Category: Main Issues

  • HOLLYWOOD IS “HERE” IN ARMENIA

    HOLLYWOOD IS “HERE” IN ARMENIA

    An Interview with Braden King, Writer/Director of award-winning “HERE”

    By Appo Jabarian Executive Publisher / Managing Editor

    USA Armenian Life Magazine
    Friday,  March 13, 2009
    “HERE is a landscape obsessed road movie that chronicles a brief but intense romantic relationship between an American satellite-mapping engineer and an expatriate Armenian art photographer who impulsively decide to travel into uncharted territory, both literally and metaphorically.”   This is the description provided by HERE’s writer/director Braden King. The uncharted territory, however, goes beyond the story and characters, and is an apt description of the production itself and process of bringing this movie to life as filming begins in Armenia this summer.   HERE represents an opportunity to highlight Armenia’s uniqueness on the world stage – from its rich culture and spirited people to its beautiful topography. Having already garnered awards from top festivals, notably Cannes and Sundance, the widespread positive buzz on HERE by film enthusiasts and Armenian supporters worldwide can certainly raise international awareness of Armenia’s prime location in one of the world’s most coveted regions. HERE also represents an opportunity to create an image of Armenia as a film production destination.   The potential for new commerce and industry and of increasing Armenia’s international profile is no small task, but one that the production team of HERE seems intent on taking on. However, it is clear to all involved that achieving these goals will be partly dependent on the support by Armenians worldwide. Armenians in the twin Armenian Republics – Armenia and Artsakh (Karabagh) – and the Diaspora should take both pride in and ownership of HERE.

    Recently, USA Armenian Life Magazine’s Managing Editor Appo Jabarian conducted an interview with Braden King, Writer/Director of HERE. Richard Marshalian, a member of USA Armenian Life Magazine’s Assistant Editors’ team of “Youth Forum,” contributed to this interview.

