Category: Main Issues

  • International Conference and Student Workshop on the Armenian Diaspora

    International Conference and Student Workshop on the Armenian Diaspora

    BOSTON—Boston University will host an international conference and a student workshop on the Armenian Diaspora during the weekend of February 12. The three-day event is organized by the Charles K. and Elisabeth M. Kenosian Chair in Modern Armenian History and Literature, Boston University.

    Armenian Diasporan communities emerged over centuries as a result of voluntary migration and forced displacement in times of military conflicts, the Genocide during World War I, and economic and political crises. Featuring ten panels, the conference and the workshop will bring together more than forty scholars to present their views and new research on the Armenian Diaspora. They will explore a wide range of topics, including the formation of Armenian Diaspora communities and identities in different parts of the world, the role of the Armenian communities in host societies, and the development of diasporic cultures in various contexts (e.g., nationalism, transnationalism, feminism).

    Friday Program:

    The student workshop will take place on Friday, February 12, from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. at The Castle, 225 Bay State Road, Boston University.

    The workshop is sponsored by the Charles K. and Elisabeth M. Kenosian Chair in Modern Armenian History and Literature, and the International Institute for Diaspora Studies (A Division of the Zoryan Institute).

    Session 1: Diasporic Identities and Community-building
    Friday, 10 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.
    Chair & discussant: Simon Payaslian (Boston University)

    Presenters:

    Cynthia Oliphant (California State University, Fresno)
    “The Effect of Organizational Structure on the Diaspora Experience”

    Anna Harutyunyan (Freie Universität Berlin, Institute Of Ethnology)
    “Challenging the Theory of Diaspora from the Field”

    Hakem Rustom (London School Of Economics)
    “The ‘Others’ of the Diaspora: Armenian Migration from Anatolia to France”

    Session 2: Diaspora and Cultural Development
    Chair: Bedross Der Matossian (MIT)
    Discussant: Kevork Bardakjian (University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor)
    Friday, 1:30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.

    Presenters:

    Lilit Keshishyan (UCLA)
    “Wandering as Rule: The Diasporic Subject in Vahe Berberian’s Namakner Zaataren”

    Marie-Blanche Fourcade (Université De Montréal)
    “Heritage Challenges in Diaspora: How to Preserve, to Share and to Pass Down? The Case Study of the Quebec Armenian Community”

    Stephanie Stockdale (Thunderbird School Of Global Management)
    “Cultural & Social Factors of the Armenian and Jewish Diasporas of Argentina: A Comparative Study”

    Session 3: Transnationalism, Nationalism, and Conflict
    Friday, 4 p.m. – 6 p.m.
    Chair: Richard G. Hovannisian (UCLA)
    Discussant: Asbed Kotchikian (Bentley University)

    Presenters:

    Stepan Stepanyan (Fletcher School Of Law And Diplomacy, Tufts University)
    “The Armenian Community of Georgia as a Factor of Security in the South Caucasus Region”

    Anush Bezhanyan (University Of South Carolina)
    “Iraqi Armenians after the Toppling of Saddam Hussein: Emigration or Repatriation”

    Katherine Casey (University Of Chicago)
    “Agree to Disagree: The Incompatible Nationalisms of Armenia and Its Diaspora”

    Lorand Poosz (Bolyai University)
    “Data Concerning the Transylvanian Armenian Community’s Response to the Armenian Genocide”

    Saturday-Sunday Program

    The conference will take place on Saturday, February 13, from 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and on Sunday, February 14, from 9:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. On both days the conference will be held at the School of Management, Auditorium-Room 105, 595 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston University.

    The conference is sponsored by the Charles K. and Elisabeth M. Kenosian Chair in Modern Armenian History and Literature, the International Institute for Diaspora Studies (A Division of the Zoryan Institute), and the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research, Belmont, Mass.


    Saturday Program

    Session 4: Diasporic Identity, Human Rights, and Genocide
    Saturday, 9 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.
    Chair: Simon Payaslian (Boston University)
    Discussant: George Shirinian (Zoryan Institute)

    Presenters:

    Nanor Kebranian (Kenderian) (Columbia University)
    “Can the Armenian Diaspora Speak? Diasporic Identity in the Shadow of Human Rights”

    Joyce Apsel (New York University)
    “Teaching the Armenian Genocide in North America: New Resources, Programs, and Integration within Genocide Studies”

    Rubina Peroomian (UCLA)
    “The Third-Generation Armenian-American Writers Echo the Quest for Self-Identity with the Genocide at Its Core”


    Session 5: Narrativization of Diasporic Belongingness and Revival
    Saturday, 10:30 a.m. – noon
    Discussant: Khachig Tölölyan (Wesleyan University)
    Chair: Marc Mamigonian (NAASR)

