Category: Cyprus/TRNC

  • Role of Cuban Pilots in Jewish Air Exodus to Israel Revealed

    Role of Cuban Pilots in Jewish Air Exodus to Israel Revealed

    cubaFollowing the foundation of the State of Israel in 1948, a Cuban airline and a group of Cuban pilots were commissioned to transport all the Jewish people who wished to immigrate to the dawning state. Their many flights between 1951 and 1952 as part of what may be the largest air evacuation in human history had remained unknown until now.

    By: Luis Hernández Serrano

    Email: serrano@juventudrebelde.cu

    They were not diplomats or delegates going to an international convention, nor pilgrims on the search for indulgences or archaeological relics. The group of pilots that departed from Cuba in 1951 to the Holy Land had a different mission.

    The event remained unknown for almost 60 years. The Cuban pilots were to take part in the largest mass air evacuation in human history.

    Aviation historian Captain Rolando Marron told Juventud Rebelde newspaper the details of their ordeal.

    “In 1948,” he began, “the Republic of Israel was founded in a territory that had been part of Palestine and was under British control. The deficient economy of the country demanded arms to harvest the land and brains to administrate the dawning republic.”

    “In Europe, as a consequence of the recently concluded world war, there were hundreds of thousands of dispossessed Hebrews eager to move to the new homeland they were being offered. Large groups of immigrants began to arrive in Israel from all over Europe, as it was easier for them to find ways to get there.

    “As the relations between Jewish and Arabs became tenser in Arab countries, the Israeli government intervened to facilitate the evacuation of a larger number of Jewish people to their Promised Land.

    “Arab governments prohibited Jewish immigrants to travel by road, and the Egyptian blockade of the Suez Canal made it impossible for them to get to Israeli territory by sea.

    “The only option left was organizing a mass air evacuation. Negotiations began under acute time constraints. Since Israel had no diplomatic relations with Arab League member states, and planes bearing Israeli flags could not therefore be used for the exodus, they had to hire planes from a neutral country.

    “By coincidence, an important official of the Israeli mission in New York was a very good friend of Cuban businessman and civilian pilot Narciso V. Rosello Otero, who was appointed chair of the company created for the plan: Intercontinental Aerea de Cuba S.A

    “When the company had secured the required permits in Cuba, its central office opened at 464 Zulueta, in Old Havana, and a branch office was also inaugurated in Nicosia, Cyprus.

    The historian said that while the final arrangements were made to the administrative structure of the company, Cuban pilot were hired, in compliance with Cuban laws, to fly the planes.

    “The first group was made up of five pilots who were unemployed at the time because the company they worked for, Aerovias Cubanas Internacionales S.A., had gone bankrupt due to the incipient development of domestic commercial flights in Cuba.

    The Air Exodus

    Historian Marron adds that during the nearly two years that the mission lasted, more than 115,000 refugees were brought from Iraq; 25,000 from Iran, and a few hundred from India and Yemen. The Yemen refugees had to cross the border to reach the English territory of Aden to board the planes.

    “Most of the refugees from Iraq boarded at the airport of Baghdad, and the rest in Bahra, near the famed Abadan oil refinery, at the important oil harbour located only a few miles away from the Persian Gulf border.”

    The historian noted that it was in Iraq where the Jewish passengers experienced the most difficulties, given the persecutions and dangers they faced in that country, and it was necessary to evacuate them as soon as possible. The abovementioned number of Iraqi refugees was rescued over a period of approximately ten months.

    “The Iranian refugees,” continued Marron, “were picked at the Teheran airport. They were not forced to leave the country, and all of them immigrated to Israel voluntarily, with the exception of 1,000 who had escaped from Iraq and Afghanistan through the border, and could not remain in Iran due to immigration regulations.

    “The longest flights were to Bombay, in India, where a few hundred decided to immigrate. Many of them would return later to India because they were not able to adapt to the living conditions they found in their new homeland.