    Zoe Kevork, Executive Producer of HERE, helped make this invaluable movie project a reality. She is a dynamic source of cooperation and communication between the writer/director of this new promising movie and the Armenian communities in U.S.A.-Europe and Armenia.   Below is the text of the interview:
    USA Armenian Life: Why the title “HERE?” Braden King: In the process of developing this film I’ve been following a kind of thread. I didn’t wake up one day with a fully formed idea, knowing I wanted to make a film about a satellite mapping engineer. It was a very slow process that had to do with wanting to make a film about a feeling – specifically, the feeling of cross-country travel; journeys I had taken across the United States and around the world by car. The title is just one part of that journey, that thread that I’m still following.
    That said, it did come very early on, the word – HERE. It came at the very beginning. The different ways in which that word – married to a film that is ultimately about ideas of place, culture, geography and how we tie all of these things together – it sort of seemed like the only fitting word. I stopped thinking long ago about what it might mean or what the specifics of it were; it was simply something that seemed to represent what this film is trying to be about.
    USA Armenian Life: Are you surprised that the word “HERE” came to the forefront in your thoughts and what made you decide to adopt it?
    KING: No, I’m not surprised. It seemed organically symbolic of what I was trying to get at. I didn’t attach a specific meaning. The word was there from the very beginning. This part of the story: Years ago, before all of this was even a vague idea in my head, I was living in a big loft apartment in Chicago with a group of musicians. I remember waking up one day and just painting the word HERE on the wall in big, black, capital letters and knowing that it was the next thing that I had to explore, the next puzzle I had to solve. I didn’t know what it meant; I didn’t know what it was; I didn’t know what it symbolized. But I knew that it was the beginning of a new journey.
    USA Armenian Life: Your character, this engineer has been to many countries. Why Armenia?
    KING: The only way I can answer that question is to talk about the way that I ended up in Armenia. I was searching for the most appropriate place for the film, the most appropriate landscape and culture for the story. I thought about places like Morocco, North Africa… I traveled to countries that are further east, various “-stan” countries where a lot of these mapping projects are going on because of natural resource exploration. And then came Armenia.
    Armenia was first suggested to me by a friend, an experimental filmmaker who lives in Toronto. We were having a discussion very early on – before there was even a script – about this vague idea I had for a film about a cartographer. And this friend, she very subtly suggested that I consider Armenia as a location.
    I didn’t pay too much attention at first, but as I continued developing the project and developing the story I would come across articles buried in the back of the paper – a photo would catch my eye. And then I was doing more research – looking at landscapes, etc. – a slow obsession started to build with this country whose national symbol – Mount Ararat – was across an international border. I started finding thematic analogies for the film that existed in the actual world. These were fascinating to me. They were things I couldn’t make up. For a film that was about questioning ideas of geography, a film about questioning ideas of orientation and even mapping – coming across these things was unbelievable.
    When I finally visited in 2004, it very quickly seemed clear that there was no more appropriate place in which to set this story. Here was this culture that existed between east and west, both culturally and literally, on the map; a country whose history has been a transition point; a country with such a gorgeous and varied landscape within such a small space – a landscape that is as magnificent as anything you would see driving across 2000 miles in America.
    Armenia is also a country that is between times – ancient history in all its monasteries and religion – and it’s also on the cusp of the future. You go there now and you see all these hundreds of construction cranes and all these new technologies everywhere. In the end, Armenia became the third co-writer on the script. The country, the culture, the people allowed me to finish this story. They finished the piece for me, in a way that was breathtaking.
    USA Armenian Life: What was the hardest part of deciding on the location (Armenia) to make this movie?
    KING: There are two answers. The first, as I’ve mentioned, is that once I arrived in 2004, I saw clearly that there was no more appropriate place to make this film.
    The second is purely practical – how do you bring a western-style production – even a relatively small one – into a country with very little film infrastructure? In our case, this has posed challenges, but nothing so severe that it made me think for a second of moving the production to another country. I believe that Armenia could be a truly international film production hub – one that could sit alongside those in places like Romania. If HERE can, in some small way, help bring that idea closer to reality, I will be very pleased. The country has so much to offer cinema and the world.
    USA Armenian Life: What would you like to see an audience member go home with after watching the movie?
    KING: I’m still thinking about your previous question – about why is this movie is set in Armenia. It got me thinking a bit about an off topic thing: how this lead character – the satellite mapping engineer – ended up in Armenia.
    After couple of years of work making notes and writing about the characters, developing the characters, and thinking about the kinds of things they would do and the things that were going on in their lives it came to the point were I wanted to find “the” place before actually writing the screenplay. I couldn’t do that without a location to pin the story to – much in the same way that the satellite imaging engineer is doing his work: to pin the map to the location. We had to do the same thing for the script. In some respects, this character could be doing his work anywhere in the world. But in this story, Armenia was the only place he could be. In order to get at the themes of this story, in order to accurately reflect them, there is no other place in this world to make this film.
    In terms of what I want an audience member to experience, that’s a difficult question. Part of me doesn’t want to define that in any way. The most magical thing that can happen in any cinematic experience – or any experience with art, period – is the feeling that happens sometimes when you leave the theater or the concert or the museum and the world outside has changed a little bit.
    One thing that I have found as I’ve been working with the industry on this project – especially in the non-Armenian community – is a fascination with the Armenian landscape and culture that is sparked by the script. What has amazed me, whether it’s with the people I’ve talked to at the Sundance labs, or with people in the industry, is how often after they’ve read the script, I’ll come in and talk about the project and there is a whole secondary conversation about how after looking over this project they have gotten on the internet and Googled different parts of Armenia and looked at what the landscape looks like. Or they’ve started to read about the culture or the country’s history. I’ve been to Armenia nine times now and it’s still an amazing place with just layers and layers to penetrate and explore. To see this same reaction happening with the potential audience, even at the script stage, is amazing. It gives me great confidence that an audience can be led along that same exciting journey of discovery that I was led along.
    USA Armenian Life: How is the story different from others that have crossed international borders? KING: That’s a good question. I think you have to go back to the reasons why Armenia was the most appropriate for this type of story to answer that question.
    You have this American satellite-mapping engineer continually coming into cultures he does not understand, yet he is defining these places in a certain way.
    Then there is this woman who comes from what I consider to be one of the most richly detailed, historic and interwoven cultures I have ever experienced, a woman who has gone in the opposite direction, who has gone to Canada, who has gone to Europe to start a new life. A woman who has this very grounded culture running through her and who is dying to assimilate now after having had all of these new experiences outside. How does she fits back in? What happens to her, and to her experiences when she comes back? The combination of these two characters and the transformations that their relationship and the journey they embark upon together leads them through – that experience allows them to see themselves in ways that they couldn’t see with anyone else. It’s what makes their relationship unique.
    Traveling with this American who doesn’t have the ties to the place that she does allows this woman to get a different perspective than I think she could get in any other way. Similarly with the American – the Armenian perspective, the Armenian sense of place is a very deep and unique one that contains ties that bind generations to that land. His questioning of his solitary life and his lack of that kind of history probably couldn’t be more acute because it takes place in this particular country. So it’s about the ways in which these two people inform each other and ultimately change each other against the backdrop of this amazing place – Armenia.
    USA Armenian Life: Is there a specific message that you are trying to relate to the audience through your depiction of the two main heroes?
    KING: I would not use the word message, I would use a word like feeling. Or experience. It’s about trying to create something that allows the viewer to experience the world – their world – in a slightly different way.   USA Armenian Life: You mentioned that you visited Armenia for the first time in 2004, you talked about he landscape, and the photographs of the land, what about the people? What was the most striking characteristic that you noticed?
    KING: We could have a day-long conversation about this topic alone. Where to begin? My experiences in Armenia have been such a gift – and I mean that not only in terms of learning about the culture, but also in seeing the landscape, and in being exposed to an endless stream of amazing people. I felt I was supported, I felt I was being taken in. I still feel that. The generosity of the country, the hospitality of the country and the Armenian people is what allowed me to complete this story. It would have been impossible without Armenia. There is no one specific answer. It’s everything.
    What I found in Armenia was a landscape and culture that had such an amazing amount to give. The overwhelming sense I had about Armenia was the incredible amount of potential the country has.
    I remember being overwhelmed on my first trip because there was so much to pack into the film – so many details, so many things I wanted to get in there. I came away feeling that there needed to be a hundred films made in Armenia. A thousand films made in Armenia. There was no way I could shoulder the responsibility alone. It was just so inspiring. I came away wanting to share as much of my experience and what I had seen as I could. But I also knew that I could ultimately only be one of many. So many more stories need to be told. This is part of why we have pledged to reserve 5% of HERE’s profits to benefit young filmmakers within Armenia. So many more films need to me made.
    USA Armenian Life: How will the production of this movie affect you personally and professionally?
    KING: The process of developing the film has already been deeply affecting. I have no idea how the actual production will affect me, but I am anxious to move on to that phase of the journey. I don’t make films with these kinds of calculations in mind. I make films because I feel I have no choice; because I feel that I have been presented with something that I have to go through, to figure out. This is what led me to Armenia and to HERE.
    For additional information and updates about HERE we encourage our readers to visit the film’s website – www.herefilm.info.

