Category: Cyprus/TRNC

  • KEYNOTE SPEECH BY THE PRESIDENT OF TURKEY

    KEYNOTE SPEECH BY THE PRESIDENT OF TURKEY

    KEYNOTE SPEECH BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AT THE EUROPEAN BUSINESS SUMMIT

    (BRUSSELS, 26 MARCH 2009)

    Distinguished Guests,

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    It is a great pleasure for me to participate in the Seventh European Business Summit. I am confident that, the Summit will provide to the business community yet another occasion to address important problems that face Europe, at present.

    Business people will better know that, the “fine line” between success and failure is the ability to shape perceptions according to changing conditions. I believe that the same applies to international affairs.

    To influence global developments, we should be able to renew our perceptions about political, social and economic challenges.

    The European Union was conceived by such visionary leaders as Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman: They have changed the perceptions about the future of Europe by launching the idea of a united continent.

    This project started as a marriage of coal and steel. However, today, the same project has reached the dimension of a political, economic and social integration process. The dream of a “European Union” is today a reality.

    Furthermore, the European Union is now poised to be a major force to run world affairs in the 21st century.

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    While the EU is now a global economic and political powerhouse, it is not immune to global challenges.

    Quite the opposite!

    The most immediate challenge the EU, together with the world community, faces is the recent global financial and economic crisis. This is a testing time for Europe. But Europe has faced other challenges in the past. It has always succeeded in overcoming them. Europe should be confident in its capacity to overcome today’s ordeal and emerge from it even stronger.

    The EU today draws its strength from the sense of common destiny, with its common values, policies and institutions. It is well equipped to face present challenges.

    I have no doubt that at the end, thanks to the truly European spirit of debate and compromise, we shall emerge from this crisis stronger than before. Such a debate has already started to produce creative ideas.

    The EU’s greatest achievements of the last decades, from the “Single Market” to “enlargement”, have all been the results of acting collectively and responsibly in an inclusive way. Today, the EU, employing the same principles and instruments, is finding the right path to its political and economic future.

    No one can claim that, in the face of today’s economic, political and social crises, an inward-looking, divided, weak or smaller EU would be better off.

    Distinguished Guests,

    Turkey, as an accession country, a member of the G-20, and the sixth largest European economy, is uniquely placed to work hand in hand with the EU to overcome the global economic crisis which started out in the financial markets.

    Turkey is ready to do its share in order to deal with this global economic crisis and to provide sustainable solutions. Indeed, Turkey went through such a financial crisis in 2001. We lost almost one fourth of our GDP. As a result, we made extensive structural reforms focused on strengthening the regulatory bodies. This proved to be an expensive but valuable lesson. At least today, our banking system is very sound.

    We all know that the basis of economic activity is transparency and trust. Therefore, while reforming the financial system, this basic tenet must be upheld. We share the consensus view that governments, central banks and the business world must engage in strong collective action in this direction.

    We must also stimulate economic growth while keeping inflation under control. Therefore, it is essential to support the real economy and at the same time promote social solidarity.

    We need to give much thought to a new global financial architecture based on supervision and regulation. It is a positive development, that such issues are now being dealt with, not only at the national level, but also at the supranational level. In this direction, the World Bank, the IMF and other financial organizations need to be restructured to answer the requirements of modern economic times.

    A well-regulated free market economy should definitely continue to be our main point of reference. We should never overlook the productivity brought about by private sector activity. Although the shares of some financial institutions have been or will have to be transferred to national treasuries, these shares should come back to the hands of the private sector whenever conditions permit.

    Protectionism is also a dangerous trend. In the medium to long term, it is our own people, the consumers, who pay the price of protectionist policies. At the end of the day, such policies hurt everybody.

    In this respect, Turkey is ready to cooperate with the EU at the G-20 and the Doha Round.

    I hope that the EU will also stand up for the basic principles which have made it a great economy.

