Category: Cyprus/TRNC

  • After Canceling Concert, Lopez Faces Possible Suit

    After Canceling Concert, Lopez Faces Possible Suit

    A hotel in Cyprus said it might sue Jennifer Lopez, below, after the singer withdrew from a scheduled concert for fear that it would be construed as making a political statement, Agence France-Presse reported. Ms. Lopez was to perform at the Cratos Premium hotel and casino complex in Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus on July 24, an event that Greek Cypriots have said would further polarize the country, which has been divided since the 1970s and whose northern region is recognized only by Turkey. Ms. Lopez’s representatives said last week that she would not perform the concert, citing “sensitivity to the political realities of the region.” But Murat Bozoglu, chief executive of the company that runs Cratos Premium, told Agence France-Presse that Ms. Lopez’s contract for the show had not been canceled. “If she does not show up for the concert, we will begin a procedure in the courts to claim $35 to $40 million in damages,” Mr. Bozoglu said.

    The New York Times

  • Cypriot Hotel Threatens To Sue J.Lo For $40m

    Cypriot Hotel Threatens To Sue J.Lo For $40m

    A luxury hotel in northern Cyprus has threatened to sue pop star Jennifer Lopez for $40m (£27m) after she cancelled a gig there for “political” reasons.

    But newspapers in the Turkish-occupied territory said the hotel owner has offered J.Lo an olive branch, saying there is still time to reverse her decision.

    The singer had been due to perform on July 24 at the Cratos Premium hotel and casino complex – but the booking outraged Greek Cypriots in the south of the island nation.

    They claimed that performing in the disputed north would be tantamount to making a political statement and the singer was deluged with thousands of letters of protest.

    A Facebook site against the concert signed up almost 20,000 members within a week.

    In backing out of the concert, a spokesperson for J.Lo told celebrity gossip website TMZ: “Jennifer Lopez would never knowingly support any state, country, institution or regime that was associated with any form of human rights abuse.

    “After a full review of the relevant circumstances in Cyprus, it was the decision of management to withdraw from the appearance. This was a team decision that reflects our sensitivity to the political realities of the region.”

    Yet Feza Firat, whose Istanbul-based F&F Agency represents the Cratos hotel, claims Lopez had been “led to believe there was a war going on”.

    Mr Firat went on to say the singer’s fee had already been paid.

    The US-based American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association claimed the concert would “lend credence to an illegal entity recognised only by Turkey”.

    Cyprus has been divided since 1974 when Turkey occupied the north to try and stop Nicosia uniting with Greece.

    The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus is only recognised by Turkey and has been a significant political barrier to Turkey being allowed to join the EU.

    The SkyNews

  • J-Lo cancels controversial north Cyprus show

    J-Lo cancels controversial north Cyprus show

    NICOSIA, Cyprus — Singer Jennifer Lopez called off a controversial show in the breakaway north of Cyprus, provoking celebrations by Greek Cypriots while Turkish Cypriots denounced the move.

    jloReports that Lopez would perform at a luxury hotel in the north on her 41st birthday this month triggered a Greek Cypriot online campaign pushing for cancellation.

    Greek Cypriots on Friday hailed Lopez’s withdrawal “a victory”. They saw her appearance as helping legitimize the island’s division. It was split into a Greek speaking south and a Turkish speaking north in 1974 when Turkey invaded following a coup by supporters of union with Greece.

    Turkish Cypriots called the cancellation part of a Greek Cypriot campaign to keep them isolated.

    Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

  • J.Lo’s gig panned as a Turkey

    J.Lo’s gig panned as a Turkey

    jennifer lopezNICOSIA, Cyprus — Jennifer Lopez has stepped into a diplomatic minefield by agreeing to perform in Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus, stirring anger among thousands of Greek Cypriots.

    J.Lo is scheduled to perform at the opening of a luxury hotel on July 24, her 41st birthday, in what’s called the Turkish Republic of Cyprus, a breakaway state recognized only by Turkey. Ethnic Greeks say it’s a slap in the face to people forced to flee the area during a Turkish invasion in 1974.

