Category: Armenian Question

“The great Turk is governing in peace twenty nations from different religions. Turks have taught to Christians how to be moderate in peace and gentle in victory.”Voltaire’s Philosophical Dictionary

  • Turkey must lift veil on ‘first Holocaust’

    Turkey must lift veil on ‘first Holocaust’

    * Katerina Cosgrove
    * From: The Australian
    * September 10, 2010 12:00AM

    TRAVEL to Istanbul or any of the Aegean coast towns of Turkey and you may think this secular, hospitable place with its pebbled beaches and Hellenistic ruins has no secrets. Travel east and you come to traditional Turkey, a land of headscarves and workaday mosques, a far cry from the architectural wonders of the Suleiman Mosque and Aghia Sophia.

    Here you will see desecrated frescoes in 10th-century churches, towns and villages whose names have been changed.

    Beneath Turkey’s veneer as an easy tourist destination lies a history that is darker, a reality more complex.

    Scratch the surface and the mass graves, the bloodstained banknotes and the dearth of ethnic minorities beg questions the Turks still refuse to answer.

    Here took place a forgotten genocide. Robert Fisk calls it “the first Holocaust” and claims “the parallel with Auschwitz is no idle one”. Turkey’s reign of terror against the Armenians was an attempt to destroy the entire race. The death toll was about two million between 1915 and 1917.

    Those who didn’t die during the deportations were taken to concentration camps and worked to death or killed. Others were herded into underground caves in their thousands and set on fire – the world’s first gas chamber, which became a model for the Nazis.

    Most of the survivors are now dead, their descendants scattered, even as far as Australia. Yet there are two million Turks today with an Armenian grandparent.

    Fethiye Cetin grew up proudly Turkish; reciting nationalist poems at school festivals, comfortably ensconced in her culture.

    All this was shattered the day she learned that Seher, her Muslim grandmother, was really Heranush, a Christian Armenian. During a death march, Heranush was wrenched from her mother’s arms by a gendarme on horseback and brought up Turkish Muslim. She kept her past secret until she was close to death. Then she finally confided in her granddaughter.

    Cetin is a human rights lawyer, writer and activist for the recognition of the genocide. In her intimate, tender memoir she tells the story of a woman who was no nameless victim, nor bearer of grudges. What occurred in Heranush’s world at the dawn of the20th century was typical of the pattern throughout eastern Turkey, the former Armenia.

    When the Young Turks triumvirate took over the government from the corrupt Ottomans they promised Christian minorities equality and the right to bear arms. So when Turkish gendarmes came to Heranush’s village in 1915 with guns and bayonets, they brought also a sense of betrayal. Men and boys were rounded up, taken away to be shot, their throats cut and bodies thrown into rivers or ravines. The death marches began; the endless lines of elderly and infirm forced from their villages into the Syrian desert, to the killing centres of Shaddadie and Der ez Zor.

    Of course there were humane Turks who hid Armenians in their homes, adopted children, saved them.Yet the stubborn fact remains that the majority of Turks still refute the genocide today. Officially there is a culture of denial in Turkey, leading to self-censorship, trials in criminal courts, prison, even murder. In January 2007, Armenian journalist and academic Hrant Dink was gunned down outside the offices of his Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos by an ultra-nationalist, a 17-year-old boy. Before his death, he had been convicted under infamous article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, the crime of “anti-Turkishness”.

    Cetin represented him during his trial, and continues to work for his family. He wrote articles urging his own people to forget the “poisonous blood” between them and the Turks and reconcile their differences. The Turkish popular press twisted his meaning, attributing to him the words, “Turkish blood is dirty”.

    It has since been proven that security forces knew of plans for the murder, that his phone was tapped and his emails and correspondence intercepted. How far the government, police and judiciary are involved in reprisalsis cause for debate.

    Yet after Dink’s death, the boy who killed him was photographed posing with the two gendarmes, smiling under a Turkish flag.

    This is the same law under which Nobel Prize-winning author Orhan Pamuk was tried, after merely talking about the genocide in a Swiss magazine. He faced up to three years in prison.

    “What happened to the Ottoman Armenians in 1915 was a major thing that was hidden from the Turkish nation; it was a taboo,” he said. “But we have to be able to talk about the past.”

    In 2006, Turkish-American Elif Shafak wrote a novel, The Bastard of Istanbul, containing one Armenian character, descendant of those killed in the genocide. She was put on trial for the same crime of “denigrating Turkishness”, but the charges were dropped. How could they not see the absurdity of pressing charges against a fictional character?

