Category: Armenian Question

“The great Turk is governing in peace twenty nations from different religions. Turks have taught to Christians how to be moderate in peace and gentle in victory.”Voltaire’s Philosophical Dictionary

  • Turkish Military Opposes Armenian Apology Campaign

    Turkish Military Opposes Armenian Apology Campaign

     

     

     

     

     

    Reuters

    Turkey’s powerful generals on Friday stepped into a deepening controversy over an apology by Turkish intellectuals for the mass killings of Armenians in World War One, saying the campaign had “harmful consequences”.

    The Internet initiative, which has drawn criticism from Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and nationalists, coincides with a diplomatic rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia to end almost 100 years of hostility. Nearly 14,000 people have signed the apology.

    “We definitely think that what is done is not right. Apologizing is wrong and can yield harmful consequences,” Brigadier General Metin Gurak, spokesman for the General Staff, told a news conference.

    On Wednesday, Erdogan said the campaign had no other benefit than “stirring up trouble, disturbing our peace and undoing the steps which have been taken”.

    President Abdullah Gul has distanced himself from those comments, hailing the initiative as proof of Turkey’s democratic health. He became the first Turkish leader to visit Armenia in September as Turkey sought to improve ties.

    Turks, including Nobel prize-winning author Orhan Pamuk, have been prosecuted in the European Union candidate country for affirming that the mass killings of Armenians in 1915 amounted to genocide.

    Turkey accepts that many Armenians were killed during the waning years of the Ottoman Empire, but strongly reject Armenian assertions it was genocide, saying that Muslim Turks also died in inter-ethnic conflicts. Western historians have backed Armenian arguments that the killings amounted to genocide.

  • Turkey criticizes apology campaign

    Turkey criticizes apology campaign

    Devlet Bahçeli:”I am ashamed of the persons who initiated the campaign.”

     

    Turkey-A campaign initiated by several intellectuals to apologize for the events of 1915 — which Armenians claim constituted genocide — continued to be discussed very vividly yesterday, with opposing groups issuing strong statements against one another.

    In Parliament, on the street and on TV programs, the subject took center stage, with some critics attacking personalities such as President Abdullah Gül and the intellectuals who initiated the campaign.

    “My conscience does not accept the insensitivity showed to and the denial of the Great Catastrophe that Ottoman Armenians were subjected to in 1915. I reject this injustice and for my part, I empathize with the feelings and pain of my Armenian brothers. I apologize to them,” the campaign statement says.

    Republican People’s Party (CHP) deputy Canan Arıtman called the organizers of the campaign traitors. “The false scientists signing it should apologize to Turkey,” she said, claiming that President Gül — because of his “ethnic origins” — was not reacting to the campaign. “We see that the president supports this campaign. Abdullah Gül should be the president of the entire Turkish nation, not just of those sharing his ethnicity. Investigate the ethnic origin of the president’s mother and you will see,” she said. There have been rumors that Gül’s family has Armenian roots.

    When Gül was asked for his opinion on the campaign, he said the state’s attitude is to improve relations with its neighbors. “We believe dialogue to be the solution for problems we have with our neighbors. Perpetuating problems is not useful to anyone,” he said.

    Arıtman also suggested that that Gül was encouraged by his visit to Armenia. Gül visited Yerevan in September upon the invitation of his Armenian counterpart, Serzh Sarksyan, to watch the World Cup qualifying game between the two countries’ national soccer teams.

    Another attack came from Devlet Bahçeli, leader of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP). “I want to say that I am ashamed of the persons who initiated the campaign. We as the Turkish nation should be ashamed of them,” he said, adding that the campaign should be stopped.

    At Tuesday’s meeting of the parliamentary Foreign Relations Committee, deputies from opposition parties, including the MHP, offered to make a statement condemning supporters of the campaign. The pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party (DTP), however, objected to this. Following discussion, a decision was made for deputies to condemn the apology campaign on an individual basis.

    The MHP initiated this campaign yesterday and Bahçeli is expected to be the first to sign the statement condemning the intellectuals whose campaign, the MHP claims, aims to defame Turkish history. “There is no single crime or anything to be ashamed of in the honorable history of the Turkish nation. It is no one’s right and no one is entitled to demand an apology by distorting history and defaming our ancestors.”

    Justice Minister Mehmet Ali Şahin said civil society organizations can approach the situation differently and that it is up to them, but that he shares the view of the state. “I am in favor of the continuation of the policy, view and the stance of the Turkish Republic regarding Armenian claims of genocide,” Şahin underlined.