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Let us consider some of the major challenges facing Europe today:

    Economic recession; Unemployment; Demographic decline; Illegal immigration; Terrorism; Energy security; Climate change and others.

    I am convinced that all of these challenges will be tackled much more effectively when the EU finally enlarges to Turkey. The ties that bind Turkey and the EU together are already strong and deep-rooted:

    – Our common values, like democracy, rule of law and human rights,

    – Our strong economic partnership framed by a highly successful Customs Union,

    – Our shared interests on matters like energy security, good governance, effective regulation of the free market and the fight against poverty,

    – Our joint objectives of expanding peace and stability in our region and beyond.

    The interests of Turkey and the EU overlap in a vast geography and across many areas.

    Turkey’s geography and its historical ties in a large region covering the Balkans, the Middle East, the Caucasus and Central Asia give it unique opportunities. Out of the thirteen European Security and Defense Policy missions worldwide, seven are being conducted in Turkey’s neighborhood. Turkey is the largest non-EU contributor to ESDP missions.

    On issues as diverse as Iran, Iraq, the Middle East, Afghanistan, Georgia, Kosovo and others, Turkey’s efforts directed at facilitating dialogue and compromise are clearly constructive. Just to cite a few examples:

    – Israel and Syria began indirect peace talks under Turkey’s auspices.

    – Turkey, together with Egypt, is actively working for inter-Palestinian reconciliation.

    – My trips to Baghdad two days ago and to Teheran two weeks ago are indications of our efforts to contribute to international peace and stability.

    – Next week, we shall bring together the Presidents of Afghanistan and Pakistan together with their military and intelligence officials in Ankara.

    – My first-ever trip to Armenia last year and our initiative for the Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform have been part of our commitment to a better atmosphere in the Caucasus region.

    In short, Turkey is a force for good in a number of the world’s principal pressure points. Clearly, increased synergy between Turkey and the EU will be to our mutual benefit.

    Therefore, obstacles preventing benefits of such a synergy, like the Cyprus issue, should be removed before wasting more time and losing more opportunities. Turkey and Turkish Cypriots have already done their share for a peaceful settlement of this issue. We are committed to continue in the same line. Our vision is to create another strong pillar of Europe in the Eastern Mediterranean among Turkey, Greece and the island of Cyprus once a comprehensive settlement has been reached.

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Energy is yet another area of interest for all of us. It is obvious that energy security is closely associated with prosperity and stability.

    In this respect, let us not forget that Turkey is close to nearly 70 percent of the world’s energy resources. It has a strategic location along the main transport routes of the oil and natural gas resources of the Middle East, Central Asia and Caspian regions.

    Turkey’s energy security strategy overlaps with the EU’s policy of diversification of energy supply routes. Indeed, Turkey is aiming at becoming Europe’s fourth artery of natural gas after Russia, Norway and Algeria. Following the realization of the main projects of the East-West Corridor, we are now working with our partners to realize the Southern Energy Corridor which includes natural gas pipeline projects going through the territory of Turkey.

    In this context, the Nabucco Project is a priority of our energy strategy. It will play a crucial role in moving gas further towards European markets.

    Distinguished Guests,

    I have outlined some of the main areas where Turkey is uniquely placed to help address the challenges faced by Europe. Turkey is a negotiating candidate country determined to join the EU. Turkey continues on its path to accession and an enormous transformation process is also taking place. The comprehensive political reforms enacted in the past six years have enhanced our democratic system. We are determined to take them further ahead.

    We will continue the negotiations in good faith with the shared objective of accession as clearly stated in the negotiating framework of the EU. It is essential that Turkey’s accession process be continued objectively, fairly, in a foreseeable way and according to the rules of the game.

    Distinguished Guests,

    Strategic vision is no longer confined to military or geopolitical considerations alone. Strategic approaches now aim for common values, intercultural dialogue and mutual harmony. Such a strategic approach implies Turkey’s accession to the EU.