  • Pressure on Obama

    Pressure on Obama

    ADAM SCHIFF                         FRANK PALLONE

    Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:36pm EDT   By Susan Cornwell

    WASHINGTON, March 11 (Reuters) – Several U.S. lawmakers have written to President Barack Obama urging him to follow up on campaign statements and label the 1915 massacre of Armenians as genocide.

    The pressure on Obama comes ahead of an expected presidential trip to Turkey, which has warned that such declarations by the United States would damage relations.

    Turkey denies that up to 1.5 million Armenians suffered genocide at the hands of Ottoman Turks during World War One. Turkey accepts many Armenians were killed, but denies they were victims of a systematic genocide.

    Ronald Reagan was the only U.S. president to publicly call the killings genocide. Others avoided the term out of concern for the sensitivities of Turkey, an important NATO ally.

    Four members of the House of Representatives urged Obama to make a statement ahead of the 94th anniversary of the killings on April 24.

    “As a presidential candidate, you were … forthright in discussing your support for genocide recognition, saying that ‘America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian genocide and responds forcefully to all genocides.’ We agree with you completely,” the letter said.

    It was signed by Democrats Adam Schiff of California and Frank Pallone of New Jersey, and Republicans George Radanovich of California and Mark Kirk of Illinois.

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on a visit to Turkey last week, said Obama would visit “within the next month or so” in his first trip as president to a Muslim country.

    During Clinton’s visit, Foreign Minister Ali Babacan said Turkey would consider mediating between the United States and Iran over Tehran’s nuclear program.

    The foreign minister also said in a recent television interview that he saw a risk that Obama would describe the Armenian deaths as genocide, because Obama had done this during his campaign. But Babacan said the United States needed to understand the sensitivities in Turkey.

    Another consideration for Obama will be that both Turkey and Armenia say they are close to normalizing relations after nearly a century of hostility.

