Category: Armenian Question

“The great Turk is governing in peace twenty nations from different religions. Turks have taught to Christians how to be moderate in peace and gentle in victory.”Voltaire’s Philosophical Dictionary

  • Turkish and Armenian historians met in Yerevan

    Turkish and Armenian historians met in Yerevan


    Monday, 20 October 2008

    It is learned that Turkish and Armenian scientists met in Yerevan after President Abdullah Gul’s Armenia visit. Scientists decided to study for a project together and publishing Armenian and Turkish archives side by side and making public opinion researchs in both countries. President of the Turkish committee of scientists, Professor Dr. Dogu Ergil said, “We started an second channel diplomacy. And as being parties we will leave decision to the Turkish and Armenian people”.

    Ergil replied the questions of daily journal “aksam” about the meeting in Yerevan. Ergil stated that the organization is arranged by German DVV International foundation which is centered in EU and doing studies in Caucasia. Ergil said that German foundation was studying about Turkish-Greek reconciliation for years. “They came to me with this idea, and we attended to the meeting in Yerevan. We were four scientists from Turkey, in the meeting” said Ergil. Ergil said that it is always said for Historians to solve the issue, and they were in there to do that. He said that scientists from Sabancı and Bilgi Universities attended to the meeting, who have international degrees on their branches.

    Ergil said, “This is second channel diplomacy that is started by President Abdullah Gul. We think that this door is opened and we are hopeful about the process. Project is being prepared and studies may start in 2009”.

    www.historyoftruth.com

  • Forward To The Past: Russia, Turkey, And Armenia’s Faith

    Forward To The Past: Russia, Turkey, And Armenia’s Faith

    Russia, too, must deal with Armenia in good faith.

    October 21, 2008
    By Raffi K. Hovannisian

     

    The recent race of strategic realignments reflects a real crisis in the world order and risks triggering a dangerous recurrence of past mistakes. Suffice the testimony of nearly all global and regional actors, which have quickly shifted gears and embarked on a collective reassessment of their respective strategic interests and, to that end, a diversification of policy priorities and political partnerships.

    It matters little whether this geopolitical scramble was directly triggered by the Russian-Georgian war and the resulting collapse of standing paradigms for the Caucasus, or whether it crowned latently simmering scenarios in the halls of international power. The fact is that the great game — for strategic resources, control over communications and routes of transit, and long-term leverage — is on again with renewed vigor, self-serving partisanship, and duplicitous entanglement.

    One of the hallmarks of this unbrave new world is the apparent reciprocal rediscovery of Russia and Turkey. Whatever its motivations and manifestations, Turkey’s play behind the back of its trans-Atlantic bulwark and Russia’s dealings at the expense of its “strategic ally” Armenia raise the specter of a replay of the events of more than 85 years ago, when Bolshevik Russia and a Kemalist Turkey not content with the legacy of the great Genocide and National Dispossession of 1915 partitioned the Armenian homeland in Molotov-Ribbentrop fashion and to its future detriment.

    Time To Face Up

    Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh, in Armenian) was one of the territorial victims of this 1921 plot of the pariahs, as it was placed under Soviet Azerbaijani suzerainty together with Nakhichevan. That latter province of the historical Armenian patrimony was subsequently cleansed of its majority Armenian population, and then of its Armenian cultural heritage. As recently as December 2005, Azerbaijan (like Armenia, a member of the Council of Europe) completed the total, Taliban-style annihilation of the medieval Armenian cemetery at Jugha that contained thousands of unique cross-stones.

    Nagorno-Karabakh, by contrast, was able to turn the tide on a past of genocide, dispossession, occupation and partition and defend its identity, integrity, and territory against foreign aggression. In 1991 — long before Kosovo, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia became buzzwords — it declared its liberty, decolonization, and sovereignty in compliance with the Montevideo standards of conventional international law and  with the Soviet legislation in force at that time.

    Subsequent international recognition of Kosovo, on the one hand, and the later withholding of such recognition for South Ossetia and Abkhazia, on the other, demonstrate that there exists no real rule of law applied evenly across the board. On the contrary, such decisions are dictated by vital interests that are rationalized by reference to selectively interpreted international legal principles of choice and exclusivist distinctions of fact which, in fact, make no difference.

    It’s time to face up to the farce — and that goes for Moscow and Ankara too, judging by recent pronouncements by high-level officials. And if the two countries are driven by the desire for a strategic new compact, then at least their partners on the world stage should reshift gears and calibrate their policy alternatives accordingly. Iran, the United States, and its European allies might find here an objective intersection of their concerns.

    What Is Needed

    Russia and Turkey must never again find unity of purpose at the expense of Armenia and the Armenian people. The track record of genocide, exile, death camps, and gulags is enough for all eternity.

    These two important countries, as partners both real and potential, must respect the Armenian nation’s tragic history, its sovereign integrity and modern regional role, and Nagorno-Karabakh’s lawfully gained freedom and independence.

    Football diplomacy is fine, but Turkey can rise to the desired new level of global leadership and local legitimacy only by dealing with Armenia from a “platform” of good faith and reconciliation through truth; lifting its illegal blockade of the republic and opening the frontier that it unilaterally closed, instead of using it as a bargaining tool; establishing diplomatic relations without preconditions and working through that relationship to build mutual confidence and give resolution to the many watershed issues dividing the two neighbors; accepting and atoning, following the brilliant example of post-World War II Germany, for the first genocide of the 20th century and the national dispossession that attended it; committing to rebuild, restore, and then celebrate the Armenian national heritage, from Mount Ararat and the medieval capital city of Ani to the vast array of churches, monasteries, schools, academies, fortresses, and other cultural treasures of the ancestral Armenian homelands; initiating and bringing to fruition a comprehensive program to guarantee the right of secure voluntary return for the progeny and descendants of the dispossessed to their places and properties of provenance; providing full civil, human, and religious rights to the Armenian community of Turkey, including the total abolition the infamous Article 301, which has served for so long as an instrument of fear, suppression, and even death with regard to those courageous citizens of good conscience who dare to proclaim the historical fact of genocide; and finally, exercising greater circumspection in voicing incongruous and unfounded allegations of “occupation” in the context of Nagorno-Karabakh’s David-and-Goliath struggle for life and justice, lest someone remind Ankara about more appropriate and more proximate applications of that term.

    As for Russia, true strategic allies consult honestly with each other and coordinate their policies pursuant to their common interests. They do not address one another by negotiating adverse protocols with third parties behind each other’s back; they do not posture against each other in public or in private; and they do not try to intimidate, arm-twist, or otherwise pressure each other via the press clubs and newspapers of the world. Russia, too, must deal with Armenia in good faith, recognizing the full depth and breadth of its national sovereignty and the horizontal nature of their post-Soviet rapport, its right to pursue a balanced, robust, and integral foreign policy, as well as the nonnegotiability — for any reason, including the sourcing and supervision of Azerbaijani oil — of Nagorno-Karabakh’s liberty, security, and self-determination.