    Turkey’s accession will carry within it some keys to solving many of the EU’s political, social and economic problems. I shall remind you that tomorrow’s Turkey will be a much different and stronger country compared to what it is today. When Turkey becomes a member, it will shoulder some of the burdens of Europe.

    Turkey is proof that a well-functioning secular democracy in a predominantly Muslim society can prosper, preserve its traditional values and also be a part of Western institutions.

    None of these are new concepts in defending the cause of Turkey’s accession to the EU. However, their importance increases as the challenges confronting us gain urgency with every day going by.

    The case is a rather simple one: The world needs the EU’s soft power. And to become a global power, the EU needs Turkey. For such a successful “peace project” involving 500 million people, Turkey’s integration is the most viable way forward.

    Distinguished Guests,

    The EU needs to approach this matter with a sense of vision.

    It must take the vision of its own Founding Fathers who aimed to eliminate barriers which divided Europe and not create new barriers. Therefore, I wish to recall the Czech Presidency’s motto: “Europe without barriers”.

    Thank you for your attention.

  • Cypriot, Greek and Turkish Affairs

    Cypriot, Greek and Turkish Affairs

    LOCATION London School of Economics (LSE)

    SPEAKER Caroline Flint

    DATE 26/02/2009

    Europe Minister, Caroline Flint, delivered a speech titled ‘a Cyprus settlement: who benefits? at the London School of Economics on 25 February 2009.

    Copied from British Foreign Office announcement

    Read the speech

    I’d like to thank Zenon and the Association for Cypriot, Greek and Turkish Affairs for inviting me here tonight.  Thanks also to the LSE for hosting us and for James for acting as chair.

    It is an honour to speak at this event where we remember Keith Kyle, a distinguished historian, journalist and a true friend of Cyprus.  I’m delighted that some of Keith’s relatives are able to be here tonight.
    Since I took over as Europe Minister last Autumn, I have made it one of my top priorities to do all I can to support the Cyprus settlement negotiations.  I am proud that it is very much a personal commitment and I was asked to take a lead on by Gordon Brown and David Miliband.  A commitment that I know those here tonight will share.

    Earlier this month I made my second visit to Cyprus as Europe Minister. I came away feeling that we need to do all we can to foster an expectation of success – an expectation that this round of negotiations can and will become the basis of a strong and lasting agreement.

    Negotiation towards a settlement is moving forward – and I believe much has already been achieved.  Important steps have been taken, such as opening Ledra Street, cancelling military exercises, and co-operating on cultural heritage and the environment. These steps show what can be done when the political will exists.

    But it is also clear that significant challenges still lie ahead.  Challenges that will require the continued willingness and courage of both communities if they are to find the compromises needed.

    And while it is up to the leaders to agree a timescale for action, I urge both sides to keep up momentum; to take the bold and imaginative steps needed to turn the expectation of success – into the reality of success.
    Inevitably much of the focus of the media, politicians and the public is on the difficult decisions ahead.  These are important decisions, but equally important is ensuring that everyone keeps sight of the benefits that a settlement can bring. Benefits for the Greek and Turkish Cypriots themselves, but also for the International Community who are supporting this process.

    Reaping the benefits of a settlement will require the support and enthusiasm of all those who want to see a united Cyprus.  That’s why I’m delighted to be here tonight, speaking to you – the representatives of the Cypriot UK Diaspora.

    Your size and your influence is such that you can make a difference to whether this round of negotiations succeeds or fails – but I’ll come back to that thought at the end if I may.

    First I’d like to set out the benefits I see a settlement bringing to Cyprus, the region and Europe more widely, and to explain clearly why the UK is so committed to a lasting settlement.

    Now I do recognise in the short time that I’ve been in this job, that the UK’s views on Cyprus are still seen with scepticism by some – and there are those who claim the UK has a hidden agenda when it comes to Cyprus.

