Category: Main Issues

  • Did Turkey’s Ambassador Really Lobby For Passage of Genocide Resolution?

    Did Turkey’s Ambassador Really Lobby For Passage of Genocide Resolution?

    sassounian33
    Thousands of articles are posted on the internet every day. But, very few make us fall off our chairs!
    Last week I came across a shocking news item posted by the Turkish Forum — the largest website for Turkish news. It was titled: “Forgotten Ambassador in Sierra Leone Uses Armenian Genocide Resolution to solve his Problem.” Here is the summary in translation of that incredible article:
    “In recent years, parliaments of several countries have adopted resolutions on the Armenian Genocide. In retaliation, Turkey has recalled its ambassadors from these countries. It has been revealed that some opportunistic ambassadors exploited this situation, by abusing their position.
    “According to a Foreign Ministry announcement this morning, Orhan Emin Turkone, Turkey’s Ambassador in Sierra Leone for the past 12 years, has been fired for having lobbied for the passage of the Armenian Genocide bill in that country’s Parliament.
    “During a press conference this morning, the Foreign Ministry’s Undersecretary Ersin Ozbukey explained: ‘Recently, it came to our attention that the so-called Armenian Genocide bill was placed on the agenda of the Parliaments of Chad, Eritrea, and Djibouti. But, when we saw that this bill was unanimously adopted by the Parliament of Sierra Leone, we started suspecting that something had gone terribly wrong.’ Ozbukey added: ‘We formed an investigative committee that uncovered some interesting, but disturbing information.’
    “’We confirmed that Amb. Turkone had carried out lobbying activities in favor of the Armenian Genocide bill,’ Ozbukey stated. ‘Of course, this can’t be excused, but the Ministry also has its fault in this affair. This man was abandoned and forgotten in a far away country. He got that idea, after [Turkish] Ambassadors were recalled following the adoption of the genocide resolution by other countries. Twelve years is a long time,’ Ozbukey admitted.
    “Ozbukey then provided the details of Amb. Turkone unbelievable actions in publicizing the Armenian Genocide in Sierra Leone. Ozbukey said that whenever the Ambassador visited a bar, he would write on facebook: ‘We massacred the Armenians in such a nasty way.’ He told bartenders: ‘My grandfather alone killed 100-150 Armenians whose bones are in the basement of our home.’ The Ambassador made up such falsehoods and lies. He basically said whatever came to his head. Sierra Leone is a small place. Word spreads quickly. No one had ever heard of either Armenia or Turkey. But, within a month, everyone in the whole country was agitated over this issue. People were dancing in the streets when they learned that the genocide was recognized. This shouldn’t have happened, but unfortunately, it did!
    “Ozbukey explained that after this revelation, the Turkish government started paying more attention to the agenda of various parliaments. In order to avoid such situations in the future, instead of recalling ambassadors, ‘we are now considering the possibility of cutting off trade relations, until the resolution is removed from the Parliament’s agenda,’”
    Even though this article sounded too good to be true, the amount of detail and specific names mentioned in it led dozens of Turkish websites to post it, without realizing that it was a hoax! After learning that Turkey did not have an embassy in Sierra Leone, the Turkish Forum deleted the fake news from its website. It was also not true that Armenian Genocide resolutions were being considered by parliaments of Chad, Djibouti and Eritrea in recent months.
    It is not known who concocted this elaborate hoax. Given the extensive amount of criticism directed at Prime Minister Erdogan within Turkey in recent weeks, the author could well be a disgruntled Turk with a sense of humor who decided to take a sarcastic swipe at his Don Quixotic leader. The article was accompanied by an authentic looking photo of three African officials along with a non-African individual at a signing ceremony. The photo gave the false impression that the latter was the Turkish Ambassador to Sierra Leone.
    It is not at all surprising that several Turkish websites fell for this ruse, as the government of Turkey has made a practice of recalling its ambassadors from France, Canada, the United States, and other countries for having recognized the Armenian Genocide.
    Namik Tan, the newly appointed Turkish ambassador to Washington, was recalled on March 4 after the House Foreign Affairs Committee approved the Armenian Genocide resolution. It was reported that he might stay in Ankara until after April 24. This is great news for Armenian-American activists, as they can lobby Congress without facing any opposition from the Turkish Ambassador during the crucial weeks leading to April 24, when he needs to be in Washington trying to block the Genocide Resolution in the House and persuade Pres. Obama not to refer to the Armenian Genocide in his annual statement!
    To the best of our knowledge, Amb. Tan did not lobby Congress for passage of the Armenian Genocide resolution, as did the fictional ambassador in Sierre Leone, in order take an extended vacation with family and friends back home. However, judging from Prime Minister Erdogan’s recent self-defeating statements, sometimes truth is indeed stranger than fiction!

