Category: Armenian Question

“The great Turk is governing in peace twenty nations from different religions. Turks have taught to Christians how to be moderate in peace and gentle in victory.”Voltaire’s Philosophical Dictionary

  • Denialist Turkish Professor Threatens Appo Jabarian

    Denialist Turkish Professor Threatens Appo Jabarian

    appo

    8/18/10 – Issue # 1221


    By Appo Jabarian
    Executive Publisher / Managing Editor
    USA ARMENIAN LIFE
    My column of August 5, titled "Unlike Democracies, Turkey's
    Constitution Defends the State against its own Citizens," apparently
    has made a number of denialist Turks uncomfortable -- if not annoyed.
    
    One such individual is Prof. Gurbuz Celebi of Ege University in Smyrna
    (now Izmir).
    
    In an August 6 letter to the editor, Prof. Celebi has shamelessly
    distorted my last name "Jabarian" into "Geberyan." In Turkis
     "geber"
    means "die."
    
    In case a distortion is geared to ridiculing a person, then the
    targeted individual would seek appropriate remedy from the hurler of
    the insult. However in this case, the situation is much more serious
    than that. The Turkish word "geber" -- used by the "good" pr
    fessor,
    carries a threat and for that I hold him personally responsible.
    
    Instead of dealing fairly and squarely with the truth in my article,
    Mr. Celebi delivered a threat by declaring me "dead" in his opening
    paragraph: "Appo Geberyan! You are menace to humanity."
    
    In my article, I had reported that in a July 23 article in Turkish
    Hurriyet Daily Newspaper, Mustafa Akyol had written: "When we,
    the Turkish majority, speak of a homogeneous 'Turkish nation' which
    includes all citizens of Turkey, we are wishful rather than factual."
    
    I had also pointed out: "Akyol further dealt a serious blow to
    'Turkishness' by declaring 'Kemalism,' the infamous movement created
    by its founder Mustafa Kemal, an utter failure. He stated: 'Ataturk
    had actually used a transitional term in the early 20's, a 'nation
    of Turkey,' but he quickly moved on to 'Turkish nation,' and, alas,
    even the 'Turkish race.' His belief was that with enough 'education,'
    and propaganda, the state would be able to transform the society into
    whatever it wills. Well, that dream obviously failed. The Kemalists
    often put the blame on the 'treason' of internal forces."
    
    Visibly disturbed by Mr. Akyol's statement and my remarks, Mr. Celebi
    threw on a temper-tantrum: "It is your and Mustafa Akyol's own wishful
    thinking that 'the last vestige of the Ottoman Turkish Empire finally
    started showing cracks in its internal firewall.' ... How dare you
    and your likes pronounce the word 'Ataturk!'"
    
    Then he carried out his propaganda -- jam-packed with academic
    lies, that he is used to delivering to his unwitting students at the
    university where he "teaches.": "Turkishness is not an imaginary
    nd
    elusive concept, anyone who says 'I am a Turk' is one! This is one
    thing Turks can teach Westerners (and of course bigots like yourself).
    
    A contemporary state should of course be blind to ethnicity, religious
    belief, sex, gender or whatever other primitive descriptions of
    humanity there is."
    
    Ironically people who exercise their right to better understanding and
    religious tolerance are despised by Mr. Celebi who is all too eager
    to insult Turks who have integrity: "But people with under-developed
    brains will commit themselves to religion (Mustafa Akyol for example
    is perhaps one who has surrendered his brain to the 1400 year-old
    ideas and practices of Mohammed. I know for sure his father has done
    so. Hence their hatred for Mustafa Kemal. But this plays good in
    Turkey. Mustafa Akyol his father and their likes are making fortunes
    in the state owned media (Radio and TV) for cursing at contemporary
    republican values in this country. They deny Darwin, they are living
    in the dark ages. But what is so funny is that they frequently use
    the word 'democracy.' For them even cannibalism would be OK if it
    is somebody's belief . And this is just what they are doing: In
    many islamic countries they are eating WOMEN. So I suggest you find
    other allies in Turkey (if of course in addition to being a bigot -
    you are not also a man of the dark ages yourself.)"
    
    One can not help but see a link between Anti-Defamation League's
    National Director Abraham Foxman's bigotry towards Muslims in USA and
    Christians in Turkey, and Prof. Celebi's intolerance towards Muslims
    and Christians of Turkey.
    
    I wonder what Mr. Celebi has to say in defense of his "tolerant"
    Turkey which he claims to be "blind to ethnicity, religious belief,
    sex, gender or whatever other primitive descriptions of humanity
    there is," when in fact secular-controlled Turkish army regularly
    gases its Kurdish minorities with deadly chemical weapons.
    
    According to an August 13 report on bioprepwatch.com, German experts
    have confirmed the authenticity of photographs that show Kurdistan
    Workers' Party fighters killed in Turkey by chemical weapons. In
    that report IsraelNationalNews.com informed that the photographs
    "were published in the German magazine Der Spiegel earlier this
    week ... given to a German human rights delegation by activists in
    March ... depicted scorched and maimed body parts that were barely
    recognizable as human.
    
    Hans Bauman, a German photo forgery expert, confirmed the authenticity
    of the photos. ... The eight dead PKK fighters are believed to have
    been killed in September of 2009. A forensics report released by the
    Hamburg University Hospital concluded that the eight Kurds were likely
    killed due to the use of chemical weapons."
    
    It seems Prof. Celebi is the by-product of a Kemalist Turkey which
    "has always denied facts and never apologized for what it did," as
    underlined Orhan Kemal Cengiz in an August 17 Today's Zaman Turkish
    daily article titled "Hrant Dink, the Nazis and a state that never
    apologizes."
    
    "Turkey's position before the ECtHR has always been quite an
    extraordinary one. An exceptional procedure, fact-finding hearings,
    became the rule for Turkey. Applicants claimed their villages were
    burnt down, Turkey claimed this was done by the Kurdistan Workers'
    Party (PKK); an applicant claimed that she was raped in custody,
    Turkey said this person had never been taken into custody; the
    applicants claimed that their relative was killed while in custody,
    Turkey said this person had just escaped and joined the ranks of the
    PKK, and so on and so forth," concluded Cengiz.
    
    A genocidal Turk remains genocidal. Anytime a citizen of what is
    now Turkey, be it a righteous Turk, an autonomy-seeking Kurd, or
    a right-of-return seeking exiled grand child of a survivor of the
    Armenian Genocide, the Greek Genocide, the Assyrian Genocide raises
    a legitimate demand for justice, that individual is met with the word
    "geber" ("death").
    
