Author: Aylin D. Miller

  • Stray animals of Turkey

    Stray animals of Turkey

    Today Istanbul holds an unusually large population of stray cats. They are often well taken care of by the city’s population. How old is this tradition, is it due to Turkish or Islamic culture, or does it date back to Roman times?

    cats dogs kedi kopek

    Today Istanbul holds a usually high population of stray cats, and are often well taken care of by the cities population. How old is this tradition, is it due to Turkish or Islamic culture, or does it date back to Roman times?

    Is looking after stray animals due to Turkish or Islamic culture, or does it date back to Roman times?

    It is easy to check. There are a couple of countries who claim heritage of Turkish, Islamic or Roman culture. For example, how good the countries such as Italy, France, Germany or England who were heirs of Roman Empire, take care of stray cats? Or how good the countries such as Morocco or Iran which are prominently Muslim Majority countries treat the animals? Do they differ from other Turkic states such as Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan or Turkmenistan in regards of animal rights?

    A quick research on internet tells it was not a Roman tradition. You may check following articles.

    • Ritualistic Cat Torture Was Once a Form of Town Fun
    • 1677: Londoners burn live cats in wicker pope – Past Peculiar
    • The Golden Bough/The Fire-Festivals of Europe
    ottoman manca dog cat food

    But we have some well-documented information about animals of Turkish History. For example, there was an occupation in Ottoman for the people who fed stray animals which called “mancaci”. Manca means cat & dog food.

    mancaci dog cat ottoman osmanli

    Mancaci would feed the stray animals with the donation money of animal-lovers.

    stray dogs ottoman
    ottoman children dogs

    Not just cats or dogs were fed, but wild animals such as wolves. In winter months, necessary meat had been left for them, so they would not attack people or wouldn’t come to settlements.

    osmanli dogs wolves
    ottoman dogs

    Not to forget feeding birds

    ottoman birds
    children birds

    Of course only feeding them is not enough. They also needed some institutions. A cat hospital in Uskudar, Istanbul, a bird hospital in Dolmabahce, Istanbul. And another one in Bursa, solely for the storks (Gurabahane-i Laklakan) since 16th century.

    ottoman birds hospital
    ottoman animal hospital

    Animal-loving also shows itself in architecture as bird-palaces since 15th century.

    bird palaces
    bird palace

    They were even included in pious foundations and wills. For example Bayezid Foundation had spared annually 30 gold for feeding birds among other things. It was/is also common to put water cups for birds in graveyards.

    graceyard bird feeding

    The first official regulation in the world regarding animal rights?; The Imperial Degree of Ottoman Sultan Murat III, dated 19th March, 1587 stated that “It was forbidden to overload animals such as horse or mule more than their capacity. And necessary care should be given about feeding and caring animals. And those who do not comply with the provisions would be punished.”

    ottoman sultan murat animal rights

    Deserved a retirement: The Cattle, which pulling cannons during wars, were retiring with a salary, when they got old. Retired animals were living in a farm which specifically established for them since 1654.

    retired animals ottoman

    Animal holiday: An imperial degree dated 2nd October 1856, reminded people that it was forbidden by law, on fridays, to use horses to carry goods as well as ride them. Fridays were holidays for the horses since they were working remaining six days of the week.

    animal holidays ottoman

    Asking permission to kill ants: It is well known story that Suleiman the Magnificent asked his Sheikh al-Islam, whether it was ok to kill ants, which searing fruit trees in palace gardens. (The answer was: No, it was not ok!)

    ants magnificent suleiman ottoman

    Many foreign traveller such as German Hans Dernschwam (1542), French Jean Thevenot (1656), Lamartine, Guer and British Ambassador Paul Ricout mentions about animal hospitals and pious foundations for animals which they had witnessed in Istanbul.

    ottoman animals
    osmanli ottoman animals

    In the 17th century, the traveller Jean du Mont wrote that “For Turks, it is a crime to kill animals such as cats, dogs or horses which were not fed for their meats.

    pera istanbul animals

    Also Busbecq (1554) writes in his travelogue about a Venetian merchant who was taken to court by Turkish people because he had nailed a bird to his door while it was alive.

    ottoman osmanli dogs

    Dogs came to Istanbul with Turks and they were always part of street life. However not all stories are pleasant. In 1910, a French Company which used dogs for the perfume and chemical industry applied Coup D’etat Government (Comittee of Union & Progress) of Ottoman in order to buy these dogs. They signed a deal. However, when news heard there was an uproar. Using dogs in experiment was unthinkable for most Turks, that’s why they protested.

    dogs sold ottoman era

    Yet, coup government did not care. When stray dogs had been gathered on a ship, animal lovers raided the ship and saved the dogs. However, poor creatures been forcefully re-gathered. And this time there were guards who were ensuring their captivity. Then, it was decided that dogs could wait in a deserted island instead of a ship.

    kopek adasi dog island istanbul

    While 80.000 dogs were staying in a deserted island, French company declared that they backed off from the deal. All dogs died from hunger and thirst.

    hayirsiz ada sivriada dogs kopekler

    Official name of the island was/is “sharp” (sivri). However from then on people started to call that island as “scapegrace” (hayırsız ada). People also believed that, the earthquake of 1912 and many other following misfortunes befell on them due to this unheard cruelty towards these voiceless, innocent creatures.

    main qimg be58c60158c0c5f844bc6108082db577 pjlq

    This heartbreaking and disgraceful event still vividly remembered by people.