  • Andrew Dismore AND Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day Bill 2009-10

    Andrew Dismore AND Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day Bill 2009-10

    Andrew Dismore

    Labour MP for Hendon

    Andrew Dismore,

    Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day Bill 2009-10

    in sponsoru… TF olayın ensesinde! ☾✫

    https://www.turkishnews.com/en/content/2010/03/22/scandal-mps-caught-trying-to-sell-their-influence-for-cash/
    Saygilar, hürmetler…

    Haluk Demirbag
    — On Mon, 3/22/10, H Savas ( wrote:)

    Toplantiya katilan Esin Hanim’onemli bir bilgisi (Andrew DIsmore  ile ilgili)
    Haluk

    Tel: 07770302822

    Haluk, cok onemli bir BBC haberi. Dismore’un Cyprus baglantilarini acikliyor!
    esin
    ————————————————————————-
    ———————-

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8580183.stm

    Dismore’la ilgili bolum:

    “… The rules on overseas visits are there to ensure that no-one canaccuse MPs of accepting foreign hospitality in return for politicalfavours, for example pressing the UK government for financialassistance.
    They require MPs to register such visits and then declare relevant trips in questions, motions or debates.
    Oneof those who appears to have fallen foul of the code of conduct isLabour’s Andrew Dismore, a member of the Commons Standards andPrivileges Committee – the very body which polices MPs’ behaviour.
    Hebroke rules more than 90 times, following annual visits to Cyprus, byfailing to declare the hospitality when raising issues about the islandin Parliament.
    In total, he has tabled more than 200 Commonsquestions about Cyprus since the last election in 2005, on topics suchas missing persons from the island and its victims of past conflictbetween Turkey and Greece.
    The Commons information office estimates it costs on average £149 to answer a written question.
    MrDismore has also signed motions and led debates about Cyprus. However,he denies any wrongdoing and claims his questions about Cyprus were notsufficiently relevant to his trips to require a declaration….”

  • Turkey needs to calm down on the Armenian issue

    Turkey needs to calm down on the Armenian issue

    Monday, 22 March 2010

    Dr. Faruk Logoglu , Buyukelci (E), Turkish forum danisma kurulu Uyesi

    [email protected]

    The Turkish government’s attitude and response to recent developments in the United States and Sweden regarding Armenian claims are off the mark and counter-productive. Without a counter-strategy, Turkey is closing down its shutters and painting itself into a corner.

    Moreover, the Justice and Development Party, or AKP, leadership, by arguing and exploiting the issue domestically, is making a mistake because it could backfire. The current approach, if not altered soon, may hurt our national standing and interests.

    The Turkish contestation and protests of American and Swedish decisions on Armenian claims are certainly justified because parliamentary bodies have no business or competence in legislating history. However, the official reaction by Turkey, heavily laden with anger and resentment, is self-damaging and dysfunctional.

    Recalling our ambassadors for consultations is a legitimate exercise and quite appropriate. Yet not sending them back until and unless certain conditions are met is another thing entirely and serves no useful purpose.

    Other countries, including Russia and France, took similar decisions in the past, a considerable number of them during the time AKP had been in power. Indeed, the same House Committee in the U.S. had approved similar resolutions twice before in the last five years. The reactions then were more measured and calculated.

    Today the government should explain to our people why this time the official reaction is so vehement and insular and what and how they expect to gain from this self-aggrandizing stance.

    In foreign relations, we need diplomacy most in time of crises. Even under the most challenging circumstances, one must keep its channels of communication open, try to reverse the damage done, and limit further damage to national interests. Even in today’s Internet and telephone age, ambassadors are still prime agents in diffusing tensions and in resolving problems between countries.