    The Armenian government, in turn, must of course also shoulder its share of responsibility for creating a region of peace and shared stability, mutual respect and open borders, domestic democracy, and international cooperation. An ancient civilization with a new state, Armenia’s national interests can best be served by achieving in short order a republic administered by the rule of law and due process, and an abiding respect for fundamental freedoms, good governance, and fair elections, which, sadly, has not been the case to date.

    Armenia urgently needs a new understanding with its neighbors that will preclude once and for all its being cast again in the role of either fool or victim.

    Raffi K. Hovannisian served from 1991-92 as foreign minister of the Republic of Armenia. He is the founder of the Armenian Center for National and International Studies and represents the opposition Heritage Party in the Armenian parliament. The views expressed in this commentary are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL

  • As Talks with Azeris/Turks Falter, Armenia Expands Access to Georgia/Iran

    As Talks with Azeris/Turks Falter, Armenia Expands Access to Georgia/Iran



    Publisher, The California Courier
    Senior Contributor, USA Armenian Life Magazine
    The budding relationship between Armenia and Turkey, which started with last month’s “football diplomacy” with much fanfare and high expectations, is facing serious difficulties.
    While no one expected a quick resolution of the long-standing issues stemming from the Genocide and its persistent denial by Turkey, few anticipated that the nascent rapprochement would falter so quickly.
    After a very friendly and hopeful first meeting between the presidents and foreign ministers of Armenia and Turkey, occasioned by the unprecedented soccer match between their national teams on September 6 in Yerevan, it appears that the Artsakh (Karabagh) conflict is the main reason for the sudden rift.
    To begin with, it was strange that the presidents of Armenia and Turkey did not hold a follow-up meeting during their attendance of the U.N. General Assembly sessions in New York in late September. When Pres. Gul was asked by Turkish journalists why no meeting was scheduled with the Armenian President, he first said he was not aware that Pres. Sargsyan was coming to New York and then assured them that they would run into each other during one of many diplomatic receptions. Despite such optimistic talk, the two presidents never meet. They may have been waiting for the outcome of discussions between the foreign ministers of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey who met on the last day of their stay in New York.
    On September 28, two days after Pres. Sargsyan left New York, he told reporters that there were “no concrete results yet” from the foreign ministers’ meeting and that he had not expected much from their encounter.
    On the same day, Pres. Gul confirmed that there had not been any significant movement to merit the lifting of the blockade of Armenia. Taking a tough stand, he told a Turkish group that “no talks on border opening are possible before Armenia’s liberation of Azerbaijani territories,” according to the AzeriTaj news agency. Thus, Pres. Gul was reverting to Turkey’s previous preconditions that had been long rejected by the Armenian side. A senior aide to Azerbaijan’s president, in his turn, confirmed this week that several serious issues remain unresolved on the Artsakh issue.
    Ankara and Baku assumed that since the Georgian-Russian conflict had temporarily deprived Armenia of the opportunity to import more than 70% of its vital supplies from Georgia’s Black Sea ports, this was the ideal time to force Yerevan into making serious concessions on the Genocide issue and the Artsakh conflict.
    Whether it was coincidence or not, several major initiatives announced by Pres. Sargsyan last week had the effect of countering the hard-line taken by Ankara and Baku in their recent negotiations with Armenia, and dispelling the false impression that Yerevan is desperately seeking to reopen the border with Turkey at any cost.
    Pres. Sargsyan announced during his last week’s visit to Tbilisi that he had reached an agreement with Pres. Saakashvili to jointly build a modern highway that would considerably shorten the transport time between the Georgian Port of Batumi and Yerevan.
    In a nationally televised speech delivered for the first time in the Armenian Parliament — akin to the State of the Union address by American presidents before the U.S. Congress — Pres. Sargsyan announced that a new railway would be constructed to link Iran with Armenia, to facilitate and expand trade between the two countries. He also said that Armenia would build a new nuclear power plant to ensure that the country remains energy self-sufficient when its aging plant is shut down. Finally, he stated that a Pan-Armenian Bank and an investment fund would be established in Yerevan to finance these projects. He said that these “large and daring initiatives” would solve Armenia’s important strategic and economic problems.
    Along with these major programs, Armenia just formed a new Diaspora Ministry to streamline and strengthen its relations with millions of Armenians living abroad. On September 24, during a major banquet in New York, Pres. Sargsyan gave the 700 Armenian guests an uplifting message of unity, urging them to join forces for the betterment of Armenia and the Diaspora. He also thanked all those assisting in the resolution of the Artsakh conflict, “the condemnation of the Armenian Genocide, and the restoration of historical justice.”
    These new initiatives are bound to improve Armenia’s bargaining hand and help negotiate with Turkey and Azerbaijan from a position of strength. The expansion of Armenia’s alternate land routes through Georgia and Iran would considerably diminish the utility of opening the border with Turkey and circumvent more effectively the blockades imposed by Ankara and Baku.
    While Armenian officials do want to improve relations with all of their neighbors, they are not so desperate as to make unacceptable concessions on the Genocide and Artsakh issues.
  • how to reach a decision on voting for one candidate over another.

    how to reach a decision on voting for one candidate over another.

    While Obama Adopts Sound Position on Crucial Issues, McCain Beats Around the “Bush” 
    By Appo Jabarian
    Executive Publisher & Managing Editor
    Friday, October 10, 2008

    During this presidential election season, many readers have asked me how to reach a decision on voting for one candidate over another.

    The process that I have adopted during this and many other election seasons has enabled me to reach a decision that I can live with.

    The determining factor is the candidates’ position on the most important issues for me as an Armenian American. Each candidate’s intellectual preparedness, honesty, courage, sense of initiative, overall presence and manner are also important.

    In my opinion, the most important issues are:

    1. Armenian Cause/The Armenian Genocide;
    2. Economy;
    3. Foreign Policy;
    4. War In Iraq;
    5. Tax Policy;
    6. Healthcare Policy;
    7. Corruption/Greed in government and major corporations.

    During the past several weeks, the two major parties’ presidential candidates, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), and Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) have expressed their opinion and position. On Tuesday October 7, they have reiterated their ideas during the second presidential debate in Nashville, TN.

    Below is the compilation of their position on each of the issues:

    1. Armenian Genocide
    Sen. McCain sparked controversy on Tuesday, February 29, 2008 when he said that he would not support a congressional resolution calling on the government of Turkey to acknowledge the 1915 Armenian Genocide.
    Sen. Obama wrote in June 2008: “The United States must recognize the events of 1915 to 1923, carried out by the Ottoman Empire, as genocide…. We must recognize this tragic reality. The Bush Administration’s refusal to do so is inexcusable, and I will continue to speak out in an effort to move the Administration to change its position.”

