Category: Main Issues

  • Turks won 2nd Property Case at the ECHR

    Turks won 2nd Property Case at the ECHR

    ECHR RULING

    GREEK CYPRIOTS LIVING SECOND SHOCK IN PROPERTY CASES AT ECHR

    The Greek Cypriot Administration is living its second shock following a new ruling concerning property in Cyprus . Following the ruling in April which recognised the North Cyprus based Immovable Property Commission as being able to provide a domestic legal remedy to Greek Cypriots, a second ruling made yesterday has also gone against the Greek Cypriots concerning the use of property in Northern Cyprus which previously belonged to Greek Cypriots. Let’s view our report….

    The European Court of Human Rights had made a ruling in April which recognised the North Cyprus based Immovable Property Commission as being able to provide an effective domestic legal remedy to Greek Cypriot applicants, even though it recognised the body as being a subordinate authority of Turkey.  The same ruling had also ruled that cases can be resolved through compensation, exchange and restitution – and another striking feature of the ruling was that the human right of the current property possessor also had to be respected.

    Following this ruling, two more Greek Cypriot brought cases against Turkey concerning property in the TRNC was dealt with and a ruling was made by the ECHR yesterday. The two cases of “Asproftas and Petrakidu” were brought under Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which says:

    CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS, ARTICLE 8:

    1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home

    and his correspondence.

    2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of

    this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary

    in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety

    or the economic well-being of the country…

    The two cases alleged that Turkey had violated this Article, particularly the part of the Article referring to “his home.” However the case had actually been brought by the next of kin (children) of the original, previous owner.

    The question which the court sought to answer was whether the “next of kin” or children could benefit from this Article. In the two cases, it was alleged that the applicants had lived in the properties until 11-12 years of age, and so it was argued that the term “family home” covered them. However the ECHR ruled that the Article was not applicable, and the ruling means that the respecting family life, his home and correspondence has not passed to the new generation of Greek Cypriots, whose families may have possessed property in North Cyprus prior to the Turkish peace intervention in 1974.

    The ruling of the ECHR did not stop there. According to Greek Cypriot press reports, the ruling has also stated that when such applications were being made, “there was a need to have a manifest concrete relation to the property with no weaknesses”. The court ruled that this was not the case in these cases. It also said that “they should not have realistic expectations” of seeking to reinstate legal rights on a property following the long passing of time.

    The ECHR ruling has once again gone against the Greek Cypriot point of view that “Property Rights belong to the original owner”.

    Source: ATCA, London

  • Armenians in Turkey 100 Years Ago,

    Armenians in Turkey 100 Years Ago,

    From: [email protected]

    Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 4:46 PM

    Subject: Exhibition in London: Armenians in Turkey 100 Years Ago, 1 May-25 July 2010

    Dear all,

    The event below might be of your interest. It is an exhibition organized by Armenian Institute on “Armenians in Turkey 100 Years Ago,” including a collection of historical postcards and pictures documenting the life of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire before 1914. The exhibition may be visited from 1 May  to 25 July 2010 at the Brunei Gallery (SOAS), Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG. For further questions, please contact Osman Koker, e-mail: [email protected].

    Best regards,
    Umit Sonmez
    Research Officer: Turkey and European Union
    European Institute
    LSE Contemporary Turkish Studies
    London School of Economics and Political Science
    Houghton Street WC2A 2AE
    London, UK

    E-mail: [email protected]
    Tel: +44 (020) 7955 6067
    Fax: +44 (020) 7955 7546

    Brunei Gallery (SOAS), Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG
    1 May – 25  July 2010  Tuesday-Saturday 10.30-17.00

    Armenians in Turkey 100

  • THESE ARE THE SAME TURKS

    THESE ARE THE SAME TURKS

    06:24 pm | May 24, 2010 | Politics

    “Armenia is conducting a fearful and cautious policy,” said Ramkavar
    Azatakan Party (HRAK) leader Harutyun Arakelyan.

    He views the European Parliament’s recent resolution as another
    attempt of pressure.

    “Armenia has always been pressured by outer forces. As a UN member
    state, Armenia must spare no effort to use the opportunities envisaged
    by international law. Only after Armenia is guided by the norms of
    international law in relations with Azerbaijan and Turkey and shifts
    the Genocide issue from the political domain to the international
    level, will the USA, Russia and European Union change their stance
    towards Armenia,” says Mr. Arakelyan.

    The HRAK leader thinks Armenia should speak to the international
    community in their language and by their laws.

    “As long as we sit at a negotiation table with criminals like Turkey
    and Azerbaijan and “pressurize” Turkey by recognizing the parliaments
    of other countries and denouncing genocide, similar resolutions
    and pressures are natural against a country [Armenia] which lacks
    resources and market.”