    Prof. Celebi's unhindered occupation of his academic post at the Ege
    University continues to cloud "his" Turkish student's future. If
    Erdogan government is genuine in its efforts to portray itself
    as a developing democracy, so that it succeeds in joining the EU,
    it must first free the coming Turkish generations from the yoke of
    Turkey's genocidal dark past by retiring individuals like Celebi,
    and by paving the way for courageous and honest individuals in the
    Turkish society to further the internal debate on spiritual and moral
    atonement of Turkey through the selfless efforts of lucid individuals
    like Mustafa Akyol; Ahmet Altan, editor of the independent newspaper
    Taraf; Publisher Ragip Zarakolu; Writer Mehmet Guler; Orhan Pamuk;
    Ertugrul Kurkcu; Muharrem Erbey; Elif Shafak and many others.

    ===========================================================================

    G. Çelebi’s reply to Jabarian on his article

    Mr. Jabarian,                                            August 19, 2010

    Several years ago when I first called you “Geberyan” you took it properley  as a joke and in your reply you addressed me: “Mr. Sen Geberyan”. After this we had maybe a few more correspondences. Then I asked you “please” not to send me any more Armenian news messages and your hateful remarks on Turkey. I erased your e-mail address from my computer and was happy not to receive any more messages from you for a long time. Then, just recently you started sending me messages again.  I asked you again to stop it. All the same you kept doing it. Finally, I sent you my last message which you quoted frequently in your article. How is calling you “Geberyan” a treath to you, thousands of miles away from me in the US.  You are not only an enemy of Turks but also a very immature (childish) and a notorious slanderer. You are such a slanderer that you put words in my mouth that I never said. Did I  ever write you a word about  Kurds or what the Turkish army did or did not do to them? Was not our discussion only about your claims of an Armenian Genocide and how we in Turkey perceive these tragic events. On this issue it would be better for you to correspond with “lucid individuals” you praised so much in your article and leave me alone.

    What do I have to do with Abraham Foxman (whoever he is)  and  “Kurdistan Workers’ Party fighters being killed in Turkey by chemical weapons”? What do I have to do with “bioprepwatch.com”,  “IsraelNationalNews.com”, “the German magazine Der Spiegel” and all the rest you tried to associate my name with? Are you trying to recuit allies to destroy or defame me?

    Don’t you agree that “A contemporary state should of course be blind to ethnicity, religious belief, sex, gender or whatever other primitive descriptions of humanity there is.” Ataturk had done just that he tried to build a contemporary state and gained the admiration of millions of people throughout the world. Did you expect that statements like “‘Kemalism,’ the infamous movement created by its founder Mustafa Kemal, (is) an utter failure” would go unnoticed with no reaction?

    You are right, I am a product not a “by-product of a Kemalist Turkey” but what do you know about what I think of Hrant Dink? I happen to think that he was a congenial and loyal citizen of this country and a good man. I wish you too had a similar personality. I felt terribly sorry when he was misteriously assasinated.

    How is it that what you wrote in your article is “the truth”. It is your truth. How is it that my calling you “Geberyan” is to declare you “dead” while I know you are alive and well and delivering insults to me in statements like “A genocidal Turk remains genocidal” and accusing a whole nation for having committed a genocide. What are you expecting to gain from this demagorary?

    Would my agreeing with you on your distorted ideas solve anything? Where in my reply to you did I “insult Turks who have integrity”? I was just stating my observations on the set of mind of those people.

    How do you know that “.. unhindered occupation of (my) academic post at the Ege University continues to cloud (my) Turkish student’s future? Have you ever attended one of my classes? To begin with, I am a professor not of political or social sciences but of natural sciences and I  never ever had the intention nor the opportunity to speak on political and social issue in my classess. The subject matter of my teaching were way too mind boggling to allow me leisurely speculate on politics (and for you to understand). My students never knew what my political or socail views are.

    You suggested Mr. Erdogan’s government to retire individuals like me. Is this what they do in the US of which you are a citizen. Do you think this is what academic freedom is? Do presidents or politicians in the US retire academicians if they don’t like their ideas or at the request of certain fanatics? But I have good news for you: “I am already retired”.

    Your article was a shame. Although much to my dissent the two of us corresponded in the past privately. But with your article you prooved your ill intentions by making our discussions public to just defame me. You even tried to harm me recuiting  enemies against me. To say the least this is inhuman.

    I don’t have a journal to manage or in which I can freely publish my views. In this respect too, you are in an unfair struggle with me. If you have a bit of conscience you will publish my response and then forget about me. I can not help you!

    Finally, we have a saying in Turkish for cases like you: “Sizi Allah islah etsin!”.You probably understand it, if not I am sure you can have someone  translate it for you.

    G. Celebi

    Izmir

    =================================================================

    Response of Sukru Server Aya in armenianlife.com to Jabarian’s article

    Gentlemen,                                                                                  Istanbul, 21.08.2010

    Since I am a regular reader of the blog site, your article did not escape my attention. I am not in the habit of corresponding or commenting on the USUALLY NONSENSE – NON-KNOWLEDGE editorials of Messrs. Sassounian and Jabarian whom I understand that they must appeal to the California Armenian community and please their readers with their boastings or remarks. I know Prof. Gurbuz Celebi to be a neutral – modern minded world scholar who happens to be a Turkish citizen. I know nothing about his past intimate friendship with Mr. Jabarian, or their off-limits personal jokes or tail pulling. It looks like Mr. Jabarian gave some lectures as regards who are “bon-a-fide decent persons” in Turkiye and that spilled the glass of patience of Mr. Celebi, and Mr. Jabarian immediately grabbed those spilling drops to “brain-shower the public” in his column, which has been edited in your blog. I do not know the ages of the good looking Appo and Harut as two gentlemen, may not any older than my son who is 52 now and knows USA inside out. The problem with these young hard pushing editors is that they have not read even their own historians or official documents which will immediately prove that the GENOCIDE claim, is a physical impossibility – numbers fallacies etc. Apparently those “writers are no readers” and possibly have not read even one percent of the publications in your blog, which means they would have read at least 500 pages! I doubt if they read even 50 pages, and what they know about the Armenian Heroes, Andranik, Pastermadjian, butcher Dro, Lalaian, Katchaznuni, Nassibian plus a pile of official documents in English –  that are not refutable. On your posting Aug.21, you have listed 19 book chapters I very recently sent you. Did they read any of it?  Harut will say “We do not read what denalists write!”. You have that cheap attitude, used by every scholar to run and hideaway, because they do not hold even an inch of solid evidence to prove the allegations of fantasy. These things have been written so many times, I strongly suggest that writers and readers refer to my posting # 2399 “There is No Monster in the Attic” which stays clear!. So far NO ONE COULD PRESENT EVEN ONE WRONG with the references I lay and are published in this blog!

    Until such time that I am introduced to such knowledgeable persons, I am compelled to stay out of arguments. Murphy law says “Never argue with stupid, the other people may not know the difference”! I have repeated my declaration several times and I repeat again: I am prepared to talk-debate-show documents to anyone in the whole world, whatever his status may be. You can fill up stadiums, have thousands of questions, the answers are all there given not by me but by official documents and/or Armenian-American- British officials. (I don’t use Turkish documents nor the colossal works of Justin McCarthy, or Stanford Shaw etc. whose house was set on fire in UCLA. Now a few remarks on Mr. Jabarian’s Attacks to: all-time-genocidal Turks! If he does not reply, he is an all time Liar- Editor and Palaver Slinger! I know too many decent Armenians; so I do not generalize!


