Category: Main Issues

  • Nancy Pelosi: “We are all Armenians!”

    Nancy Pelosi: “We are all Armenians!”


    House Speaker pledges to fight on for Genocide recognition

    by Emil Sanamyan

    Published: Wednesday April 21, 2010

    Speaker Pelosi speaking at April 21 congressional commemoration. The Armenian Reporter

    Washington – “Tonight we are all Armenians!” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) declared as she began her address at the annual congressional commemoration of the Armenian Genocide on April 21.

    “We are tired of the story being told [about why Congress should not adopt an Armenian Genocide resolution] but we are not tired of fighting for the truth,” Pelosi insisted as she spoke in front of some 200 people, mostly Armenian Americans.

    Speaker noted the importance of last month’s House Foreign Affairs Committee vote on the Armenian Genocide resolution that “insisted on the truth” and expressed hope that the vote was “of some comfort” to Armenian Americans.

    Pelosi added that she and other supporters of affirmation would not rest until the federal government clearly recognizes the Armenian Genocide, but she made no commitments about bringing the House resolution to vote, a move that is opposed by the Obama Administration.

    She also referred to last year’s court decision in California that used the U.S. government position as justification to deny Armenian Americans an opportunity to collect on WWI-era insurance policies of their ancestors.

    The event organized by co-chairs of the Armenian caucus Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), included House Majority leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Howard Berman (D-Calif.) and more than a dozen other members of Congress, including two members of Armenian descents Reps. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) and Jackie Speier (D-Calif.)

    The event also featured remarks by Armenia’s Ambassador to U.S. Tatoul Markarian, Artsakh’s Representative Robert Avetisyan, and invocations by the Armenian Church clergy, including Archbishop Oshagan Choloyan who offered an opening prayer for the House of Representatives earlier in the day.

  • Turkish-Armenian relations and Azerbaijan

    Turkish-Armenian relations and Azerbaijan

    by
    Novruz Mammadov*

    Recently, the Turkish media has widely discussed Azerbaijan’s role in Turkish-Armenian relations.

    Many commentators argue that in order to become a global player Turkey must mend ties with Armenia, and they accuse Azerbaijan of thwarting this process. Some even claim that Turkey has made its foreign policy hostage to Azerbaijan’s demands. Most of these arguments do not reflect reality.Over the last two decades, the major impediments in Turkish-Armenian relations have been the Armenian campaign for the recognition of the genocide claims and Armenia’s refusal to publicly recognize the Turkish border. Turkey’s decision to close its border with Armenia in 1993 in response to the occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding Azerbaijani territories by Armenian forces has set another milestone in the relations. On the other hand, under the influence of their Armenian lobbies, the US and European countries have made significant efforts to help Armenia, ignoring its continuing occupation in Azerbaijani territories. Recently, the US has been using the possible recognition of the Armenian genocide claims as a threat to pressure Turkey to open the border without any preconditions.

    Three main arguments are used to compel both Turkey and Azerbaijan to accept a plan that would only benefit Armenia. Firstly, the Turkish-Armenian problem has nothing to do with Nagorno-Karabakh, and hence these two issues should be treated separately. Secondly, the opening of the border will eliminate the genocide issue, which is a major problem in the US-Turkish relations. Thirdly, both Turkey and Azerbaijan will benefit from the opening of the border because this will contribute to the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

    First of all, we believe that as two states with the same people, Turkey and Azerbaijan bear the moral responsibility to defend each other’s interests. Those who demand that Turkey ignore the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict should be reminded that many Armenian fighters in the conflict, by their own account, were driven by the desire to “settle scores with the Turks” and expelled close to a million people from their lands by undertaking massacres such as the one in Khojali. These people were victims of ethnic cleansing because they were Turks, and naturally they expected support from Turkey. The Turks’ desire to consider the most important problem of their Azerbaijani brethren should be clear to American officials who prepare genocide recognition bills and pressure countries across the ocean in order to satisfy their relatively minor Armenian population.

    On the other hand, it is not plausible that the opening of the border will relieve Turkey from the genocide problem. The Armenian diaspora considers the genocide issue its lifeline and an important political tool. Armenian officials have also embraced the recognition of the genocide claims as a national cause and continue to support it. This issue has been used as a political tool both within US domestic politics and in its relations with Turkey. It is ironic that those who use the genocide card to pressure Turkey to open the border today argue these claims will be shelved with the improvement of Turkish-Armenian relations. Turkey’s major concern should be the scenario lurking behind the recognition campaign, as it is well known that the other two pillars of the Armenian cause are reparation and territorial claims.