    The U.S. is still our ally and partner and Sweden is a strong friend of Turkey. With both countries, we have vital interests at stake. Their governments have both disavowed the decisions of their legislatures. In the U.S., it is a resolution of the full House of Representatives that counts, not a vote in one of its committees. The right thing to do, therefore, is to seek to work with the U.S. and Swedish authorities on how to protect and promote our relations and mutual interests under the prevailing circumstances.

    The first step should then be the return of our ambassadors, both highly capable diplomats, to their duties without undue delay.

    The more important task is to develop a coherent and sophisticated foreign policy. On the Armenian issue, we need a broader strategy. Angry reactions to the aberrations of foreign parliaments do not constitute a foreign policy and are self-defeating. The first order of business is for to press for progress on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. Turkey did the right thing in signing the two protocols with Armenia, but failed to factor the Azeri-Armenian conflict into the Turkish-Armenian opening. Progress there would make room for Turkey to restore the process of Turkish-Armenian reconciliation.

    Whatever the provocations and setbacks emanating from Armenia or any other source, Turkey must keep the protocols with Armenia “on line.” And we must keep Azerbaijan on our side.

    Armenia’s lukewarm ownership of the protocols and the January ruling of its Constitutional Court have stalled the process. However, if we want to normalize our relations with Armenia and the Armenians, we too must avoid making mistakes.

    Especially saddening is the idea of expelling Armenian citizens working illegally in Turkey. The notion, while legally justifiable, is morally wrong and unacceptable, politically unwise and socially unbecoming for Turkish people who always extend a helping hand to those in need. We would be doing incalculable harm to our social conscience if we send these people back as our image in the world would suffer irreversible damage.

    Our leaders are often fond of resorting to traditional sayings. One to remember in this context is “who rises in anger, sits a loser.”

    We will not achieve anything useful by turning inward or by posing conditions that cannot be fulfilled. There is no way for the U.S. administration to give any guarantees involving the Congress or for the Swedish government to reverse the decision of their parliament. What we can do is to prevent further damage to our relations and to check further progress of Armenian claims. We must therefore be calm and calibrated in our responses, in the certitude that we are always ready and willing to face the facts of our history.

  • Turkey to lodge lawsuit against states, recognizing Armenian genocide

    Turkey to lodge lawsuit against states, recognizing Armenian genocide

    03/22/2010

    Turkish oppositional parties’ MPs from National Unity and Republican People’s Party intend to come up with a lawsuit against the states, that recognized Armenian Genocide of 1915 in Ottoman Empire, Turkish Hurriyet reads.

    The final decision on the matter should be made by Turkish government, that is yet silent.

    According to the Republican MP Sukru Elekdag, international court should give a precise response to Turkey about its fault. He reckons that both countries’ parliaments break assumption of innocence, accusing Turkey of the genocide: “I suppose that if we achieve the international out-of-court settlement, extensive work should be done to establish our case.”

    He deems the states, that already recognized the fact of genocide should realize the meaning of the word and determine whether one state can accuse the other of such a crime.

    S.T.

    News from Armenia – NEWS.am

  • US, Turkey postpone business meeting

    US, Turkey postpone business meeting

    Font Size: Larger|Smaller

    Monday, March 22, 2010
    ‘We wish for trade relations between the two countries, as well as investments, to develop further,’ says Uğur Terzioğlu.

    An annual conference on United States-Turkey relations scheduled for April 11-14 has been postponed due to tensions over the U.S.’s official attitude toward Armenian genocide claims, according to the chairman of a Turkish business association.

    The 29th Annual Conference on United States-Turkey Relations was postponed due to fears there would be low attendance by Turkish representatives, according to Uğur Terzioğlu, chairman of the Turkish-American Business Association, or TABA/AmCham.

    “With respect to our government’s politics and depending on the fact whether U.S. President Barack Obama uses the world ‘genocide,’ we are supporting the postponement of the American-Turkish Council [ATC] meeting,” he said.

    “We hope to see the dark clouds over politics to disappear. We wish for trade relations between the two countries, as well as investments, to develop further,” he said.

    The Turkish-American Business Council, or TAIK, and the ATC made the postponement decision together, said the Foreign Economic Relations Board of Turkey, or DEİK.