    Harutyun Arakelyan thinks Armenia will gain nothing from the suspension
    of the Armenian-Turkish Protocols.

    “As soon as international winds start blowing, the protocols will
    appear on the parliament’s agenda, and our deputies will ratify them
    in a flash.

    The danger is not eliminated. Turkey has proved the world that it
    is a secular country seeking friendly relations with its neighbours
    and EU membership. Armenia’s weak point is “its inner” Turks,” said
    Arakelyan meaning the propagandists who state that present Turks are
    different from the ones who committed the genocide.

    “This approach was put into circulation before the genocide. But we
    must understand that there is no difference between them. Today’s
    Turks must repay for the atrocities of their forefathers. An U.S.

    prosecutor said in Nuremberg that Hitler did not take his crimes to
    the grave and each German must repay for his misdeeds. Similarly,
    we should have a Nuremberg; we must create a separate court under the
    auspices of The Hague, similar to the International Criminal Tribunal
    for Rwanda,” Arakelyan concluded.

    __._,_.___
  • Turkey and the Holocaust

    Turkey and the Holocaust

    By Arnold Reisman

    Arnold Reisman is an engineer and a retired professor of operations research at Case Western Reserve University. Born in Lodz in 1934, he came to the United States after World War II and is the author of numerous books about Holocaust refugees in Turkey, including Turkey’s Modernization: Refugees from Nazism and Ataturk’s Vision (New Academia, 2006).

    Turkey is now center stage in many discussions and policy debates worldwide.  When it comes to the State of Israel and Turkey’s small remaining Jewish community, the news coming out of Turkey is not good.

    But what about the historical relationship between Jews and Turks?  Most historians are quite aware that Jews lived and prospered throughout the Ottoman Empire, and, until the last decade of the Empire’s existence, they prospered in Palestine as well.  But what about the Holocaust, which took place outside of Turkey’s borders?

    Ask a historian what Turkey’s role in World War II and most will answer that Turkey was neutral.  That is correct—at least until Turkey declared war on Germany and Japan on February 23, 1945.

    Ask a historian what Turkey’s role in saving Jews during the Holocaust was and most will say, “I don’t know.”  Some will be very negative and blame Turkey for the Struma—a derelict ship carrying over seven hundred illegal refugees from Romania to Palestine, all but one of whom perished when the ship was towed out of Istanbul by the Turkish Coast Guard and sent adrift in the Black Sea.  Their facts are correct, but the reasons for the tragedy are in great part misdirected.  Turkey had a law which allowed transit rights through its territorial waters for all those who had valid visas to other destinations.  Even after lengthy negotiations spanning three continents, however, Great Britain refused to provide such visas.  For reasons still unknown, the ship was torpedoed by a Soviet submarine.

    Ask a historian if any ships succeeded in transiting Turkey’s territorial waters with Jewish refugees and reached Palestine [illegally] prior the formation of Israel as a state in 1948, and most will say, “I don’t know.”  The fact is that a number of ships did so succeed.  Among these waere the Velos in 1934; the Draga/Eli in 1938; the Assimi, the Rim/Aghios Nickolaos IV, the Astir/Marsis, the Parita, the Tiger Hill and the Sakarya in 1939; the Marien in 1941; and the Milka I, Milka II, the Kazbek, the Belasitsa, and the Salahattin in 1944.  A number of ships with Jewish immigrants also transited Turkey between the end of the war and the formation of the State of Israel in 1948.

    Ask a historian what Turkey’s role was in saving nearly two hundred eminent intellectuals and providing them with jobs commensurate with their academic stature and most will have no idea, even though at least two books have been published on the subject in English (Turkey and the Holocaust by S.J. Shaw and Turkey’s Modernization: Refugees from Nazism and Atatürk’s Vision by Arnold Reisman)

    Tell a historian that among those so saved was Arthur von Hippel, the acknowledged father of nanotechnology; Erich Auerbach, who while in Turkey penned the Mimesis, a seminal text that laid the foundation for a unified theory of representation that spans the entire history of Western literature; Benno Landsberger and Hans G. Güterbock, who after the war made the University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute world-famous; Dr. Rudolph Nissen, famous for developing a widely used operation to prevent esophageal reflux and who performed an exploratory laparotomy on Albert Einstein, and most historians will be astonished to hear about it.

    Lastly, ask a historian about the role of Turkish diplomats in saving close to three thousand Jews with Turkish connections living in France and nearly all will say, “I have never heard of it.” Yet in my forthcoming book Ambassador and a Mentsch: The Story of a Turkish Diplomat in Vichy France, I found, using Yad Vashem’s official population data, that a French Jew without Turkish roots had a 3.7 greater chance of dying in Hitler’s ovens than a French Jew who had Turkish connections.  The reason was the intervention of the Turkish legation staff in both occupied and in Vichy France.  Headed by Ambassador Behic Erkin, the diplomats worked night and day to save Jews, and they did this against the will of their government in Ankara. Thus they were risking their careers while often risking their lives. For this they deserve to be recognized as Righteous Among the Nations even if it means that Yad Vashem will have to change its rules of how these selections are made.  The law of large numbers should be substituted for the three survivor testimonies required in the past.