    Those who claim the opening of the border might contribute to the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict by leading to a moderation in Armenian politics or argue that Turkey’s support for Azerbaijan strengthens our position and makes us irreconcilable in the negotiations are apparently not well informed on this issue. In order to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict, Azerbaijan has closely cooperated with the Minsk Group of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE); however, so far the negotiations have been futile because of Armenia’s intransigence. Armenia’s track record in the negotiations creates the impression that it wants to keep the conflict unresolved as an excuse for an indefinite occupation. If the expected concession from the Azerbaijani side is our acknowledgement of the occupation, it will not happen under any conditions. The closed borders with Turkey and Azerbaijan remain a major factor that might compel Armenia to take a constructive step for the resolution of the conflict. Opening the border before Armenia takes any steps in this direction would be a major blow to the peace prospects and Azerbaijan.

    Lastly, it is simply not true that Azerbaijan has not supported Turkey. Azerbaijan was not with Turkey in the recent nuclear security summit because it was not invited, and in fact, the media interpreted this as yet another manifestation of US efforts to exclude Azerbaijan from Turkish-Armenian relations. Azerbaijani officials consider raising and defending issues important to Turkey a responsibility, and our countries have consistently taken a unanimous position on almost every issue in international forums. Since its independence, Azerbaijan had to fight against the use of the Armenian genocide claims as a political instrument because we have suffered most from these claims. Armenia has successfully overshadowed its occupation and ethnic cleansing in Azerbaijani territories with an active genocide campaign in the West, and today, it is painful to observe that this tactic has started to succeed even in Turkey.

    The relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan are based on strong traditions and mutual interests. Over the last 20 years, Turkey has been Azerbaijan’s gate to the West, and Azerbaijan has played the same role in Turkey’s relations with Central Asia. Notwithstanding great pressures, Azerbaijan insisted on building its major oil and gas pipelines through Turkey toward the West. Standing by Azerbaijan during difficult times, Turkey has earned the esteem and sympathy of the Azerbaijani people. We consider the current external pressures another test that will further strengthen the ties between our peoples and countries.


    *Ambassador Novruz Mammadov is the director of the department of foreign relations in the presidential administration of Azerbaijan.


    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Pax Turcica” group.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
    For more options, visit this group at .

  • ARMENIAN QUESTION AND TURKS (1)

    ARMENIAN QUESTION AND TURKS (1)

    Attorney A. Erdem Akyüz

    Member of Ankara Bar Association,

    General Director of Society of Law Sovereign

    [email protected]

    There have been discussions on recognition of Armenian Genocide committed by the Ottoman Empire carried out at the sessions of the Parliaments in various countries, and some resolutions for official recognition of Armenian Genocide has recently been passed by some of the Parliaments. Actually, accusation of Armenian Genocide has also been used as an instrument of bargaining and compulsion for Turkey to make some political or economical compromises before and after these resolutions.

    Apart from the fact that it is still a question whether the crime was actually committed or who committed the genocide against whom, I would like to quote literally the memories of my father, who actually lived at the place and date regarding genocide accusations, without making any comments, but making a historical record by letting the reader to decide.

    My father’s family is a well-known family residing in Erzurum for many decades. His family used to be called as “Molla Ahmet Oğulları” at the times when titles were used instead of surnames, and the family has a history that goes back to generations. My father, Mahir Akyüz, was born in 1903 in Erzurum. He is one of the first Judges of the Republic of Turkey. His professional life started when he was assigned as an interrogator (“Müstantik”) in 1926; he became an attorney at law admitted to Ankara Bar Association in 1968 and passed away in 1973. His photograph, which was taken in the period of his first assignment as a judge, is highly interesting as it reflects the fashion of that era.

    He was a child at the age of 12-13 when Erzurum was invaded by Russians and Armenians in 1916. When Russians started to retreat as the result of Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, Erzurum was left to Armenians. My father used to narrate, without any hatred or particular malice whatsoever, some events starting from March 12, 1918 until Armenians left the country. I remember the following events narrated by my father at home during long nights as true stories based on his experiences:

    TURKS WERE TAKEN AWAY FROM THEIR HOUSES (1)

