Category: Cyprus/TRNC

  • Joint British Turkish Cypriot NGO Action Group calls for David Burrowes MP to resign as APPG Chairperson for Cyprus

    Joint British Turkish Cypriot NGO Action Group calls for David Burrowes MP to resign as APPG Chairperson for Cyprus

    David Burrowes with Greek Cypriot protestors

    FROM: Cetin Ramadan

    Dear Editor,

     

    Joint British Turkish Cypriot NGO Action Group calls for David Burrowes MP to resign as APPG Chairperson for Cyprus

    Tuesday, 04th December 2012:  The British Turkish Cypriot Association (BTCA) in conjunction with over 55 British Turkish and British Turkish Cypriot non-government & civil society organizations have collectively undersigned this statement as listed in Addendum A.  They are requesting the resignation of David Burrowes as the Chairperson of The British All Party Parliamentary Group for Cyprus (“APPG”).

     

    03 December 2012

     

    To all members of the Cyprus All Party Parliamentary Group

    House for Commons

    London SW1A 0AA

     

    Dear APPG Member,

     

    RE: DAVID BURROWES

     

    Over 55 British Turkish and British Turkish Cypriot non-government & civil society organizations have collectively undersigned this statement as listed in Addendum A.  We are requesting the resignation of David Burrowes as the Chairperson of The British All Party Parliamentary Group for Cyprus (“APPG”).

     

    Turkish Cypriots living in the UK have lost confidence in David Burrowes as an impartial guardian for the APPG.  We feel that his representation of Cypriot affairs in particular to the House of Commons is far from balanced and contrary to HMG policy.  He has consistently ignored the views of the overwhelming majority of the Turkish Cypriots living in the UK.

     

    As Chairperson of the APPG, and in accordance with the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association principles, his actions should be impartial.  It is incumbent upon him to represent the views of ALL Cypriots.  Openly and without any reasonable justification dismissing British Turkish Cypriot NGO groups simply as “extremists” is incorrect and inappropriate behaviour on the part of Mr Burrowes.  Moreover, his selective refusal to communicate with British Turkish Cypriot NGO groups shows an absolute bias and a closed mindset.

     

    He has failed to exemplify any genuine intentions of using his position to re-connect the two communities and allowing a fair and equitable solution because his door is not open to ALL the Cypriot people and the APPG is not an impartial interlocutor as it is claimed.  David Burrowes has consistently expressed a one-sided attitude in relation to handling British Turkish Cypriot concerns.

     

    By far the worse illustration of his bias is his purposeful omission and demeaning of the destruction of the Turkish Cypriot National Heritage in the south.  More than 25% of the mosques left under the jurisdiction of the “Republic of Cyprus“ have been destroyed.  In contrast, less than 4% of the churches left in the north under Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus’ jurisdiction have been destroyed.  However, Mr. Burrowes’ commentary on this matter leads others to believe that the problem only exists in Northern Cyprus.

     

    David Burrowes conveniently chooses to ignore the facts and unashamedly misleads the House of Commons with false accusations and incorrect statements.  This deliberate and manipulative strategy is unacceptable behaviour from a person who is meant to be impartial.  His polarised views are harming the negotiation process because his actions entrench positions on all sides and he undermines any confidence building measures of the UN and/or the International Community at large.

     

    Turkish and Turkish Cypriots in the UK & Cyprus will no longer tolerate his bias and insulting views.  As the Chairperson of the APPG Mr Burrowes cannot continue to claim to represent both the Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities if he is consistently singing the virtues of one over the other.  This renders his position untenable.

     

    We therefore request that David Burrowes should be requested to resign from his position as Chairperson of the APPG with immediate effect and appoint a person who is unprejudiced, unbiased and non-partisan.

     

    Yours sincerely

     

     

    Mr. Cetin Ramadan

    Chairman

    British Turkish Cypriot Association

    Joint UK Coordinator

    34-35 D`Arblay Street, London W1F 8EY, United Kingdom

     

    ENDS/

     

      Addendum A

     

    The following UK non-government and civil society organizations have confirmed their support for the statement:

     

    Aksu Türk Birliği
    Anadolu Kultur Merkezi / Anatolian Cultural Centre
    Birmingham Türk Cemiyeti
    British CPTR
    British Turkish Cypriot Association
    Cezire Association
    Doğan Türk Birliği Dayanışma Derneği
    Erenköy Mücahitler Derneği
    Ergazililer Derneği / Ergazililer Association
    Green Tower Turkish Cypriots Elder’s Club
    Güney Londra Türk Yaşlılar Derneği
    Ingiltere Turk Dernekleri Federasyonu / The Federation of Turkish Associations UK

