosaic Of Distrust

    Turkey’s frosty relations with Armenia, however, are part of a larger mosaic of deep animosities, historical grievances, and bitter tensions that have long plagued the region.

    Turkey was among the first countries to recognize Armenian independence after the breakup of the Soviet Union. But when Armenian forces occupied Azerbaijan’s Nagorno-Karabakh region, Ankara broke off diplomatic ties with Yerevan and closed its border with Armenia.

    Most analysts say it is highly unlikely that Turkey would make any moves toward rapprochement with Armenia without Azerbaijan’s consent — making Armenian-Turkish reconciliation tightly bound to a settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.

    Moreover, Yerevan’s claim that the mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I constitutes genocide is angrily rejected by Turkey and continues to be a major roadblock in normalizing relations. In an attempt to entice Istanbul, Sarkisian has offered to have a joint commission of Armenian and Turkish scholars investigate the claims.

    Observers in Turkey nevertheless remain skeptical.

     

    Turkey’s president, Abdullah Gul

    “It looks like Armenia seriously wants to negotiate, but as far as we see there is no change in their position on Karabakh or on questions of Turkey’s territorial integrity,” Omer Lutem, TURKISHFORUM ADVISORY BOARD MEMEER and  head of the Armenia department at the Istanbul-based Eurasian Strategic Research Center told RFE/RL’s Azerbaijani Service in a recent interview. “Will they give up on their claims of genocide, or will they fight? Will they make changes or not? It is not clear. If there will not be any changes, how will the question be resolved?”

    Alizira agreed that untangling this web and resolving these issues would prove to be a complicated task. “There have been a lot of false dawns on this front,” he said.

    But some observers say that the politics of the region at this particular time gives Moscow plenty of incentives to try.

    Moscow’s Motives

    Russia has been steadily losing influence in the South Caucasus in recent years. Relations with Georgia are embroiled in deep hostility over the pro-Moscow separatist regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and over Tbilisi’s bid to join NATO. Azerbaijan, whose energy wealth grants it a degree of independence from Moscow, is increasingly looking West as well.

    Russia maintains a large degree of influence in Armenia, where it maintains a military base and has invested heavily — particularly in the energy sector.

    Alexander Iskandarian, director of Caucasus Media Institute in Yerevan, calls Armenia “Russia’s only trusted partner in the South Caucasus,” adding that it is not in Russia’s interests to have such an ally isolated, with its borders with Turkey and Azerbaijan closed. Moreover, Russian firms investing in Armenia badly want the border opened so they can use the country as a springboard to expand into markets throughout the region and beyond.

    “When Russia was in a different position in the South Caucasus, the fact that Armenia was so isolated wasn’t so troublesome. Since the situation has changed, Russia is less satisfied with this situation,” Iskandarian says. “If the road to Turkey were open, and it will open if there would be normal diplomatic relations, Russian capital here could use this. It could go to the Turkish market, export goods and services. And Russian capital and Russian investment in Armenia is not small. This opens possibilities and makes entry into the Southern European and Middle Eastern markets cheaper.”

    Total Russian investment in Armenia reached $1.2 billion this year. A spin-off company of Russia’s former electricity monopoly Unified Energy Systems operates Armenia’s only nuclear power plant and would like to use Armenia’s grid to sell power to Turkey and elsewhere in the region. The state-controlled natural-gas monopoly Gazprom owns a majority stake in Armenia’s gas-distribution network. Russian investment is also heavy in the banking and gaming sectors.

    Questions remain, however, about whether Russia has enough over Turkey and Armenia to broker a deal.

    “I don’t think that they have much leverage on the Turkish side of the fence, and I’m not sure how much leverage they have on the Armenian side of the fence,” Aliriza says. “Secondly, the Russian-Turkish relationship, which is so important to Moscow and to Ankara for so many reasons, is not going to be a function of the Turkish-Armenian relationship from Moscow’s point of view.”

     

  • Appo Jabarian Speaks in Lebanon on:”The Armenian Factor in the American Media”

    Appo Jabarian Speaks in Lebanon on:”The Armenian Factor in the American Media”

    Appo Jabarian Speaks in Lebanon on:
    “The Armenian Factor in the American Media”

     
    By Appo JABARIAN
    Executive Publisher/Managing Editor
    USA ARMENIAN LIFE Magazine
     
    appojabarian@gmail.com
     
    My recent journey to Lebanon, the country of eternal Cedars and my birthplace, was highlighted by both personal and community events.
     