    “Taking off from the modern Lydda airport in Tel Aviv, the flight had a stopover in Sharjah, at the Royal British Air Force base, in the remote area of Oman Trucial off the coast of the Arabian Peninsula, in the Persian Gulf.

    “A typical Arab village by the seaside and the barracks of the English troops were the only signs of life near the airfield in the middle of the dessert. The second part of the trip was the crossing of the Indic Ocean, battered by the dangerous monsoons, and the journey concluded at the Santa Cruz airport in Bombay.

    “The hardest and more frequent routes were Lydda-Baghdad and Lydda-Teheran,” said Marron.

    A Forced Landing

    “Although the first of these routes was relatively easy in the winter,” explained Marron, “flying conditions would drastically change in the summer, when sandstorms considerably reduced visibility in Baghdad, impeding access to the airport. Sometimes pilots had to land in alternate airfields to wait for the weather conditions in their places of destination to change.

    “Furthermore, high temperatures affected the performance of plane engines. In Baghdad, it was normal to have temperatures between 45ºC and 50ºC in the shade! And not only at noon, but also in the morning and late afternoon. That is why pilots always tried to take off in the night, in order to gain time.

    “Adolfo Diaz Vazquez was the only pilot who had to make a forced landing during the evacuation program. One of the engines of the C-46 he was flying stopped on route between Baghdad and Lydda, at night! Thanks to his vast experience, all the passengers and the plane escaped unharmed. The passengers and the crew were taken to Israel in another plane. Some days later, Eugenio Ramos Escandon flew the plane to Lydda. The aircraft had been repaired by a group of Cuban mechanics under the guidance of Eduardo Segredo Salgado.

    “By the end of 1952, the wave of immigration to Israel decreased and some of the planes that had been used for these ends began flying to European cities: Paris, Rome, Amsterdam, Zurich, London, Athens and Geneva.

    “In early 1953, the group of Cuban pilots returned to Cuba, after having successfully transported almost 150,000 Jewish immigrants to Israel. The crew of these flights wore an insignia with a Cuban flag on their uniforms.

    “The main base of operations of the Intercontinental Aerea de Cuba S.A. Company was always in Cuba, but its planes never flew in the national territory; they never even touched Cuban soil. Part of the money earned in this operation was probably used to bribe the Cuban president at the time, since permits were only granted following a local inspection of the aircrafts.

    Pilots who took part in the evacuation program:

    Manuel Gonzalez Linares, with more than 6,000 hours of flight.

    Eugenio Ramos Escandon, experienced C-46 capatain.

    Guillermo Verdaguer Boan, survivor of a plane crash in which one of his comrades lost his life.

    Miguel Acosta Rosellp.

    Antonio “Nico” Fernandez Martinez

    Adolfo Diaz Vazquez, also known as “Lindbergh,” an aerobatics champion. He was the sixth pilot on Narciso Rosello’s payroll.

    Eduardo Segredo Salgado, the brilliant mechanic of the team.

    The Zionist State of Israel

    When the Second World War ended in 1945, Jewish political organizations led by Theodor Herzl pushed for the creation of a state that should have its capital in Jerusalem, Palestine, which was a British protectorate at the time. The plan was to give the Jewish victims of the Nazi genocide a place to start over after the war. It is said that the area was infiltrated by terrorist groups with a view to speeding up the British withdrawal.

    Arab Palestinians, with the support of Eastern Arab states, energetically opposed the plan, which was paradoxically fascist. The wave of immigration had the support of US and British Jewish organizations, and a US-British supervising commission was created for the forced Jewish colonization.

    After the failure of the Conference of Palestine in 1947, England brought the issue to the attention of United Nations, and in November of that year, a plan was drawn up to split the Palestinian territory into two states: a Jewish state and an Arab state. On May 14, 1948, when there were only a few hours left before the British rule was to expire, the Jewish proclaimed the independence of the Hebrew state, and they called it Israel.