  • Why does Turkey allow ANZAC day celebrations?

    Why does Turkey allow ANZAC day celebrations?

    Why does Turkey allow Australians to celebrate ANZAC day on its territory?

    Here is what the commander of the Turkish forces at Galipoli had to say about the fallen ANZACS;

    “Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives … You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours … You, the mothers who sent their sons from faraway countries, wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.”

    Pretty sure that answers your question.

    Mark Peacock
    Studied at Murdoch University

    783510 120425 gallipoli
    Australians are being warned of the possibility of terror attacks in Turkey as Anzac Day approaches. File image. Source: AFP
  • We condemn the movie ‘’Smyrna’’

    We condemn the movie ‘’Smyrna’’

    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    Ray Nutt, CEO
    Fathom Events
    [email protected]

    Dear Mr. Nutt,

    We are writing to you in relation to the movie “Smyrna”, which we understand will be screened on December 8, 2022 at multiple theaters across the U.S. during an organization by Fathom Events. The Turkish-American community is deeply disturbed and offended by the fact that this production, which is portraying an unsubstantiated and erroneous account of historical events, is afforded such a vast platform by your company. We would like to take this opportunity to set the record straight concerning its subject matter. 

    We condemn the movie ‘’Smyrna’’ which is full of black propaganda. The Turkish War of Independence was conducted between 1919 and 1922, against those who coveted Anatolia, our homeland. Led by the Great Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, it resulted in a rightful victory of independence and freedom as well as paved the way for the proclamation of the modern Turkish Republic. 

    It also challenged the imperialistic ambitions of the era, which envisioned Greece waging an invasion and occupation of the Turkish homeland, starting in İzmir, referred to as “Smyrna” by the said production. During this course of events, Greece committed most heinous atrocities against humanity in Turkish territories. The occupying Greek forces resorted to brutal and savage methods in Anatolia, including but not limited to perpetrating massacres of the Turks.

    We do not intend to open up a debate on history. However, if there needs to be a quick reminder, in the face of the horrors caused by the Greek occupation in Anatolia, Greece’s war-time allies had to investigate its crimes against humanity by establishing an Investigation Commission. Furthermore, Greece’s vicious acts were registered as contrary to the law of war in the 59th Article of the Lausanne Peace Treaty of 1923. The liability of the tragic events of the time falls on the Greek side— not on the Turks, as attempted to be depicted in “Smyrna”. This production, as a whole, is devoid of any historical credibility. In the records and archives, there is no historical evidence that fire was caused due to the act of Turkish side. Also, as it can be seen from the works of Turkish history specialist, such as Bernard Lewis, Donald Webster and Lord Kinross, there was never an intention from Turkish authorities to commit such anBarbaric crime.

    We are concerned by the negative implications of the continuation misleading, irresponsible black propaganda on peace and cooperation between communities. The influential medium of art has the sacrosanct responsibility to help lay the ground for cooperation and solidarity in our Nation, most especially between the communities forming it. Never should it incite hatred and animosity. Enabling those who wish to manipulate this medium to amplify their black propaganda through demagoguery cannot serve that end. We kindly call youfor common sense and ask you to refrain from contributing this black propaganda.

    We earnestly hope that you will consider the dissemination of future projects with greater scrutiny and sensitivity. 

    Sincerely, 

    smyrna movie

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11935566/

  • Celebrate Human Rights Day

    Celebrate Human Rights Day

    Today: Celebrate Human Rights Day with Ms.Hawa Diallo, Chief, UNDGC_CSU & 30 Children December 10

    human rights day

    Greetings to you ALL:

    You are invited to celebrate the 74th anniversary of 30 (Thirty) Articles of the UNDH which will be presented by ETAC Children’s Club on the observance of the United Nations’ Human Rights Day, December 10.

    The UDHR consists of a preamble and 30 articles that set out a broad range of fundamental human rights and freedoms to which all of us, everywhere around the world, are entitled. It guarantees our rights without distinction of nationality, place of residence, gender, national or ethnic origin, religion, language, or any other status.

    The 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights will be celebrated on 10 December 2023. Ahead of this milestone celebration, starting on this year’s Human Rights Day on 10 December 2022, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UN-OHCHR) will launch a year-long campaign to showcase the UDHR by focusing on its legacy, relevance, and activism.

    StandUp4HumanRights #UDHR74 #HumanRightsDay #10December #UNWithCivilSociety #ETACUSA #LMGlobalOrg #lightmillennium

    Please join us today to celebrate Human Rights Day with our keynote speaker Ms.HAWA TAYLOR-KAMALA DIALLO, Chief, UNDGC_CSU; and 30 Children at 10:00 a.m. PT; 1:00 p.m. ET; and 9:00 p.m. TR on Saturday, December 10th.