    Let’s be honest, the long and historic relationship between our two countries has not always been free of mistrust and disagreement.  I’d like to set the record straight this evening.  To explain clearly why the UK wants to see a resolution of the Cyprus problem – and show that our interest is straight forward and in complete harmony with that of Cypriots.

    Our overall commitment is to support the UN’s efforts to achieve a settlement based on a bizonal, bicommunal federation with political equality.  We want to see a settlement agreed and peacefully implemented by Cypriots for Cypriots.  A settlement that will deliver a stable, prosperous and united Cyprus, operating as a valued partner within the EU.

    And whilst we see huge benefits in this for both Greek and Turkish Cypriots, our motivation is not entirely altruistic.  The fact is a resolution for Cyprus is in Britain’s national interest too.

    One major reason for our interest lies in the strong personal ties that bind Britain and Cyprus together.

    Those here tonight represent 300,000 Greek and Turkish Cypriots living permanently in the UK.  9,000 Cypriot students choose to study at British Universities every year and increasing numbers of British people choose to retire to Cyprus.   The friendships and personal associations at the core of these groups form the backbone of the bilateral relationship between the UK and Cyprus – and will do for generations to come.

    We have a long history of bilateral trade – which continues to this day.  Cyprus is the UK’s main customer for a huge range of agricultural products, many of which – Kiwi fruits and Avocados for example – would have been luxury items a generation ago.  UK exports to Cyprus totalled over 400 million pounds the year before last.

    Last year the UK Prime Minister and President Christofias signed a memorandum of understanding highlighting the breadth of the UK/Cyprus relationship.  It set out a framework for continued cooperation on a range of bilateral, EU and regional issues in which we have shared interests.  Issues of importance to ordinary people, such as education, health and policing.  Issues where UK/Cypriot cooperation brings benefits to both countries.
    We followed this up in December with a further memorandum specifically designed to strengthen our research and development links.  We agreed to take steps to promote greater contact between our academic institutions; to increase the exchange of research and best practice; and to embark upon joint research projects – work which I hope will attract funding from the EU.

    In north Cyprus, we are helping the Turkish Cypriot community prepare for a settlement.  Together with the European Commission we are supporting their efforts to bring their laws and policies into line with the EU.

    The autumn of 2008 also saw the launch of the Cyprus/UK business association – which will build on existing commercial links in goods, services and investment and enhance an already flourishing trade relationship.  Last month’s visit by the Lord Mayor of the City of London highlighted the level of co-operation between Cypriot and British businesses, and the potential for even closer links.
    It is true that many of the things we have in common and much of what we are working together to achieve would continue, regardless of whether or not a settlement is reached in Cyprus.  But, with a solution, this relationship would be even stronger – and even more productive.
    Beyond the purely bilateral relationship – there are real benefits to the UK in seeing Cyprus as a fully mainstreamed member of all the relevant international institutions – where we could work together to ensure those organisations reflected the values we both share.

    There are also clear knock-on benefits to Turkey’s EU aspirations – which we strongly support.  We will continue to urge Turkey to meet its obligations under the Ankara Protocol and sustain its support for a comprehensive settlement on the island.

    All of this adds up to a compelling package of ways in which the UK would benefit from a settled solution for Cyprus.

    But the most important reason for wanting a Cyprus settlement is this:  we can see no better guarantee of long term stability, peace and security for the people than a united island within the European Union.

    A solution, and the guarantee of long-term security that a solution will bring, will end the ever-present anxiety of all Cypriots. The UN Green Line cuts through the island like a scar and that division has gone on far too long. It is in everyone’s interest that the next generation do not grow up knowing only division, buffer zones and peacekeepers. When visiting the minefields recently, I saw for myself the physical impact of the frozen conflict. I met those brave men who are clearing the mined area, some of whom have been injured in the course of their duty. And it underlined, more than ever, the importance of working towards a settlement, and towards a more peaceful and secure state of affairs.

    And, of course, there will be wider benefits in terms of jobs and opportunities on the Island.