    Armenia is now an eighth of its original size. Many of its western provinces were ceded to Turkey after World War I, from Lake Van to Erzerum to the Black Sea coast. Yerevan, the capital of the Republic of Armenia, is where the country’s spiritual symbol, Mount Ararat, can be seen from every window, yet it is across the border on Turkish soil.

    Cetin’s memoir highlights our need to officially recognise this atrocity as genocide, to record the details of these lost and grant them their place in history. It reminds us of our duty to finally put names and stories to all those in unmarked graves, mothers and fathers and children whose bones will never be found.

    Katerina Cosgrove is the author of The Glass Heart and a forthcoming novel based on the Armenian genocide. She will be in conversation with Fethiye Cetin at Sydney’s Gleebooks today at 6.30pm. Cetin’s memoir, My Grandmother, is published by Spinifex Press

    Related Coverage

    • The divided self The Australian, 27 Aug 2010
    • Turkey expands influence in Middle East The Australian, 17 Jun 2010
    • Does Gaza signal Turkey’s defection The Australian, 2 Jun 2010
    • Armenian genocide the final frontier The Australian, 23 Apr 2010
    • Obama raises nuclear terrorist spectre The Australian, 11 Apr 2010

  • ARMENIAN HISTORIANS URGE NOT TO VISIT AKHTAMAR ON SEPTEMBER 19

    ARMENIAN HISTORIANS URGE NOT TO VISIT AKHTAMAR ON SEPTEMBER 19

    File:Akhtamar Island on Lake Van with the Armenian Cathedral of the Holy Cross.jpg
    Liana Yeghiazaryan

    “Radiolur”
    06.09.2010 17:06

    A number of Armenian intellectuals from the History Institute of the
    Armenian National Academy of sciences have issued a statement today,
    according to which Turkey will demand an expensive reimbursement from
    the Armenian side in exchange for the conduct of the liturgy at the
    St. Cross Church of Akhtamar. Director of the History Institute Ashot
    Melkonyan is confident that there only one way out of this slippery
    situation – we should not support the Turkish show by visiting Akhtamar
    on that day.

    The Turkish side is trying to present the demonstration of the cross
    to the public and the conduct of the liturgy at St. Cross Church as
    an expression of goodwill towards Armenia and the Armenian people. The
    Turkish side also wishes to involve 5-6 thousand people in the event.

    Rumors say the Armenian-Turkish border is going to be opened for
    three days. Armenian historians are assured, however, that Turkish
    thus wants to reach certain objectives, which are anti-Armenian.

    “We have no desire to participate in the recurrent Turkish show. This
    is true mockery. It would take half an hour to install the cross
    on the dome. I think there can be no second opinion here,” said
    Ashot Melkonyan, adding that “we are the masters of our Akhtamar
    and we will have a lot of opportunists to conduct liturgies there,
    and we should not do it under the Turkish flag waving and the face
    of Mustafa Kemal there.”

    Director of the Oriental Studies Institute Ruben Safrastyan says the
    show organized by Turkey is a simple deceit. According to him, the
    decision of the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin to boycott the mass
    at St. Cross has made many citizens refuse from the idea of leaving
    for Van.

    “I think the majority of Armenians say ‘no’ to this show. We should
    understand that the Shariat prohibits renovating a Christian Church
    and installing a cross on it. Besides, the political situation in
    Turkey should be taken account of. 75% of the Turkish citizens are
    active Muslims, and the government will not go against them. Actually,
    they are deceiving,” he said.

    Armenian historians are confident that e Tukrey is doung that step
    to resist the anti-Turkish wave expected to raise on the occasion
    of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. According to the
    statement, Turkey had to do this under the Lausanne Treaty of 1923.

    The statements calls on every Armenian, who respects his national and
    religious dignity, to refrain from visiting Akhtamar on that day to
    avoid becoming a tool in the hands of the foreigners in this dirty
    and anti-Armenian game.

    __._,_.___

  • Assyrian Genocide Scholar in New Zealand

    Assyrian Genocide Scholar in New Zealand

    Assyrian International News Agency AINA
    Sept 4 2010

    Auckland (AINA) — Assyrian genocide scholar Sabri Atman, director of
    the Seyfo Genocide Research Center, presented a lecture on August 26
    at the Assyrian Nineveh Association. In his lecture Mr. Atman outlined
    the Turkish genocide of Assyrians in World War One, in which 750,000
    Assyrians (75%) were killed by Turks and Kurds between 1915 and 1918.
    He also discussed other genocides and pogroms of Assyrians.