    2. Economy
    Sen. McCain misguidedly said on Sept. 15 that the “fundamentals” of the U.S. economy were “strong.” During the primary election season, he has admitted that the economy is not his expertise. Although he has promised reform and expressed optimism about its future, most Americans remain skeptical about his ability to lead America into better economic times.
    Sen. Obama has continuously shown deep understanding of the economic woes faced by the majority of fellow Americans, and has genuinely vowed to take bold initiatives to make life more bearable for the Main Street, and not let Wall Street get away with greed and corruption.

    3. Foreign Policy
    Sen. McCain’s foreign policy statements sound similar to the current Republican Pres. George W. Bush’s positions on crucial issues ranging from the war in Iraq to confrontation/cooperation with Russia. Many independent observers rate the current U.S. foreign policy as the poorest in many decades. They also agree that it was under Bush that the United States experienced the greatest loss of prestige in the international political arena.

    Sen. Obama offers a high level of understanding of the international issues affecting the United States. On many occasions, he has illustrated that he has the ability to launch a fresh and insightful beginning, bringing this country out of its current confrontational modus operandi. Under Pres. Obama, the United States would offer to its potential adversaries both diplomacy and decisiveness backed by military firmness.

    4. War In Iraq
    Sen. McCain has shown poor judgment in claiming that the war in Iraq would be “swift and short” and that the American soldiers would be welcomed as “liberators.” He was wrong. Pres. Bush’s claims for “Weapons of Mass Destruction” proved to be Words of Mass Distraction. During a town hall meeting in Derry, New Hampshire on Jan. 3, Sen. McCain told a crowd of roughly two hundred people that it “would be fine with” him if the U.S. military stayed in Iraq for “a hundred years!”
    Sen. Obama stresses that it was a mistake to send U.S. troops to Iraq when in fact they were direly needed for a more effective military campaign to confront and root out Al-Qaeda and the other anti-U.S. militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan. He offers a responsible and gradual deployment of U.S. troops out of Iraq, and encouragement of firm increase of Iraqi responsibility in running that country. Obama stresses the fact that the U.S. taxpayers should be relieved from the $10 billion a month burden of financing that misguided war, and that the Iraqi government which has a surplus of nearly $80 billion, should spend its own money in governing its people.

    5. Tax Policy
    Sen. McCain offers to reduce taxes for the top 5-7% of the taxpayers, namely the oil companies and other major corporations and their executives.
    Sen. Obama vows to oppose such elitist taxation policy pursued by Sen. McCain. He considers McCain’s lavish tax breaks for the super rich an increase of federal spending costing the taxpayers over $350 billion. Instead, he proposes tax reduction for 95% of the taxpayers. He offers tax reduction to those who make $200,000/year or less.

    6. Healthcare Policy
    Sen. McCain offers $5,000 tax rebate to every citizen. He offers them to go out and buy their own insurance. Yet the recipients of such rebates would have to pay additional taxes and won’t be able to buy health insurance at that price.
    While Sen. McCain thinks that healthcare is a “responsibility” without making it clear as whose responsibility, Sen. Obama underlines that healthcare is a “right” which should be enjoyed by every citizen. He insists on healthcare for everyone fostered by the federal government.

    7. Corruption/Greed in government and major corporations
    Sen. McCain, a 26-year veteran member of the Washington establishment, and a longtime ally of major business circles, is closely connected with special interests that have “demanded” and received deregulation of the financial industry. As a direct result of the deregulation policies championed by elected officials like Sen. McCain, corruption and greed has infested the U.S. financial markets. During the second debate, he proposed further bailout of the abusive mortgage lenders by way of buying bad loans costing an additional $300 billion above and beyond the recent $700 billion bailout promoted by Pres. Bush.

    Sen. Obama criticized the corruption and greed on Wall Street and in the corridors of corporate America. He even called for apprehending those corrupt corporate executives and getting the U.S. taxpayers’ monies back. He stressed the importance of re-establishing the federal regulations for the purpose of taming the uncontrollable financial appetites and of taking away the “golden parachutes” of certain corporate officials.
    I hope the above facts can be instrumental in helping our readers reach a healthy decision. As for my decision, my choice is clear between the 20th century candidate Sen. McCain and the 21st century candidate Sen. Obama.

    My support and vote go to Sen. Barack Obama.

  • NEAR EAST FOUNDATION CELEBRATES 90th YEAR;

    NEAR EAST FOUNDATION CELEBRATES 90th YEAR;

    Merhaba Sukru Bey,<SSaya@superonline.com>
    Bugun aksam American Turkis Society ve Turkish Coalition of America’n ortaklasa dozenledigi konferansa gidecegim. Aksam gec vakit Istanbul’a donecegim, Londra’da butun gun kaldikdan sonra.
    Near East Foundation web sayfasindan bazi bolumleri gonderiuorum, Armenian genocide’la basliyor.

    YUKSEL OKTAY [mailto:yukseloktay@verizon.net]