    The British High Commission in Nicosia sponsored two independent reports by the International Peace Research Institute of Oslo looking into the potential commercial and wider economic benefits to Cyprus of reunification.

    The first report, conducted last year, estimated that the benefit for each Cypriot household during the first seven years after a settlement would amount to 5,500 euros per year.  This figure was based on the commercial opportunities for increased trade between the EU, a reunited Cyprus and Turkey.  And I have to say it was a deliberately conservative estimate.

    A second report released earlier this year increased that estimate to 12,000 euros per family by taking into account the effect of the construction boom that a solution would stimulate. The impact of a settlement on tourism, transport, higher education and financial and business services, would raise real GDP growth in Cyprus by 3% in the first five years after a settlement.  I know that’s difficult now in the light of the world financial crisis that we’re all facing.

    That would result in the creation of more than 33,000 jobs, benefiting people from all over the island. Again, these are deliberately conservative estimates.

    These findings confirm what we heard from the IMF and World Bank back in 2004 – that the economy of a re-united Cyprus will be far greater than the sum of its parts.

    And what if the money currently spent on military patrols around the buffer zone were ploughed into redevelopment instead?

    Streets that now play host to decaying buildings and UN soldiers could be transformed into vibrant communities where Cypriot people could live normal lives; could come together to meet and to do business.  You need look no further than Ledra Street for evidence of what can be achieved where there is a will.

    For many who fled their communities in the 1960s and 1970s – who lost their homes, livelihoods, friends and members of their family – healing the psychological scar of the green line will, perhaps, be even more important than the economic benefits of reunification.

    A lasting solution would generate a sense of security, leading to the withdrawal of Turkish troops and the development of a new relationship with Turkey based on peace and common interest.

    It would also enable a generation of people to find a way to close a traumatic chapter of their lives – particularly when the settlement process addresses the property issue.   Many refugees would be able to return to their homes, while others would receive compensation or benefit from exchanging properties.

    And the next generation – their children and grandchildren – would no longer be constrained within communities divided by suspicion and mistrust – but would be free to travel wherever they choose within a stable, united island – and worship in restored mosques and churches.

    Freed from a focus on division, the leaders of a united Cyprus would instead be able to concentrate on the day to day issues that matter so much to people all over Europe – education, health, job creation and building for the future.  They would be able to devote all their time to bringing improvements that would raise the quality of life for everyday people and families from the north and the south.

    Reunification would also provide the space for civil society to flourish and for leaders to look outwards – to spend more time on helping find solutions to global issues such as climate change; energy insecurity; illegal immigration and organised cross-border crime; and to ensure that the Cypriot people come out of the current global economic downturn well placed to enjoy a prosperous and sustainable future.

    The benefits to the Cypriot people of a lasting settlement would spill over to their neighbours and allies as well, including the European Union.  Not least because Cyprus has potential as a positive influence in the region: as a hub of stability at the crossroads between Europe, North Africa and the Middle East.

    Again, the benefits go both ways – for too long, people in the north have been unable to reap the full benefits of EU membership or to contribute to the EU effort.  A solution would provide legal certainty and open the way to greater trade, investment and cultural opportunities.

    We need to be clear that these benefits are mutual – increased opportunities for Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots; benefits to both Turkey and Greece.

    Too often in conflict situations, particularly during active settlement negotiations, there is too much emphasis placed on winners and losers.  Everything is boiled down to a zero sum game, where anything that benefits one side is viewed as a defeat for the other.  This is not the reality.  A settlement in Cyprus is a win for both sides.

    It is of course for the Cypriot people to agree on the shape of an eventual settlement.   But I hope that I’ve left none of you in any doubt that the UK is fully committed to offering all the support and assistance we can to the settlement process.

    In closing, I’d like to return to the issue of how you can make a positive difference – and take this chance to appeal to you. Please use the influence you have to ensure these negotiations are successful.  Get in touch with your contacts in Government, in business and in civil society – and urge them to support the current negotiations and reject the status quo.