    Other members of the administration, including Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden, have in the past supported calling the Armenian killings genocide.

    Democratic aides said they also expected several lawmakers to reintroduce a resolution branding the massacre of Armenians as genocide. Armenian-Americans have been pushing for passage of similar proposals in Congress for years.

    Two years ago, a resolution was approved in committee but dropped after Turkey denounced it as “insulting” and hinted at halting logistical support for the U.S. war effort in Iraq.

  • Armenian Business Organization Joins UBCCE

    Armenian Business Organization Joins UBCCE

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Contact: Abdullah Akyuz
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Phone: 202-776-7770

    TUSIAD-US: Armenian Business Organization Joins UBCCE, a Regional Confederation Initiated by TUSIAD

    The US Office of the Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association (TUSIAD) has issued the following statement with regard to the cooperation of business associations from Turkey and Armenia as well as other countries in the region:

    “The Second General Assembly of the Union of Black Sea and Caspian Confederation of Enterprises (UBCCE) was held in Istanbul on March 2, 2009.  UBCCE is the first independent and voluntary business organization of the Black Sea and Caspian Region and was set up under the leadership of TUSIAD in 2006.

    The General Assembly approved the membership requests of the Union of Manufacturers and Businessmen of Armenia (UMBA), the Georgian Entrepreneurs Confederation (GEC), the Iraqi Businessmen Union (IBMU), the Confederation of Employers of Ukraine (CONFEU) and the Federation of Employers of Ukraine (FEU). With the admission of new organizations, the number of UBCCE members increased from 18 to 22.

    According to the decisions taken during the Second General Assembly, UBCCE Presidency also passed from TUSIAD to the Hellenic Federation of Enterprises (SEV) for the term 2009 – 2011.  The Azerbaijan Turkey Business Association (ATIB), National Economic Chamber of Kazakhstan (ATAMEKEN Union), Turkish Confederation of Employer Associations
    (TISK) and the Alliance of Romanian Employers’ Confederation (ACPR) were elected as the Vice Presidents in charge of “Regional Economic Integration”, “Business Environment Development”, “Innovation and Entrepreneurship” and “Relations with the European Union and BUSINESSEUROPE” respectively.

    During a ceremony held prior to the General Assembly, UBCCE signed a memorandum of understanding and cooperation with the International Congress of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (ICIE) and the Turkish Enterprise and Business Confederation (TURKONFED).

    For more information about UBCCE please visit www.ubcce.org.”

    About TUSIAD and TUSIAD-US

    Founded in 1971, the Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association (TUSIAD) is an independent, non-governmental organization dedicated to promoting public welfare through private enterprise.
    TUSIAD supports independent research and policy discussions on important social and economic issues in Turkey and abroad. Much like the US Business Roundtable, TUSIAD is comprised of the CEOs and Executives of the major industrial and service companies in Turkey, including those that are among global Fortune 500 companies.

    TUSIAD-US opened in November 1998 in Washington, D.C. to enhance ties between the U.S. and Turkey by representing the interests of the Turkish business community within the United States.

  • Fiasco for the Azeri propaganda in the EP

    Fiasco for the Azeri propaganda in the EP

    Stomach sickening example of murdered democracy and freedom of speech

    From: SS Aya [[email protected]]


    From: European Armenian Federation [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:11 PM


    EUROPEAN ARMENIAN FEDERATION

    B-1000 Bruxelles
    Tel/ Fax: +32 2 732 70 27/26
    Website :Eafjd

    PRESS RELEASE

    For immediate release

    Wednesday 11 March 2009

    Contact : Varténie ECHO

    Tel. / Fax. : +32 (0) 2 732 70 27

    FIASCO FOR THE AZERI PROPAGANDA IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

    – The anti-Armenian Pogroms in Sumgait were evoked at the Azerbaijani commemoration of Khojalu

    – The ambassador of Azerbaijan prohibited to speak

    The “commemoration” of the Khojalu events that was for Azerbaijan the pinnacle moment of its ongoing misinformation campaign turned to a fiasco on Tuesday, March 3, 2009, in the European Parliament.

    Alerted by the European Armenian Federation and other voices of European public opinion, the MEP Mrs. Gisela Kallenbach (Greens, Germany) which initially had sponsored the exhibition of the “Aliev Foundation”, became aware that she was the object of the Azeri attempt of manipulation. Consequently, she surprised the participants, primarily the Azeris by declaring that she was there only “because it was too late to cancel the exhibition”.