    —————————————————————

    Founded during Armenian Genocide
    NEAR EAST FOUNDATION CELEBRATES 90th YEAR;
    FIRST U.S. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION;
    PIONEER OF AMERICAN PHILANTHROPY ABROAD
    “NEF@90: Celebrating Development; Honoring
    Philanthropy” is the theme of this year’s
    commemoration of the 90th anniversary year of the
    Near East Foundation (NEF), which was founded as
    Near East Relief in 1915 in urgent response to the
    Armenian genocide and deportations and in the process
    pioneered international humanitarian assistance. A
    series of celebratory events is being planned throughout
    the year, highlighted by a gala banquet to take place
    September 21 in New York City.
    During World War I, the Near East Foundation is
    credited with saving a million lives of Armenians,
    Assyrians, Arabs, Persians and others in the region,
    among them 132,000 orphans. Many an Armenian can
    trace their lives or those of their parents and
    grandparents back to Near East Relief orphanages and
    camps. NEF’s rescue mission and relief operation
    during war and subsequent reconstruction work in its
    aftermath employed techniques that reverberated
    through the following decades and are employed to this
    day. NEF’s approach created the models for the
    Marshall Plan, Truman’s Point-4 Program, the Peace
    Corps, the US Agency for International Development
    (USAID) and the United Nations Development
    Program.
    Commented NEF President Ryan A. LaHurd, Ph.D.,
    “While the Near East Foundation has an extraordinary
    record of past accomplishments, we remain on the
    cutting-edge of practice today. Currently we are at
    work in a wide range of development projects in a
    dozen countries of the Middle East and Africa, carrying
    out this organization’s historic mission–‘To help people
    the people of the Middle East and Africa build the
    future they envision for themselves.’”
    Corroborating that view, last year NEF received the
    prestigious Arab Gulf Programme for United Nations
    Development Organizations (AGFUND) International
    Prize for Pioneering Development Projects for 2004,
    for enhancing nursing as a career in Upper Egypt.
    Announced in Riyadh, the award came as a result of a
    competition with 83 projects from 32 countries on
    three continents.
    Also, the Near East Foundation received the 2004
    Freedom Award, the highest recognition granted by the
    Armenian National Committee of America for the
    organization’s “longstanding history of aiding the
    Armenian people and others in their darkest hours.” In
    February of this year, NEF was among those honored,
    and NEF’s President delivered the keynote address, at
    the “International Relief, Refuge, and Recognition”
    luncheon sponsored by The Armenian Assembly of
    America, The Armenian General Benevolent Union,
    and The Western Diocese of the Armenian Church of
    North American to honor Near East Foundation’s
    humanitarian response to the Armenian Genocide.
    Further recognition came in the 2003 museum
    exhibition, “Near East/New York: The Near East
    Foundation and American Philanthropy,” of 300
    photographs and objects from the Near East
    Foundation archive chronicling its early work. The
    show debuted at the Museum of the City of New York
    in Manhattan, and has subsequently toured this past
    winter to the Doheny Memorial Library at the
    University of Southern California. It will next be on
    view at the Armenian Library and Museum of America
    in Watertown, Massachusetts, opening April 24, the
    commemorative date of the Armenian Genocide. In
    2004 NEF’s history and its current work in Morocco
    and Egypt were featured in two, half-hour, television
    programs, produced for “The Visionaries,” a series on
    “philanthropies that make a difference” broadcast
    nationally on PBS.
    ORIGINS
    NEF was created in response to an alarming cable from
    American Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire Henry
    Morgenthau to the U.S. Secretary of State stating that
    the Turkish “destruction of the Armenian race is
    progressing rapidly,” and it was urgent that something
    be done. Within two weeks a group of civic, business
    and religious leaders, led by Cleveland H. Dodge,
    formed a committee, mostly comprised of distinguished
    New Yorkers, to rescue over a million people caught up
    in the tragedy. Dodge’s grandson, David S. Dodge, still
    serves the Near East Foundation, having been for many
    years the chair of its board of directors. He is
    representative of the intergenerational commitment of
    many of the founding families and their ongoing
    financial support through the years.
    The volunteer committee quickly met its $100,000 goal,
    thanks to donations from those early board members.
    By 1919 the committee was chartered by Congress and
    designated the primary channel for U.S. postwar aid to
    the region. From 1915 to 1930, Near East Relief raised
    $110 million for refugees—that is about $1.25 billion in
    today’s dollars—including $25 million in in-kind food
    and supplies. This remarkable outpouring occurred at a
    time when bread cost a nickel a loaf.
    More than one million people had been rescued from
    certain death by starvation and exposure. Some 12
    million people had been fed, and at one point between
    1919-20, an average of 333,000 people were fed daily.
    Forty hospitals were built. Over 130,000 children were
    housed, fed and taught in orphanages and provided
    with medical care. One of these Armenian children was
    Phoebe Kapikian, who thinking back to her memories
    of being a two-and-a-half year old in the village of Sivas
    recalled only “confusion…driven out…groups with
    bundles on their backs of things that belonged in the
    house going on ahead…60-70 children left behind and I
    was clinging all the time to my older sister Ashan…a
    long, hard journey….”
    She was piled into one of the many carriages hired to
    rescue abandoned orphans and taken to the Island of
    Syra. “The buildings already were in construction. We
    were taken care of very well by the Near East
    Foundation. We would rise on time, wash our faces.
    There was plenty of water. They tested every child for
    his or her capacity of how much they could read and
    write. So we had to go to school and we had food,” she
    explained, recalling her years at the orphanage.
    Nearing the age of 10, she was chosen to join a group
    of children being sent to England, later joining her older
    sister in America–thanks to the tireless efforts of
    Katharine Reynolds McCormick, an philanthropist who
    traveled the United States lecturing about the plight of
    orphans, raising funds and finding homes. “She was a
    mother for all that she did for me and my sister too,”
    said Miss Kapikian in an interview shortly before her
    death in 2004 after a rich life and career as a librarian in
    Queens, New York.
    Very early in the relief effort attention focused on
    helping the rescued orphans to become self-supporting
    and contributing members of the communities that
    absorbed them. Both in its orphanages and in foster
    care homes under NEF auspices, attention shifted to
    teaching agriculture and industrial skills, primarily at
    NEF demonstration centers. A generation of poultry
    raisers, dairymen, mechanics, shipbuilders, cabinet
    makers, masons, shoemakers, tailors and nurses grew up
    and moved out into their adopted countries. Thus
    NEF moved beyond relief to become the first true
    international development organization.
    In the Middle East, NEF became a symbol of American
    generosity and a prototype for the Peace Corps, besides
    its work with orphans, providing medical aid to six
    million patients. NEF was the vehicle for service to the
    region by hundreds of American volunteers—doctors,
    nurses, teachers, social workers. In short, NEF
    provided hope, home, training and education to a
    generation “without a childhood.” NEF saved the
    remnants of Armenians, helping resettle them in
    Armenia, Lebanon, Syria, Cyprus, Greece and the
    United States; and helped rescue other wartime victims
    including Assyrians, Greeks, Turks and Kurds. NEF
    was at work in Armenia, Turkey, Persia, Lebanon, Syria,
    Palestine, Egypt and the Caucasus.
    PHILANTHROPY
    An unsurpassed achievement at the time and