    My December 31, 2006 trip to Lebanon took place after my older brother Vatché suddenly passed away at the age of 53, because of a heart attack. My July 2008 trip to Lebanon was to celebrate the academic success of Vatché’s daughter, my niece, Rita.
     
    Back in mid-2007, when Rita informed me of her anticipated graduation from Haigazian University of Beirut, one of the top ten universities in Middle East, I promised myself to be there and congratulate her in person. Be there, I did!
     
    During my six-day stay, I visited – alas – a limited number of colleagues. One of my destinations was a pilgrimage to Bikfaya-based summer Seat of His Holiness Aram I, the Catholicos of The Great House of Cilicia.
    I also met with several special individuals, including Honorable Antoine Daher and his family. Mr. Daher is my former teacher at St. Paul College – College de Bzommar in Beirut in early 1970’s. He is now the Presiding Judge of Lebanon’s Northern District. Since my graduation from CDB and on my frequent visits to Lebanon I have made a special point to see him always remembering how much he influenced me during my teen years. It is with gratitude that I remember how he shared with his students his invaluable knowledge of academic and intellectual discipline. During his tenure at CDB, Mr. – now President – Daher used to study law at the St. Joseph University.
     
    Next, I visited Shahan Kandaharian, the dynamic Managing Editor of Aztag daily who proposed that I present a report on the Armenian factor in the American media during a town hall meeting to be held on my fourth day in Lebanon. I accepted the invitation. The impromptu mini-conference took place as planned. Below is the news report published in Aztag daily on July 8:
     
    The Aztag Daily of Lebanon presented its 14th Town Hall meeting on Monday, July 7, at 7 p.m., at its editorial headquarters. The presentation of the topic “The Armenian Factor in the American Media,” was made by Appo Jabarian, Managing Editor of the Los Angeles-based USA Armenian Life Magazine.
     
    This impromptu conference was attended by several editors and journalists representing various political party organs and other community-based organizations. Among the guests was Ms. Satenig Karabaghtsian, the Managing Editor of Armenia-based “Menk Mer Masin” (“Us About Us”) monthly magazine.
     
    The opening remark was delivered by Jacques Hagopian, one of Aztag’s Executive Editors. He noted that the topic of the mini-conference was especially important because lately the Armenian American community and the proliferation of Armenian issues in America have become the center of attention throughout the Armenian world.
     
    Hagopian said that the main issue constituted the Armenian Cause. He then presented the main speaker’s curriculum vitae.
     
    Next, Appo Jabarian delivered his remarks. First, he saluted the spirit of cooperation and solidarity among the various members of the Armenian Lebanese media. The Armenian Lebanese community is primarily served by the official organs of the main Armenian political parties: Zartonk of Ramgavar Armenian Democratic League, Ararat of Social Democratic Hunchakian Party, and Aztag of Dashnaktsutiune-ARF. He underlined that the positive atmosphere and camaraderie in one community influences positively on others in the Diaspora.
     
    Jabarian presented the Armenian American print and electronic media listing Asbarez Daily, Nor Or Weekly, Nor Gyank-New Life (co-founded by Jabarian in 1978), The California Courier, Armenian Observer, USA Armenian Life, Hye Kiank Armenian Weekly, The Armenian Reporter, The Armenian Mirror Spectator, The Armenian Weekly, Hayrenik and several monthlies.
     
    Jabarian presented the 12 most important political challenges confronted by the Armenian Americans since 2005. Each challenge, presented by the Turkish denialist government, was handily converted to a resounding Armenian political victory. For the audience members, it was interesting to learn about the inner workings of community-wide efforts in the general context of mainstream American life.
     
    He said that 2005 proved to be a ground-breaking year because the emerging challenges gave Armenian activists and organizations the unique opportunity to regroup their resources and launch massive campaigns with unprecedented momentum.
     
    Reflecting on the issue of Armenian Genocide acknowledgment adversely affecting U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Evans’s career, Jabarian stated that the subsequent hold on Ambassador Richard Hoagland’s nomination by Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey, and the recent postponement by US Senate Foreign Relations Committee of the nomination of Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, dealt serious political setbacks to Pres. George Bush’s administration.
     
    Speaking of the Anti-Defamation League’s executive director Abraham Foxman’s denialist remarks, Jabarian said that as a result of the Armenian and mainstream American activism initiated on July 6, 2007 by David Boyajian of the Greater Boston Area, 13 Massachusetts municipalities have canceled their “No Place For Hate” partnership with Foxman’s ADL.
     