    ————————————-

    Aya’s replies (italics) paragraph by paragraph to Jabarian’s article (regular fonts):

    My column of August 5 (Appo Jabarian), titled “Unlike Democracies, Turkey’s Constitution Defends the State against its own Citizens,” apparently has made a number of denialist Turks uncomfortable — if not annoyed. One such individual is Prof. Gurbuz Celebi of Ege University in Smyrna (now Izmir).

    Are these remarks made as an American citizen or Armenian ARF member? You get angry to the joke of “geberian” but you use the nonsense insult “denialist” as free as “My Dear…”.  What makes you an authority to argue on Turkish Constitution or domestic problems?Will the failures in Turkiye “become profit to Armenia or diaspora”?

    Do you realize that you are disturbing the lives of many Turkish citizen Armenians or Armenians earning a hard living in this “country you debase”?  What’s to you Sir?  Why do you have to expose your bias with a childish example Smyrna-İzmir?  Do you call New York, “New Amsterdam”? Can you see how you waste, your and our time?

    In an August 6 letter to the editor, Prof. Celebi has shamelessly distorted my last name “Jabarian” into “Geberyan.” In Turkish “geber” means “die.”

    In case a distortion is geared to ridiculing a person, then the targeted individual would seek appropriate remedy from the hurler of the insult. However in this case, the situation is much more serious than that. The Turkish word “geber” — used by the “good” professor, carries a threat and for that I hold him personally responsible.

    If such letter was sent to you in privacy, why do you disclose it?  If your column was posted on this blog and the “geberyan letter” was sent to BLOG, then we might have criticized Mr. Celebi for abusing the language of such forum. But if it was a “private personal letter”, it would not interest me any more than your house or outside life.

    Incidentally for those who do not know it, in Turkish “Cebbar”  has the meaning of STRONG but also RUTHLESS and TYRANT. For me “given names are not important, earned personality and respect is what counts in life.”

    Instead of dealing fairly and squarely with the truth in my article, Mr. Celebi delivered a threat by declaring me “dead” in his opening paragraph: “Appo Geberyan! You are menace to humanity.” In my article, I had reported that in a July 23 article in Turkish Hurriyet Daily Newspaper, Mustafa Akyol had written: “When we, the Turkish majority, speak of a homogeneous ‘Turkish nation’ which includes all citizens of Turkey, we are wishful rather than factual.”

    We have a saying, “Tell me who your friends are, I’ll tell you what kind of a man you are”! Mustafa Akyol, is a spoiled young and totally ignorant man on most subjects (like his father) but occupy good columns and TV posts with fat payments because they are “His Master’s Voice” who pays! I am surprised that Mr. Celebi, wasted his time on this “ballast” article.

    I had also pointed out: “Akyol further dealt a serious blow to ‘Turkishness’ by declaring ‘Kemalism,’ the infamous movement created by its founder Mustafa Kemal, an utter failure. He stated: ‘Atatürk had actually used a transitional term in the early 20’s, a ‘nation of Turkey,’ but he quickly moved on to ‘Turkish nation,’ and, alas, even the ‘Turkish race.’ His belief was that with enough ‘education,’ and propaganda, the state would be able to transform the society into whatever it wills. Well, that dream obviously failed. The Kemalists often put the blame on the ‘treason’ of internal forces.”

    Why Mr. Jabarian is so joyous to have someone insulting Mustafa Kemal or “Kemalism”?  If Mustafa Akyol is a complete ignorant turncoat selling tail wagging, where does Mr. Jabarian fit or profit?

    Visibly disturbed by Mr. Akyol’s statement and my remarks, Mr. Celebi threw on a temper-tantrum: “It is your and Mustafa Akyol’s own wishful thinking that ‘the last vestige of the Ottoman Turkish Empire finally started showing cracks in its internal firewall.’ … How dare you and your likes pronounce the word ‘Atatürk!’”

    Mr. Celebi is wrong because he overlooked the fact that Mustafa Akyol, like his father, has no ethics or knowledge other than being a pipe blower. Ataturk is the “most sacred INTELLIGENCE of human ethics and personality”! For us, he is as sacred as Jesus is to most others!

    Then he carried out his propaganda — jam-packed with academic lies, that he is used to delivering to his unwitting students at the university where he “teaches.”: “Turkishness is not an imaginary and elusive concept, anyone who says ‘I am a Turk’ is one! This is one thing Turks can teach Westerners (and of course bigots like yourself). A contemporary state should of course be blind to ethnicity, religious belief, sex, gender or whatever other primitive descriptions of humanity there is.”

    Mr. Jabarian, occupies himself NOT  with the problems or status in Armenia or USA but extends his Pinocchio nose all the way to Turkiye, as if he is a judge, arbiter, a friend or any party other than being a “trouble monger” becoming happy if neighbor’s house burns! Mr. Jabarian mixes us religion-ethnicity-humanity-sex in one stew pot. Replied in next paragraph.

    Ironically people who exercise their right to better understanding and religious tolerance are despised by Mr. Celebi who is all too eager to insult Turks who have integrity: “But people with under-developed brains will commit themselves to religion (Mustafa Akyol for example is perhaps one who has surrendered his brain to the 1400 year-old ideas and practices of Mohammed. I know for sure his father has done so. Hence their hatred for Mustafa Kemal. But this pays good in Turkey. Mustafa Akyol his father and their likes are making fortunes in the state owned media (Radio and TV) for cursing at contemporary republican values in this country. They deny Darwin, they are living in the dark ages. But what is so funny is that they frequently use the word ‘democracy.’ For them even cannibalism would be OK if it is somebody’s belief. And this is just what they are doing: In many islamic countries they are eating WOMEN. So I suggest you find other allies in Turkey (if of course in addition to being a bigot – you are not also a man of the dark ages yourself.)”

    Mr. Jabarian, again went off his limits of elementary knowledge by messing up with beliefs, tolerance and the rest of easy propaganda!  I do not care if he goes to any church and how often but speaking of religious tolerance, should be the last thing he can speak, because I say:

    In Turkiye we have more than 60 Armenian churches in full service. This means ONE church for 1000 persons!  Do you have as many churches in Armenia say 2000 Churches? There may even be less than the number in Turkey!. In California there are about 300.000 Armenians; do you have 300 Armenian churches to match up with Turkiye! I think that you may not have even 30.  And in Armenia how many Moslem mosques are there?  NONE How many Muslıms live? NOT ONE!