    On Saturday, DEİK said the conference, which was planned for the second week of April in Washington, was postponed due to the approval of a resolution on genocide claims in a Foreign Relations Committee of the U.S. Congress and the political tensions it subsequently raised.

    On March 4, the U.S. House committee approved a resolution that supported Armenian genocide allegations during the deaths of Ottoman Armenians in 1915.

    In response to the development, Turkey has temporarily recalled its ambassador in Washington, Namık Tan, to Ankara.

  • SCANDAL: MPs caught trying to sell their influence for cash

    SCANDAL: MPs caught trying to sell their influence for cash

    [1]

    ‘MPs for hire’ face lobbying clean-up

    Cabinet ministers rounded on their former colleagues, including Stephen Byers, Patricia Hewitt and Geoff Hoon, who were caught trying to sell their influence for cash.

    Lord Adonis
    Cabinet members have vowed to tighten up lobbying laws

    Related Tags:

    Geoff Hoon
    Patricia Hewitt
    David Miliband
    ministers
    secretary

    They vowed to tighten up lobbying laws after MPs including Stephen Byers, Patricia Hewitt and Geoff Hoon were secretly filmed talking to undercover reporters.

    ‘There is absolutely no room for the sort of innuendo or promises that seem to have been floated in this case,’ said foreign secretary David Miliband.

    Chancellor Alistair Darling sugges ted the MPs had been naive to fall for the sting targeting 20 MPs standing down at the next general election.

    ‘Really, what on earth did they think they were doing?’ he said.

    ‘The best answer when you get a call like that is to put the receiver back down again – it’s obvious.’

    In the footage for Channel 4’s Dispatches programme, former transport secretary Mr Byers described himself as ‘like a sort of cab for hire’charging £5,000 a day to pull the strings of movers and shakers. He also claimed to have influenced Lord Adonis in his dealings with National Express.

    Former health secretary Ms Hewitt allegedly said she had helped a client paying her £3,000 a day to win a seat on a government advisory group.

    And ex-defence secretary Geoff Hoon is said to have offered introductions to current ministers, in return for fees of £5,000 a day.

    Mr Byers last night insisted he had ‘never lobbied ministers on behalf of commercial organisations’. He said he had made ‘exaggerated claims’ in the discussions caught on camera.

    , 21st March, 2010

    [2]

    Calls for inquiry into ‘MPs for hire’ scandal

    Damian Whitworth, Francis Elliott and Alex Ralph

    David Cameron demanded yesterday that Gordon Brown investigate a boast by the former Cabinet minister Stephen Byers that he had used his influence to change policies to favour businesses.

    The former Transport Secretary [Lord Adonis], who was secretly filmed offering himself “like a sort of cab for hire” for up to £5,000 a day, will be referred to the parliamentary standards watchdog today.

    Mr Byers told an undercover reporter that he had secured secret deals with ministers and said that he received confidential information from No 10 and was able to help firms involved in price fixing to get around the law.

    The claims gravely embarrassed Labour, which rushed forward a promise to introduce a compulsory register of lobbying which it said had been planned for the election manifesto.

    Thirteen Labour MPs and seven Tories were approached by investigators for Channel 4’s Dispatches and The Sunday Times, pretending to be executives from a fictitious American lobbying firm. The others to feature in the documentary to be screened tonight are Labour’s Geoff Hoon, Patricia Hewitt, Margaret Moran and Baroness Morgan and the Tory MP Sir John Butterfill, who is understood to have boasted about his closeness to Mr Cameron.

    Mr Byers was covertly filmed telling the reporter that he would be able to lobby ministers and gave examples of where he had done so before. He said he would charge £3,000-£5,000 a day and claimed he had done a deal with Lord Adonis, the Transport Secretary, to benefit National Express. He later retracted his claims and he, Lord Adonis and National Express all strongly denied any deal yesterday.

    All of the MPs filmed, including Ms Hewitt and Mr Hoon, former Cabinet ministers, denied any wrongdoing and insisted that they had breached no rules. “I am confident that any investigation from the Standards Commissioner will confirm that I have always fully complied with the MPs’ code of conduct,” Mr Byers said. “I have never lobbied ministers on behalf of commercial organisations and have always fully disclosed my outside interests.”