    Presenters:

    Susan Pattie (University College London)
    “Constructing Narratives of Belonging among Armenians in the Diaspora”

    Sebouh Aslanian (Cornell University)
    “Networks of Circulation, Patronage, and ‘National Revival’: The Armenian Translation of Charles Rollin’s History of Rome”

    Sona Haroutyunian (Ca’ Foscari University Of Venice)
    “Vittoria Aganoor’s Alter Ego”

    Session 6: Armenian Repatriations 1946-1949: Contexts, Experiences, Aftermaths
    Saturday, 1:30 p.m. – 3:45 p.m.
    Chair & Discussant: Susan Pattie (University College London)

    Presenters:

    Sevan Yousefian (UCLA)
    “Picnics for Repatriates”

    Astrig Atamian (Inalco, Paris)
    “Armenia, here we come! The French Armenian Communists during the Repatriations”

    Kari Neely (Middle Tennessee State University)
    “Kevork Ajemian’s Use of Middle Eastern Armenian Repatriation in ‘A Perpetual Path’ ”

    Session 7: Desnelle Collective
    Saturday, 4 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.   
    Chair: Hrayr Anmahouni/Eulmessekian (La Crescenta, Calif.)
    Discussant: David Kazanjian (University Of Pennsylvania)

    Presenters:

    Helin Anahit (Middlesex University, London)
    “Diaspora Landscapes as a Thought Model”

    Emily Artinian
    (Chelsea College Of Art & Design, London)
    “From Ararat to Anywhere?”

    Christopher Atamian
    (New York)
    “Thinking the Past: Restorative and Reflective Nostalgia in Frounze Dovlatian’s ‘Garod’”

    Charles Garoian
    (Penn State School Of Visual Arts)
    “Scattered Flesh / Tservadz Mort”

    Neery Melkonian (New York)
    “A Feminism that is Often Accented, Sometimes Whispers, Even Stutters: Modern and Contemporary Armenian Women Artists in Transnational Contexts”

    Abelina Galustian (University Of California, Santa Barbara)
    “The Substance of Orientalism in Visual Representation”

    Sunday Program

    Session 8: Culture & Economy in Diasporan Communities
    Sunday, 9:30 a.m. – noon
    Chair: George Shirinian (Zoryan Institute)
    Discussant: Marc Mamigonian (NAASR)

    Presenters:

    Aida Boudjikanian (Montreal)
    “The Armenian Jewelers’ Niche of Montreal: Between a Local Trait and an Armenian Diasporic Tradition”

    Gregory Aftandilian (Washington)
    “Re-cementing Kinship Ties: Armenian-American Soldiers and the French Armenian Community during World War II”

    Philippe Videlier (Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique, Lyons)
    “Armenians and Turks in France Confronting the Genocide”

    Matthias Fritz (State Linguistic V. Brusov University, Yerevan)
    “The Evolution of the Armenian Diaspora in Germany during the Past Two Decades”

    Session 9: Transdisciplinarity of Diaspora Studies
    Sunday, 1 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
    Chair: Richard G. Hovannisian (UCLA)
    Discussant: Khachig Tölölyan (Wesleyan University)

    Presenters:

    Daniel Douglas And Anny Bakalian (CUNY)
    “Armenians in the United States: A Quantitative Analysis Using the American Community Survey”

    Carel Bertram (San Francisco State University)
    “Diasporic Armenians as Pilgrims to Their Family Towns and Villages”

    Joan Bamberger (Anthropologist, Watertown, Mass.)
    “Re-Generation of Armenian Arts in Watertown, Massachusetts”

    Nikol Margaryan (Yerevan State University)
    “Anthroponyms in the Context of Ethnic Identity”


    Session 10: Diasporan Ethnonationalism and Transnationalism
    Sunday, 3:45 p.m. – 6 p.m.
    Chair: Asbed Kotchikian (Bentley University)
    Discussant: Bedross Der Matossian (MIT)

    Presenters:

    Ara Sanjian (University Of Michigan-Dearborn)
    “Limits of Conflict and Consensus among Lebanese-Armenian Political Factions in the Early 21st Century”

    Vartan Matiossian (Hovnanian School, New Jersey)
    “Domino Effect: U.S. Immigration Policies and the Formation of the Armenian Communities in Latin America”

    Ohannes Geukjian (American University Of Beirut)
    “Armenia-Diaspora Intransigence in Light of Armenian-Turkish Relations and the Resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, 1991-Present”

    Both the workshop and the conference are open to the public, and admission is free.

    Founded in 1839, Boston University is an internationally recognized institution of higher education and research. With more than 30,000 students, it is the fourth largest independent university in the United States. BU consists of 17 colleges and schools along with a number of multi-disciplinary centers and institutes that are central to the school’s research and teaching mission.

