Author: Aylin D. Miller

  • Did Ottomans relate themselves to Byzantines or Romans?

    Did Ottomans relate themselves to Byzantines or Romans?

    The answer to this question comes from Dimitris Almyrantis on Quora:

    Yes; but forget the Romans you know. The Ottomans didn’t have the option of seeing Rome through a squeaky clean, faux Latinate veneer, pedantically accurate academic writing, or ripped centurions with a British accent. For the Ottomans, Rome was all they had to compare themselves with; the land they were treading was Roman soil, the peoples they alternately fought and married were Roman peoples, and their ceremonial was in the Rumi style. Their own empire was geographically made up of the ‘Roman and Persian and Arab lands’, and on a personal level all their lives were spent within the first third.

    In the most practical sense, for the Ottomans Rome wasn’t part of history but of modernity, a viscerally tribal as well as a cultural reality. The only proper translation in our speech would be to speak of the West, not just Rome, encompassing the associations and content of both. The German Kaiser in Vienna, the Greek peasant on his field, and the Pontic country on the easternmost frontier of his empire were all Rum to the Ottoman.

    So of course the relation was underway on all levels. The routine of the divan, the sacred privacy of the imperial person and the rhythm of government’s operation – whom the sovereign would speak with, how he would comport himself at court and on the streets – were all consciously adopted from the Roman ceremonial, and fixed as the centerpiece of the Ottoman conceptual space, for all the empire to arrange itself around. On the popular level, the Crescent and the Cross were juxtaposed against each other on every level of society, and the identities built around them were both opposed and codependent. New Rome had been a point of literary and popular fascination for the Islamic world since the latter’s inception; now that the center of one civilization was identified with the other, the combined mythos of both was the spirit of the age.

    Miniature ‘Astanbolu’ by Bülent Özgen

    istanbul minyaturu
  • Discontinued Turkish Forum-Google Service

    Discontinued Turkish Forum-Google Service

    Dear Turkish Forum Reader,

    On April 14, 2021, Google announced they would migrate FeedBurner to new infrastructure but remove “non-core” functionality including email subscriptions and browser-friendly viewing. You will no more receive Turkish Forum daily RSS news from Google, please try other platforms instead to continue receiving our updates, such as :

    Google News, Our twitter or facebook account, web notifications etc..

    Thank you for using Google FeedBurner service to receive our news till now.

    Best Regards
    Turkish Forum
    Turkish: www.turkishnews.com/tr/content
    English: www.turkishnews.com/en/content

  • Biden disregarded four articles of the U.S. constitution

    Biden disregarded four articles of the U.S. constitution

    April 18, 2023
    President Joe Biden
    The White House
    1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
    Washington, DC 20500

    Re: President Biden disregarded four articles of the U.S. constitution by describing the 1915 events as genocide 

    Dear Mr. President, 

    We are writing this letter as the representatives of the Turkish American community, to express our disappointment and dismay concerning your one-sided declaration on April 24, 2022, that the Ottoman Empire committed genocide on its Armenian subjects in 1915.  A claim which was never proven legally or through historical research.  

    Mr. President, we are aware and proud of the fact that you are a graduate of Syracuse Law School and that you were the Chairman or Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee for 16 years.  We know how knowledgeable, respectful, and sensitive you are about the rule of law. Furthermore, you did solemnly swear as the president-elect on that glorious inauguration day that you would “preserve, protect and defend the U.S. Constitution.”  Yet, we are very astonished, Mr. President, that you disregarded at least four articles and amendments of the U.S. Constitution.  

    We believe that your April 24 statement is in conflict with basic principles of fairness in the U.S. Constitution. The first and second issues are related to the fundamental fairness principles, while the third and fourth issues specifically pertain to the “Due Process Rights” of Turkish Americans.

    The first issue concerns Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, which makes international treaties ratified by the Senate a part of U.S. domestic law.  Here is a partial quote:

    “…This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding…”

    “Genocide”, an international crime, was coded by the “U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide,” approved and proposed for ratification in 1948 and entered into force in 1951. Türkiye became a party to this Convention in1950. This Convention regulates the crime of genocide in the domestic legal structure of the U.S. by being approved by the Senate on November 11, 1988, in accordance with Article VI of the U.S. Constitution. It became PUBLIC LAW 100-606 called the “Genocide Convention Implementation Act of 1987 (the Proxmire Act)”.  You, Mr. President, yourself sponsored the resolution that paved the way to this law.  