    Mr Hoon, a former Defence Secretary, reportedly said that he charged £3,000 a day and was looking to turn his knowledge and contacts into “something that frankly makes money”. He said: “At no stage did I offer, nor would I attempt to, sell confidential or privileged information arising from my time in government.”

    Ms Hewitt said she “completely rejected” the allegation that she helped to obtain a key seat on a government advisory group for a client paying £3,000 a day.

    The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats said they would table parliamentary questions about the claims in an attempt to see if there had been breaches of the ministerial code.

    “I have been warning for some time that lobbying is the next scandal to hit British politics,” Mr Cameron said. “These are shocking allegations. The House of Commons needs to conduct a thorough investigation into these ex-Labour ministers.”

    He said that the Prime Minister “would want to get to the bottom of the accusations being made about his Government — and real change is needed”.

    Senior Cabinet ministers distanced themselves from their former colleagues.

    Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, said it was “ridiculous” that the MPs had been caught out in the sting. “The best answer when you get a call like that is to put the receiver back down again. There are rules about serving MPs — we’ve said that we are going to have to get a statutory-backed code of conduct to deal with former ministers. But really, what on earth did they think they were doing?”

    David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, said that he was “appalled” and added: “There is absolutely no room for anyone to trade on their ministerial office.”

    Research by The Times shows eight former ministers have made up to £370,000 in outside work of various kinds since announcing they would be stepping down as MPs. They include John Prescott, John Reid, John Hutton, Alan Milburn and Ms Hewitt. Mr Prescott, former Deputy Prime Minister, has made up to £166,000, mostly through television documentaries and his autobiography.

    , March 22, 2010

    [3]

    Metro Leeds 22 March 2010

    [4]

    MPs’ foreign visit rules breached

    Hundreds of breaches of parliamentary rules by MPs who accepted free overseas trips from foreign governments have been uncovered by a BBC investigation.

    More than 20 MPs broke rules on declaring hospitality in questions or debates after visiting locations such as the Maldives, Cyprus and Gibraltar.

    Between them, the MPs – from all the major parties – breached parliamentary regulations on more than 400 occasions.

    One former standards watchdog says it shows MPs cannot regulate themselves.

    Some MPs dismissed the breaches as technical errors or oversights.

    However, the former Commissioner for Standards in Public Life, Sir Alistair Graham, told the BBC repeated rule breaches threatened to “undermine the integrity” of the democratic system.

    He said it “demonstrated the failure of the self-regulating system of discipline in the Commons” and called for a shake-up of the way MPs’ behaviour is monitored.

    “This is a very worrying situation which will further demean the standing of Parliament,” he said.

    BBC home editor Mark Easton, who led the investigation, said it would raise further questions about the Commons’ ability to regulate itself.

    The rules on overseas visits are there to ensure that no-one can accuse MPs of accepting foreign hospitality in return for political favours, for example pressing the UK government for financial assistance.

    They require MPs to register such visits and then declare relevant trips in questions, motions or debates.

    One of those who appears to have fallen foul of the code of conduct is Labour’s Andrew Dismore, a member of the Commons Standards and Privileges Committee the very body which polices MPs’ behaviour.

    He broke rules more than 90 times, following annual visits to Cyprus, by failing to declare the hospitality when raising issues about the island in Parliament.

    In total, he has tabled more than 200 Commons questions about Cyprus since the last election in 2005, on topics such as missing persons from the island and its victims of past conflict between Turkey and Greece.

    The Commons information office estimates it costs on average £149 to answer a written question.

    Mr Dismore has also signed motions and led debates about Cyprus. However, he denies any wrongdoing and claims his questions about Cyprus were not sufficiently relevant to his trips to require a declaration.

    Conservative David Amess has admitted failing to register a free trip to the Maldives – regarded as a “very serious” breach of the rules by the Committee on Standards and Privileges, according to the MPs’ code of conduct.

    He also accepts he did not register a second trip for almost a year, blaming an administrative error by his office staff.

    ‘Paradise’

    During a debate he tabled about the Maldives in 2007, Mr Amess told the Commons how his “splendid visit” had given him “an early taste of paradise”.

    “No words can describe adequately just how beautiful the islands are,” he added, before suggesting the UK Government “could be encouraged to do a little more than is being done at the moment” for the islands in the Indian Ocean.