    In her inaugural speech, Gisela Kallenbach did not hesitate to say that she regretted that the exhibition did not include pictures of the anti-Armenian pogrom that was committed in the Azerbaijani city of Sumgait in 1988, before taking one minute of silence in memory of the victims of all the conflicts of the South Caucasus. She criticised implicitly the Azeri attempt of misinformation and stated that she learnt that this exhibition “could be used in order to destroy the promising and recent process of reconciliation between Armenia and Azerbaijan” and  “that was absolutely not” her intention.

    The short speech that Mrs. Kallenbach delivered on this occasion is available here.

    Mrs. Kallenbach quickly put an end to her participation while the ambassador of Azerbaijan was prevented from expressing himself and distributing his false propaganda.

    According to various sources, Mrs. Kallenbach had been deceived by officers of her political group directly financed by the Aliev Foundation.

    “We congratulate Mrs. Kallenbach for her courage and her perspicacity” declared Hilda Tchoboian, the chairperson of the European Armenian Federation; “it is clear that the commemorations of Khojalu organized everywhere in Europe and in the United States form part of the political warmongering of the leaders of Azerbaijan; they aim to prevent the settlement of the conflict by prohibiting any concession to its public opinion, while masking its own crimes” she continued.

    Within the framework of a worldwide campaign of disinformation, the Baku regime intends to make the international institutions acknowledge that the events which would have occurred in Khojalu in 1992 at the time of Artsakh liberation war (formerly Nagorno Karabakh) would have constituted war crimes – even a “genocide”. These events – presented as such using photos taken in Kosovo were never clarified but several sources – in particular Azeri – tend to prove that they would have been caused by the Aliev clan to destabilize the Azeri regime of Mutalibov which was at that time in power.

    The massacres and pogroms of Armenians in Sumgait, Baku and Kirovabad, recalled by Mrs. Kallenbach, are on the other hand, attested as having constituted the response of Azerbaijan to the peaceful process by which the Armenian populations of Karabakh had requested their unification to Armenia, in accordance with the Soviet constitution which was into force at that time. These pogroms caused the Artsakh liberation war to begin.

    At that time, the European Parliament strongly criticised the actions of Azerbaijan towards its Armenian population, pointing out “the blockade and the aggression of Azerbaijan”, “the 300,000 Armenian refugees who fled the pogroms”, the murders of Armenians perpetrated “in horrific circumstances”, “the economic blockade of Armenia”, “the unprecedented attack against the Armenians of Karabakh” and their “right to self-determination”.

    These resolutions of the European Parliament are available on the European Armenian Federation website.

    “Taking into consideration the serious incriminations that the European Parliament and the International community charged against Azerbaijan, for the first time, the machine of Azeri misinformation failed to use the European Assembly as a springboard to spread its falsified interpretation of the history” commented Hilda Tchoboian.

    “The abusive exploitation by Azerbaijan of the Karabakh conflict to justify the warmongering and racist speech of his leaders towards Armenia and the Armenians, will have to be condemned by the European Union which carries a real interest with the establishment of a durable peace in the area” continued the Chair of the European Armenian Federation.

    The European Armenian Federation recalls that for several years, the Azeri power has tried repeatedly to discredit the OSCE Minsk group who is in charge of the peace negotiations in order to move their framework. In spite of these attempts, the European Parliament constantly affirmed its confidence in the Minsk group which takes into account the right to self-determination of the Karabakh people in compliance with the principles of the International law.

    Fiasco for the Azeri propaganda in the European Parliament

    Stomach sickening example of murdered democracy and freedom of speech

    From: SS Aya [[email protected]]


    From: European Armenian Federation [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:11 PM

    EUROPEAN ARMENIAN FEDERATION

    For Justice & Democracy

    Avenue de la Renaissance 10
    B-1000 Bruxelles

    Tel/ Fax: +32 2 732 70 27/26
    Website :Eafjd

    PRESS RELEASE

    For immediate release

    Wednesday 11 March 2009

    Contact : Varténie ECHO

    Tel. / Fax. : +32 (0) 2 732 70 27

    FIASCO FOR THE AZERI PROPAGANDA IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

    – The anti-Armenian Pogroms in Sumgait were evoked at the Azerbaijani commemoration of Khojalu

    – The ambassador of Azerbaijan prohibited to speak

    The “commemoration” of the Khojalu events that was for Azerbaijan the pinnacle moment of its ongoing misinformation campaign turned to a fiasco on Tuesday, March 3, 2009, in the European Parliament.