    Jabarian noted that the adoption of the congressional resolution (HR106) on the Armenian Genocide by the Foreign Relations Committee of the House of Representatives is nothing new. But the strong reaction and the anti-Armenian propaganda unleashed by the pro-Turkish neo-conservative machine and the subsequent dissemination of over ten thousand news items on the Armenian Cause in the mainstream American and international media is a far-reaching accomplishment.
     
    The speaker also reflected on PBS and the proposed insulting panel discussion giving two Turkish denialists an opportunity to plant the seed of doubt in the mind of American TV viewers on the veracity of the Armenian Genocide. The post-show was slated to be broadcast April 2006 immediately after the dissemination of a documentary on the genocide. He said a worldwide wave of protest erupted as a result of the investigative article written , the Publisher of The California Courier. As a direct result, PBS stations in the largest cities canceled the denialist post-show panel, and the denialist PBS Vice President Jacoba Atlas resigned from her position at PBS.
     
    Next, he discussed the Los Angeles Times’ denialist Managing Editor Douglas Franz fiasco. Franz had committed discrimination against a long-established and highly respected journalist Mark Arax. Franz had killed in March 2007 a front-page story on the congressional resolution on the Armenian Genocide using Arax’s Armenian background as the basis for an 11th hour decision not to publish it. The community-wide uproar erupted when Sassounian broke the story. Denialism cost Franz his job and irreparably damaged his career in journalism.
     
    Jabarian also said that almost all American presidential candidates during the 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary campaign affirmed their acknowledgment of the genocide. He underlined that this latest development is unprecedented. He emphasized that the presidential primary period is a unique opportunity to further the issues that interest the Armenian American community.
     
    He informed that the number of Armenian-related news stories appearing in the mainstream American media is on the rise and that fact is the direct result of organized continuous efforts. The speaker said that due to these recent accomplishments, the Armenian Diaspora has amplified the Armenian Factor’s growing importance on the American and the world stage.
     
    Then he said that one must benefit from the facilities offered by the worldwide web by way of mass letter-writing for the purpose of defending Armenian interests; and by employing other communication means in order to educate the international community on the Armenian Cause.
     
    In his closing remarks, Jabarian said that as Sassounian had clearly outlined in the April 24 interview with the Los Angeles Times, Armenian activists must move from recognition of the genocide to demand for Justice in order to recover what was forcibly taken away from their ancestors by Turkey. Then he answered a series of questions presented by the participants.
     
    The discussion also touched upon the Turkish lobby. In this regard, Jabarian said that the Armenian lobby was created in direct response to the existence of long-entrenched Turkey’s cronies in Washington.
     
    He outlined the orientation adopted by community-based organizations and their tactics. He stated that the Armenian American organizations pay special attention to the welfare of the Artsakh/Karabagh Republic and the further economic and social development of the 17 year-old independent Republic of Armenia.
     
    He concluded by underlining the importance of achieving progress through a “step-by-step” strategy by being vigilant about any and all anti-Armenian activities, and by swiftly countering them whenever or wherever is necessary.
     
    The conference was followed by a reception at the editorial headquarters of Aztag in Bourj Hamoud.
     
    ============================== ===========
    You received this email because you have shown interest in current events and community-related issues, therefore you are part of a recurring email distribution list.
    If you wish:
    1) To change your contact information please reply to this email and write ADDRESS CHANGE; or
    2) If you receive the same message more than once please reply to this email and write DUPLICATE(S); or
    3) To be removed from this email distribution list, please reply to this email and write REMOVE; or
    4) To add one or more e-addresses to this distribution list, please reply to this email and write ADD.
    Please allow 2-3 weeks for any update to take effect.
  • Call for papers from SAM, The Center for Strategic Research of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Call for papers from SAM, The Center for Strategic Research of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    From: strategy@mfa.gov.tr

    CALL FOR PAPER

    SAM, The Center for Strategic Research of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Turkey, invites foreign and Turkish academicians to submit manuscripts of their original paper (which haven’t been published anywhere before) for possible publication in “Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs”, Vol. XIII Number 3 Autumn 2008.

    Topic: Any subject related to international political relations, regional issues, security and defense matters.

    A note for interested contributors and a declaration form are enclosed herewith.

    An honorarium will be paid for each article published in the Quarterly.

    Due Date: 31 October 2008

    For further information write to:

    Center for Strategic Research
    Kircicegi Sok. 8/3, 06700 GOP/Ankara, Turkey
    Tel.:+90 312 446 04 35 – 436 58 12
    Fax: +90 312 445 05 84
    E-mail: strategy@mfa.gov.tr
    Web: www.sam.gov.tr

    >> Notes for Contributors

    >> Declaration Form