    remarkable even today, all this was accomplished by
    pioneering philanthropic techniques which continue to
    be used today. Among the innovations, NEF produced
    a series of compelling posters created by top American
    illustrators. Their national fundraising campaign feature
    Madison Avenue-style slogans like “Hunger Knows No
    Armistice” and “Clear Your Plate—Remember the
    Starving Armenians.” NEF Bundle Days encouraged
    Americans to send used clothing overseas, which they
    did—by the tons. Celebrities became spokespersons.
    Child-actor Jackie Coogan spearheaded the NEF Milk
    Campaign; and cans of condensed milk were collected
    at screenings of his films at movie theaters around the
    country. He even visited the region, traveling on a
    “milk ship” out of New York. Americans were urged
    to “adopt and orphan,” being told “$60 a year cares for
    a child.” On International Golden Rule Sunday, families
    across the country ate a simple orphanage meal and
    donated the equivalent cost of their average Sunday
    dinner. Based on population, each American town and
    city was asked to contribute. President Woodrow
    Wilson issued proclamations and wrote endorsement
    letters.
    The lingering impact of NEF fundraising is evident in
    today’s attention-grabbing graphics on through celebrity
    endorsements. And the Milk Campaign continues as
    well. Twenty tons of milk were distributed by the Near
    East Foundation to malnourished children in the West
    Bank from December 2003 to early May of 2004. Since
    then milk, cheese and other local dairy products were
    delivered to the families of 836 children enrolled in all
    17 kindergartens in the cluster of West Bank villages
    north of Nablus, where NEF currently is at work on a
    range of development projects.
    Forty tons of water, much of it to be mixed with
    powdered milk for children, were trucked to Baghdad
    by NEF at the height of the Iraq war along an
    extremely dangerous route during U.S. bombings. Also
    despite extreme risk to humanitarian personnel, NEF
    delivered 50 sheep to the Abou Shashir refugee camp in
    Darfur, Sudan, for the special occasion of the recent
    Eid Al-Adha celebrations. For a brief time, despair in
    the camp lifted and life seemed almost normal for
    people who feel preyed upon by all sides. NEF was the
    only non-Islamic, Western agency participating in the
    feast with the local people of Darfur. An NEF
    shipment of medicines and blankets followed.
    FROM RELIEF TO DEVELOPMENT
    While providing emergency relief in these
    circumstances, the Near East Foundation has been a
    force for the human and economic development of the
    region since 1930, when it had successfully completed
    its refugee activities. NEF aimed for long-term change,
    particularly attending to vocational education and
    agriculture, including experimental projects and
    instruction in raising sheep, poultry and cattle and the
    use of fertilizer’s, seeds and mechanized farm
    equipment. NEF had become America’s first
    international development agency, teaching people skills
    that could permanently improve their lives. The idea
    expressed in the saying, “give a man a fish and he will
    eat for a day; teach him to fish and he will eat for a
    lifetime” became NEF’s watchword.
    “NEF’s approach has had far-reaching significance and
    has impacted foreign aid programming for the past half
    century,” according to Dr. Linda Jacobs, a Middle
    Eastern archeologist and current chair of the NEF
    board of directors. Dr. Jacobs previously was a
    member of the NEF staff. The Jacobs Family
    Foundation, set up by her parents Dr. Joseph and
    Violet Jabara Jacobs, has been a long-time generous
    supporter of NEF’s work, and her mother is NEF’s
    largest individual donor. The Jacobses represent yet
    another example of the intergenerational commitment
    of many NEF supporters through the years.
    4
    “Today this approach is termed ‘self help,’” Dr. Jacobs
    continued, “but NEF has been doing this since the
    1920s and 1930s, decades before it became widespread
    practice. And ‘self help’ remains a cornerstone on our
    development work internationally to this day. In
    dozens of programs we work at the grassroots where
    training, technology and community-based
    organizations touch people’s lives.”
    The NEF-American University of Beirut Institute of
    Rural Life and its specialists provided much of the
    leadership in the post World War II Middle East in the
    areas of education, economic development and health.
    Activities ranged broadly from water purification and
    sanitation improvements, to decreasing infant mortality
    and introducing malaria control, to home and welfare
    demonstrations and small industries employing women,
    to organizing schools and teacher training and
    developing rural cooperatives.
    The Near East Foundation’s first experimental rural
    development program was in Greece where they
    worked in 48 villages on land donated by the Greek
    government. The program consisted of training in
    practical farming adapted to local conditions, water
    management, basic education in literacy, and health
    maintenance. From the beginning the aim was to
    develop local leadership and create programs which
    could carry on after NEF staff departed. Using this
    Macedonian experiment, NEF’s work spread eastward
    to Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Iran. Just one case in
    point, in 1946 the Iranian government asked the Near
    East foundation to establish a rural improvement
    program for 350 villages based upon their successful
    Macedonian model. Four years later in 1950, President
    Truman established the Point Four Program on
    international aid modeled on NEF’s work in Iran.
    “Many of the now standard ways of going about the
    business of international development,” Dr. Jacobs
    commented, “can be traced back to the Near East
    Foundation way before the 1960s cries of ‘power to the
    people’ and subsequent social movements. I cannot
    emphasize this enough since it is an amazing fact given
    the prevalent paternalism or worse at the time.
    PHILOSOPHY
    “From its earliest days the philosophy of the Near East
    Foundation has been never to impose an agenda, never
    to come into a community with preconceptions of what
    is best, but to listen and learn about the needs from the
    people themselves, then get down to work and help,”
    she continued. “The Near East Foundation has an
    enviable record through the years of valuing the dignity
    of people and respecting their opinions way before it
    was considered the preferred way to proceed,” she
    summed up, concluding, “And unfortunately many
    organizations involved in similar work still remain
    painfully remiss on this issue today.”
    Her opinion is reiterated by Steven W. Lawry, Ford
    Foundation staff person who was former representative
    for that Foundation’s Middle East and North Africa
    programs, based in Cairo. He had many opportunities
    to observe NEF in action up close. According to
    Lawry: “The Near East Foundation has made
    remarkable contributions toward alleviating human
    suffering over the many years since its founding. My
    belief is that NEF is best characterized as a humanistic
    organization, dedicated to giving vulnerable
    communities the capacity to shape sustainable solutions
    to their own problems. Their staff are dedicated
    professionals, highly trained and practiced in sociology,
    agriculture, engineering, urban planning and other fields
    relevant to development and change.
    “But they also understand the central importance of
    giving leadership to beneficiary communities in the
    design and governance of development and change
    initiatives. Importantly, NEF staff member bring to
    their work a profound respect for the dignity and
    knowledge of those they wish to serve. This results in
    interventions and programs that build community social
    capital and better enable individuals and communities to
    constructively address their problems over the longterm.
    In short, I personally have had very rewarding
    experiences with the Near East Foundation and the
    qualities of professionalism, service and imagination
    that characterize their work.”
    5
    In 1964 the Near East Foundation began working with
    the newly-independent African countries on agricultural