    “It is with dismay and shock that the people of Cyprus . . . heard the news,” the Cyprus Action Network of America said. Thousands have also flooded a Facebook site with demands that the Bronx-born star cancel her trip.

    JENNIFER LOPEZ

    “Slap” at Greek Cypriots.

    Lopez was not available for comment on the performance, for which she’ll be paid a reported $3 million.

    Read more:

  • Turkey’s Consul General Speaks of Its Friend Israel

    Turkey’s Consul General Speaks of Its Friend Israel

    une 22, 2010

    by Jonah Lowenfeld, Contributing Writer

    R. Hakan Tekin, Turkey’s consul general in Los Angeles.
    Last week, while New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman was in Istanbul talking to businessmen, journalists and academics about the “fight for Turkey’s soul,” R. Hakan Tekin, Turkey’s chief representative in Los Angeles, offered up a local version of his country’s official perspective. “We have a saying in Turkish: ‘Friends speak the bitter truth,’ ” the consul general said over an afternoon cup of Turkish coffee in his office on Wilshire Boulevard. “Turkey is a friend of Israel and is speaking the bitter truth — that their policies and practices in the region are not helping them.” With Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan calling last month’s flotilla incident an example of “state terrorism” and the nation’s ministry of foreign affairs saying that “Israel has once again clearly demonstrated that it does not value human lives,” it might be hard to remember that the two countries had, until recently, long been steadfast allies. Tekin, who has headed the Los Angeles consulate since April 2007, experienced the closeness of Turkish-Israeli relations firsthand.
    RELATED: Wiesenthal Center Advises Against Travel to Turkey
    “When I first started here, my first contacts were with the Jewish community,” Tekin said. He connected with leaders of the Anti-Defamation League, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, to name a few. Last November, he sat on a panel at Pepperdine University titled “Finding Common Ground: Reconciliation Among the Children of Abraham” with his Israeli counterpart in Los Angeles, Jacob Dayan. “Jacob is a very good friend of mine,” Tekin said. “We have a very close relationship. Of course, we are not agreeing on everything, especially these days.” But even back in “the good old days,” when Tekin spoke to audiences at the American Jewish Committee or at Hillcrest Country Club, the Q-and-A sessions weren’t easy. Asked to recall some of the more challenging questions he was asked, Tekin didn’t hesitate: “ ‘Why is Turkey so against Israel?’ Or, ‘Why didn’t we criticize Hamas as much when they were shooting rockets at Israel?’ ” But though Tekin used to field questions about anti-Semitism in Turkey or questions about Iran, he is sure about one thing: “If I had an event with a Jewish group these days, the only issue would be the flotilla incident.” And from Tekin’s point of view — which is to say, Turkey’s — the ramifications of the flotilla incident on the Turkish-Israeli relationship could not be more severe: “Israel is on the verge of losing Turkey’s friendship,” the veteran diplomat said. “The flotilla incident was a historic event for us,” Tekin said. “Never before had any group of Turkish civilians been attacked by a foreign military. So this is something serious. And this is not a government issue. The overwhelming majority of the public is furious about this.” Political observers — including Friedman — have pointed out that Erdogan has used the flotilla incident to build political support in the lead-up to next year’s election. “Like every politician,” Tekin responded. He pointed to Rep. Adam Schiff and the 43 other members of California’s congressional delegation who co-sponsored a bill that would affirm that the Ottoman Empire committed genocide against the Armenian people between 1915 and 1923. “Why are they so enthusiastic about the Armenian issue? And why are none of the congressmen from Montana co-sponsoring? Because this is politics. It’s a game of votes. There’s a big Armenian community here, and they [California’s representatives] want to cater to that constituency.” Tekin was also well aware that some Jews in Israel and in the United States had also begun taking a renewed interest in “the Armenian issue,” particularly as the relationship between Israel and Turkey became more strained. “There’s no connection between these two things, the controversy over the events of 1915, the Armenian issue — a historical issue — and Turkish-Israeli relations,” Tekin said. “And if now we see some members of Congress or some Jewish organizations saying, ‘It’s payback time: Now we should punish Turkey by recognizing the Armenian Genocide,’ and moving toward passing a resolution in Congress, I think it would be really shortsighted, counterproductive and a very opportunistic approach. It would seriously further damage the Turkish-Israeli relationship. It could cause long-term damages.” Tekin continued: “If you look at a historical issue, you have to evaluate it within its context, within its parameters. If you are adopting a position on a certain historical controversy, you have to set your position according to what you think is right and not according to some irrelevant issue.” In the past three weeks, Tekin has seen the pro-Israel group StandWithUs protesting outside his building and was visited by members of LA Jews for Peace, who came to his office to offer their condolences. But without a more official apology from Israel, and without a “transparent and international” investigation of what happened aboard the Mavi Marmara, “we cannot take any steps,” Tekin said. “If a confidence-building measure should be taken to improve Turkish-Israeli relations, that measure should be taken at this point by Israel.”