    Convince Cypriots from north and south to make their voices heard in support of the courageous steps both leaders are facing now and the tough decisions they will need to take in the future.

    Build and strengthen the expectation of success by asking political and community leaders to engage in the bi-communal activity that is absolutely essential to building trust and moving towards the reconciliation that Cypriots deserve.

    And to convince them to reach out and grasp this opportunity to shape a better future.  I hope you agree with me that it’s an opportunity too good to miss.

    Disseminated by:

    For just Social Engineering in Cyprus. No more or No less!

    COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF TURKISH CYPRIOT RIGHTS – UK

    CPTCR and CPTR are affiliated to Council of Turkish Cypriot Associations of United Kingdom

    and Turkish Forum, World Turkish Alliance

    c/o SCTA, 152 Old Kent Road,

    London SE1 5TY

    United Kingdom

    londoncharity@aol.com

    020 7701 7375

    WATCH THE VIDEO https://archive.org/details/CarolineFlintMPCyprusSettlement-WhoBenefits

    Then click embed this again.

    Cyprus Settlement – Who Benefits?
    2nd Keith Kyle Memorial Lecture

    A joint event by the Hellenic Observatory, LSE
    and the Association for Cypriot, Greek & Turkish Affairs

    London School of Economics
    Wednesday 25 February 2009

    Europe Minister Caroline Flint MP set out why a Cyprus settlement is so important to the UK in the 2nd Keith Kyle Memorial Lecture on British-Cypriot Relations at the London School of Economics on Wednesday 25 February.

    Caroline Flint said:

    “With over 300,000 Greek and Turkish Cypriots living in the UK, a long history of trade and increasing numbers of British people choosing to retire in on the island, the UK and Cyprus have much in common. But, with a solution, this relationship will be even stronger and a resolution in Cyprus is strongly in the UK’s national interest.

    With a settlement, the UK will benefit from a Cyprus fulfilling it potential on the international scene, the boost to Turkey’s EU aspirations – which we strongly support and the guarantee of long term stability, peace and security for the people of Cyprus and the wider region.”

    Caroline Flint has a strong interest in supporting Cypriots to find a solution to the Cyprus problem and has made it one of her top personal priorities. Following a successful visit to the island in October (in her first week in the job) she has maintained a close interest in developments and visited the island earlier this month, meeting both leaders. In January she announced a UK donation of 50,000 Euros to the UN Mine Action Centre in Cyprus which helped this important confidence building measure continue its work.

    The full text of the speech (but NOT of the Question and Answer Session) by Caroline Flint is available online at:

    Contact Details:
    Dr Zenon Stavrinides
    General Secretary, Association for Cypriot, Greek and Turkish Affairs
    8 Ganners Mount, Leeds LS13 2PE, Great Britain
    Tel: 0113 256 8907 Mobile: 07790 107353
    Email: Z.Stavrinides@lineone.net

    Visit the ACGTA websites at
    and

    Other Online Videos by the ACGTA are visible at:

    Other Cyprus-related videos by this producer are visible online at:
    http://archive.org/bookmarks/grokked

    This movie is part of the collection: Ourmedia

    Producer: Caroline Flint MP
    Keywords: Cyprus; Greece; Turkey; ACGTA; Association for Cypriot Greek and Turkish Affairs; Caroline Flint MP; EU; European Union; United Kingdom; United Nations; James Kerr Lindsay; LSE; London School of Economics; 2nd Keith Kyle Memorial Lecture; Hellenic Observatory

    Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs

  • Solving the EU-Turkey-Cyprus Triangle

    Solving the EU-Turkey-Cyprus Triangle

    Istanbul/Brussels, 23 February 2009: The International Crisis is pleased to announce the launch of a new frequently updated webpage covering the nexus of issues surrounding Cyprus, Turkey and the European Union: “Solving the EU-Turkey-Cyprus Triangle” .