    Arab government representatives, who never agreed to the UN ruling, rejected this political decision, giving way to an armed conflict in which the Zionist groups, that were better trained and equipped, managed to expand their domain over a broader area, extending as far as the Jordan River. They would later gain more and more ground.

    The foundation in 1948 of the Zionist state in the heart of the Arab region was the beginning of the historic suffering of the Palestinian people, which has come to be one of the most heartbreaking contemporary conflicts in the world.

    In 1967, for example, the human cost of the conflict amounted to more than one million displaced Arab Palestinians, their homes and lands given to the Jewish settlers from Europe.

    It is a fact that the state of Israel was founded by splitting up the Palestinian territory inhabited by Arab Palestinians who had been born in those lands, with the objective of bringing justice to the Jewish people but at the cost of a new injustice.

    Israel’s subsequent history has been a history of unstoppable territorial expansionism in order to gain more land and water, and consolidate their privileged geopolitical position.

    , 21.10.2010

    [2]

    In 1951-52, Cuban dictatorship operated Jewish immigration airlift to Israel

    The Cuban newspaper Juventud Rebelde (Rebel Youth) reported that an airlift was organized in the early 1950s by the Cuban company Intercontinental Aérea de Cuba S.A., owned by businessman Narciso V. Roselló Otero, to fly 150 000 Jewish immigrants to Israel (of which 115 000 were from Iraq and 25 000 from Iran).

    These revelations shed light on a little-known operation until now.

    In order to colonize Palestine, the Zionist movement planned to displace not only the European survivors of Nazi persecutions, but also the Jewish populations living in the Middle East.

    To compel Iraqi Jews to emigrate, the Zionist movement mounted an operation in three stages:
    An agreement was reached with pro-British Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Said to force Iraqi Jews to accept a one-way ticket to Israel. On 9 March 1950, Parliament adopted a law requiring that Iraqi Jews leaving the country had to renounce their citizenship in writing and would not be allowed to return.
    From 19 March 1950 to 30 January 1951, a series of bomb attacks targeted the venues of Jewish congregation. The attacks were falsely attributed to the Golden Square officers (who had sided with Germany against the British during World War II). As it is, they had been orchestrated by Israeli intelligence under the direction of Mordechaï Ben Porat (as endorsed in 1956 by Uri Avnery’s Israeli magazine Haolam Hazeh).
    Immediately, an airlift was set up from Cuba by the dictatorial regime of General Fulgencio Batista enabling the evacuation of 115 000 Jews, terrified by the turn of events. Cuban planes and pilots took off from Baghdad stopping over in Nicosia (Cyprus). Towards the end of the operation, planes with a bigger capacity shuttled from Iraq to Israel directly so as to speed up the operation.

    Mordechaï Porat, a terrorist with close ties to David Ben-Gurion, served four times as member of parliament and once as minister without portfolio. In 2001, he was awarded the Israel Prize for the whole of his career and in particular for having pushed Iraqi Jews to emigrate.

    Narciso V. Roselló left Cuba for the United States after the attack on his home at the hands of Fidel Castro’s revolutionaries, who thus confiscated the weapons that they used to conquer Havana and overthrow General Batista.

    ==

    “Pilotos cubanos en la Tierra Santa”, by Luis Hernández Serrano, Juventud Rebelde, 16 October 2010.

    Bibliography:
    Ropes of Sand : America’s Failure in the Middle East, by Wilbur Crane Eveland, WW Norton & Co (1981, 382 p.), ISBN-13 : 978-0393013368.
    Ben Gurion’s Scandal : How the Haganah and the Mossad Eliminated Jews, by Naeim Giladi, Dandelion Books,U.S. (Seconde edition 2003, 364 p.), ISBN-13 : 978-1893302402.

    https://www.voltairenet.org/article167398.html, 24 OCTOBER 2010

  • Jennifer Lopez and Turkish Republic Of Northern Cyprus

    Jennifer Lopez and Turkish Republic Of Northern Cyprus

    By Tolga Cakir

    Most of us remember the Jennifer Lopez called off a controversial birthday show in the north of Cyprus, provoking celebrations by Greek Cypriots and condemnations from Turkish Cypriots. Greek Cypriot online campaign pushed Jennifer Lopez to cancel her performance at a hotel in Northern Republic of Turkish Cyprus.