    (representing 16

    Kıbrıs Türk Cemiyeti Baskanı
    Kıbrıs Türk Kültür Derneği
    Kıbrıs Türk Ticaret Odası / Cyprus Turkish Chamber of Commerce
    Kuzey Kıbrısla Dayanışma Derneği
    North London Turkish Islamic Trust / Kuzey Londra Türk İslam Vakfı
    Limasollular Dernegi
    Olıve Tree Educatıon Foundatıon
    Plan B Platform
    Polilıler Derneği
    Serdarlı Kıbrıs Türk Derneği
    Southwark Kıbrıs Türk Derneği
    Swindon Turkish Cypriot Union
    Toplumcu Dayanısma Dernegi
    TRNC Freedom
    Türk Birliği
    Turkish Cypriot Foundation
    Turkish Cypriot Surveyors Association
    Turkish Cypriot Trust
    Turkish Elders Club / Türk Yaşlılar Kulübü
    Turkish Forum World Turkish Alliance (TFWTA)
    UBP Londra Dayanısma Dernegi
    USİAD/TABA
    Vroisha-Yagmuralan Association
    Ataturk Society UK  / Ingiltere Ataturkcu Dusunce Dernegi
    Avrupa Turk Birligi
    KKTC Magdurlar Dernegi
    Association of Turkish Cypriots Abroad
    TRNC Human Rights Association (UK)
    The Azerbaijan House (London)

     

      Addendum B

     

    The following TRNC non-government and civil society organizations have confirmed their support for the statement:

     

    ISAD KKTC / TRNC Businessmen Association

    Milli Varolus Konseyi / Council of National Existence

    Ulusal Halk Hareketi  / The National People’s Movement 
    Emekli Ast Subaylar / Retired Non-Commissioned Officers
    K.K.T.C Parlamenterler Birligi / TRNC  Parliamentarians  Union
    T.M.T. Mucahiter dernegi / TMT Association of the Mujahideen
    Dunya Kibris Turkleri Vakfi / Worldwide Turkish Cypriot Foundation
    TRNC Human Rights Association
    TRNC Consumers Association
    Trade Union of the Public Service Personnel
  • EU – Enlargement – Aid Programme for the Turkish Cypriot Community – European Commission

    EU – Enlargement – Aid Programme for the Turkish Cypriot Community – European Commission

    Aid Programme for the Turkish Cypriot Community

    Background

    cyr

    Cyprus joined the EU on 1 May 2004 as a de facto divided island. The EU fully supports the current negotiations (under the auspices of the UN) between the leaders of the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot communities which aim to reach a comprehensive settlement leading to the re-unification of the island and establish a bi-zonal, bi-communal federation in which the communities would enjoy political equality. Such a settlement is urgently needed to end a conflict that is now more than 40 years old.

    The EU will accommodate a Cyprus settlement that allows the country to play its full role as an EU member while respecting the EU’s basic founding principles – democracy, the rule of law and human rights.

    Pending a settlement, the European Commission has several specific responsibilities with regard to Cyprus, over and above its normal responsibilities toward a member country:

    closely following the negotiation process and providing political and technical support

    directly implementing the aid programme decided by EU member countries to help the Turkish Cypriots prepare for reunification.

    regularly reporting on the implementation of the Green Line Regulation.

    To meet these responsibilities, the Commission’s Directorate-General for Enlargement has set up the Task Force for the Turkish Cypriot community. The task force runs a ProgrammeSupport Office (EUPSO) in the northern part of Nicosia, to act as a contact with the beneficiary community and help deliver the assistance.

    The Green Line

    The whole of Cyprus is EU territory. However, in the northern part of the island, where the Government of Cyprus does not exercise effective control, EU legislation is suspended in line with protocol 10 of the 2003 accession treaty.

    Since 1974 the “Green Line” separates the two parts of the island. The EU’s Green Line Regulation 866/2004 , sets out the terms under which persons and goods can cross this line, which is not an external border of the EU.

    The main practical effect is that the northern areas are outside the EU’s customs and fiscal territory – but this does not affect the personal rights of Turkish Cypriots as EU citizens. They are citizens of an EU country – the Republic of Cyprus – even if they live in a part of Cyprus not under government control.

    The situation will change once a Cyprus settlement enters into force and EU rules apply over the whole of the island.

    While many people move across the green line every day, trade across the line is limited (approximately €400,000 per month).

    Aid for the Turkish Cypriot community

    In 2006, the EU approved aid regulation 389/2006 to end the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community and to help prepare for reunification. €259 million was allocated for a 5‑year programme to be implemented by the Commission (DG Enlargement).

    Programme objectives:

    promote social and economic development in the Turkish Cypriot community (particularly rural, human‑resources and regional development)

    develop and refurbish infrastructure (particularly energy, transport, environment, telecommunications and water supply)

    foster reconciliation, build confidence and support civil society

    bring the Turkish Cypriot community closer to the EU, through information and contacts between Turkish Cypriots and other EU citizens

    help the Turkish Cypriot community prepare for the implementation of EU law once a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus issue is agreed.