    The lecture also included a documentary film on the Genocide which
    included interviews with individuals that lived during 1915 and
    onwards and their experience and the horror they went through during
    events carried out against them by the Ottoman Turks, Kurds and
    Persians in WWI.

    The Assyrian Youth Group, along with the Assyrian Nineveh Association
    and the Assyrian community in Auckland, joined Sabri Atman at One Tree
    Hill on Saturday, September 4. At this prominent location in Auckland,
    Assyrian and New Zealand flags were raised. Signs reading “Never Again
    1915,” “We Will Never Forget Simele 1933” and “Hands Off Mor Gabriel”
    were held by the participants.

    There are about three thousand Assyrians living in New Zealand, based
    in Auckland.

    Mr. Atman began his genocide awareness tour in early July in the
    United States of America, then he came to Australia for the unveiling
    of the Assyrian Genocide Monument in Fairfield (AINA 8-7-2010,
    8-30-2010). From Australia he came to New Zealand will continue his
    tour in Greece, Israel, Syria, Sweden, Switzerland, and Armenia for
    the remaining of the year. Mr Atman’s aim is to travel to many
    countries to educate Assyrians and raise awareness for the recognition
    of the Assyrian Genocide.

    The next stop in Mr. Atman’s tour is Athens, where he will demand the
    recognition of the Assyrian Genocide from the Greek government.

    Rena Shlemun contributed to this report.

  • ORGANIZATION OF ISTANBUL ARMENIANS – CALIFORNIA

    ORGANIZATION OF ISTANBUL ARMENIANS – CALIFORNIA

    ISTANBUL ERMENI DERNEGININ SALON ACILISI

    ISTANBUL ARMENIANS CALIFORNIA

  • Assyrian, Greek Organizations Condemn Genocide Monument Vandalism

    Assyrian, Greek Organizations Condemn Genocide Monument Vandalism

    Assyrian International News Agency AINA
    Sept 4 2010

    (AINA) — A number of Melbourne’s Assyrian and Hellenic organizations
    issued a joint statement today condemning recent acts of vandalism
    against two Sydney memorials dedicated to the Assyrian Genocide and
    the Assyrian Levies (AINA 8-30-2010). The six signatories included two
    Greek federations and a number of Assyrian political, social and
    cultural organizations. The six signatories to the letter affirmed
    their opposition to all acts of vandalism and voiced a call for
    worldwide recognition of the Assyrian, Armenian and Pontian-Greek
    Genocide.

    The statement follows:

    We the undersigned Melbourne-based Assyrian and Greek organizations
    express our deep concern at recent events which have seen two Assyrian
    memorial sites vandalised. Sydney’s Assyrian Genocide Monument
    (recently dedicated by the Assyrian Universal Alliance) and the
    Assyrian Levies Plaque (dedicated by the Assyrian Levies Association)
    were both vandalised with physical damage and the painting of
    anti-Assyrian profanities in the preceding week.

    Both the mentioned monuments stand in tribute to millions of
    Assyrians, Armenians and Pontian-Greeks who were ruthlessly murdered
    in a calculated campaign of extermination by the Ottoman Empire.
    Historians have termed this the first genocide of the twentieth
    century. The Assyrian-Australian community, like other communities
    residing in Australia, is entitled to remember these victims of
    genocide with dignity and without hindrance from vandals. We
    explicitly condemn the vandalism of the monument and memorial plaque
    and call upon the relevant authorities to investigate the matter
    hastily.

    While the perpetrators of both these incidents are as yet unknown, and
    police investigations are continuing, it is clear from the content of
    the vandalism, on the Assyrian Genocide Monument in particular, that
    those involved hold a strong level of enmity towards the Assyrian
    people.

    The struggle for the recognition of the Assyrian, Armenian and
    Pontian-Greek Genocide is a continuing one. The historical truth of
    the genocide is not in question, as suggested by the forces of
    genocide denial. The school of scholarly evidence is overwhelming. In
    fact, the world’s leading group of genocide scholars, the
    International Association of Genocide Scholars has affirmed that the
    Assyrian, Armenian and Pontian-Greek was indeed perpetrated by the
    Ottoman Empire during its dying days. This recognition is in addition
    to dozens of federal, state and local governments around the world who
    have also recognized the Assyrian, Armenian and Pontian- Greek
    genocide.