    The Cyprus issue is crystal clear; Turkey intervened to the Cyprus at 1974 after Eoka terrorism took so many innocent lives of Turks and British people.

    Kibris rum barbarligi

    If Jennifer Lopez and her team were kind enough to make a little bit of research, they would certainly understand the severity of the mistakes they have made. Moreover recent BBC records that were published may have helped Jennifer Lopez and her team to understand this important matter.This is a matter of human rights.

    We are calling Jennifer Lopez and her team to act

    We are calling them to act now

    We are calling them to take the side of good

    Jennifer Lopez

    For this London may be the right place, where many Turkish Cypriots live. Jennifer Lopez and her team can celebrate an important event with the Turkish Cypriot Community in London to show the world that they are not involved in politics and they support human rights.

    Photo :Internet Haber CSMonitor

  • Ankara: Cyprus property measures intact despite court ruling

    Ankara: Cyprus property measures intact despite court ruling

    A recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in which it ordered Turkey to pay millions of euros to Greek Cypriots for their abandoned properties on the northern part of the divided island of Cyprus does not rule out the effectiveness of the Immovable Property Commission (IPC) of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (KKTC), the Turkish Foreign Ministry said on Wednesday.

    The ECtHR on Tuesday fined Turkey more than 15 million euros in 19 cases filed by Greek Cypriots. The cases concerned the applicants’ complaints that the 1974 Turkish military intervention in the northern part of Cyprus deprived them of their homes and properties. In judgments issued in September 2009 and October 2009 the ECtHR upheld the view that there had been a continuous violation of Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which covers the protection of property, in all 19 cases and of Article 8, which deals with the right to respect for private and family life, in 11 of them. The question of the application of Article 41, which concerns just satisfaction, was reserved for a later date.

    In its judgments released on Tuesday, the court ruled that Turkey was to pay a total of 15,001,498 euros in pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages and 160,375 euros for legal expenses.

    The Strasbourg court, in a March ruling, recognized the IPC of the KKTC as a valid domestic judicial remedy whose jurisdiction extends to Greek Cypriots, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Selçuk Ünal recalled when invited to comment on the ruling at a regular press conference on Wednesday. “The ruling is not a ruling against the effectiveness of the IPC,” Ünal said, while noting that Tuesday’s judgments concerned applications that were announced as admissible before the March ruling.

    The aforementioned judgment means that Greek Cypriots will not be able to launch court cases against Turkey in the European court prior to seeking redress with the IPC and sets a precedent for approximately 1,500 property cases pending at the ECtHR. The ruling is significant in that for the first time a Turkish Cypriot commission has been recognized by Europe’s top human rights court, boosting the international legitimacy of the KKTC.

  • The Baffling Short-sightedness in the EU-Turkey-Cyprus Triangle

    The Baffling Short-sightedness in the EU-Turkey-Cyprus Triangle

    cyprus tradeDiehard believers in Turkey’s European future had, for a brief moment, hung their hopes on the European Parliament (EP) as the key to unlocking the poisonous stalemate in Turkey’s ailing accession process. The glimmer of light had come with the Lisbon Treaty, which could have been used to
    unblock the stalemate over the Direct Trade Regulation (DTR) between the EU and northern Cyprus by granting a voice to the EP on the matter.
    Breaking the stalemate would not have magically removed all obstacles to Turkey’s protracted accession process. But it would have breathed new
    life and instilled a dose of much-needed optimism in the troubled relations between Turkey and the Union.
    Alas, that opportunity has been lost and, with it, the short-term hope of a rosier future for Cyprus, Turkey and the EU as a whole.
    Read full document…
  • EU decision on trade deals further blow to Cyprus solution hopes