    This is a critical year for Cyprus as efforts to resolve the long conflict gather steam, and for Turkey as frustration with EU enlargement fatigue weighs heavy on its chances of approaching membership. With Cyprus a member state of the EU and troops from NATO-member Turkey still in the northern half of the island, the inter-relationships are many.

    Will Turkey’s efforts to join the Union be formally blocked if it does not normalise its relations with Cyprus by autumn? Will other EU member states that have a negative stance towards Turkey’s membership continue to argue that Turkey has no place in the Union? Will such moves turn Turkey away from the EU, stifle ongoing reform and push Ankara towards other allies? Will the EU’s need to diversify energy sources and the Nabucco pipeline plans affect thinking in Brussels and member state capitals? And how will all these factors affect the search for a final peaceful settlement between Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots, elusive for so many decades?

    “Solving the EU-Turkey-Cyprus Triangle” , the new Crisis Group webpage, is an effort to continually revisit these questions and others with frequently updated analysis and commentary following the situation as it unfolds. The point is not to respond to every new diplomatic twist and turn, but to make a reasoned and considered assessment of events and offer recommendations to the key actors with greater immediacy than can be done with a longer report.

    Part of the reasoning behind this new webpage comes from the results of the online survey Crisis Group conducted a few weeks ago. Through that poll, we learned that 74% of our subscribers find our themed pages on specific conflicts useful — our most popular website feature. More than half of the over 11,500 survey respondents said they would like Crisis Group to produce more frequently updated analysis and commentary on our website. Almost as many said they wanted more information from the field.

    This new webpage will meet these expectations, with updates and new material once or twice a week from Crisis Group Europe Program Director Sabine Freizer in Brussels and Turkey/Cyprus Project Director Hugh Pope in Istanbul. With these frequent inputs into the public debate, we intend to play our part in the peaceful resolution of the Cyprus conflict in a way that can draw Turkey and the EU closer together.

  • tension between Turkey and Israel

    tension between Turkey and Israel

    IDF: Officer’s criticism of Turkey does not represent official view
    By Barak Ravid and Yossi Melman, Haaretz Correspondents, and Reuters
    An Israel Defense Forces spokesperson on Saturday said that IDF Maj. Gen. Avi Mizrahi’s recent criticism of Turkey does not reflect the official position of the IDF.

    “While referring to the criticism of Israel by Turkey, Gen. Mizrahi made
    statements that could be interpreted as criticism of Turkey’s past,” said a statement by Brig. Gen. Avi Benayahu, a spokesman for the IDF.

    “The IDF spokesperson wishes to clarify that this is not the official position of the IDF.”

    Turkey earlier on Saturday called on Israel to explain remarks quoted in Haaretz by Mizrachi that questioned Turkish policies toward Kurds and Cyprus, saying ties between the Middle East allies could be at stake.

    The Turkish Foreign Ministry also on Saturday summoned Israeli Ambassador Gabby Levy to protest comments by Mizrahi, commander of Israel’s land forces.

    Mizrahi was quoted as saying Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan should have “looked in the mirror” before slamming President Shimon Peres last month at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

    Mizrachi also said that Turkey was not in a position to criticize Israel’s actions in the Palestinian territories when it stations troops in northern Cyprus.

    He also accused Turkey of repressing its Kurdish minority and massacring Armenians during World War I.

    The Turkish military said on Saturday that Mizrachi’s criticism threatened to harm relations between the two countries.

    The flap was the latest sign of tension between Turkey and Israel, who maintain close military ties but whose alliance has been strained by the Israeli offensive on Gaza.

    Erdogan accused Peres of “knowing very well how to kill” in a public debate last month at the World Economic Forum.

    The Turkish General Staff, in a statement carried by the state-run Anatolian news agency, said Mizrahi’s remarks were completely unacceptable.

    “The comments have been assessed to be at the extent that the national interests between the two countries could be damaged,” it said.

    Turkey and Israel’s military cooperation includes allowing Israeli jets to use Turkish airspace for training.