    Professor Erol Kürkçüoğlu, manager of the Turkish-Armenian Relations Research Center, part of Erzurum’s Atatürk University, and known for his research into 185 mass graves of Turks allegedly killed by Armenians, also commented on the campaign. He claimed that “Turkish, Russian and French archives show the real victims of those years were Turks.”

    He repeated the official view of the state in his interview with the Anatolia news agency and claimed that the law of forced migration was issued after the uprising of Armenians in Van. “The forced migration law definitely does not amount to genocide or massacre. With this law the state tried to protect the life, property and honor of its citizens,” he suggested.

    He added that during his research into mass graves, he even found the elderly and women holding their babies. “In those days our people were exposed to massacres and we lost thousands. These things happened yesterday while some journalists and academics today organize an apology campaign,” he said.

    He added that the aim of the campaign is to confuse people. “Everyone should take into account what we, historians, are saying. We know best. If anyone defends the opposite, he should come and see the mass graves,” he added.

    Süleyman Çiğdem, a professor at Atatürk University and chairman of the Erzurum branch of the Association Fighting Groundless Claims of Genocide (ASİMED), said the campaign was organized without taking into consideration the facts. “We apologize to our martyrs for not remembering them,” he said.

    Meanwhile, Armenian Assembly of America (AAA) Executive Director Bryan Ardouny defined the campaign as the start of an irreversible trend. “Over 12,000 people in Turkey want history to be recorded truthfully, having already signed the Internet-based petition apologizing for what they call the ‘Great Catastrophe’ that befell the Armenians of Ottoman Turkey in 1915. This public apology is a first step in that direction and will inevitably lead to Turkey coming to grips with its genocidal past.”

  • Turkish General Staff condemns Armenian apology campaign

    Turkish General Staff condemns Armenian apology campaign

     

     
     

    Ankara – APA. Turkish General Staff took a stance on the internet campaign launched for apologizing to Armenians.

    APA reports quoting Turkish news agencies that the army regarded the campaign as an act that may harm the country. Official of the General Staff, General Metin Gurak said at the traditional weekly meeting with media representatives that it was wrong to apologize.
    “We do not consider this campaign right,” he said.

  • MP claiming Abdullah Gul’s mother is Armenian threatened

    MP claiming Abdullah Gul’s mother is Armenian threatened

    Ankara – APA. “I do not judge, humiliate president in connection with his ethnic origin, on the contrary I express my respect. I criticize president for not seeing or ignoring the dangers of Turkey and not taking necessary measures,” member of Republican People’s Party (CHP), MP Janan Aritman told journalists in the parliament, APA reports. She said that new strategy of Armenia and Armenian Diaspora is to make Turkish people to admit the Armenian genocide. Aritman also touched on assessment of her statement as disgrace in media and political circles. She said those who say it do not know the meaning of the word disgrace.

    The parliamentarian said she received many calls and e-mails from people.
    “People say “we support you, you are the voice of the nation”. My assistants and I do not find time to answer the calls and e-mails,” she said.

    Janan Aritman also said she was threatened.
    “I have never been afraid of anyone. I do not pay attention to these threats. I am happy to be the lawyer of the nation. I will continue it,” she said.

  • Chelik: “Everybody knows whom the initiators of Armenian apology campaign serve”

    Chelik: “Everybody knows whom the initiators of Armenian apology campaign serve”

    Baku. Ulkar Gasimova – APA. “I do not accept the internet campaign launched in Turkey for apologizing to Armenians for the so-called Armenian genocide,” famous Turkish singer Chelik told APA exclusively. He underlined that it was obvious whose interests the campaign served.
    “Those who ignored the actions against Turks in Bosnia, Turkmens in Iraq, occupation of Nagorno Karabakh by Armenia are now collecting signatures. When something happens in favor of Turkish people, a group of people who call themselves “intellectuals” begin to compete in order to harm the people. These people back the Armenian apology campaign,” he said.

    Chelik said Turkish Armed Forces had openly expressed its position on this issue.
    “I watched it on TV. If I am not mistaken the government also objected to the campaign. I also support the position of my Army and government. This competition will have a final. Patriots will be waiting in the finish,” he said.