    Alerted by the European Armenian Federation and other voices of European public opinion, the MEP Mrs. Gisela Kallenbach (Greens, Germany) which initially had sponsored the exhibition of the “Aliev Foundation”, became aware that she was the object of the Azeri attempt of manipulation. Consequently, she surprised the participants, primarily the Azeris by declaring that she was there only “because it was too late to cancel the exhibition”.

    In her inaugural speech, Gisela Kallenbach did not hesitate to say that she regretted that the exhibition did not include pictures of the anti-Armenian pogrom that was committed in the Azerbaijani city of Sumgait in 1988, before taking one minute of silence in memory of the victims of all the conflicts of the South Caucasus. She criticised implicitly the Azeri attempt of misinformation and stated that she learnt that this exhibition “could be used in order to destroy the promising and recent process of reconciliation between Armenia and Azerbaijan” and  “that was absolutely not” her intention.

    The short speech that Mrs. Kallenbach delivered on this occasion is available here.

    Mrs. Kallenbach quickly put an end to her participation while the ambassador of Azerbaijan was prevented from expressing himself and distributing his false propaganda.

    According to various sources, Mrs. Kallenbach had been deceived by officers of her political group directly financed by the Aliev Foundation.

    “We congratulate Mrs. Kallenbach for her courage and her perspicacity” declared Hilda Tchoboian, the chairperson of the European Armenian Federation; “it is clear that the commemorations of Khojalu organized everywhere in Europe and in the United States form part of the political warmongering of the leaders of Azerbaijan; they aim to prevent the settlement of the conflict by prohibiting any concession to its public opinion, while masking its own crimes” she continued.

    Within the framework of a worldwide campaign of disinformation, the Baku regime intends to make the international institutions acknowledge that the events which would have occurred in Khojalu in 1992 at the time of Artsakh liberation war (formerly Nagorno Karabakh) would have constituted war crimes – even a “genocide”. These events – presented as such using photos taken in Kosovo were never clarified but several sources – in particular Azeri – tend to prove that they would have been caused by the Aliev clan to destabilize the Azeri regime of Mutalibov which was at that time in power.

    The massacres and pogroms of Armenians in Sumgait, Baku and Kirovabad, recalled by Mrs. Kallenbach, are on the other hand, attested as having constituted the response of Azerbaijan to the peaceful process by which the Armenian populations of Karabakh had requested their unification to Armenia, in accordance with the Soviet constitution which was into force at that time. These pogroms caused the Artsakh liberation war to begin.

    At that time, the European Parliament strongly criticised the actions of Azerbaijan towards its Armenian population, pointing out “the blockade and the aggression of Azerbaijan”, “the 300,000 Armenian refugees who fled the pogroms”, the murders of Armenians perpetrated “in horrific circumstances”, “the economic blockade of Armenia”, “the unprecedented attack against the Armenians of Karabakh” and their “right to self-determination”.

    These resolutions of the European Parliament are available on the European Armenian Federation website.

    “Taking into consideration the serious incriminations that the European Parliament and the International community charged against Azerbaijan, for the first time, the machine of Azeri misinformation failed to use the European Assembly as a springboard to spread its falsified interpretation of the history” commented Hilda Tchoboian.

    “The abusive exploitation by Azerbaijan of the Karabakh conflict to justify the warmongering and racist speech of his leaders towards Armenia and the Armenians, will have to be condemned by the European Union which carries a real interest with the establishment of a durable peace in the area” continued the Chair of the European Armenian Federation.

    The European Armenian Federation recalls that for several years, the Azeri power has tried repeatedly to discredit the OSCE Minsk group who is in charge of the peace negotiations in order to move their framework. In spite of these attempts, the European Parliament constantly affirmed its confidence in the Minsk group which takes into account the right to self-determination of the Karabakh people in compliance with the principles of the International law.