    development, recruiting hundreds of technicians trained
    in livestock improvement, water management, and
    scientific crop improvement. As its work evolved, NEF
    established a separate African Endowment Fund that by
    1980 funded development of experimental projects in
    new areas. In the 1980s the Near East Foundation
    responded to the threat of famine in Mali with a
    program that embraced livestock rehabilitation, village
    seed and cereal banks, agricultural credit, literacy, and
    soil and water conservation. Even before the end of
    Lebanon’s civil war, in 1988 NEF had launched a
    vocational training initiative in that country, including
    projects to assist those disabled by the war to find
    employment.
    In the competition between population growth and
    food shortages in Africa and the Middle East,
    throughout the 1980s NEF continued to work on
    agricultural improvement tailored to local conditions
    and the strengthening of local institutions and
    communities—what historically they had been very
    good at accomplishing. Increasingly NEF worked in
    cooperation with other donor agencies to implement
    projects ranging from beekeeping in Sudan and
    Swaziland to community development projects in Egypt
    and Jordan and seed and cereal banks in Mali.
    It was in Mali that Steve Lawry of the Ford Foundation
    first became acquainted with the Near East Foundation.
    He was there supervising a University of Wisconsin
    team researching forest rights and management. “The
    locally-based NEF team asked us to help evaluate their
    efforts to build an efficient, low-cost system for better
    harvesting rainwater for agricultural and forestry
    purposes. What we found was astounding,” he still
    sounds astounded to this day.
    “NEF staff had designed a simple water harvesting
    technology based on surveying natural water run-off
    patterns and constructing, with village volunteer labor,
    low-level earthen ridgelines that channeled water to
    cultivated areas. The practice reduced stress to crops
    and improved food security. It represented in
    important ways an adoption and extension of traditional
    and locally-familiar water conservation techniques.
    ‘However, traditional harvesting practices were limited
    to individual farms, “ Lawry continued, “To successfully
    extend the design to a larger water catchment area,
    NEF helped community members work through a
    number of complex questions around land tenure, water
    rights and labor management. NEF staff worked with
    intelligence and sensitivity at every level, the technical as
    well as the social, in helping shape an intervention that
    yielded sustainable benefits and could be managed by
    the local community permanently.” He remains an
    NEF fan to this day and later, as the Ford Foundation
    representative for the Middle East and North Africa,
    recommended Ford funding for a variety of NEF
    research and community development initiatives.
    CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
    A major NEF milestone occurred in 1990 with the
    establishment of the Center for Development Services
    in Cairo, with assistance from the Ford Foundation to
    support their initiatives in community development.
    The center maintained that early focus on self-help in
    dozens of programs and brought together a cadre of
    professionals who could become a “think tank” of
    practicing development workers to refine techniques
    and mentor local talent. Current projects range widely
    from a number of local Egyptians initiatives on through
    working with street children to recover their lost
    potential in five Arab countries and a six-country
    initiative on Islamic philanthropy.
    Lawry again: “After working in the country for several
    years, NEF leadership had concluded that the most
    enduring contribution it could make to Egypt would be
    to help establish an Egyptian development support
    organization, embodying many of NEF’s own traditions
    of professionalism and service, but bolstered by the
    added knowledge, experience and legitimacy that
    Egyptian staff would bring to the fore over the longterm.”
    He adds, “It is rare for international development
    organizations to design initiatives with the explicit aim
    of putting themselves out of business. But this was
    6
    effectively the goal of NEF in establishing the Center
    for Development Services as a resource for Egyptians
    to struggle with complex problems on their own
    terms,” he continued, adding, “This initiative
    distinguishes, in my mind at least, NEF as a humanistic
    as well as a technical assistance organization.”
    One of those Egyptians was Montasser Kamal, a
    medical student 20 years ago at Cairo University when
    he first became associated with the Near East
    Foundation’s work in Egypt, and later at manager at the
    Center for Development Services. “NEF has had a
    profound impact on my life,” he states categorically,
    “work ethos, team work, mutual respect and having an
    investigative mind are all qualities which I gained while
    at NEF, and which I carry with me to this day. As
    NEF ‘pushed the envelope,’ its ethos was embraced by
    its staff throughout their professional and even personal
    lives and in turn by the communities where NEF
    worked.” Dr. Kamal also obtained a Ph.D. in medical
    anthropology and is now with the World Health
    Organization.
    He elaborates further: “NEF has without doubt come
    to be one of the most influential institutions in the lives
    of many disadvantaged people in Egypt and other
    countries of the Middle East. NEF also became
    influential in my life and the lives of many other
    development practitioners in the region. The influence
    of NEF, however, cannot be attributed to the scale of
    its financial resources, which was always modest.
    Rather, the influence can be attributed to the ability of
    NEF’s leadership to tackle key cutting-edge
    development issues before they became ‘flavor-of-themonth’
    and pursing them long after others were swayed
    away from them because of their inherent challenges.
    “The abilities to make timely decisions, charter new
    strategic directions, and create alliances have helped so
    many poor because, in part, these were qualities that
    inspired new generations of professionals to enter the
    field of development,” he believes.
    In 1991 NEF began working in Lesotho in southern
    Africa on a comprehensive rural development program
    based on the creation of a local non-governmental
    organization called GROW. In 1993 an Appropriate
    Technology Training Center was established in
    Morocco to promote technical alternatives for
    development by rural women. That same year they
    started a micro-credit program in the rural villages of
    Jordan.
    PALESTINE
    In 1994 NEF enhanced its program in West
    Bank/Gaza by supporting water resources with the
    Palestinian Hydrology Group to help save some 400
    springs and ponds. Other programs included a
    community health unit at Birzeit University; specialized
    training for United Nations Development Program
    personnel in multi-village development; technical
    assistance to U.N.’s Relief and Works Agency providing
    education, health and social service to 2.8 million
    registered Palestinian refugees in the West Bank, Gaza,
    Lebanon, Jordan and Syria; job creation and building up
    technical expertise.
    “The needs were enormous,” commented Dr. Vartan
    Gregorian, president of the Carnegie Foundation, an
    Armenian, long-time NEF supporter and member of its
    International Council. “If Palestinian selfdetermination
    and home rule had to become a reality; if
    its economy had to be viable, its economic
    infrastructure had to be secured and strengthened.
    Hence NEF had established several important
    programs.”
    In 1998 NEF expanded its urban development work in
    some of the poorest sections of Cairo, which in Ford’s
    Lawry’s opinion “were decisive in saving a low-income
    community in central Cairo from being forcibly
    removed to make way for historic conservation and
    tourism projects.” He says the Center for Development
    Services demonstrated that the community, though
    poor, was stable and had a variety of closely-knit
    economic and financial arrangements that created large
    numbers of service and small-scale manufacturing jobs.