  • OBAMA REQUESTS $ 40 MILLION AID TO ARMENIA

    OBAMA REQUESTS $ 40 MILLION AID TO ARMENIA

    OBAMO OTURUYOR

    PanARMENIAN.

    Net
    02.02.2010 12:25 GMT+04:00

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ President Barack Obama’s fiscal year 2011 (FY11)
    budget, released earlier today, calls for $40 million in assistance
    to Armenia — $10 million more than his FY10 request, but still
    $1 million less than the total appropriated by Congress last year,
    reported the Armenian National Committee of America -ANCA.

    The figure, while representing a substantial increase over the
    President’s last request, falls just short of the $41 million actually
    appropriated last year by Congress, and far short of the $70 million
    request that was made last year by the Armenian Caucus and broadly
    supported by Armenian American advocacy organizations.

    The President’s budget proposes maintaining Foreign Military Financing
    (FMF) assistance parity between Armenia and Azerbaijan, requesting
    $3.5 million for each country. In past years, the White House has
    sought to tilt the military aid balance in support of Baku, only to
    have its efforts rejected by Congress, which has consistently ensured
    balanced FMF figures for the two nations. The Administration did
    not extend the parity principle to International Military Training,
    Education, and Training (IMET), instead seeking to provide twice as
    much for Azerbaijan ($900,000) than Armenia ($450,000) in this area.

    The President requested $22.12 million in assistance to Azerbaijan,
    $120,000 more than appropriated by Congress last year. The President’s
    overall assistance request for Europe and Eurasia is $599,164,000,
    which represents a reduction of $11,818,000 from the previous year.

    “We welcome the decision by the Obama Administration to ask for
    $10 million more in economic aid to Armenia this year than he did
    last year, and also his proposal to maintain parity in a key area
    of military aid to Armenia and Azerbaijan,” said Aram Hamparian,
    Executive Director of the ANCA. “We want to offer our special thanks
    to Representatives Frank Pallone, Adam Schiff, Anna Eshoo, and Jackie
    Speier – and, of course, Nita Lowey – for their energetic efforts
    in sharing with the Administration how increased aid and support
    for Armenia
    advances both U.S. interests and American values in a
    strategically important area of the world. We look forward, as well, to
    working with all our Congressional friends in building on these numbers
    and securing the adoption of increased aid levels and constructive
    policy provisions that will contribute to the strengthening of the
    U.S.-Armenia relationship and the search for a fair and lasting peace
    in the region.”

    The proposed assistance to Armenia is a significant improvement over
    the FY10 request, which called for a 38% cut in aid to Armenia,
    a 20% increase in aid to Azerbaijan, and the abandonment of the
    longstanding Armenia-Azerbaijan military aid parity agreement in favor
    of Baku. The ANCA led the Armenian American community in expressing
    its concerns to the Administration last year, and working with the
    Congressional Armenian Caucus and members of the Senate and House
    Foreign Appropriations Subcommittee on Foreign operations to increase
    the figures.

    The Foreign Operations Subcommittees of the House and Senate
    Appropriation Committees will now review the President’s budget and
    each draft their own versions of the FY11 foreign assistance bill.

    The Armenian National Committee of America -ANCA is the largest and
    most influential Armenian American grassroots political organization.

    Working in coordination with a network of offices, chapters and
    supporters throughout the United States and affiliated organizations
    around the world, the ANCA actively advances the concerns of the
    Armenian American community on a broad range of issues.

    The ANCA is an outgrowth of the American Committee for the Independence
    of Armenia (ACIA) which founded after World War I by Vahan Cardashian,
    the former Consul of the Ottoman Empire in Washington. Many
    prominent American and Allied leaders including James W. Gerard,
    the U.S. Ambassador to Germany, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, Charles
    Evans Hughes (later appointed Chief Justice of the U.S.

    Supreme Court), Elihu Root and others participated to this
    organization. The goal of ACIA was the independent Wilsonian Armenia.

    The ACIA had a Central Office in New York City and 23 regional offices
    in 13 states.

    Later, these offices gradually evolved into the Armenian National
    Committee of America, which expanded its activities to include public
    relations efforts to acquaint local communities about Armenian issues
    including the Armenian Genocide and Armenian National aspirations.

    Other activities included April 24th commemoration activities,
    public forums, voter registration efforts, support for local and
    state political candidates, and updating the local community on
    Armenian issues.