    Dear Mr. Jabarian, I am not for or against any religion and I take it as his personal preference belonging to him only, like his sex or other pleasures. But when you use such dogmas, you find yourself into nowhere, dark ages, dark holes or even Dante’s hell, which he had seen and wrote!

    One can not help but see a link between Anti-Defamation League’s National Director Abraham Foxman’s bigotry towards Muslims in USA and Christians in Turkey, and Prof. Celebi’s intolerance towards Muslims and Christians of Turkey.

    Again Mr. Jabarian, what is up to you about Foxman? You are slandering Celebi, he is not against any Muslim or Christian or Jew, he is just against (like me) serving this warped Joker Cards to appeal to simple minded persons. How many Jews you have left in Armenia? Let me tell you, last time they were only about 500, Muslims  ZERO! You should have shown Mr. Foxman the book of Christopher John Bjerkens; remind him about the “Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians”. They are all in chapter 21 of my book, and you can also show him the services of Drastamat to Hitler!

    Wake up Sir, my book has been on the internet now nearly for three years! Not one could refute one paragraph! If you are a coward or afraid to learn the truth, please sing to yourself. If you want to learn, and know what you are speaking or writing about, you should read a 1000 for 1 page you write!

    I wonder what Mr. Celebi has to say in defense of his “tolerant” Turkey which he claims to be “blind to ethnicity, religious belief, sex, gender or whatever other primitive descriptions of humanity there is,” when in fact secular-controlled Turkish army regularly gases its Kurdish minorities with deadly chemical weapons.

    You first answer the above paragraph. Secondly you produce evidence that Turkish army used any gas against PKK. I am afraid you confused and forgot some 300.000 Kurds taking refuge in Turkiye at Halepce when Saddam had thrown gas bombs!

    According to an August 13 report on bioprepwatch.com, German experts have confirmed the authenticity of photographs that show Kurdistan Workers’ Party fighters killed in Turkey by chemical weapons. In that report IsraelNationalNews.com informed that the photographs “were published in the German magazine Der Spiegel earlier this week … given to a German human rights delegation by activists in March … depicted scorched and maimed body parts that were barely recognizable as human. Hans Bauman, a German photo forgery expert, confirmed the authenticity of the photos. … The eight dead PKK fighters are believed to have been killed in September of 2009. A forensics report released by the Hamburg University Hospital concluded that the eight Kurds were likely killed due to the use of chemical weapons.”

    Speigel and Israel news?  Let them come to me and let me show them everything for WW II, plus the scandalous court case of Talat pasha in 1920, where they did not even let General Sanders and Bronsart witness as the first hand German officers! Another respected Armenian friend had once written on this blog “chok karistirma, boku chikar”. He forgot his advice, he wrote me some memos, and he got the answers. Now it is your turn, if you are still willing to stir this mess, be sure you will hear the documented truth from me! There is still another proverb, which may be originally Armenian “iki ucu boklu degnek” (stick with shit on both ends).  If you will claim that your end is clean, you will be sorry when you lay your hands on it! Want to try?  Go ahead, or please shut-up!

    It seems Prof. Celebi is the by-product of a Kemalist Turkey which “has always denied facts and never apologized for what it did,” as underlined Orhan Kemal Cengiz in an August 17 Today’s Zaman Turkish daily article titled “Hrant Dink, the Nazis and a state that never apologizes.”

    “Today Zaman”, another correspondent of Armenian Courier! Orhan Kemal Cengiz? Another complete ignorant that does not even know that he is totally ignorant!  “Nazis?”  Read Chapter 21 of my book, refresh your memory and show me where I am wrong!  “Hırant Dink”?  Poor fellow he got shot by a fanatic Turkish idiot, because instead of speaking of blood Rh, he spoke of clean Armenian blood and dirty Turkish blood. 100.000 Turks protested this murder walking on streets.  But I have lists and books on murders of over 42 Turkish diplomats in more than 250 acts of terror with leaders like Mourad Topalian!  Did anyone protest at anytime any of the killings in USA or Armenia? Or do you give medals to killers as heroes Who is to apologize from whom?

    “Turkey’s position before the ECtHR has always been quite an extraordinary one. An exceptional procedure, fact-finding hearings, became the rule for Turkey. Applicants claimed their villages were burnt down, Turkey claimed this was done by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK); an applicant claimed that she was raped in custody, Turkey said this person had never been taken into custody; the applicants claimed that their relative was killed while in custody, Turkey said this person had just escaped and joined the ranks of the PKK, and so on and so forth,” concluded Cengiz.

    Cengiz is your type of PKK advocate, he writes to please and earn his bakshih. You are most welcome to join him and belly dance over cheap unproven slanders.

    A genocidal Turk remains genocidal. Anytime a citizen of what is now Turkey, be it a righteous Turk, an autonomy-seeking Kurd, or a right-of-return seeking exiled grand child of a survivor of the Armenian Genocide, the Greek Genocide, the Assyrian Genocide raises a legitimate demand for justice, that individual is met with the word “geber” (“death”).

    Now Mr. Jabarian, read my book and see that it was the Kurds who raided the moving columns did most of the fights with your revolutionaries humpabets! Now, I see that Armenians and Kurds forgot your throat cuttings and join hands with palavers of Genocide. Let me give you some advice, you “racist ignorant columnist, because you are so carried away that you call all Turks genocidal and inherit crime!” I hope that the reader will understand to what limits of total stupidity you are dragged by making such a racist statement, much too worse and general than “geberyan”.  Listen Mr. Jabarian and answer the following questions on this blog. Don’t hide behind your columns throwing stones to the bush, answer clearly, read and learn if necessary:

    a- Read in Posting 3144, that Turks offered Autonomy to ARF at Erzurum  before the War but that ARF refused and preferred Russians. Logic:  No person plans killing a partner he needs!

    b- Pastermadjian gives plenty examples of his treachery or bravery. Armenians fought three wars from 1914 through 1920 against Turks, revoked the Peace Treaties an joined enemies each time.

    c- To kill 1.5 million persons in 150 days “relocation period” you need to kill 10.000 every day,you must hand- dig stadium size graves every day and need 150 of such stadium graves!Not one has been found. Those found belong to killed Moslems. Read Posting #3116.

    d- Read posting # 3143 for Official Numbers. If there were only 1.3 million Armenians in (1914)  the Ottoman Empire, how can you kill 1.5 million and have a balance in 1921, as 1.4 million (US Senate), 1 million League of Nations, Paris Conference,  800.000 Lalaian and Nubar Pasha?  Tell me which one is wrong! Read the posting, use your elementary school mathematics come up with the result.

    e- Now get this thing straight Sir because I depend solely on documents:  During the period 1914-1920 about 520.000 Muslims died in the hands of/or because of Armenians.

    f- Only during the period 1918-1920 (Ararat Democratic – Dashnak Republic) 190.000 out of 1 million Armenians died in Armenia because of starvation and privations, epidemics, sheltering..

    g- About 10.000 Armenians died in attacks on columns by Kurds (42 gendarmes died fighting Kurds), another 50.000 during transfer from homes to assigned camps. Another 250.000 Armenians out of about 750.000 relocated died of epidemics and starvation mainly imposed by British ports blockade.

    h- “Refinements of killing” trophy goes to Armenian Revolutionist who devised inhuman experiments of killing. Turks, when “they could retaliate, simply killed the culprits” without any refinements!