    “Importantly, and perhaps ironically,” he commented,
    7
    “the research also found that the volunteer efforts by
    community members had over the years been decisive
    in saving many revered Islamic monuments from
    collapse, while wealthier groups had long-ago
    abandoned the district for the suburbs.
    “The Center’s research findings were taken up by the
    staff members of the Aga Khan Foundation, who were
    leading restoration efforts in the district, and used to
    convince Cairo local government authorities that
    displacement would destroy vital social and economic
    support networks and that the community should be
    allowed to remain,” he summed up.
    While working at the Center Dr. Montasser saw NEF’s
    pro-poor ethos and participatory modus operandi in
    development in action, up front and personally. He
    credits NEF’s approach with “substantially helping to
    alleviate the suffering of poor women, men and children
    in the region” in both urban and rural areas—and
    impacting the professional development community in
    the process. “The work of NEF in urban development,
    in health programming, in local community
    development and in economic development has helped
    so many poor to stand up for their right and to become
    sufficient,” he says. “NEF was there to see them
    through and is still there to tap into these communities
    as a resource to help others in need.
    “NEF works in many areas where poverty has alienated
    people and government apathy has left societies
    disenfranchised,” he continued. “In the context of this
    all too common picture in developing countries, the
    extraordinary work of NEF was felt and will be felt for
    many years to come. The poor and underprivileged
    who have become independent and vocal; the women
    who are now more assertive and financially
    independent; the youth who are now working and are
    fully engaged in the affairs of their community; and the
    men who are now more actively engaged in the
    governance of the resources in their communities—are
    all extraordinary examples of how local development
    can change lives if done properly.
    “Through gradual and sustained effort, profound
    changes in the lives of people NEF works with have
    taken place,” he reaffirmed. “From dependent,
    expected handouts with a sense of political
    hopelessness, NEF has helped people to be
    independent active members of society who are socially
    engaged in a process of change.
    “Perhaps one of the most extraordinary achievements
    of NEF has been to bring the voice of the poor to
    policymakers,” he added. “In the absence of
    democratic processes, people’s voices are often lost to
    the more powerful. That is not the case where NEF
    works. Where NEF works, people now know that
    power is not a zero-sum game and that they have an ally
    who can help them bridge this power gap in various
    effective and constructive ways. I remember the time I
    was working at NEF, when the concept of citizen
    participation in development was paid lip-service at
    best. NEF had embarked on a change strategy by
    which all its projects and programs had to demonstrate
    that they were participatory in nature. It was not easy.
    It is still not easy. But progress has been made, and
    NEF has come to set the ground rules on how to
    encourage participation and create the social sphere for
    it take place.”
    CURRENTLY
    Today the Near East Foundation continues to provide
    qualified specialists to transfer technical skills and
    training, leverages funding for projects with strong local
    support, and extends its reach through inter-agency
    cooperation. “Being the oldest, nation-wide,
    international assistance organization in the United
    States gives us certain advantages,” commented NEF
    President LaHurd. “We have the history and
    experience that attracts a constantly-growing group of
    affiliates and contacts as well as highly-qualified staff.
    And with few exceptions they are all nationals from the
    countries in which they work.
    “So we operate with a strong network of partners and
    the confidence and trust of local authorities—right now
    in 12 countries,” Dr. LaHurd continued. “Our Cairo
    regional office and Center for Development Services
    are both highly regarded in the Middle East in
    8
    particular. That we are the largest publisher of
    development materials in Arabic is just one of many
    reasons we are so well respected.”
    An up-to-the-moment report on the Near East
    Foundation’s current activities is available at their
    website www.neareast.org and detailed descriptions of
    their projects country-by-country in their 2004 annual
    report also is online at the site. What is particularly
    noteworthy is how their successful approaches in one
    country are replicated in others where they work. A
    case in point, the generation of supplemental income
    from fish farming in irrigation ponds of poor farmers
    pioneered in the 1980s in Jordan and now expanding
    wonderfully in the Jordan Valley—going soon to Gaza
    and Sudan when funding is available.
    For Abou Baker, a 60-year-old farmer in an agricultural
    community in the Gor Al-Safi district south of the
    Jordan Valley, fish farming brought in $700 last
    November, a traditional down-season, increasing his
    family income 15-20 percent. This was very important
    to him, since he is getting older…now 60; lost a leg
    because of a landmine accident, has a family of 14 to
    support on his small farm burdened by water shortages,
    high production prices, and poor marketing. Abou
    Baker was one of 25 small farmers who received
    fingerlings, fish feed, and technical and financial
    assistance when NEF initiative a fish farming program
    in his area in 1999.
    Then there is the Near East Foundation’s pioneering
    work in micro-credit dating from long before it was chic
    and used in many countries where NEF works, like
    Sudan. Here the so-called “popsicle lady” lives, a
    widow with a family to support and doomed to beg in
    the streets…until receiving her $200 NEF loan. She
    bought a refrigerator with a freezer and every evening
    fills small plastic bags with juice. Next morning she
    heads to the nearby elementary school and sells them to
    school children at recess—and supports her family. She
    was able to repay the loan in a year.
    In Jordan NEF’s micro-credit activities have recently
    taken a new twist—home improvement loans for the
    urban poor. While in Lebanon, where NEF has had
    long-term involvement in landmine issues, they are now
    providing loans to disabled victims and their families
    and caretakers. Like Abo Khalid, a blind man who used
    his $700 loan to furnish his small kiosk with goods—
    tea, newspapers, cigarettes, children’s candies. His
    average monthly income of $300 helps feed his
    children. Thanks to NEF-provided-credit, wheelchairbound
    Ali was able to establish a small maintenance
    service center for computers and electronic
    equipment—and a reputation for high quality work.
    Both have been freed from previous dependency on
    others, regained control over their lives, and become
    fully productive members of society.
    The Near East Foundation also has particular expertise
    in desert environments, both adapting agriculture to the
    harsh conditions and desert reclamation, including 10
    years of research on trees best suited to Mali’s Sahel,
    ultimately fruitful in every sense of the word. Now
    NEF’s involvement with reclaimed desert around
    Egypt’s Lake Nasser could in time become the largest
    agricultural project NEF has ever undertaken in that
    country.
    Speaking of large, the Near East Foundation has
    completed planning and is now seeking funds for what
    could prove to be the most far-reaching initiative in
    NEF’s entire history of development work in Africa,
    involving nine countries and over 100 million people. It
    would support local governance in West Africa’s huge
    Niger River Basin under severe environmental threat
    and competing demands, building upon successful
    approaches modeled in Mali since the 1980s.
    NEF continues its investment in the people of the West
    Bank, most intensely involved in a cluster of villages
    north of Nablus in a wide range of projects, from
    traumatized children and nutrition, to environmental