  • We’re failing to follow Turkey’s sea change

    We’re failing to follow Turkey’s sea change

    IN A SPEECH, he made at the University of Bosporus, 10 days ago, Turkey’s Minister of European Affairs Egemen Bagis, said that Turkey would even discuss the withdrawal of all troops from Cyprus.

    “In Cyprus, Greece also has troops and Britain has military bases. If there is a possibility, for all the troops to withdraw, then come and let’s talk about it.”

    cyprusmapAgreeing to discuss the full withdrawal of Turkish troops from Cyprus is unprecedented in the history of the Cyprus problem. So much so, it should have become a leading news item in the media. But it was ignored and did not make it into the ongoing Cyprus problem debate.

    Had Bagis said “the army will never withdraw from Cyprus”, or had he repeated what Turkish politicians had all been saying until 2002, namely “the Cyprus problem was solved in 1974”, we would never have heard the end of it.

    It makes you wonder whether we actually want the withdrawal of the Turkish troops or whether their presence suits us, as it ensure the ethnic purity of half the island. Is re-unification a sincere objective, or is partition preferable to the majority of the people? This is, more or less, the historical dilemma that Cypriots are facing and will need to make a final decision on in the next few months.

    In the last eight years Turkey has radically revised its foreign policy. Gone is the view that the country was surrounded by hostile countries, replaced with the doctrine of “zero problems with our neighbours”. Ankara has resolved its disputes with Syria and Russia, improved relations with Greece and has been trying to do the same with Armenia, but it is not making any headway on the Cyprus problem which is poisoning its dealings with the European Union. Turkey wants a Cyprus deal because the net benefits of a solution far outweigh the net losses for maintaining the status quo.

    After 40 years of division, there is a Turkish population in Cyprus which accounts for 20 to 25 per cent of the total. With the passing years, these people have acquired rights in the occupied areas that have been acknowledged by the European Court of Human Rights. Consequently, either we will govern the whole island together or we will split it in two.

    Turkey could push things in either direction, but it seems that, for many important reasons, she would rather have the participation of the Turkish population in the running of the whole island than have total control of half. But to gain participation in running the whole island, the Turkish side would need to give things in exchange – complete withdrawal of troops, a ceiling on the number of Turkish nationals that would be part of the Turkish Cypriot community, a return of territory and a contribution to the compensation fund for properties are some of them.

    The Greek Cypriot side suffers from an inherent weakness by failing to follow this changing Turkish policy and still approaches it with a Cold War mentality. This is why it interprets every change in Turkish positions as a “communications tactic” which nobody else buys.

    But instead of being in denial about these changes, the Cyprus government should have set out its priorities, conveyed them and explained them to its EU partners and sincerely committed itself – not take the EU for a ride as it had done in 2004 – to signing an agreement if these conditions were met. It could also have proposed an international conference in which Greece, Turkey and the EU participated, for overcoming any persistent differences.

    Of course, the choice may be permanent separation, in which case President Christofias would need to muster the courage to negotiate the terms of partition rather than allow it to be imposed by default. We are heading in this direction thanks to the government’s dogmatic position about a Cypriot solution by Cypriots, “without time-frames and arbitration”. Inevitably, we are arriving at partition under the worst possible terms.

    By Makarios Drousiotis
    Published on June 20, 2010

    Source: Cyprus Mail