    EU decision on trade deals further blow to Cyprus solution hopes

    A decision by a committee of the European Parliament ruling that the issue of direct trade with Turkish Cypriots is not under jurisdiction of the parliament has sparked bitter reaction from both Turkey and Turkish Cypriots since they have considered the decision as encouraging the Greek Cypriot side to further drag their feet in efforts for finding a solution to the decades old Cyprus dispute.

    Northern CyprusThe European Parliament’s legal affairs committee decided on Monday night that members of the European Parliament (MEPs) do not have co-decision powers over a proposal by the European Commission to allow direct trade between the KKTC and EU member states. The decision — 18 in favor, five against and one abstention — is regarded to mean that the Commission’s direct trade regulation is now solely in the hands of EU members, including Greek Cyprus. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan recalled on Wednesday that the European Union has so far failed to keep promises given to Turkish Cypriots back in 2004 for easing their international isolation.

    Erdoğan, speaking at a joint press conference following his talks with Finnish Prime minister Mari Kiviniemi during an official visit to Helsinki, also recalled that some member states have blocked several negotiation chapters with Turkey, claiming that Turkey has to live up to its obligations in the Ankara Protocol, which includes opening up Turkish air and sea ports to Greek Cypriot vessels and aircraft.

    Turkey refuses to lift the ban, saying that the EU should lift the economic isolation on Turkish Cyprus because the country is displaying a political will to reunify the island. In July 2005, while signing the Ankara Protocol extending its customs union to the then-new member states of the EU, Turkey at the same time issued a declaration saying that its signature did not mean it had recognized the Greek Cypriot administration.

    Allowing Turkish ports and airports to Greek Cypriot traffic requires parliamentary approval and the EU’s approach is not constructive at all for gaining such approval from the Turkish parliament, Erdoğan said in Helsinki.

    “It is obvious that this development will create a serious crisis of confidence between Turkish Cypriot people and the EU,” the KKTC presidency said in a written statement released on Tuesday evening, while calling the committee decision on the Direct Trade Regulation as “saddening.”

    In 2004, the European Commission proposed direct trade with the KKTC, which is recognized only by Turkey, but efforts to bring the proposal to life have been blocked by Greek Cyprus, a full member of the EU. The Greek Cypriots, who rejected a UN plan to reunite the island, were admitted to the EU as representatives of all of Cyprus — days after voting against the reunification plan.

    The debate at the European Parliament’s legal affairs committee focused on whether the EU should permit trade with 264,000 Turkish Cypriots, who live in political isolation and are not permitted to trade freely with the outside world. The European Parliament became part of the decision-making process in 2009 with the Lisbon Treaty, which gives it greater powers.

    The debate focused on whether direct trade with Turkish Cypriots is a trade issue, which requires qualified majority voting among EU member states, or a political one, which gives states veto rights. Greek Cypriots have argued that it is political.

    “The decision taken by the Legal Affairs Committee will lead to a weird situation in which the European Parliament returns an authority to the [European] Council — maybe for the first time in the institution’s history,” the KKTC presidency also said. “The point to which the European Parliament — which has been in a struggle with the [European] Council over its authority since its foundation — has been brought via pressure by the Greek Cypriot side is thought provoking,” the presidency noted.

    “On the other hand, it is not possible to explain this situation only with the Greek Cypriot side’s manner or its attempts,” it said, underlining that the absence of the EU’s will led to rewarding the Greek Cypriot side’s stance preventing the Cyprus solution once more after they had been rewarded via EU entry in 2004 although they said “no” to reunification. Such absence of will encourages the Greek Cypriot side, which already has an irreconcilable attitude at the negotiation table, to be more rigid, it said.