    “It was the times of Armenian and Russian invasion took place in Erzurum. It was a cold winter night. Our door was riotously knocked. Several armed Armenian invaders dressed like Comitadji[1] entered into the house. They took my father, Ahmet, and me out of the house by force. They knocked out my mother, Raife, who tried to stop them, with butt-stroke of their rifle. My little sister, Emine, cringed at the corner looking behind us with her scared eyes. Back then, I was a 12-13 years old child. My father was a white-bearded and old-aged person who was over the age of 60. They took us from our homes and put the entire neighborhood in line on the street. After they lined us up, a young Russian soldier approached us a little later. He said: ‘Old man, you are aged; take your kid and go!’ Then, we went back to our home. While we were trying to close the door, the door was wide open again. It was opened by one of the Armenian soldiers who previously came to our home and took us away. He cursed, took away, lined up and butt-stroked us again. While we were walking in line, the same young Russian soldier saw us once again. Then, he took us out of the line and signed us to go with his hand. We rushed to our home. We had a wooden cabinet where we used to put our bed mattresses. My father hid himself in the cabinet; my mother and sister covered him with blankets. My mother put me in tandoor. ‘Tandoor’ is an oven built underground for insulation; a fire is kindled inside, and it is used for baking breads and cooking foods in Erzurum houses. She closed the tandoor. It was not cold yet. My hands and feet hurt, but I could do nothing. After a while, I heard noises. Our house door was completely broken. They were messing up and breaking our goods into pieces. They were searching the house to find us. Then, I heard distant outcries; and they left. It took hours for me to get out of the tandoor; my mother covered my cheeks with a piece of cloth. We could go out at dawn on the next day. By shaking in the cold, we walked along with our neighbors consisting of old men, women and children, who were left behind. The mosque of our neighborhood was half burnt. You could still see the smoke rising up in the air. We found our neighbors who were taken from their houses at night. They couldn’t survive from the fire or the bullets.”

    We used to hear my fathers’ childhood memories with fascination by sitting around the same tandoor in Erzurum, and we used to look at the burn marks on his hands and feet.

    My father used to say that his big brother, Ismail, was a soldier fighting on Tripoli, Balkan and Caucasian fronts at the same time. He was fighting in defense of his country when his father and mother were under invasion. My father used to tell the followings about his brother with a great respect: “My big brother came from the front after the invasion. Fingers of his left hand were crushed. He used to pick up and hold me in his arms. I used to push his crushed fingers to open his hand, but he couldn’t hold his fingers straight and they were curled up just like a spring as soon as I stopped pushing his fingers. He used to tell me that he fell down when he was fighting at Caucasian front, and his fingers were crushed under the feet of one of the horses of chevaliers. Then he was called to front again. He never came back. They said that he became a prisoner of war in Russia.” My father, Mahir Akyüz, who witnessed the days of Armenian and Russian invasion, became one of the first judges of the Republic of Turkey by granting the title of interrogator (“Müstantik”) in 1926. As the result of long and exhausting researches that he carried out, he found the tomb of his big brother, “Ahmet oğlu Ismail” at “Turkish War Cemetery in Vladivostok, where he died as a martyr.

    The photograph of my grandfather white-bearded Ahmet Akyüz, my grandmother Raife Akyüz and my father, Mahir Akyüz, who survived the genocide only by chance, shall be a historical witness with regards to their suffering and pain experienced 100 years ago. If my father couldn’t get out of the line that they were put or if they were caught by Armenian soldiers in my father’s house, none of the members of our family, his five children who became doctors, lawyers and engineers as well as our children, would not be born. In other words, not only his generation survived genocide, but also ours. Consequently, the fate of the neighborhood exposed to fire and bullets in the mosque ended up by suffering and losing their lives.

    This Republic and State had experienced hard days in the last century. Undoubtedly, similar cases and stories could be found in any family witnessing the same period.

    Attorney A. Erdem Akyüz

    Member of Ankara Bar Association,

    General Director of Society of Law Sovereign

    [email protected]


    [1] The term Komitadji (also known as Comitadji or Komitaji) (Bulgarian Комити; Romanian: Comitagiu; from Turkish: Komitacı, “a rebel, member of a secret revolutionary society”) refers to members of Bulgarian rebel bands operating in the Balkans during the final period of the Ottoman Empire, fighting against Turkish authorities and rival Greek and Serbian groups. Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komitadji

  • The other side of the Caucasus story

    The other side of the Caucasus story

    By Anca Gurzu

    Published April 21, 2010

    In 1915, the region of Eastern Anatolia was being threatened by czarist Russian troops and the Ottaman Empire was crumbling. The Ottomans decided to forcibly relocate about 700,000 Armenians from the eastern region to create a buffer zone against the Russians. This resulted in horrific death and suffering as people starved and faced harsh wartime conditions. The Armenian diaspora, and many other Western countries, describe the events as a genocide—organized killings meant to eliminate the Armenians.