    We renew our call for worldwide recognition of the Assyrian, Armenian
    and Pontian-Greek Genocide. In particular, we call upon the Australian
    federal government, in addition to state governments, to join their
    counterparts around the world and add their voice to truth and justice
    by recognising the genocide.

    We the undersigned organisations extend our support to all
    organizations that have contributed to the Assyrian Genocide
    recognition movement, affirm our rejection of acts designed to insult
    the memories of those who were murdered and condemn any attempt to
    distort the truth of the Assyrian, Armenian and Pontian Greek
    Genocide.

    Australian Assyrian Arts and Literature Foundation
    Federation of Pontian Associations of Australia
    Panepirotic Federation of Australia
    Assyrian Democratic Movement
    The Popular Chaldean Syriac Assyrian Council
    Beth-Nahrin Cultural Club

    By Joseph Haweil

  • ATTENTION TO: AMBASSADOR ERTUGRUL APAKAN / NY-USA

    ATTENTION TO: AMBASSADOR ERTUGRUL APAKAN / NY-USA

    Ambassador Ertugrul Apakan

    The Turkish Mission to the UN

    821 UN Plaza

    New York, NY 10017

    Dear Ambassador,

    I was invited and attended a symposium organized by Armenians at the UN building on 29 July 2010. It was presented to look like it was under the auspices of the UN.

    It turned out to be neither. It was a political pep rally of the Armenians. Enclosed you will find   the invitation, my response to the organizers and a letter I wrote to the UN Secretary General.

    As a Turkish born citizen of the US I would like to suggest that we need to represent the Turkish view in a more proactive way than be just reactive. If the Turkish Mission would organize a similar symposium at the UN grounds and it may even give the illusion that it was sanctioned by the UN as the Armenians did, I would be willing the assist in any way I can. My dear friend Sukru Aya travels to the US from time to time. His book “The Genocide of Truth” is a valuable reference book. I could ask him to present a lecture Surely there are others who are willing. Turkish Forum is a good source.

    I extend my best wishes to you and the entire Turkish staff.

    Sincerely,

    Demirtas Bayar, TurkishForum Seref Uyesi

    White plains, NY

    [email protected]

    August 10, 2010

    =================================================================

    =================================================================

    Dear Presenter,

    I was invited and attended a meeting by the UN Armenian delegation at the UN building on 29 July 2010 billed as a seminar and suggested that it was under UN auspices. Neither was correct.

    In a seminar one discusses statements made by other speakers. I asked to be heard about an incorrect statement made by the Presenter. I was not allowed to complete my sentence. This meeting then turned out to be a political pep rally where other true facts were not allowed to be presented.

    The Presenter incorrectly stated that the deaths of Turks during WWI were due only to the battle conditions. The truth is that the destruction of 22 villages and the killing of 500,000 Turks, Kurds and Jews were committed by the Hinchak and Dashnak terrorist organizations. Excavations of mass graves since 1980 are still continuing. The names of the killed and the vanished families are known and are being classified. The background of the two Armenian terrorist organizations is clearly explained by William Langer [1] who received a Medal of Merit from President Truman and at the time was considered as the dean of historians. Katchaznouni, [2] the first prime minister of Armenia, in his report to the Dashnak Party conference in 1923 also describes their war efforts and puts the blame for the outcome of the failure to create an independent State to the Armenian extremists’ excesses and not on the Turks.

    The speaker also made a summary judgment of her own in assigning the crime of Genocide to the Turks making it an Un-American statement. In the US and in all civilized Nations there is the concept of due process. We do not call a person criminal until the person is convicted in a court of law. We use the word alleged. In some cases the person is acquitted. At the end of WWI the western allied Nations occupied Turkey. The English prosecutors imprisoned more than 100 prominent Turks such as Governors, Cabinet members and Army Generals and sent them to Malta for trial accusing them of crimes against humans, war crimes and torturing Armenians. These trials were the same kind as the WWII trials in Nuremberg. For two years the prosecutors of the occupying Nations searched the archives of the Ottomans for evidence. They found none. They asked the US Government for evidence. The US Government’s reply was that they did not have any evidence either. The documents regarding these trials are available in the archives of the British and US archives. All one needs to do is to be willing to learn the truth. This then brings up the other unethical attitude of the Armenian speaker. In the US we have a concept called “double jeopardy” which prohibits a second trial after an acquittal.

    Due process was applied by the Bosnians charging Serbia with genocide in the International Criminal Court. UN Human Rights Organizations did not announce that genocide was committed in Darfur but just recently charged El-Basher with genocide in Courts. An individual like the Presenter in this meeting cannot assume they represent the UN and make criminal accusations.