  • Peaceful Protest: JOIN TURKISH AUSTRALIANS ON SATURDAY 29th MAY 2010

    Peaceful Protest: JOIN TURKISH AUSTRALIANS ON SATURDAY 29th MAY 2010

    ErmenileriprotestogosterisiWhere: In front of Fairfield Council 86 Avoca road, Wakeley-N.S.W
    Time: 12:00 – 15:00

    Turkish Australians have had enough of the so-called genocide claims by the Armenians & Assyrians and others, who are part of an International conspiracy!!..

    Peaceful Protest against the claims of so-called genocide has been organised by Turkish Australians, we urge all Australians to attend and let Fairfield Councillors know that we Australians are not happy with the actions of the councillors who have no idea what happened in 1915,  A.T.A.G calls on the Australian Government to accept the offer made by the Prime Minister of Turkey to set up a Independent Executive Committee made up of Historians, Forensic Scientists, Academics and Experts to look in to the claims of the co-called genocide, this is the only way that will once and for all set the record straight.. The Armenians and others are refusing to take part in such an Independent Enquiry by an Independent Executive Commission, WHY, yet they continue to LOBBY Local, State and Federal politicians to accept their version of the 1915 incidents… Liberal M.P Joe Hockey (aka, HOKEDONIAN) IS PART OF THE SAME CONSPRICY, that continues to paddle the same LIES AND DISTORTION OF HISTORICAL FACTS…
    more information on this issue to be continued;…

  • Matthew Bryza Named New US Ambassador to Azerbaijan

    Matthew Bryza Named New US Ambassador to Azerbaijan

    Matthew Bryza, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, delivers a briefing on the “Situation in Georgia and Implications for the Caucuses” in August, 2008. After much speculation, the US State Department is confirming Bryza’s appointment as ambassador to Azerbaijan. (Photo courtesy: US Department of State.)

    May 21, 2010 – 9:15am, by Shahin Abbasov
    EurasiaNet

    The White House has appointed US diplomat Matthew Bryza, a former American co-chair for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict resolution talks, as its new ambassador to Azerbaijan, EurasiaNet.org has learned.

    A diplomat from the US embassy in Baku who asked not to be named stated that an official announcement will be published on the White House’s website on May 21.
    The Azerbaijani government issued its official consent to the appointment on May 20, the source said.

    Bryza, whose appointment to Baku has long been the source of considerable speculation, has a near-22-year-long diplomatic career that put him at the center of two of the South Caucasus’ most strategic issues: resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the introduction of non-Russia-related oil and gas pipelines from Baku to the Black Sea.

    As deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs from 2005 to 2009, Bryza coordinated US energy policy in the Black and Caspian Sea regions, and represented the US on the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s Minsk Group talks on a resolution of Azerbaijan’s 22-year conflict with Armenia over the breakaway region of Nagorno Karabakh.

    Under US President Bill Clinton, he served as a deputy advisor on Caspian Sea energy diplomacy and worked on US government efforts to develop a network of oil and gas pipelines in the region.

    Bryza’s appointment must be confirmed by the US Senate, where he is likely to face questioning about his actions leading up to the 2008 Georgia-Russia War, a conflict that some critics charge was prompted by a Georgian misunderstanding of American readiness to intervene.

    The Azerbaijani government has not yet issued an official comment on Bryza’s appointment. Bryza’s name was submitted to the Azerbaijani government a few weeks ago, the US embassy source said.

    The absence of a US ambassador to Baku – the post has been vacant for almost a year — has been cited previously as a source of irritation for some Azerbaijani officials, who allegedly saw it as a slight of President Ilham Aliyev’s government amidst American promotion of a Turkish-Armenian rapprochement.  With Bryza’s appointment, Washington is sending a “positive signal” that it is ready to smooth over relations with Azerbaijan, Elkhan Shahingolu, director of the Baku-based Atlas think-tank, believes.

    Brzya, whose 2007 wedding to Turkish-born foreign policy analyst Zeyno Baran, was attended by Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov and several other Azerbaijani officials, is seen as a known entity for President Ilham Aliyev’s government.

    “They were in touch with him for a long time, they know his character and see him as a good specialist on the region,” commented Shahingolu.  “So why not to be happy?”

    Editor’s note:

    Shahin Abbasov is a freelance correspondent based in Baku. He is also a board member of the Open Society Institute-Azerbaijan.