    Kurt Lechner, a centre-right German MEP who had written a report on the issue, suggested that using the parliament’s powers over international trade would undermine the sovereignty of Greek Cyprus, www.europeanvoice.com reported.

    Nonetheless, Bernhard Rapkay, a centre-left German MEP who chairs the parliament’s group high-level contact for relations with the Turkish Cypriots, called the vote “ridiculous,” the same news portal reported. “I want law to be respected and [the Treaty of] Lisbon gives these issues co-decision and we are agreeing not to use this procedure,” Rapkay was quoted as saying by The European Voice.

    Rapkay, meanwhile, appealed to the committee to give members more time to study the opinion by the parliament’s legal service on which Lechner’s report was based, underlining that the opinion had been given to members only on Friday.

    21.10.2010
    News
    TODAY’S ZAMAN WITH WIRES
  • Turkey stages Cyprus drills amid oil dispute

    Turkey stages Cyprus drills amid oil dispute

    Archived from Kuwait Times on June 18, 2009

    oil search cyprus

    ABOARD THE TCG GEMLIK: Turkish and Turkish Cypriot warships staged search and rescue drills off the island of Cyprus yesterday amid tensions over a disputed search for oil and gas. The frigate Gemlik and other vessels took part in the maneuvers off the northern town of Famagusta, which included extinguishing fire on a ship, rescuing illegal migrants from a sinking rubber boat and rescuing the crew of a sea plane in distress.

    Turkish Cypriot military officials denied the maneuvers were a show of force, but it comes amid a rekindled dispute with Greek Cypriots over who is entitled to the island’s potential offshore oil and gas wealth. Cyprus was divided in 1974 when Turkey invaded in response to a coup by supporters of union with Greece. The island has an internationally recognized Greek Cypriot south and a breakaway Turkish Cypriot north where Turkey maintains 35,000 troops.

    Turkey does not recognize European Union-member Cyprus as a sovereign country and strongly objects to a Greek Cypriot search for mineral deposits inside the island’s exclusive economic zone. That area covers 51,000 square kilometers of seabed off the island’s southern coast. Turkey has warned Cyprus against pursuing “adventurist policies” and says Turkish Cypriots should also have a say in how the island’s oil-and-gas rights are used.

    Cyprus government spokesman Stefanos Stefanou said Tuesday the search for fossil fuels inside the island’s zone remains its sovereign right and it’s protesting the military drills at the UN and EU. But Stefanou said both communities could share in the possible bounty if ongoing reunification talks prove successful. Cyprus President Dimitris Christofias and Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat restarted stalled peace talks last September, but have yet to reach a breakthrough in the slow-moving process.
    This is an additional motivating factor … to continue negotiations so that we can reach a just, viable and functional settlement, to reunify our homeland,” Stefanou said.

    The involvement of a US energy firm Noble Energy, which is set to launch seismic work inside Cyprus’ zone later this year, could further complicate matters for Turkey, a US ally. Cyprus has licensed Noble to search for fossil fuels near two significant gas discoveries in its Israeli offshore blocks. US authorities are siding with the Cypriot government, saying “the involvement of US firms in such investment is a business decision, not a political one.” Cyprus has also signed agreements with Lebanon and Egy
    pt to mark out undersea borders to facilitate future oil and gas exploration, prompting Turkey to urge those two countries to scrap the deals.

    Turkey’s stakes in the dispute are higher as Cyprus has threatened to further impede Turkey’s EU accession negotiations because Turkish warships had interfered with an offshore fossil fuel survey last year. Turkey’s EU membership bid is already hobbled with eight of 35 negotiation chapters frozen over its refusal to open its air and sea ports to Cyprus “Turkey’s policy of solving the problem through use of force has not brought any good to its advantage in the international arena,” said Prof. Yuksel Inan
    at International Relations Department of Bilkent University based in Ankara. “Instead, Turkey should seriously think about taking the issue to the Security Council as a temporary member now.” – AP