  • HISTORY OF THE ARMENIAN QUESTION

    HISTORY OF THE ARMENIAN QUESTION

    FROM AMBASSADOR MORGENTHAU’S PAPERS, REEL 22
    Manuscript Division,
    Library of Congress,
    Washington, D.C. 29540
    Morgen01tn

    HENRY I MORGENTHAU,
    American Ambassador at Constantinople from 1913 to 1916

    Ambassador Morgenthau's Story By Henry Morgenthau.png
    Armenian News Network / Groong
    February 1, 2010

    By KAY MOURADIAN, EdD

    For the last six hundred years their history is a record of
    persecutions, a real martyrdom. No where else the abuse of brutal
    force has been so great as in Turkey. The conquered Christians have
    not had security of life, honor or property. Religious toleration has
    been practiced under most humiliating conditions. Churches should be
    small and not conspicuous; no bells should ring; a Moslem had a
    perfect right to stop a Christian on the street and cut his head off
    to see if his sword was sharp enough. A Christian should have an
    extra handkerchief t take the dust off the shoes of a Moslem at a
    signal.

    It is only after second half of the 19th century, under pressure of
    the European countries, whose influence was growing- that the
    condition of Christians in the capital was improved; those living in
    the interior were and are still in the same insecure state.

    As a result of this oppressive rule, the number of Armenians has
    greatly decreased.

    Massacres: Thousands have been massacred periodically:
    In 1896 (reign of Abdul Hamid) 300,000 perished by violent death,
    disease, hunger and exposure.
    In 1909 (Young Turk Regime) 20,000 were massacred at Adana.
    Thousands have been forced to become Moslems, and many have emigrated
    to Europe and America.
    But the mass of the people have persisted to stay in their country and
    maintained, in spite of all persecutions, their national institutions,
    racial traditions, language and religion.
    European Powers have principally taken interest in the Armenian
    Question since the last Russo-Turkish War (1878), when they obligated
    Turkey by Article 61 of the Treaty of Berlin to introduce reforms in
    the Administration of the Armenian provinces.
    The demands of the Armenians were most elementary: They wanted rights
    of security of life, honor, and property and equality before the
    law. They wanted the establishment of a regime of order and justice
    under European control, as experience had proved to them that the
    Turks would and could do nothing by themselves in the matter of reforms.
    These simple rights have been denied them.
    On account of political considerations and rivalry, the Great Powers
    have never been able To agree to force the Turks to fulfill the
    provisions of Article 61 of the Berlin Treaty.

    Reasons of Persecution manifold: 1. Political 2. Economic 3. Social
    and Religious Political: The Turks have been unable to assimilate the
    Armenians. The latter are on a higher plane by their civilization and
    culture. On account of the terrible sufferings they have endured, in
    spite of their loyalty and services to the State, they, the Armenians,
    have naturally turned their eyes to the European Christian Powers for
    help and deliverance. Turks have resented this bitterly and in order
    to avoid foreign interference-

    instead of following the wiser course of
    reforming their administration and thereby solve the problem at its
    roots- they have decided to annihilate the Armenian race and thus
    terminate the Armenian Question.
    The Turks want Turkey for the Turks alone. Therefore by all imaginable
    means they have tried to exterminate the Armenians.
    A misconceived, narrow, nationalism-combined with a fanaticism of the
    blindest and darkest kind- has been one of the chief causes of these
    unprecedented persecutions.

    Economic: The Turks have been a warring race. They left the Commercial
    field to the Christians and the Jews. They have had the army and the
    administration of the country in their control.
    There are some merchants, artisans and agriculturists among them, but
    the vast majority of the Turks are public officials, soldiers and
    laborers.
    The non-Moslems have become rich through commerce and industry, while
    the Turks, in spite of all the assistance they have received from the
    Government have made no progress in that line.
    To show you how the Armenians control commerce and industry in
    Asia Minor, I will mention the following statistical facts regarding
    the province of Sivas, where the Armenian population is not so large
    as in some other vilayets.
    Of 153 factories in vilayet of Sivas, 130 belonged to Armenians, 20 to Turks.
    Number of workmen amounted to 17,000, of these 14,000 were Armenians.
    Of 316 merchants, 268 were Armenians, 36 Turks, and 12 Greeks.
    Of 37 bankers, 32 were Armenians and 5 Turks.

    As the Turks could not overtake the Armenians, the Government would
    periodically organize massacres and hamper them all the time in order
    to check their progress.