    Gross Total:  300.000 Armenians died in the period 1914 – 1921, 1914-1918 Turkish rule, 1918-1921 Allied occupation  PLUS 200.000 died in Armenia in 2 years total approx. loss: 500.000  (my estimate)

    Prof. Celebi’s unhindered occupation of his academic post at the Ege University continues to cloud “his” Turkish student’s future. If Erdogan government is genuine in its efforts to portray itself as a developing democracy, so that it succeeds in joining the EU, it must first free the coming Turkish generations from the yoke of Turkey’s genocidal dark past by retiring individuals like Celebi, and by paving the way for courageous and honest individuals in the Turkish society to further the internal debate on spiritual and moral atonement of Turkey through the selfless efforts of lucid individuals like Mustafa Akyol; Ahmet Altan, editor of the independent newspaper Taraf; Publisher Ragip Zarakolu; Writer Mehmet Guler; Orhan Pamuk; Ertugrul Kurkcu; Muharrem Erbey; Elif Shafak and many others.

    Again Mr. Jabarian pokes his nose in matters that should not be his concern and recommends us a list of turncoats, some of which were leftist convicts now becoming capitalist pipe blowers. They are quite far away from “decency, intelligence and knowledge”.  You put them all in one sack, shake them they would not even ever heard of a “humpabet or panchonnie” and I doubt Sir, if you really know what “potorig” stands for in the Armenian history.

    Tell all these big mouth “lazy – self appraised” scholars or writers, that there is an old man with his book and columns in the internet for years, trying to discover the TRUTH behind this CHARLATANISM who makes certain persons rich.  TRUTH defenders like me or this blog, never gets a penny…but we make ourselves “accepted whether you like it or not”.  If you do not have original pyramidal documents, don’t give us all the “Yankee –doodle – dandy ”talks!. We are fed up and are too old to swallow palavers and cheap vocabulary such as “genocidal”, “denialist” and the rest of the trash…

    I am not writing on Harut Sasounian, because he does not read anything. He has a profession and he deserves his earning by writing NOT THE TRUTH but WHAT PLEASES HIS READERS! My disclosures are open to all including the Turkish belly-money dancers!

    Executive Publisher / Managing Editor

    Sukru S. Aya

  • Who will decide Armenia’s destiny — patriots or tyrants?

    Who will decide Armenia’s destiny — patriots or tyrants?

    The Christian Science Monitor – CSMonitor.com

    SARKISIAN

    As Armenia begins its 20th year of independence, its dreams for democracy have been mugged by the reality of a repressive government. But some patriots are working to ensure that the tree of liberty will grow in Armenia one day.


    By Garin Hovannisian
    posted September 21, 2010 at 1:43 pm EDT

    New York —Across an ocean and a continent, on a sliver of land tucked between two seas, a little republic today enters its 20th year of independence. I know a man there, an American by birth � except that 20 years ago, he quit his law firm in Los Angeles, decided he had no further business in the United States, and went to search for his destiny in Armenia.

    It was a romantic time. One by one, the 15 Soviet satellites were breaking from the Kremlin�s orbit, and exiled sons were returning to their homelands to share in the creation of new republics.

    As for my father, Raffi K. Hovannisian, once the football star of the Pali High Dolphins, he left a promising legal career and moved with wife and children to Yerevan, the capital of Soviet Armenia. After independence was officially declared on Sept. 21, 1991, my father was handed a fax machine and a first month�s paycheck of 600 rubles � $143. He was told he was the republic�s first minister of foreign affairs.

    Post-Soviet seeds of democracy

    All across the Soviet plains, the seeds of democracy were being sown into soil tyrannized for generations, but no one doubted that they would grow. My father certainly didn�t. Within a year, he had established diplomatic relations with every major democracy in the world. At United Nations headquarters in New York, he had raised the red, blue, and orange Armenian flag.

    That was nearly 20 years ago. Everything was possible then.

    But the shadow of history soon closed in on the Armenians. The capital went dark. Faucets dried up. Grain shipments stopped coming in. And suddenly, as if for the first time, the Armenians realized where they were. To the west: a history of horror with Turkey, the memory of an unrequited genocide in 1915. To the east: the anticipation of war with Azerbaijan, occupant of the ancient American enclave of Artsakh, or Mountainous Karabagh.

    It is a dangerous thing, when survival becomes the sole ambition of a people. But that is what happened to the Armenians in the years after independence. They lost their hope, their cause, their conviction. They were not as generous as they used to be. And the old Soviet symptoms reappeared.

    Corruption and failure

    On the streets of Yerevan, a generation of child beggars emerged. Policemen waved batons for two-dollar bribes. Teachers worked for bribes, too. The presidents came to control every judge, prosecutor, and public defendant who wanted to keep his job. Fair trials and free elections became failed promises. Incumbents almost always �won� � while losers almost never went home without first leading a mob of a hundred thousand citizens through the capital.

    In 1999, during a session of parliament, all the president�s key adversaries were assassinated.

    My father long ago resigned from the Yerevan government, but he, at least, never gave up the dream. Instead, in 2001, he gave up his American passport once and for all. The following year, he founded Heritage, a national-liberal party, which now represents the opposition in the Yerevan parliament. To this day, my father is admired by his people. In a recent poll, Gallup pegged his popularity at 82 percent � but not for the obvious reasons.

    �Achke kusht e,� the people say of him, �His eye is full.� In other words: the man has seen the world, and he�s not in politics for the money. In Armenia, that is enough.

    Today the Yerevan government is linked to a group of powerful businessmen called �oligarchs,� who invest in and control the political game. One of them has the monopoly on gas, another the monopoly on sugar and flour. All of them have nicknames, armies of bodyguards, and fleets of luxury cars escorting them ostentatiously through the city.

    Power-hungry tycoons

    The rulers are multimillionaires, the lot of them, though they have incurred great debts to the original power tycoons surrounding the Kremlin in Moscow, to whom they have been selling the country�s gold mines and electricity plants. And they are ready to sell much more than that.

    Last month, Armenia hosted a summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, a post-Soviet alliance including Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan � republics unclaimed by the West, republics that are now following an ancient gravity to its source in mother Russia. During the August meeting, Russia secured a 24-year extension of its lease on a key military base in Armenia. Actually, lease isn�t the word. The base is funded and sustained entirely by the Armenian state.

    Now you see why today, in Yerevan, there is not much independence or democracy left to celebrate. And by now my father, too, must see what his romanticism has long prevented him from seeing: Armenia is not free, not independent, not united. The Soviet soil has spit out the seeds of democracy.