    issues and community organization, to good drinking
    water and youth centers, even helping train two
    promising Palestinian athletes bound for the Athens
    Olympics.
    It is a particularly rewarding site to see kindergarteners
    from the six participating West Bank communities
    clapping their hands and bursting into grateful song
    when they see the NEF team approaching to distribute
    their packages of dairy products. Later, when group
    pictures were taken, the children held their milk cartons
    9
    high above their heads and loudly cheered. As the
    mother of Sabreen from Ijnisniya put it: “I feel so
    happy when I see my child drinking the milk, especially
    the chocolate-flavored—she loves that kind. We put
    the cheese and yogurt in the fridge to eat later. I am so
    happy that we have these important foods for such a
    price. You know how bad our economic situation is
    nowadays, and without this program, we could not get
    these milk products for our children.” While there had
    been some absenteeism in the kindergartens at the
    beginning of the school year, during the “Cup of Milk”
    distribution date—there was absolutely none.
    In over 70 villages in the Souss-Massa Dra’a area of
    southern Morocco where NEF has been working, in
    literacy alone, 92 percent of women participating say
    they have learned to read, and 72 percent can now add
    and subtract and report using their skills regularly.
    Fifty-thousand people in southern Morocco—women
    in particular—have gained new self-esteem, education
    and income because of NEF’s programs over the years.
    Women like Fatima Bouhassi from the village of
    N’Kob, who can now read and write, has completed
    NEF-sponsored midwife training, and gathers all the
    other village women in her house and shares everything
    she learns. Using innovative theater techniques, NEF
    promoted Morocco’s new and history Family Code that
    took effect last July, governing women’s position in
    society and status. With seven women playing various
    roles for illustration and clarification, NEF field staff
    discussed the new laws, particularly marriage, divorce,
    child custody and inheritance, with large groups of
    village women. So unique, it got attention from the
    BBC in news reports.
    The little white house at the GROW compound in
    Mokhotlong, home to NEF Lesotho country director
    Ken Storan, has some new visitors, named Hlompho,
    Tumeliso, Rorisang, Thabang, Tiisetso…. The latter is
    about one-and-a-half years old—his exact age is
    unknown. Before being embraced by Ken, he lived by
    himself, most of the time in a cold house, sometimes
    outside, even in the rain. Hungry and skinny upon
    arrival, two months later he had gained seven pounds
    and could stand up by pulling on a chair. Tiisetso also
    can breathe easily since his pneumonia is gone; and has
    learned to smile and laugh, and likely will soon walk and
    run too.
    This is what the AIDS pandemic really means and the
    Near East Foundation is helping children—the most
    vulnerable victims of disease and poverty—in many
    countries in Africa and the Middle East. Beyond
    providing individual children with emotional and
    physical warmth, safety, rehabilitation from
    malnutrition and sickness or care with terminal illness;
    reconnection with family or caring adoptive homes,
    schooling and mentoring; the Near East Foundation is
    combating the AIDS calamity with an integrated and
    comprehensive approach that combines health,
    agriculture, infrastructure development and more.
    In Swaziland, which has the highest HIV infection rate
    in the world, close to 40 percent, NEF is using that
    comprehensive approach in 18 chiefdoms in the
    northern Hhohho area of the country. NEF works
    with people like Lussy Tfwala, chairperson of the water
    committee of Nkonjaneni homesteaders. They had a
    water source in the mountains above, but no means of
    getting it except by making hours of trips up and down
    steep slopes, carrying water by oxen cart and upon their
    heads. With NEF support, the committee, once
    organized, successful obtained $17 from every
    homestead family who would benefit from a domestic
    water supply, for the engineering, materials and heavy
    machinery needed. Contributing their labor, association
    members carried the material up the mountain and dug
    kilometers of trenches to bring the pipes from the water
    source to local taps. Four homesteads share a tap and
    take rotational responsibility for maintenance chores.
    The amount each homestead contributed has become a
    fund for repair and maintenance costs, augmented by a
    small monthly fee, for ownership leads to responsibility
    and commitment.
    This Nkonjaneni association now has the skills,
    organization, data to build on, new ways to assign
    community responsibility, and the means to sustain
    their critical water supply. It demonstrates NEF’s
    approach: true development is not primarily about the
    project, but more about the capacities built in the
    community that sustain NEF undertakings long after
    their staff has moved on.
    And last year the Near East Foundation returned to
    Armenia, for the first time since their expulsion by the
    10
    Soviets in 1927, to work with street children. Actually
    they were the only foreign agency allowed to operate in
    the Caucasus even after the Sovietization of the region,
    and supervised the welfare of 17,000 children in
    Armenia alone until being forced out. NEF
    Chairperson Linda Jacobs received an overwhelming
    reception that left her deeply moved by the often tearyeyed
    Armenian representatives who greeted her so
    warmly in every sector– government, education, social
    welfare, religion—and ordinary citizens.
    IN CONCLUSION
    The final word on the Near East Foundation goes to an
    Armenian, the Carnegie Corporation’s Dr. Gregorian.
    “It is an honor and a privilege for me as an Armenian,
    Iranian, Middle Easterner and an American to pay
    tribute to the Near East Foundation as it celebrates its
    90th birthday.
    “NEF is not a charitable institution. It is a
    philanthropic one. It invests, it welcomes investors. It
    builds. Its aim has always been ‘to help people help
    themselves.’ It aims to assist the people of the Middle
    East and Africa in their quest of autonomy in the social,
    economic and cultural realms. It provides people
    know-how, wants to endow them with hope, to assist
    them in their struggle against poverty, disease, hunger
    and injustice. That is the mission of NEF. NEF stands
    for dignity. It stands for our community with mankind.
    It stands for the best ideals and impulses of the
    American people, its idealism, altruism and generosity.”
    Dr. Gregorian concludes eloquently: “You, who are a
    rescuer of a nation, planter of seeds of hope, promoter
    of economic and social progress in the Middle East and
    Africa, symbol of America’s faith and goodwill, we
    congratulate you for generating knowledge, generating
    goodwill, generating hope, generating progress.
    Building bridges of brotherhood and sisterhood in a
    world that will transcend religion, ideological, ethnic,
    regional and racial conflicts, especially now when more
    than ever we need to stress common values and bonds
    that unite the ‘People of the Book,’ the Jews, the
    Christians and the Muslims. May you continue your
    good work. May you bring peace to the region.”
    Near East Foundation
    90 Broad Street, 15th Floor • New York, NY 10004, USA
    Phone: +1 (212) 425-2205 • Fax: +1 (212) 425-2350
    www.neareast.org
    Press Contact
    Andrea M. Couture
    212-425-2205 x17
    acouture@neareast.org
    Copyright © 2005 Near East Foundation, All Rights Reserved.

  • Armenia: FM Denies Reports Of Turkey Proposal On Nagorno-Karabakh

    Armenia: FM Denies Reports Of Turkey Proposal On Nagorno-Karabakh

    Armenia’s Foreign Ministry denied on Oct. 2 denied reports circulating in the Azerbaijani media that Baku and Yerevan are engaged in three-way negotiations with Turkey over a Turkish proposal to resolve the conflict between the two over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, Azeri Press Agency reported.. A spokesman for the Armenian Foreign Ministry said talks are continuing “on the basis of Madrid proposals in the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group,” the report said.