    Social and Religious:
    Fanaticism. The masses of the Turkish people are in dense ignorance
    and fanaticism. The number of Turkish schools very limited. Armenians
    are unquestionably far more advanced in culture. They have their own
    schools which they run at their own expense, while the Turkish
    government schools are subsidized by the Government.
    The Armenians (like all other non-Moslems in the country) pay taxes
    for public instruction but receive no support from the Government for
    their schools.
    The Government does not favor the creation of new schools by the
    Christians, on the contrary they raise all sorts of difficulties to
    hamper and obstruct.
    Just before the deportations there were:
    785 Armenian schools in Turkey, with an attendance of 82,000 students,
    while there are only 150 Turkish schools, with an attendance of 17,000.
    The Kurds do not have a single school.
    This ignorance of the Turks, coupled with religious prejudices, has
    been another cause of disagreement between the Turks and the
    Armenians, and has rendered the masses of the Turks a ready tool of
    persecution in the hands of wicked leaders.
    A Christian is never regarded by a Moslem as his equal. A Christian is
    considered as a raya, a serf, a subject, never a citizen enjoying
    equal rights. And when you consider that not only the ordinary people,
    but the rulers also think the same way, and that really there is not a
    single governor thoroughly prepared for his position, you would
    naturally expect nothing else but these lamentable results.
    Recent Developments: Present European War and its bearing on the
    Armenian Question.
    The present party in power; its sympathy for the Germans growing out
    of their enmity to Russia.
    While they were at war with the European Powers, they wanted to avail
    themselves of the opportunity to exterminate the Armenians while
    nobody could stop them. Political considerations prevented Germany and
    Austria from interfering with the atrocities committed by their
    Turkish ally.
    The Turks claim that they had to resort to these stringent means for
    their safety as the Armenians were not loyal. But even supposing that
    the deportations were necessary, nothing can justify, as the Turks
    admit it themselves, the atrocious crimes which were committed.

    Methods of Extermination:
    1. Requisitions, goods taken without payment, resulting in economic ruin.
    2. Confiscations
    3. Forced exorbitant contributions and taxes
    4. Searches in Armenian houses for arms, but in reality for pillage.
    5. Bastinado, torture beyond imagination, too obscene to be related.
    6. Forced conversion to Mohammedanism.
    7. Massacres, partial and wholesale, women, children and old men and
    women not spared.
    8. Deportations: Slow death, with all accompanying horrors on the
    way. No means of Transportation, had to walk on foot most of the
    way. En route attacks by bands of criminals especially liberated from
    prisons for that purpose. Women, young ladies violated daily, at each
    village on their way; many of them taken to harems; families
    separated; mothers threw themselves into river with their children to
    save themselves from shame.

    No provisions made for food or shelter for these unfortunate people,
    many of whom are educated, and well-to-do people, who are not allowed
    to draw their own money from their bank as the Government had
    confiscated it together with their property as `abandoned property’.
    They sold their furniture at ridiculously low prices when they were
    ordered to leave their homes and start on a trip with an unknown
    destination. They sold pianos at $5, cows at $3. Even these moneys
    were stolen from them on the way.
    There are bishops, doctors, lawyers, professors, journalists among
    them, dead, dying…Thousands have died of exhaustion, exposure,
    disease, want of food. Corpses of children were seen on roads by
    travelers.

    Relief Work:
    Americans have been the first and most important helpers.
    Interest of America purely humanitarian.
    Missionaries have been foremost. Their sympathy towards Armenians very
    deep their whole work has been among them.
    Activities of Embassy, consulates, and Missionaries in distribution of
    funds and food among sufferers.
    Money goes direct to its object; no expenses, New York philanthropist
    is paying expenses himself.
    Present rupture of relations between America and Turkey has not
    affected work of relief. We have three distinct channels for
    transmission of relief funds, and have devoted and reliable workers on
    the field there for their distribution.
    Hundreds of thousands of Armenians need immediate help. Latest
    telegrams received from Turkey and the Caucasus make strong appeals
    for continued help. No funds on hand, already overdrawn $40,000 to
    give the poor people a morsel of bread.

    If interested in reading more from Kay Mouradian’s historical
    research, connect through her website: www.aGiftInTheSunlight.com

    Kay Mouradian’s articles in this series are archived on Groong’s
    website at: http://www.groong.org/orig/voices-from-the-past.html

    cover

    Formerly American Ambassador to Turkey

    ILLUSTRATED

    Morgen01tn
    Fig. 1. HENRY I MORGENTHAU,
    American Ambassador at Constantinople from 1913 to 1916

    GARDEN CITY NEW YORK
    DOUBLEDAY, PAGE & COMPANY
    1918

    .

    TO

    WOODROW WILSON
    THE EXPONENT IN AMERICA OF THE ENLIGHTENED PUBLIC OPINION OF THE WORLD, WHICH HAS DECREED THAT THE RIGHTS OF SMALL NATIONS SHALL BE RESPECTED AND THAT SUCH CRIMES AS ARE DESCRIBED IN THIS BOOK SHALL NEVER AGAIN DARKEN THE PAGES OF HISTORY

    .

    PREFACE

    By this time the American people have probably become convinced that the Germans deliberately planned the conquest of the world. Yet they hesitate to convict on circumstantial evidence and for this reason all eye witnesses to this, the greatest crime in modern history, should volunteer their testimony.