    Hope foreshadows freedom

    Of course my father still keeps the faith, and there is some evidence to support it. For the first time in Armenia, a civil society is taking shape to bridge a government and a people, so far disenfranchised from each other. Denied television airwaves, opposition media are now transmitting their protest through the Internet. And that little party in parliament, though it has not realized a revolution, can at least symbolize � and foreshadow � a free and independent Armenia.

    And so we hope, and we even know, that the tree of liberty will grow from Armenian soil one day. But not today, not until, in the words of another founding father, �it is refreshed by the blood of patriots and tyrants� � both of which, I�m afraid, Armenia has plenty.

    Garin Hovannisian is the author of �Family of Shadows: A Century of Murder, Memory, and the Armenian American Dream,� released today.

  • Holy Cross deserves more Armenian tears

    Holy Cross deserves more Armenian tears

    For the first time in 95 years liturgy and hymns were heard on Lake Van

    by Tatul Hakobyan

    Van, Turkey – As Armenian clergy led by acting Istanbul Patriarch Aram Ateshyan were ringing the bells and making their way from the half-destroyed bell-tower to the Church of Holy Cross to hold a divine liturgy there for the first time in 95 years, several hundred mostly Turkish Armenians walked around the church, looked out towards the lake, lit candles and cried.

    An older man kneeled before the church walls and silently prayed and cried with his eyes to the sky.

    A middle-aged woman kept trying to light a candle but couldn’t with her hands trembling as she cried.

    Another woman walked between cracked khachkars (cross-stones) lying here and there in the church yard and cried with her entire body shaking.

    holy akdamarBut the Church of Holy Cross (Surb Khach in Armenian) deserves more Armenian tears, more prayers and more believers. The Van Lake (or the Van Sea as Armenians call it), its azure waves have long yearned for Armenian eyes.

    By noon on September 19 only several dozen Armenians from Armenia arrived here with the same number coming from Diaspora.

    The many who were expected to come but did not must have heeded the calls of Armenian authorities and the Armenian Church (both Echmiadzin and Cilicia, as well as the Jerusalem Patriarchate) who urged Armenians not to go to Akhtamar on this day, September 19, not to participate in a “Turkish show.”

    But this was far from being show. Anyone on Akhtamar that day felt the energy, the magnetism of the place that dominated everywhere on the island. This was no show. This was a collective prayer for the souls of innocent victims of 1915, even though Archbishop Aram did not specifically mention them.

    Last time a liturgy at the Church of Holy Cross was performed in 1915, shortly before the final expulsion of Armenians from this area during the Genocide. Ninety-five years later, a liturgy was heard, but in spite of promises by Turkish officials, the church’s dome was still missing its cross.

    Armenian secular and religious leaders called for a boycott after it became clear that a cross would not be installed in time for the ceremony. So, most Armenians who arrived from Armenia were journalists, many of whom came with financial support of various international organizations.

    Diaspora media did not dispatch journalists to Akhtamar even though the Turkish Prime Minister’s office sent invitations offering to take up all of their expenses.

    Kapriel Chemberjian, who lives in Syria and is a director of the Punik (Phoenix) benevolent fund, has been to Akhtamar and Western Armenia before. This time he arrived with his wife. While he agrees with Armenia’s official boycott, he also believes it is natural for Armenians from all over the world to want to come to a liturgy at a place so sacred for Armenians.

    “This is our land, and we should be able to come here whenever we want, as pilgrims, to light a candle,” said Chemberjian, who is also one of the contributors to reconstruction of the Diyarbakir (Tigranakert) church and other Armenian undertakings.

    Businessman Dikran Chiderjian who lives in Monaco has also been to Western Armenia before. Together with his French wife he was here in the late 1990s.

    “Several years ago a liturgy at the Holy Cross would seem like a dream. Perhaps not everything was properly prepared, but this is an important step towards reclaiming our heritage,” said 70-year-old Chiterchian.

    The day before he crisscrossed the lake on a boat visiting other largely destroyed Armenian monuments in this area that have been abandoned for nearly a century.

    “[Reasons provided for] Echmiadzin’s refusal to dispatch representatives to the ceremony were merely a cover, real reasons are political,” Chiderjian says.

    Armen Yarmayan, 62, is a trustee of the Holy Savior hospital in Istanbul.

    “I came to hear a liturgy that is taking place here for the first time since 1915,” he said. According to Yarmayan, Armenia’s boycott is justified, but Turks too should not be blamed for not installing the cross.

    “Time will put everything in its place, the cross will be installed and believers from Armenia will come to the next liturgy,” he predicted.

    Krikor Kyokchian was born in Istanbul, but lives in Beirut. He came to Akhtamar with four members of his family to be here, as he said, on an historic day.

    “Let there be ten boycotts, I would have come here anyway, I needed to see this for myself,” he said.

    The Church of Holy Cross was built in the early 10th century in the times of Gagik the First Artsruni, King of Vaspurakan. Designed by architect Manvel the church served as the Catholicosal residence adjacent to the Artsruni court. Due to politics of the period, five Catholicoses resided at Akhtamar during the 10th century.

    As conditions in the Ararat valley more or less normalized, Catholicos moved to the Church of Argina in Ani. Since then the Holy Cross was no longer a residence for the Catholicos of All Armenians. But to preserve that memory, Akhtamar’s clerical brotherhood continued to call their leaders Catholicoses.

    So it turns out that 10th century Armenians were able to create a cultural monument of world heritage value, but 21st century Turks are “unable” to install a cross on top of it.

    They claim that either there was not enough time, or the cross was too heavy, or wonder how could they have a cross in a Muslim country, and then quickly add that the cross would go up a week after the ceremony.

    If this is a possible to do a week later, why not do it before the liturgy, to make sure that more people come, including from Armenia?

    The cross, which by the way weighs not 200 kilos as some Turks claimed, citing that as a reason why it may damage the dome, but just 76 kilos, could be seen standing not far from the church.

    In March 2007, following its restoration, the Church of Holy Cross was opened as a museum with a prohibition that it be used for religious ceremonies. Armenian officials, including deputy minister of culture, were present at that opening.

    As part of that ceremony, a huge Turkish flag was unfurled on the island and that was truly a show.

    This time there wasn’t anything like that. Other than a single blood-red flag with a crescent in the Akhtamar bay, on September 19 one would be hard-pressed to find Turkish symbols on the island.

    Nevertheless, helicopters circling in the air, and a boat with armed soldiers seen in the lake throughout the ceremony, did serve as reminders that this was a state-planned event, in a way a “show.”

    Among the guests one could see the governor of Van province and the mayor of Van, as well as foreign diplomats accredited in Ankara.

    Van governor did all he could to ensure a larger turnout through participation of local residents. During the liturgy Muslim Turks and Kurds outnumbered Armenians several times. Some of them came out of curiosity, others for a weekend getaway on the shores of Van.