    Another clearly incorrect statement by the Presenter was that 1-1.5 million Armenians were killed. At the Paris Conference in 1918 the Armenian representative Nubar Pasha suggested that the Armenians be recognized as a group who fought alongside the Allies and helped the Russians to advance into Turkey. At that conference on behalf of the Armenians Venizelos claimed that 2,100,000 Armenians (an exaggeration) were living before the War. In the US a relief organization to assist Armenians was approved by the President on Aug. 6, 1918 and the report on the “Near East Relief” [3] gives the status and audits up to Dec. 31, 1921. The report states that 400,000 Armenians fled Near East Cities such as Van and Kars and went to Transcaucases with the Russians when they retreated. Also stated is that in 1921 there were 1,000,000 (One Million) Armenians living in the Near East. Also stated is that 200,000 Armenians who joined the French returned after the French occupation of Cilicia ended but then left again. The US government is accounting for 1.6 million living Armenians in 1921 out of at most 2 million in 1912. Ottoman State census of 1905 puts the population of the Armenians in their territories at 1,294,851. The Armenians make an impossible claim that their population grew by 800,000 in 10 years.  Those interested in learning more of the truth may read the works indicated below:

    References:

    [1].    “The Diplomacy of Imperialism,” by William L. Langer, published by A. Knoff, NY 1935.  The author was awarded the Medal of Merit by President Truman.

    [2]     “There is nothing more the Tashnak Party Can Do,” by Hovhannes Katchaznouni, 1923.  This report was written by the first Prime Minister of the Armenian Republic and was presented to the Tashnak Party conference in 1923.

    [3]     “Near East Relief,” Report Doc# 192, presented by Mr. Lodge on 67th session of Congress-Senate, on April 22, 1922” was printed in 1923 by US Government Printing Office. The relief organization was approved by the President on Aug. 6, 1918 and the report gives the status and audits up to Dec. 31, 1921.

    [4]     “The Armenians,” by C.F. Dixon-Johnson, published by G. Toulmin, UK 1916. The author was a Captain in the British Army and was designated as a hero in the Boer War. He wrote:

    “Give a lie twenty-four hours’ start and it will take a hundred years to overtake it.”

    [5]     “Revisiting the Armenian Genocide,” by Guenter Lewy, Middle East Quarterly, 1925. Available on www.meforum.org/article/748.

    [6]     Admiral M. L.  Bristol US High Commissioner in the near East after in depth investigation of the conditions in the region wrote in his report on 21 March, 1921 that “. . .such Armenian reports are absolutely false.” This shows that Morgenthau who did not visit any Anatolian provinces, relied solely on the unsubstantiated and biased interpretation of the events by his Armenian assistant.

    [7]     Most prominent historians such as Mango, McCarthy, Shaw, etc dispute the term genocide as it applies to the events of WWI.

    Sincerely,

    Demirtas Bayar ([email protected])

    =================================================================

    =================================================================

    YOU ARE INVITED TO A SYMPOSIUM

    at

    UNITED NATIONS

    on

    Preventing Genocide and Torture

    Political, legal, and mind-body-spirit Perspectives

    Thursday, 29 July, 11 AM – 12:30 PM

    UNITED NATIONS Conf. room B, 46th street @ First Avenue, new building, kindly enter from visitor’s entrance

    Honoring all victims and survivors

    SPEAKERS:   Hansdeep Singh, LLM, Legal Associate Director for Voices for Freedom

    Martin Harrich, MBA, PhD cand. UN OCHA

    Representative of Office of Prevention of Genocide

    Dr Ani Kalayjian, ATOP of Meaningfulworld, Mind-Body-Spirit perspectives

    Chair and Facilitator, Dr. Ani Kalayjian

    26 June 1987, the UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Punishment or Treatment came into force. June 26 is commemorated as the

    International Day in Support of Victims of Torture

    UN Definitions: Any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him/her, or a third person, information or a confession, punishing him/her for an act s/he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating them.

    Gratitude for the following cosponsoring organizations: THE PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS, Association for Trauma Outreach & Prevention ATOP of Meaningfulworld; Armenian American Society for Studies on Stress & Genocide; Voices for Freedom, UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (INVITED); Office of the Special Adviser of the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide (INVITED)

    If you do not have a UN ID kindly contact Garen by July 26 to secure a UN ID at: [email protected]

    For information contact Dr. Kalayjian at 201 941-2266, E-mail: [email protected]

    www.meaningfulworld.com