    Despite leading two debates about UK support for the Maldives and asking 15 questions about the islands, he failed to declare an interest. Referring to the MPs’ code of conduct, Mr Amess told the BBC: “It is for the member to judge whether a financial interest is sufficiently relevant.”

    Liberal Democrat Norman Baker, who has been actively calling for a clean-up of Parliament following the expenses scandal, has admitted breaching the rules on 37 occasions.

    In a statement to the BBC, Mr Baker accepts he failed to declare an interest when leading debates and tabling questions about topics such as human rights in Tibet. He has travelled to India twice, courtesy of the Tibet Society and the Tibet government-in-exile.

    “I should have then declared a relevant interest in respect of the parliamentary activities you list,” he said. “It is an unintended oversight that I did not.”

    The MP who heads the Commons Public Administration Select Committee, Tony Wright, told the BBC that such rule-breaking was “unacceptable” and that the system should be more transparent.

    “Declarations should be the norm. It is quite proper for MPs to go on visits. Some of those visits will be financed by foreign governments. But… if they’re lobbying on behalf of governments who have paid for their visits, then clearly we need to know about it.”

    The rules are enforced by MPs themselves. Breaches are only investigated if a formal complaint is made and there is no independent body to ensure that members stick to the regulations.

    Shadow defence secretary Liam Fox has admitted breaking the rules on two occasions, having visited Sri Lanka five times in the past three years courtesy of its government. He failed to declare the hospitality when asking ministers how much UK aid had been given to Sri Lanka.

    In a statement, Mr Fox said: “I should have noted an interest and will be writing to the registrar to make this clear.” He blamed a “changeover of staffing responsibilities” for registering one of his visits more than two months late.

    During the current Parliament, Gibraltar’s government has funded 31 trips for MPs to attend an annual street party on the territory.

    Street party

    Labour’s Lindsay Hoyle has been a guest at these National Day Celebrations three times. Following his visits he has asked 30 questions, tabled three early day motions and signed a further seven, all without declaring his interest.

    Mr Hoyle also broke the rules by failing to declare an interest following registered trips to the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands.

    “I have never received or sought any financial benefit,” he told the BBC.

    Conservative Andrew Rosindell has been a guest of Gibraltar’s government twice in recent years. He subsequently asked 48 questions and signed or sponsored nine motions related to the territory without declaring an interest.

    Thirteen of his questions about Gibraltar were before a visit had been registered. The BBC put the matters to Mr Rosindell but has yet to receive a response.

    The BBC has identified a further 10 MPs from all three major parties who have been guests of Gibraltar’s government and shortly afterwards breached rules when signing motions or tabling questions about the territory.

    The investigation has also identified three more Labour MPs and another Conservative who failed to declare an interest following visits to Cyprus.

    MPs who have breached the rules:

    David Amess

    Norman Baker

    Crispin Blunt

    Graham Brady

    Colin Breed

    David Burrowes

    Andrew Dismore

    Jim Dobbin

    Alan Duncan

    Liam Fox

    Mike Hancock

    Lindsay Hoyle

    Paul Keetch

    Bob Laxton

    David Lepper

    Andrew Love

    Madeline Moon

    Mike Penning

    Andrew Rosindell

    Richard Spring

    Theresa Villiers

    Rudi Vis

    DECLARING FOREIGN TRIPS

    • Any MP who has an overseas trip paid for by a foreign government must register it within four weeks
    • They must declare a financial interest if it “might reasonably be thought by others to influence the speech, representation or communication in question”
    • This includes when tabling questions, motions, bills or amendments, and when speaking out during Commons proceedings
    • Members may not, for example, call for increased UK financial assistance to the government which provided the hospitality
    • Q&A – MPs’ foreign trips rules

    ANALYSIS

    mark eastonBy Mark Easton, BBC home editor

    The point of the regulations is to ensure that a sceptical citizenry can be confident about the integrity of their elected representatives.

    Transparency is key.

    The whole system only works if members take this responsibility seriously. Declaration doesn’t imply wrongdoing, but a failure to declare might be interpreted that way.

    The widespread abuse of the system uncovered by our investigation suggests some Members of Parliament don’t understand this.

    But what really struck me as I conducted the investigation is that the system of scrutiny surrounding the rules clearly does not work.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8580183.stm, 22 March 2010

    [5]