    From 2011 on, assistance has continued in the form of annual allocations of €28 million, to build on the results achieved and support the ongoing UN process.

    For more information on EU assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community, have a look at our brochure or go to the website of the EU InfoPoint.

    Brochure : ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2012/20121128_assistance_to_tcc_brochure.pdf

    via EU – Enlargement – Aid Programme for the Turkish Cypriot Community – European Commission.

  • ‘Istanbul-Paphos flight listing causes confusion’

    ‘Istanbul-Paphos flight listing causes confusion’

    CONFUSION was caused yesterday when the official Hermes airport website indicated that a direct flight from Istanbul to Paphos operated by Greece’s AZI (Astra airlines) would be landing in Cyprus at 3.40am tomorrow.

    Due to a flight embargo enforced by Ankara there are no direct flights from Turkey to Cyprus

    Hermes airport spokesman Adam Aspris assured the Cyprus Mail the website listing was a technical oversight, which would be corrected immediately.

    He said:” This flight is carrying the AEL football team who are playing in Istanbul. The flight, as is required, made a stop at Diagoras International Airport in Rhodes, before continuing to Cyprus. This is due to the fact that no direct flights are permitted by Turkey.”

    Due to the glitch, the website indicated where flight ZS949 initially originated from, when it should have stated the flight came from Rhodes.

    AEL left for Istanbul yesterday morning to play Fenerbahce in the Europa League.

    via ‘Istanbul-Paphos flight listing causes confusion’ – Cyprus Mail.

  • Cyprus ignores Turkey, says to continue with natgas projects

    Cyprus ignores Turkey, says to continue with natgas projects

    November 05, 2012

    RECORDER REPORT

    Cyprus on Sunday vowed to continue to develop offshore natural gas reserves, accusing arch-rival Turkey of trying to stir tensions after warning multinationals off participating in the island’s projects.

    Sharpened rhetoric between the two neighbours bitterly divided by a war almost 40 years ago underscores tensions in the east Mediterranean over a potential oil and gas bonanza worth billions.

    Cyprus on October 30 said it would start talks with multinationals including Italy’s ENI, South Korea’s Kogas, France’s Total and Russia’s Novatek for the potential development of natural gas fields to the island’s south.

    Turkey maintains ethnically-split Cyprus has no right to explore for oil or gas. On Friday it warned ENI that it would review that firm’s investment in their country if it went ahead with the Cyprus project.

    “Turkey is once again showing its true face,” Cyprus’s foreign ministry said. “It is a record burdened with violations of international law both as regards its international, and national mode of behaviour.”

    via Cyprus ignores Turkey, says to continue with natgas projects | Business Recorder.

  • OUR ENEMY IS ANKARA, NOT THE NORTHERN CYPRIOT TURKS’

    OUR ENEMY IS ANKARA, NOT THE NORTHERN CYPRIOT TURKS’

    These words belong to Archbishop Chrysostomos II, the archbishop of the Church of Cyprus, taken from his interview given to the Greek newspaper Kathimerini, published on Jan. 5, 2007, and these shameful words start the very last sentence of the first paragraph. Of course this was not the first time he spoke of Turkey or Turkish Cypriots and targeted them as the eternal enemy.

     

    The sentence “Europe is Christian” also belongs to him. “Of course Christianity is not simply European, but in any case Europe is Christian. Europe before Christianity was just a geographical term. Its inhabitants were distinguished as those who lived within the borders of the Roman Empire or Oikoumene (lands inhabited by Greeks), and those who lived outside the borders, and were generally called ‘barbarians’,” he said.

     

    How about his overdosed speech on the occasion of the official visit of former Greek President Kostis Stephanopoulos to Cyprus?

    In his speech at the ceremony, Archbishop Chrysostomos said: “They say Cyprus is away from Greece. But we expect our Hellenic brothers to help us to vanquish the Turks from our lands. I hope we will not be disappointed.”

    He claimed that “Turkey is looking for a reason to occupy the whole of Cyprus by using the federation betrayal” and warned Stephanopoulos, saying, “If Turks reach their aim in Cyprus, a few years later it will be time for the occupation of the Aegean islands.”

    Archbishop Chrysostomos calls periodically upon the Greek Cypriot administration to review its stance concerning the Cyprus problem. Chrysostomos recently said that Greek Cypriot leaders should attempt to implement the UN resolutions on the island in order to bring about the withdrawal of the Turkish Army, and pointed out that the withdrawal of Turkish soldiers from the island should be a pre-condition.

    Once an apostle of the notorious Greek Orthodox Archbishop Makarios, Archbishop Chrysostomos also advocates violence to achieve Greek aims for Cyprus. From time to time — and without missing the opportunity to jolt Greek Cypriots on some occasions — Chrysostomos persists in making statements about “fighting to the end” and “drinking the blood of Turks.”