    Erdogan told Reuters on Friday there were no plans to halt that agreement.

    Turkey keeps about 30,000 troops in northern Cyprus after invading the island in 1974 to thwart a coup attempt by Greek Cypriots. It is the only country to recognize a Turkish Cypriot administration there.

    Turkey has also fought a 25-year war against Kurdish separatists seeking to establish a homeland in the southeastern part of the country.

    Turkey denies accusations that it committed genocide against 1.5 million Armenians during World War I.

    Related articles:

  • WATCH: Turkey PM storms off stage over Peres remarks on Gaza
  • Turkey PM: Israel election results paint ‘very dark picture’
  • Cyprus – Progress by Andrew Dismore MP

    Cyprus – Progress by Andrew Dismore MP

    Cyprus – Progress so far report to ACGTA by Andrew Dismore MP – 6 Feb 2009

    https://archive.org/details/AndrewDismoreMPCyprus-ProgresssofarreporttoACGTAbyAndrewDismoreMP-6Feb2009



    embed this

    The Association for Cypriot, Greek & Turkish Affairs

    The Association for Cypriot, Greek & Turkish Affairs

    Friday 6 February 2009 at 6.30 p.m.

    London School of Economics
    European Institute
    Canada Blanch Room, Cowdray House, 1st floor,
    Portugal Street, London WC2A 2AE

    CYPRUS: PROGRESS SO FAR
    Andrew Dismore, MP

    Kyriacos Tsioupras in the Chair,
    for
    Dr Zenon Stavrinides
    General Secretary, Association for Cypriot, Greek and Turkish Affairs

    Visit the ACGTA websites at

    and

    THE SPEAKER: Andrew Dismore studied law in the University of Warwick and the London School of Economics, and worked as solicitor, specialising in helping victims of accidents and crime. He entered Parliament as Labour MP for Hendon in 1997. He has served in a number of parliamentary committees, including the Joint Committee on Human Rights, which he chairs; and the Standards and Privileges Committee. He is also involved in various political organisations, including Friends of Cyprus. His long-standing interest in the situation in Cyprus and his other interests are expressed in a number of speeches and articles which can be found in his website http://andrewdismoremp.com

    As Vice Chair of Friends of Cyprus, has paid repeated visits to the island, where he met with Greek and Turkish Cypriot politicians, academics, business people and civil society personalities. Following his last visit from 26 November to 2 December 2008, he put down many parliamentary questions which when answered were fed into an adjournment debate on Cyprus on 15 January 2009, in which the Minister for Europe, Caroline Flint, MP responded on behalf of the British government.

    This movie is part of the collection: Ourmedia

    Producer: Andrew Dismore MP
    Keywords: Association for Cypriot Greek and Turkish Affairs; ACGTA; Dr Zenon Stavrinides; Andrew Dismore MP; Vice Chair of Friends of Cyprus; Cyprus; Greece; Turkey

    Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs

  • Greeks boycott Israeli fair over Turkish Cyprus attendence

    Greeks boycott Israeli fair over Turkish Cyprus attendence

    Greek Cyprus boycotted international fair in Israel over Turkish Cyprus attendence, Turkish state media reported.

    Thursday, 12 February 2009
    World Bulletin / News Desk

    Greek Cyprus boycotted international fair in Israel over Turkish Cyprus attendence, Turkish state media reported.

    Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) has attended to the International Mediterranean Tourism Fair at Tel Aviv for the first time despite efforts of Cypriot Greeks to disturb.

    Cypriot Greek officials, up to the last minute, tried hard to prevent TRNC to attend the fair. When they could not succeed to prevent, they boycotted the fair which they attended for 15 years.

    The officials of the fair reminded to the Greeks that both sides had had their places at the fairs in Berlin and London, but they could not convince them. However, tourism firms from Cypriot Greeks attended the fair despite their state did not.

    Source:  www.worldbulletin.net, 12 February 2009