    Key Details

    Date: Saturday, December 10 @ 10 AM (PST)

    Location: Online

    REGISTER NOW
    Please send any questions and comments to: [email protected]

    Best wishes,

    ETAC-USA

  • Greece in Turco-Greek War of 1919-1922

    Greece in Turco-Greek War of 1919-1922

    Kurtuluş Savaşı’nda Yunanistan – Türkçe Altyazılı – Greece in Turco-Greek War of 1919-1922

    Bir Türk kökenli, bir yunan kökenliye kurtuluş savaşını sorarsa

    If a Turkish origin asks a Greek person about the Turkish war of independence (or Turco – Greek War of 1919-1922 as Greeks call it, Kurtuluş savaşı as Turks call)

    Greece in Turco-Greek War of 1919-1922

    kurtulus savasi turco greek war
  • On the Burning of İzmir, 1922

    On the Burning of İzmir, 1922

    Shortened version of article “Revisiting the Fire of Izmir” published in Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, V. 41, No. 1, Fall 2017.

    September 13, 2012 is the 90th anniversary of the “Inferno of Izmir” when a great fire broke out that destroyed more than three-fifths of the town. Some Western sources have wrongly placed the culpability for the fire on Turks that recaptured the city from occupying Greek army in September 1922. To that end, Governor George Pataki of New York, playing ethnic politics, shamelessly issued a proclamation in 2002 blaming Turks for the fire.

    Historical testimonials, however, clearly indicate that, while the retreating Greek army had a role in starting the fire, Armenian terrorists, dressed in Turkish uniforms, did the biggest damage.

    Atrocities by Greek and Armenian elements had actually started as early as mid-May 1919 right after the Greek landing in Izmir. Due to the pressure of the Entente’s representatives, the Greek High Command sentenced dozens of criminals in spring 1919; among the sentenced were 12 Armenians. The atrocities continued during the whole Greco-Turkish war, with Armenians participating in the violence and destruction. In a July 1922 report, Elzéar Guiffray, the administrator of the Izmir’s port, estimated that more than 150,000 Turks were killed, or “disappeared,” as a result of the Greek armed forces’ war crimes.

    The summer of 1922 was a culmination of the Greek scorched-earth policy. The Greek army forced the Christian population to leave, and burned everything, including houses of the Christians. This scorched-earth policy is established both by the report of Father Ludovic Marseille, chief of the Catholic mission in Eskișehir (who said that the Greeks had lost forever any right to speak about “Turkish barbarity”), and by a dispatch sent by the staff of USS Litchfield to Admiral Mark Bristol, the US High Commissionner at the American Embassy in Istanbul.

    According to a report by a the French Navy’s Intelligence Service (Izmir office), dated 15 November 1920, Armenians, both civilians and legionnaires, arrived in Izmir from Cilicia, engaged in arson, and tried to excite the Greek army against the Turkish population. (During the French occupation of Cilicia, the Armenian Legion committed so many crimes that the Legion itself was disbanded in disgrace [phrase used by French General Jules Hamelin in his mémoires] in summer 1920 and at least five Armenians and one Assyrian were hanged by the French military justice in July 1920 alone. The practice of arson by Armenians, especially in Adana, was a recurrent grievance in the French sources). Missionary Alexander MacLachlan, based on his investigation, also concluded that “Armenian terrorists, dressed in Turkish uniforms, set fire to the city.” The terrorists were evidently attempting to bring Western intervention.

    The Western sources clearly demonstrate that the attitude of the Turkish army during the final offensive was strikingly correct. For instance, General Pellé, the French High Commissioner in Istanbul, wrote on September 8, 1922, that since a long time, even the Greek patriarchate had not reported to him any “Kemalist massacre.”

    After a careful investigation made together with Admiral Charles Dumesnil, chief of the French Navy in the Near East, and other French representatives, French Consul General Michel Graillet of Izmir also concluded that “the Turkish army has clearly nothing to do with the arson,” and that “quite the contrary, it fought the fire to the extent of its meager resources.” Dumesnil knew the Turkish army from the Çanakkale battle where he had fought. If the irregulars (“çete”) of the Turkish army pillaged a house, they faced immediate execution.

    The Turkish army, in fact, had no reason to start fire in Izmir. The fleeing Greek army had abandoned huge quantities of military and food supplies that were desperately needed by the Turkish army and civilians. During several weeks after the fire, Turkish commanders were contemptuous of suggestions, made in a few quarters, that they had any responsibility for the burning. The commanders said that, considering what the Greeks had left behind, it would have been foolish of them to set fire to the city.

    In short, the “Inferno of Izmir” on September 13, 1922 was mainly committed by Armenian terrorists, but also aided by Greek elements.

    Maxime Gauin is a researcher and a Ph.D. candidate at the Department of History, Middle East Technical University.