    Scott Taylor believes there are always two sides of history, and he has tried to put the events in a deeper context in his new book Unreconciled Differences: Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan by highlighting Turkey’s explanation of the events, and, implicitly, how little we know about this conflict.

    Mr. Taylor, a war correspondent and the editor and publisher of Ottawa-based military magazine Esprit de Corps, is also critical of Canada’s decision to formally refer to the 1915 deportation as genocide.

    He also discusses the 1992-94 conflict between the post-Soviet republics of Azerbaijan and Armenia over the sovereignty of Nagorno-Karabakh province. This conflict resulted in the displacement of about 800,000 Azeris and thousands of deaths.

    Embassy spoke with Mr. Taylor this week, and the following is an edited transcript of that conversation:

    What drew your interests to these two specific conflicts in the Caucasus?

    “I think the biggest thing for me was to realize how little I knew. I hadn’t ever heard about the war between Azerbaijan and Armenia. When I was heading to Azerbaijan for the first time in 2006 and they told me there is a frozen conflict, I said ‘what?’ It never made our newspapers, there were some reports, but I certainly didn’t pick up on them.

    “These are really two overlooked conflicts of World War One and the present day, and it’s almost embarrassing that a war of that scale was happening while I was a war correspondent and covering places like Cambodia, Croatia, Bosnia, etc., and didn’t really know about it.

    You are trying to tell Turkey’s side of the story in the 1915 departation, which you say is not well known worldwide because of the strong Armenian diaspora. Why do you think that was necessary?

    “There is a discussion on whether this was a deliberately-ordered genocide or a completely botched relocation and deportation of the Armenians…. Everyone can agree that the aftermath was horrific, there is no discussion on that. No one denies that hundreds of thousands of Armenians perished at that particular point in time.

    “What the Turks point out is that the Armenians were also openly engaged in warfare against the Turks and the Kurds in the region and fought alongside the Russians, and in many cases committed atrocities and barbarous acts themselves.”

    “So this is part of the problem. You begin to realize that there are two divergent sides of the story. [The Armenians] managed to somehow present themselves as a singular victim and I think that’s the thing that’s important. There wasn’t just one victim. Was there human suffering? Absolutely. But at the same time, what were they doing? Burning down villages and houses.

    “[The situation] isn’t as clear-cut as it is meant to be believed here, as the diaspora presents it. What holds the diaspora together is that they were the survivors of a genocide. That’s become part of their folklore, their myth, of who they are. That’s what bonds them.”

    Throughout your book you’re critical of Canada’s resolution to refer to the 1915 displacement of Armenians as genocide. What’s the impact of such resolutions?

    “They make it tougher to close that gap. Because now [the diaspora] can say, ‘Well look, it’s been decided by other countries [that it was a genocide].’

    “How many issues are there where people are demanding things to be recognized? Even the Poles could be demanding that the Russians recognize what happened in the Katyn forest. Why should our Parliament be determining these things? We have two very different histories in our own country as well. For us to declare ourselves on one side or another seems kind of pompous and pretentious given how little we know.”

    Why did you decide to address the more recent Azeri-Armenian conflict in the same book and how are they connected?

    “I think it was the comparison of massive deportation. [The Armenians] cleansed out some 800,000 Azeris in neighbouring provinces, they went beyond just the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. They were able to cleanse out a huge region, and there still so many people living in refugee camps today….

    “I asked the Armenians, ‘How can you say that the the Turks forcibly relocated you to create a buffer zone for security, and then you forcibly relocate 800,000 Azeris to, in your own words, create a buffer zone? How can you not compare the two?’ They did the same thing. There are similarities in what happened.”

    Many of your chapters begin with personal narratives, memories of your trip to the regions or even of your background. What role do they play in your book?

    The goal is to find a common ground between the facts and the reader, who is going to discover the way I did, without having any idea about it. My background, and seeing other sides of conflicts, being in Belgrade during the bombing and seeing the dehumanizing of the Serbs, even to this day and age, that has led me to pursue the other side of the story. There are no evil people. There are evil persons, but not people. You cannot declare Turks evil.”