    “Dear Armenian friends, welcome to Van,” a poster announced near the entrance to the city. But no other writings could be seen that would identify the Akhtamar Church as Armenian, and term Armenian seemed to be studiously avoided.

    But on September 17 several pages of the local Van newspaper were published in Western Armenian, produced in cooperation with Istanbul-based Agos. They included a feature on “What happened with monasteries of Van” that listed about a hundred monuments located on the shores of the lake, most of them now destroyed and some still partly intact, all abandoned.

    Turkish Armenians say that the Church of Holy Cross will soon have its cross installed. They say that 10 to 15 years ago they would not even dare to think of its reconstruction or about having a divine liturgy here, even without a cross in place. They see the September 19 ceremony as not completely satisfactory, but still an important milestone in the life of their community.

    Akhtamar and its Church of the Holy Cross deserve to see more Armenians come, more Armenians crying, praying and walking around.

    Our Lake Van, its azure waves have long yearned for Armenian eyes.

    — Journalist Tatul Hakobyan is an expert with the Civilitas Foundation. From 2006 to 2009, he was the Armenian Reporter’s senior correspondent. He is the author of “Artsakh Diary: Green and Black,” a book about the Karabakh war published in Armenian, English and Russian. He will soon publish his second book “View from Ararat: Armenians and Turks.”

    (c) 2010 Armenian Reporter

  • Barbara Boxer (D., Armenia)

    Barbara Boxer (D., Armenia)

    It is so sad and so true that a major US newspaper calling US Senator as   D., ARMENIA.  Is US senator working as  foreign government agent or elected from CALIFORNIA to serve for the UNITED STATES? … AHMET  SUER,  PRESIDENT TURKISH AMERICAN SOCIETY of AUGUSTA & AIKEN

    The Democrat trashes an Obama nominee.

    Spare a thought for Matthew Bryza, a Presidential appointee who is a victim of election-year politics and parochial ethnic lobbies on Capitol Hill.

    Mr. Bryza is a highly accomplished career diplomat who has spent two decades working on the Caucasus and Central Asia. In May, President Obama nominated Mr. Bryza, a deputy assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian affairs in the Bush years, to be U.S. ambassador to Azerbaijan. He carries no partisan baggage, and you’d think he’d be waved through the Senate. Yet his confirmation is in jeopardy thanks to California Senator Barbara Boxer’s re-election woes.

    The most vocal opposition to Mr. Bryza comes from the Armenian National Committee of America, or ANCA. The influential lobby alleges that Mr. Bryza is biased toward Azerbaijan and Turkey, Armenia’s regional nemeses. As proof, they cite his marriage to Turkish-born Zeyno Baran, a scholar on leave from the Hudson Institute. The ANCA dredges up a few past comments by Mr. Bryza related to the dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. The diplomat co-chaired the Minsk Group, which is trying to broker peace between the two sides.

    These charges were addressed to the satisfaction of most Senators during last month’s confirmation hearings. If anything, Ms. Baran is a prominent critic of Turkey’s government who has published widely, including in these pages. Mr. Bryza enjoys good relations with politicians in Azerbaijan and Armenia, whose government doesn’t oppose his nomination.

    That Mr. Bryza is respected by all sides in this turbulent and difficult region is a testament to his diplomatic skills. But he does have a long track record—which most people would see as relevant experience—that the hard line ANCA can use to fight him and, not incidentally, gain attention for its fund raising.

    Lucky for them, the three-term Senator Boxer is in danger of losing her seat to Republican challenger Carly Fiorina. The Golden State is home to a large Armenian community, a potential swing bloc this November, and Ms. Boxer is pandering for their votes. Along with New Jersey’s Senator Robert Menendez, who runs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, she grilled Mr. Bryza in his hearing before the Foreign Relations Committee. She then asked to “bounce” a committee vote on him from last month to tomorrow.

    The delay hurts his chances. Even if Mr. Bryza gets out of committee, Ms. Boxer may put a hold on him to stop confirmation by unanimous consent. It’s unlikely the full Senate could schedule a floor vote on his nomination before the campaign recess. The White House has bigger problems than to press an endangered Democratic incumbent on an ambassadorial appointment, and it hasn’t.

    Meantime, the ambassador’s office in Baku has been empty for 14 months. This suits the ANCA just fine. The Armenian lobby would love to see America’s ties to the Turkic world weakened. Each year they press Congress to adopt a resolution that the 1915 massacre of ethnic Armenians at the hands of the Ottomans qualifies as a “genocide,” infuriating Turkey.

    These tribal Caucasian obsessions threaten U.S. interests. Oil-rich and strategically located between Russia and Iran, Azerbaijan has enjoyed close relations with Washington. Azeri leaders view the absence of an ambassador as a symptom of recent American neglect, a view reinforced by Senator Boxer’s typically political and self-serving games.

    Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A22

    Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

  • Armenians worship in eastern Turkey, and for some it’s bittersweet

    Armenians worship in eastern Turkey, and for some it’s bittersweet

    Hundreds attend a service at the Armenian Church of the Holy Cross, the first held there since 1915, when a wave of violence nearly destroyed one of the largest Christian communities in the Middle East.

    Most visited the small church for a few minutes and watched the ceremony via giant television screens set up in the gardens outside. (Mustafa Ozer / AFP / Getty Images)

    Reporting from Akdamar Island, Turkey, and Beirut —

    A Sunday service at a historic church in eastern Turkey underscored both the desire for reconciliation between Turks and Armenians and the hurdles that remain nearly a century after a violent massacre of Armenians.

    It was the first service held in the 1,100-year-old Armenian Church of the Holy Cross since 1915, when a wave of violence nearly destroyed one of the largest Christian communities in the Middle East.

    Many Armenians in the diaspora and the neighboring republic of Armenia boycotted and denounced Sunday’s service on Akdamar Island after Turkish authorities did not allow a cross to be raised on the dome of the church. It was placed on the church grounds instead.

    Still, hundreds of Armenian pilgrims attended, many coming from the relatively large Armenian community in Istanbul, Turkey’s main city, but also from Iran, Germany, France and from as far away as the United States. They flooded local hotels and sang hymns as they traversed Lake Van by boat to get to the site.

    “There is a village far, far away,” one group sang. “It’s my village even though I never go or I haven’t seen it.”

    Most visited the small church for a few minutes and watched the ceremony via giant television screens set up in the gardens outside.

    “I feel bittersweet about being here, because I grew up hearing about the life in Van from my parents,” said Paul Shahinian, a 58-year-old visiting from New Jersey. “I always had images in my head about Van. I never imagined I could come here because Turkey didn’t welcome Armenians.”

    The church, surrounded by verdant mountains and hills, is decorated on the outside with carvings of animals such as peacocks, goats and owls, which are common in Armenian iconography. Paintings inside are meant to represent the heavens.