    I have therefore laid aside any scruples I had as to the propriety of disclosing to my fellow countrymen the facts which I learned while representing them in Turkey. I acquired this knowledge as the servant of the American people, and it is their property as much as it is mine.

    I greatly regret that I have been obliged to omit an account of the splendid activities of the American Missionary and Educational Institutions in Turkey, but to do justice to this subject would require a book by itself. I have had to omit the story of the Jews in Turkey for the same reasons.

    My thanks are due to my friend, Mr. Burton J. Hendrick, for the invaluable assistance he has rendered in the preparation of the book.

    HENRY MORGENTHAU.
    October, 1918.


    CONTENTS

    I. A German superman at Constantinople
    II. The “Boss System” in the Ottoman Empire and how it proved useful to Germany
    III. “The personal representative of the Kaiser.” Wangenheim opposes the sale of American warships to Greece
    IV. Germany mobilizes the Turkish army
    V. Wangenheim smuggles the Goeben and the Breslau through the Dardanelles
    VI. Wangenheim tells the American Ambassador how the Kaiser started the war
    VII. Germany’s plans for new territories, coaling stations, and indemnities
    VIII. A classic instance of German propaganda
    IX. Germany closes the Dardanelles and so separates Russia from her Allies
    X. Turkey’s abrogation of the capitulations. Enver living in a palace, with plenty of money and an imperial bride
    XI. Germany forces Turkey into the war
    XII. The Turks attempt to treat alien enemies decently, but the Germans insist on persecuting them
    XIII. The invasion of the Notre Dame de Sion School
    XIV. Wangenheim and the Bethlehem Steel Company. A “Holy War” that was made in Germany
    XV. Djemal, a troublesome Mark Antony. The first German attempt to get a German peace
    XVI. The Turks prepare to flee from Constantinople and establish a new capital in Asia Minor. The Allied fleet bombarding the Dardanelles
    XVII. Enver as the man who demonstrated “the vulnerability of the British fleet.” Old-fashioned defenses of the Dardanelles
    XVIII. The Allied armada sails away, though on the brink of victory
    XIX. A fight for three thousand civilians
    XX. More adventures of the foreign residents
    XXI. Bulgaria on the auction block
    XXII. The Turk reverts to the ancestral type
    XXIII. The “Revolution” at Van
    XXIV. The murder of a nation
    XXV. Talaat tells why he deports the Armenians
    XXVI. Enver Pasha discusses the Armenians
    XXVII “I shall do nothing for the Armenians,” says the German Ambassador
    XXVIII. Enver again moves for peace. Farewell to the Sultan and to Turkey
    XXIX. Von Jagow, Zimmermann, and German-Americans

    LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

    1. Henry Morgenthau.
    2. Mrs. Henry Morgenthau with Soeur Jeanne
    3. Constantinople from the American Embassy
    4. Beylerbey palace on the Bosphorus
    5. The American Embassy at Constantinople
    6. Henry Morgenthau, American Ambassador to Turkey, 1913-1916
    7. Talaat Pasha, ex-Grand Vizier of Turkey
    8a. Turkish infantry
    8b. Turkish cavalry
    9. Bustány Effendi
    10a. Mohammed V, late Sultan of Turkey
    10b. Sultan’s carriage at American Embassy
    11. Wangenheim, the German Ambassador
    12. The Sultan, Mohammed V, going to his regular Friday prayers
    13. Talaat and Enver at a military review
    14. Baron Von Wangenheim, German Ambassador to Turkey
    15. Djemal Pasha, Minister of Marine
    16. The Marquis Garroni, Italian Ambassador to the Sublime Porte in 1914
    17. M. Tocheff, Bulgarian Minister at Constantinople
    18. The American summer Embassy on the Bosphorus
    19. Enver Pasha, Minister of War
    20. Saïd Halim, Ex-grand Vizier
    21. Sir Louis Mallet and M. Bompard
    22. Gen. Liman von Sanders
    23. German and Turkish officers on board the Goeben
    24. Bedri Bey, Prefect of Police at Constantinople; Djavid Bey, Minister of Finance in Turkish Cabinet
    25. The British Embassy
    26. Robert College at Constantinople
    27. The American Embassy Staff
    28. The Modern Turkish soldier
    29. The Ministry of War
    30. The Ministry of Marine.
    31. Halil Bey in Berlin; Talaat and Kühlmann
    32. General Mertens
    33. The Red Crescent
    34. Enver Pasha
    35. Turkish quarters at the Dardanelles
    36. Looking north to the city of Gallipoli
    37. The British ship Albion
    38. The Dardanelles as it was March 16, 1915
    39. Tchemenlik and Fort Anadolu Hamidié
    40. Fort Dardanos
    41. The American ward of the Turkish hospital
    42. Students of the Constantinople College
    43. Abdul Hamid
    44. A characteristic view of the Armenian country
    45. Fishing village on Lake Van
    46. Refugees at Van crowding around a public oven, hoping to get bread
    47. Kaiser William II, in the uniform of a Turkish Field Marshal
    48. Interior of the Armenian church at Urfa
    49. Armenian soldiers
    50. Those who fell by the wayside . . . . . .
    51. A view of Harpoot
    52. View of Urfa
    53. A relic of the Armenian massacres at Erzingan
    54. The funeral of Baron von Wangenheim.