    Unreconciled Differences: Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan

    By Scott Taylor

    Esprit de Corps Books

    176 pp. $19.95

    [email protected]

  • Pro-Armenian Turks Urged To Mark Armenian ‘Great Catastrophe’ In Istanbul

    Pro-Armenian Turks Urged To Mark Armenian ‘Great Catastrophe’ In Istanbul

    Armenia — Screenshot, Turkish intellectuals call for commemorating victims of 1915 events, 21Apr2010

    21.04.2010

    Prominent Turkish intellectuals have urged their countrymen to join them in marking on Saturday the 95th anniversary of the start of mass killings and deportations of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire with a silent protest in Istanbul.

    “We call upon all peoples of Turkey who share this heartfelt pain to commemorate and pay tribute to the victims of 1915. In black, in silence. With candles and flowers,” they said in an online petition signed by dozens of other Turks.

    “For this is OUR pain. This is a mourning for ALL OF US,” reads the petition posted at .

    The gathering, if it is allowed by the Turkish authorities, will take place in Istanbul’s central Taksim square and mark the first-ever public commemoration of more than one million Armenians massacred by Ottoman Turks in 1915-1918.

    The unprecedented action was initiated by renowned intellectuals challenging the official Turkish version of those events, which holds that the Armenian death toll is inflated and denies a premeditated government effort to exterminate the Armenian population of the crumbling empire. The signatories include journalist Ali Bayramoglu, historians Halil Berktay and Taner Akcam, and other scholars such as Cengiz Aktar and Baskin Oran.

    The petition stops short of calling the massacres a genocide, using instead the Armenian phrase “Great Catastrophe.” “In 1915, when we had a population of only 13 million people, there were 1,5 to 2 million Armenians living on this land,” it says, adding: “They were the grocer in our neighborhood, our tailor, our goldsmith, our carpenter, our shoemaker, our farmhand, our millwright, our classmate, our teacher, our officer, our private, our deputy, our historian, our composer…

    “Our friend. Our next-door neighbors and our companion in bad times. In Thrace, in the Aegean, in Adana, in Malatya, in Van, in Kars…In Samatya, in Sisli, in the Islands, in Galata…

    “On April 24th, 1915 they were ‘rounded up.’ We lost them. They are not here anymore. A great majority of them do not exist anymore. Nor do their graveyards. There EXISTS the overwhelming ‘Great Pain’ that was laid upon the qualms of our conscience by the ‘Great Catastrophe.’ It’s been getting deeper and deeper for the last 95 years.”

    Thousands of Turks signed a similar online petition that was initiated by mostly the same public figures in December 2008. It offered Armenians a personal apology and called for the Turkish government to acknowledge the killings.

    Turkish prosecutors threatened to bring criminal charges against the authors of the appeal under Article 301 of the Turkish penal code, which criminalizes “insulting the Turkish people.”

    The Turkish government has scrambled in recent weeks to prevent further progress of a U.S. congressional resolution recognizing the Armenian genocide. It has also pressed U.S. President Barack Obama to again avoid using the word “genocide” in a statement on the massacre anniversary due on April 24.

    Obama has been receiving diametrically opposite messages from leaders of the influential Armenian community in the United States as well as pro-Armenian U.S. lawmakers. More than a dozen members of the U.S. Senate have signed this week a letter calling on him “to stand on the right side of history and unequivocally affirm the Armenian Genocide.”

    “While we fully acknowledge the importance of the U.S.-Turkey relationship, we should never, for any reason, fail to call a tragedy of this magnitude by its rightful name,” the senators said.

    https://www.azatutyun.am/a/2020635.html
  • LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA FROM AMERICAN TURKISH COUNCIL

    LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA FROM AMERICAN TURKISH COUNCIL

    Dear ATC Members,

    ATC Chairman, Ambassador Richard Armitage, sent a letter today to President Obama urging him to avoid in his April 24 Armenian Remembrance Day Statement tagging the Ottoman Empire and its successor state, Turkey, with the crime of “genocide”.  This is an opportunity, Chairman Armitage writes, to promote Turkish and Armenian healing and to “encourage open borders and regional peace, and American security and commerce.”

    A copy of Chairman Armitage’s letter is attached.

    It is our intention, once we are past April 24, to embark immediately on several activities that demonstrate the health and vitality of Turkish – American relations, and not least of all, the potential for substantially increased bilateral commerce.

    Ambassador James H. Holmes
    President
    American-Turkish Council

    ================================================================

    AmericanTurkish Council

    – [ Bu sayfanın çevirisini yap ]ATC The leading business association in the US dedicated to the promotion of US-

    Turkish commercial, defense and cultural relations.
    www.americanturkishcouncil.org/ – ÖnbellekBenzer