  • Turks’ Apology for Armenian Genocide: Good First Step, but not Good Enough

    Turks’ Apology for Armenian Genocide: Good First Step, but not Good Enough

    harut-sassounian

    The Armenian Genocide issue has been attracting ever-growing attention despite the Turkish government’s persistent attempts to suppress its discussion at home and recognition abroad. During the past week, two public appeals were issued on the Armenian Genocide — one by Turkish intellectuals and the other by prominent individuals in Armenia.

    The Turkish appeal was initiated by scholars Ahmet Insel, Baskin Oran, and Cengiz Aktar, and journalist Ali Bayramoglu. Risking death threats by Turkish extremists and possible legal action, they issued a personal apology for “the Great Catastrophe that the Ottoman Armenians were subjected to in 1915.” On December 15, they set up an Internet site titled “We Apologize” which within 48 hours attracted the signatures of more than 10,000 Turks.

    The Turkish petition stated: “My conscience does not accept the insensitivity showed to and the denial of the Great Catastrophe that the Ottoman Armenians were subjected to in 1915. I reject this injustice and for my share, I empathize with the feelings and pain of my Armenian brothers. I apologize to them.”

    This apology was not only criticized by Turkish denialists, but also by some Turks who felt the statement had not gone far enough. Aytekin Yildiz, Coordinator of the Confrontation Association, stated: “It is a good starting point, but not enough. Firstly, what do they mean by ‘Great Catastrophe’? Let’s name it. It is genocide. Secondly, the state has to apologize.” Historian Ayse Hur said that Turkey “has to apologize on behalf of the perpetrators and for itself, because it has legitimized their actions through the years.” Another prominent Turkish intellectual, who wished to remain anonymous for obvious reasons, told Zaman newspaper that the Turkish state, rather than individuals, must do the apologizing.

    Turkish extremists, on the other hand, strongly condemned the signatories of the apology for “betraying” the Turkish nation. Historian Cemalettin Taskiran was quoted as stating: “This is the biggest betrayal that could be shown to our forefathers…. The campaign was set up to hurt the unity of the Turkish nation and to prepare the way for Turkey’s eventual recognition of Armenian claims of genocide.” Several Parliament Members representing MHP, a radical Turkish political party, accused the signatories of “insulting” Turkey. More seriously, 60 retired Turkish diplomats issued a joint statement describing the “apology” campaign as “unfair, wrong and unfavorable for the national interests.”

    The Turkish intellectuals’ apology generated both positive and negative reactions among Armenian circles. Some welcomed the apology as a good first step, while others expressed concern that Turks would try to cover up their responsibility for the Genocide by issuing a simple apology. Armenian critics pointed out several shortcomings in the Turkish statement: First, the apology avoided the term Armenian Genocide by referring to it as the “Great Catastrophe.” Second, it alluded to the year 1915 only, rather than 1915-1923. Third, the apology was issued by individual Turks rather than the Turkish state. Even if the apology emanated from Turkish officials, it could not be viewed as a substitute for reparations and restitution.

    This statement, however, serves the useful purpose of educating the Turkish public that has been kept in the dark so long about the Armenian Genocide. Rather than an Armenian-Turkish historical commission, what is needed is a purely Turkish commission that would provide a forum for Turks to discuss and discover the mass crimes of their forefathers.

    By coincidence, around the time of the Turkish appeal, nearly 300 prominent individuals from Armenia issued an open letter to Pres. Abdullah Gul asking him to take the bold step of recognizing the Armenian Genocide. The Armenian appeal, like its Turkish counterpart, does not go far enough. Rather than recognition, the Armenian signatories should have sought justice for the crimes committed against the Armenian nation.

    Nonetheless, the Armenian letter accomplishes several useful objectives: First, it debunks the oft-repeated Turkish lie that the genocide issue is raised only by “radical Diaspora Armenians” rather than residents of Armenia. Second, it strengthens the hand of Pres. Serzh Sargsyan in his discussions with Turkish officials to show to them how strongly Armenians feel about the Genocide. Third, even though the letter is addressed to the Turkish President, it also sends an indirect message to Pres. Sargsyan not to accept normalization of relations with Ankara, without the latter’s recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

    Despite their shortcomings, these two appeals may play a significant role in future decision-making by the Obama administration. It is hoped that when Turkey’s lobbyists call on the White House to block U.S. acknowledgment of the Armenian Genocide, Pres. Obama would reject their request and hear the voices of thousands of Armenian and Turkish signatories who support reconciliation based on truth and justice.

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/turks-apology-for-armenia_b_151959