    “This church, which is a valuable piece of art, is a cultural monument that belongs to the whole of humanity,” Archbishop Aram Atesyan of the Armenian Patriarchate of Turkey said during a two-hour service he led, according to Turkey’s official Anatolian news agency.

    The 8-year-old government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has strived to heal the wounds of the past by reaching out to Armenians in Turkey and abroad in an attempt to bolster its international reputation and smooth out obstacles to possible Turkish entry into the European Union. In 2005, Turkey began a $1.5-million restoration of the church, opening it as a museum in 2007. It will host an annual religious service from now on.

    Some critics, both in Turkey and among Armenians, have denounced the handling of the church opening as an attempt by Turks to whitewash a violent history. But others describe the Sunday event as an important gesture by an activist Turkish government that appears more ready and able than previous political elites to address the country’s domestic and international sore spots.

    But attempts at reconciliation between Armenians and Turks have often faltered, as much over misunderstandings of gestures as substantive differences, the latter including Turkey’s refusal to abide by the widely accepted description of the killings as genocide.

    The cross controversy underscores the sensitivity of relations between Turks and Armenians, even over relatively minor matters. Turkish officials blamed the church’s Italian architect, saying the dome could not support the 440-pound cross. The provincial governor of Van has promised that a cross would be mounted on the church within six weeks.

    But many Armenians suspect continued chauvinism by Turks, who are governed by a political party that has roots in the country’s Islamist movements. “The cross wasn’t there because of the fears of the governments,” said Rafi Altunkeser, a 40-year-old Armenian Turk visiting from Istanbul.

    But other Armenians called for reconciliation. Harry Parsekian, a Boston resident, said his family originally lived in eastern Turkey but was driven out. He first returned to the Van region in 1985 and has since gone back many times.

    “When I was young I never imagined I would have Turkish friends,” Parsekian said. “But I do have really good Turkish friends now. And I believe this is a good step for the Armenians and Turks.”

    [email protected]

    Special correspondent Saracoglu reported from Akdamar Island.

    Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times

  • Armenian Church in Turkey Reopens to Worship

    Armenian Church in Turkey Reopens to Worship

    By JOE PARKINSON

    AKDAMAR ISLAND, Turkey—Turkey allowed Armenians to worship at a symbolic but politically sensitive church here for the first time since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire on Sunday, in a service hailed by Turkish officials as a sign of growing tolerance for religious minorities, but which underscored the lingering distrust between Ankara and Yerevan.

    The emotional two-hour mass at the Church of the Holy Cross—an iconic landmark on Akdamar island in the turquoise waters of Lake Van in Turkey’s poverty-stricken southeast region—was attended by about 1,000 people. But that was a fraction of the 5,000 visitors expected, as a partial Armenian boycott saw thousands cancel their trips after Turkish authorities refused to display a 200-kilogram (440-pound) cross on the church’s roof, claiming it was too heavy and could damage the structure. The five-meter-tall (16.5-foot-tall) cross instead was set next to the belltower of the church.

    Armenians Pray at Akdamar

    Joe Parkinson/The Wall Street JournalThe 10th century Church of the Holy Cross on Akmadar Island is one of the finest remaining examples of medieval Armenian architecture. It currently functions as a museum, after renovation by the Turkish government was completed in 2007 at a cost of $1.5 million.

    Worshippers, the vast majority from the Armenian diaspora community, packed into the small red-stone church or watched Orthodox priests deliver the first liturgy there in almost 100 years on big-screen televisions specially erected for the event. Some pilgrims, overcome with emotion, held wooden crosses aloft as they prayed. Others exchanged stories about the ancient Armenian civilization that once existed in Turkey, but was almost erased in 1915 in what many regard as genocide. Turkey strongly denies that a genocide took place, describing the killings as the tragic result of a civil war in which all sides suffered.

    Eighty year-old Lebanese Armenian Victoria Tutunjian, whose parents fled to Beirut to escape those killings, said she “always hoped but never imagined” she could come to pray here. “I’m so happy this ceremony is taking place and I will come here every year until the day I die. But Turks are still my enemy, and coming here and walking on this soil is my revenge,” she said, clutching a small Armenian flag.

    akdamarOther Turks and armenians here were more positive about the service’s significance. “This is a great day for all Armenians, I’m confident things will start to change now,” said Tigran Abrahamian, a 45-year old industrial engineer from Istanbul, who is married to a Turk and brought his family to the service. An estimated 170,000 Armenians live in Turkey, according to Turkish authorities, who say more than half aren’t legal residents.

    Still, Muslim Turkey and Christian Armenia remain bitterly divided over their troubled history. The border between them remains closed despite U.S.-brokered peace accords signed last year.

    For Armenians across the world, the Church of the Holy Cross, abandoned in 1915 and reopened in 2007 as a museum after a $1.5 million restoration, has become symbolic of the deportation and killings at the hands of Ottoman forces. The controversy over the church’s cross underlines the mistrust between the neighbors. In Yerevan on Sunday, 1,500 people attended an alternative religious service at a genocide memorial that denounced the Akdamar service as a publicity stunt.

    “Our mission for today was to show that the Turkish government should not use our heritage as a propaganda tool to pretend that they are tolerant,” said Hayk Demoyan, director of Yerevan’s Genocide Museum, in a telephone interview after he addressed the crowds.

    Turkish Culture and Tourism Minister Ertugrul Gunay said that the government had agreed to the Armenian religious service in good faith and that nationalists on both sides were exploiting the event for political purposes.

    Sunday’s service was the second of two special church openings recently permitted by the Turkish government. Ankara in August allowed Christians to pray at a Greek Orthodox monastery in Sumela, in the Black Sea region, for the first time since the country’s creation.

    TURKARMEN

    Associated PressArmenians worship in Church of the Holy Cross, in Van, Turkey, Sunday.

    TURKARMEN

    Often criticized for its treatment of Christian minorities, Ankara has promoted the services as proof of its growing commitment to religious tolerance. Critics say the tightly controlled services are a carefully choreographed public-relations campaign designed to boost Turkey’s prospects of joining the European Union, for which it is a candidate.

    “Yes, this is a PR stunt by the Turkish government to show it is being respectful to its minorities… but, frankly, if it means that Turkey and Armenia can move closer towards resolving their differences, then who cares,” said Ara Sarafian, director of the Gomidas Institute, a London-based research organization.

    Local businesses in the region are Van are supportive of improved relations, hoping religious tourists would help the region profit. Gaye Akay, a hotelier born in Van but based in Ankara, is planning to open the region’s first five-star hotel next year. “We think this is the beginning of something really special,” she said. “More Armenians and international tourists will start coming here and spending their dollars.

    Negotiations to open the border between Turkey and Armenia went into deep freeze, as neither side ratified a deal outlined last year and both sides accused the other of setting additional conditions.

    Write to Joe Parkinson at [email protected]