    Fiasco for the Azeri propaganda in the European Parliament (11 March 2009)

    The anti-Armenian Pogroms in Sumgait were evoked at the Azerbaijani commemoration of Khojalu

    The ambassador of Azerbaijan prohibited to speakerdit de parole

    The anti-Armenian Pogroms in Sumgait were evoked at the Azerbaijani commemoration of Khojalu
    The ambassador of Azerbaijan prohibited to speakerdit de parole
    The “commemoration” of the Khojalu events that was for Azerbaijan the pinnacle moment of its ongoing misinformation campaign turned to a fiasco on Tuesday, March 3, 2009, in the European Parliament.
    Alerted by the European Armenian Federation and other voices of European public opinion, the MEP Mrs. Gisela Kallenbach (Greens, Germany) (…)

  • U.S. Lawmakers Pressure Obama On Armenian Issue

    U.S. Lawmakers Pressure Obama On Armenian Issue


    By Susan Cornwell, Reuters

    Several U.S. lawmakers have written to President Barack Obama urging him to follow up on campaign statements and label the 1915 massacre of Armenians as genocide.

    The pressure on Obama comes ahead of an expected presidential trip to Turkey, which has warned that such declarations by the United States would damage relations. Turkey denies that up to 1.5 million Armenians suffered genocide at the hands of Ottoman Turks during World War One. Turkey accepts many Armenians were killed, but denies they were victims of a systematic genocide.

    Ronald Reagan was the only U.S. president to publicly call the killings genocide. Others avoided the term out of concern for the sensitivities of Turkey, an important NATO ally.

    Four members of the House of Representatives urged Obama to make a statement ahead of the 94th anniversary of the killings on April 24. “As a presidential candidate, you were … forthright in discussing your support for genocide recognition, saying that ‘America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian genocide and responds forcefully to all genocides.’ We agree with you completely,” the letter said.

    It was signed by Democrats Adam Schiff of California and Frank Pallone of New Jersey, and Republicans George Radanovich of California and Mark Kirk of Illinois.

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on a visit to Turkey last week, said Obama would visit “within the next month or so” in his first trip as president to a Muslim country. During Clinton’s visit, Foreign Minister Ali Babacan said Turkey would consider mediating between the United States and Iran over Tehran’s nuclear program.

    The foreign minister also said in a recent television interview that he saw a risk that Obama would describe the Armenian deaths as genocide, because Obama had done this during his campaign. But Babacan said the United States needed to understand the sensitivities in Turkey.

    Another consideration for Obama will be that both Turkey and Armenia say they are close to normalizing relations after nearly a century of hostility.

    Other members of the administration, including Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden, have in the past supported calling the Armenian killings genocide. Democratic aides said they also expected several lawmakers to reintroduce a resolution branding the massacre of Armenians as genocide. Armenian-Americans have been pushing for passage of similar proposals in Congress for years.

    Two years ago, a resolution was approved in committee but dropped after Turkey denounced it as “insulting” and hinted at halting logistical support for the U.S. war effort in Iraq.

  • All problems will be solved as a whole

    All problems will be solved as a whole

    Istanbul. Mayis Alizadeh-APA. Turkish MP from National Movement Party (MHP), Professor Midhad Melen’s exclusive interview with APA Turkish Bureau

    – Are you satisfied with the meetings in Washington? What is Washington’s reaction towards so-called “Armenian genocide”?

    – The congressmen were more restrained. Armenian Diaspora also takes proper steps. As a matter of fact, Armenian Diaspora tries to keep Armenia under pressure not to establish relations with Turkey. In spite of Obama’s pre-election promises to Armenians, I could say that the Congress does not approach this question as closer as it was before.

    – What is the reason of this?

    – 70 members of the Congress have signed a bill on recognition of “Armenian genocide”. I don’t believe that these signatures will be enough. The US new government started a new cooperation stage with Turkey in the region. Everything will be solved as a whole. That’s why, Turkey will never retract from Azerbaijan and Nagorno Karabakh problem for normalization of relations with Armenia. As the problems will be solved entirely in the regions, solution of Karabagh conflict cannot be left aside either. Furthermore, the United States is very busy with the economic crisis at present. I don’t believe that so-called “Armenian genocide” issue may assume importance in such crisis days.

    – May the opening of borders be realized on the government’s initiative only? Will this issue be on the parliament’s agenda in the end?

    – I don’t believe that the government will take any steps secretly from the people and the parliament. In one of the meetings in Washington, our Azerbaijani brother said if Turkey opened its borders with Armenia I would break all the windows of Turkish Embassy in Baku. This objection is his just right. But I want everybody to be sure that such issue is not on the agenda. We are brothers and Turkey will never sacrifice Azerbaijani brothers for its personal interests.