    2Chapter One: A German superman at Constantinople

  • Armenia-Diaspora Unity Must be Preserved at all Cost

    Armenia-Diaspora Unity Must be Preserved at all Cost

    By Harut Sassounian
    Publisher, The California Courier
    sassounian3
    In recent months, as heated debates raged on the Armenia-Turkey Protocols, Diaspora Armenians reacted with frustration and anger at the damage these agreements would have caused to Armenian national interests.
    While Armenia’s leaders have the right to take decisions on behalf of the country’s 3 million inhabitants, they also have an obligation to take into account the interests of all 10 million Armenians worldwide on pan-Armenian issues, such as the Genocide, the Artsakh (Karabagh) conflict, demands from Turkey.
    In negotiating the Armenia-Turkey Protocols, Armenian officials should have shown more sensitivity to critical national issues. By signing the contested agreements with Turkey, they alarmed and deeply hurt Armenians worldwide. Thousands of angry demonstrators reacted by hurling vitriolic epithets at Pres. Sargsyan, during his October tour of the Diaspora to promote the Protocols. Such confrontations, unprecedented during earlier presidential visits, reflected negatively on the authorities as well as the protesting public.
    A small land-locked state faced with blockade, war, economic hardships and enemies on both sides, can ill afford internal divisions and conflicts with its Diaspora. Such discord can only please Turkish leaders who have made no secret of their scheme to split Armenia from “the radical Diaspora,” thus making it easier for them to extract concessions on Artsakh, Genocide recognition, and demands for restitution.
    What lessons Armenians must now draw from the disheartening experience of infighting over the Protocols?
    1) Armenia’s leaders should exercise greater caution and sensitivity by engaging in private consultations with Diasporan leaders prior to conducting negotiations and signing agreements on issues that impact the entire Armenian nation.
    2) A Diaspora-wide leadership must be elected to reflect properly the views of the majority of Armenians on crucial issues. Such a mechanism would facilitate the transmission of credible feedback from the Diaspora to Armenia’s leaders and to governments and international organizations. Further details will be presented on this important topic in a future column.
    3) Diaspora Armenians should not let disagreements with Armenia’s leadership discourage them from extending aid to the needy, making investments in the country’s economy, and visiting the homeland.
    4) In addition to avoiding a split between the Diaspora and Armenia, it is equally important to prevent serious divisions among Diaspora organizations, without stifling the healthy exchange of views and disagreements.
    5) The Armenian President needs to receive expert advice on critical economic and political issues which necessitates the creation of a Council of Economic Advisors and a Council on Foreign Relations, consisting of internationally recognized experts. Furthermore, a team of international lawyers should be assembled to advise the President prior to signing international agreements in order to avoid fundamental mistakes which subsequently may have to be corrected by the Constitutional Court.
    6) The Armenian government should have assigned the Diaspora Ministry to serve as an unfettered channel of communication between Armenia and the Diaspora during the debates on the Protocols. The Ministry could have been the mechanism through which the concerns and complaints of Armenians worldwide would have been relayed to the Foreign Ministry and the President’s office. After all, the Diaspora Ministry is supposed to be a bridge between the two segments of the Armenian nation. While it is true that the Diaspora Minister accompanied the President during his tour of several countries last October, the Ministry would have gained far more credibility had it been allowed to play a more independent role.
    7) Armenian officials must realize that Turkey, given its size and strategic location, has a greater opportunity to get its views publicized through the international media than it is possible for Armenia. Therefore, any issue on which Armenians and Turks have conflicting interpretations, the Turkish version will prevail by being more widely disseminated than the Armenian point of view. That is one of the reasons why agreeing to establish a “historical commission” was not a good idea. According to Turkish officials, the commission was to review the facts of the Armenian Genocide, while the Armenian leaders stated that its objective was to assess the consequences of the Genocide. Had the Protocols been ratified, the Turks would have proceeded to deny the facts of the Genocide and would have succeeded in blaming Armenians for undermining “the good work” of the commission.
    8) The Protocols, rather than helping to normalize relations between Armenia and Turkey, have in fact greatly damaged the prospects of such reconciliation. Future attempts must begin with the preliminary steps of opening the border and establishing diplomatic relations rather than cramming dozens of unrelated issues and preconditions into a single agreement. True reconciliation has to be based on truth and justice, not lies and cover ups!
  • Turkey-Armenia Pact Hits Snags

    Turkey-Armenia Pact Hits Snags

    Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A12

    By MARC CHAMPION in Istanbul

    and MARCUS WALKER

    and STEPHEN FIDLER in Davos, Switzerland

    A deal between Turkey and Armenia to open their border and establish diplomatic relations after generations of dispute over genocide allegations and territory is under growing threat of collapse.