    He recently attempted to enlarge the boundaries of the Church of Cyprus to cover the northern Turkish parts of Cyprus as well.

    The last session of the Holy Synod (ruling body of the Church of Cyprus) decided that the historic Monastery of the Apostle Barnabas in the northern territories would be declared Stavropegial (a monastery that falls directly under the archbishop’s authority) and determined the details of the changes, especially the boundaries, the parishes and the communities of the new Metropolitanates and Chorepiscopates.

    The decision was also made to establish three Metropolitanates in the northern Turkish territories and elect the relevant Metropolitans.

    The crowning ceremony of the Metropolitan Vasileos of Konstantia and Arsinoe, both in the territories of Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (KKTC), were also attended by the representatives of the Fener Patriarchate in İstanbul and Archbishop Christodoulos, the primate (head) of the Church of Greece.

     

    Ata ATUN

    Email: ata@kk.tc

    http://www.ataatun.org

    October 25, 2012

  • Cyprus Plans that were Approved by the Greek Cypriots

    Cyprus Plans that were Approved by the Greek Cypriots

    Actually, it would have been a lot better had the title of this article been “ Which Solution Plan did the Greek Cypriots accept?”

    As a matter of fact, so far there has been no plan that has been accepted or approved by the Greek Cypriots that would ultimately lead to a solution regarding the Cyprus issue.

     

    The Greek Cypriots have never had the intentions of saying “yes” to a plan that would give the Turkish Cypriots equal rights and hence a partnership status on the island, and they have never had and never will  have such thoughts crossing their minds.

    In 1959, when Makarios was signing the London and Zurich Treaties which in fact had laid the foundations for the 1960 Republic of Cyprus Constitution and  defined the Turkish Cypriots as one of the founders and partners of the new Republic, he had said “Zurich and London Treaties will form the first step toward achieving Enosis.”

    What he had actually meant with this statement was, “ I am signing this Treaty involuntarily, and my mission is to achieve Enosis.”  As a matter of fact, he had launched deadly attacks on the Turkish Cypriots three years after signing this Treaty so as to annihilate the Turkish Cypriots on the island of Cyprus.

    In 1878 the British leased Cyprus from the Ottoman Empire. Following this, the Greeks and Greeks Cypriots came up with the belief that the British would soon let them have full control over the island because both the British and the Greeks shared the same religion, i.e., Christianity, so they started to press the British to transfer the entire Island to them.

     

    Until 1878, the population ratio between the two communities was mostly 1:1 and at times 1:2, however, from the beginning of the 20th century, the Greek Cypriots brought many Greek immigrants from Anatolia and Greece to the island, and hence they changed the ratio in their favor. First it was 1:3, but later on they managed to make it 1:4. With this steady increase in Greek population on the island, they started working on their Enosis ideals, which meant annexing the island to Greece. They wanted a “Unified Greek State” to rule the island and thus started the Greek atrocıties toward the Turkish Cypriots.

    In 1945, when World War Two ended, both the UN and the USA brought it to the attention of the member states that Colonialism should no longer be practiced; that all Colonies should become independent states.  This meant a new period would begin on the Island of Cyprus.

    England had already started talking about a bi-communal governing system on the island, and in 1947, introduced a plan for a new state that would consist of two peoples, i.e., the Turkish Cypriots and the Greek Cypriots.

    The Greek Cypriots immediately rejected this plan known as the “Lord Winster Plan,” as it recognized the Turkish Cypriot existence.

    13 years after rejecting the first “State of Cyprus Plan,” the Greek Cypriots involuntarily accepted the 1960 Republic of Cyprus Constitution based on the assumption that they would achieve Enosis sooner this way. Had they not approved the 1960 Constitution, the island would again have been divided somewhere alongside the Green Line, and would have gotten the immediate approval of the UN.

    In order to avoid the legitimate partition of the island and to confiscate the entire territory, the Greeks unwillingly said, “yes” to the 1960 Constitution.  Since then and up until the year 2012, the Greek Cypriots have said “No” to 52 different plans that would have eventually led to a solution of the Cyprus problem.

    Greek Cypriots have no substantial plans for a solution other than declaring a Unified Greek Cypriot State, which would give them the right to self-determination, and eventually achieve Enosis.

    It is for this reason that the Greek Cypriots have been intentionally trying to make all the negotiations continue open ended and wait till the Turks become weak economically, politically and militarily because under such circumstances, Turkey will not have the power to intervene and send military troops to the Island.

    However, as the saying goes, there is always the possibility of losing a diamond while collecting stones.  Losing the whole island is also a probability while trying to get hold of it in its entirety. This is just one of the probabilities of the mathematics based “Game Theory.”

     

    Ata ATUN

    ata.atun@atun.com

    September 11, 2012