    Armenia is pushing for rapid ratification of the deal, signed in October, while Turkey has a longer time frame. On Wednesday, Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev added to concerns for the deal when he said he was confident Turkey wouldn’t ratify the agreement until Armenia has returned Azeri territory that it occupies, including the mainly ethnic-Armenian region of Nagorno Karabakh.

    “There is a common understanding in the region that there should be a first step by Armenia to start the liberation of the occupied territories,” Mr. Aliyev said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal in Davos, Switzerland. He said he was “fully satisfied” with Turkey’s understanding of the issue, despite harshly criticizing Turkey’s handling of it in the past.

    “If the two issues are disconnected, then probably Armenia will freeze negotiations with Azerbaijan [over Nagorno Karabakh],” said Mr. Aliyev, adding that he believed economic pressure was one of the main incentives for Armenia to come to the table. Mr. Aliyev has warned previously that pushing ahead with the deal regardless of Nagorno Karabakh and the resulting freezing of negotiations could lead to renewed war.

    Turkey’s leaders, including Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, have said repeatedly that the border opening and settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict are linked.

    There is no sign of progress in the 15-year-old peace talks. But some ambiguity remains in Turkey’s position. The territorial dispute isn’t mentioned in October’s protocols.

    “Now we are approaching the moment when things get more and more difficult,” said Vigen Sargsyan, deputy chief of staff to the Armenian president. Pressure on the Armenian president to abandon the diplomatic effort is building strongly as the next annual April 24 U.S. presidential commemoration of the 1915 Ottoman massacre of up to 1.5 million ethnic Armenians approaches.

    Turkish officials, by contrast, talk about an open-ended process that could last a year or more if necessary. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu also recently expressed anger at a decision by Armenia’s constitutional court that he said in effect puts conditions on the deal—a claim Mr. Sargsyan dismissed.

    Mr. Sargsyan said that while Armenia’s government is sending ratification papers for the deal to parliament, it is also preparing legislation to enable the president to withdraw his signature from treaties. “If this opportunity is lost it will push the whole region back, not to where we started when talks began but beyond that,” said Mr. Sargsyan. He said trust between the two sides would be destroyed.

    Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993 in protest at the occupation by Armenia-backed forces of Nagorno Karabakh and seven districts around it that were seized as buffer zones. But in the wake of the war between Georgia and Russia in August 2008, Turkey’s government said it was ready to negotiate an end to Armenia’s isolation.

    Mr. Aliyev has expressed anger over the talks by threatening to reroute Azeri natural-gas and oil exports away from Turkey.

    He also expressed frustration over the delays in construction of the EU’s planned Nabucco pipeline, which would carry natural gas from the Caspian Sea to EU markets via Turkey.

    Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A12

    Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

    This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit

    www.djreprints.com

  • Victims of Armenian Terrorism, Kemal Arikan,

    Victims of Armenian Terrorism, Kemal Arikan,


    January 28, 1982
    Los Angeles, California
    Two Armenian gunmen assassinate Turkish Consul General, Kemal Arikan, in his automobile while waiting at an intersection. Justice Commandos against Armenian Genocide (JCAG) claims responsibility. One of the assassins, Hampig Sassounian, a 19-year-old Armenian American member of the Justice Commandos against Armenian Genocide (JCAG), is arrested shortly thereafter. Sassounian’s father states on public television, “I am glad that a Turk was killed, but my son did not do it.” Sassounian’s accomplice, believed to be Krikor Saliba, escapes to Beirut. Los Angeles police search Sassounian’s automobile, seizing a .357 caliber bullet and a one-way airline ticket from Los Angeles to Beirut. Police also search Sassounian’s home, where they seize a gun receipt, pistol targets, and a manifesto of “The Armenian Youth Federation.” Although Sassounian pleads not guilty, the Court convicts him of first-degree murder and sentences to life imprisonment. Sassounian’s sentence is later changed to 25 years-life in an appeal agreement in which he finally confesses to the killing. On October 6, 1980 a first attempt was made on Arikan’s life, when his home was firebombed.
    ATAA condemns these acts of violence against innocent individuals and remembers these tragedies with great sorrow.
    For more information: www.ataa.org/reference