    According to this 1948 Convention, adopted by 140 states around the world and has the character of “jus cojens” (the compelling, overriding, unchallengeable rule) in law, in order for an act to be considered genocide, a competent tribunal must prove the material and moral elements of the crime (actus reus and mens rea) and, in particular, the crime must be determined to have been committed with special intent (dolus specialis.)  No such proceedings were instituted against the Ottoman Empire or its rulers, and no competent court ruled that the crime of genocide had been committed. In this case, your April 24 statement is clearly in conflict with both the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. domestic law, not to mention international law. 

     The second issue is the conflict with the “principle of legality” enshrined in Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution. This section prohibits the adoption of “ex post facto laws” and their retroactive application.  Here is a partial quote:  

    “…No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed….”

    According to this article, an act that does not constitute a crime according to the law of the time it was committed does not constitute a crime by a subsequent law. “Genocide” did not exist in 1915 as a word or concept. It was first defined as a crime in the U.N. General Assembly document of December 11, 1946, and codified by the U.N. Genocide Convention adopted on December 9, 1948. The 1948 concept of genocide cannot be used retroactively to describe the events in 1915.  Therefore, Mr. President, your April 24 statement is undoubtedly contrary to the letter and spirit of section 9 of Article I of the U.S. Constitution.

    The third, and the most important, issue is the “Due Process Rights” of Turkish Americans, protected under the 5th and 14th Amendments in the U.S. Constitution – combining your third and fourth infringements. 

    The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment dictates to the federal government that no one shall be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.” The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the very same words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. This means that the government must follow fair procedures and respect the legal rights of individuals before depriving them of their fundamental rights. Fourteenth Amendment applies this protection to the states and ensures that all individuals are entitled to due process of law, regardless of their race, ethnicity, or gender. In this case, we strongly believe, that the due process rights of Americans of Turkish origin were totally disregarded. We strongly disagree with your declaration as it is not based on historical facts and lacks any legal basis. We believe that your declaration was motivated solely to gain political popularity among the strong Armenian diaspora, while jeopardizing the safety and well-being of Turkish Americans in the United States.

    We are deeply concerned that your declaration, claiming the events of 1915 as Armenian Genocide, could negatively affect the fairness and impartiality of legal proceedings involving American citizens of Turkish and Armenian descent. It is important to note that the growing Turkish American community has become increasingly vocal about the facts of the 1915 events and aims to educate the public about the Turkish perspective, which has long been overshadowed by the one-sided and often fabricated narrative presented by the Armenian side.

    The growing visibility and public awareness of the true side of the History, as advanced by non-partisan scholars based on credible historical research, has unfortunately led to an increase in hate crimes and terrorism, victimizing Turkish Americans at the hands of Armenian radicals.  Your declaration may inadvertently encourage the perpetrators of these hate crimes and negatively impact the fairness and impartiality of legal proceedings against such suspects. Encouraged by your April 24 statement, Armenian racists inclined to avenge the alleged Armenian Genocide, threatened Turkish Americans, inflicted physical harm on them, and destroyed their property.  We are kindly asking, Mr. President, that you consider incidents of hate crimes and bullying against Turkish Americans, particularly in California, where a significant number of Armenians reside.

    As a community that values justice, fairness, and the principles of due process, we, the people of Turkish American heritage, request that you reconsider your declaration and take steps to promote a more balanced and accurate understanding of the events of 1915. We believe that all individuals, regardless of their ethnicity or background, deserve fair and impartial treatment under the law.

    Mr. President, you put forward the long-discredited political claim of Armenian genocide as an irrefutable fact, following up on your many similar statements during your 2020 election campaign.  Your statement, unfairly and untruthfully, stigmatized Turkish Americans as evil people who deserve to be punished.   What you have done with the April 24, 2022 statement is nothing less than “extrajudicial execution” in terms of the U.S. Constitution and domestic law.

    Your April 24 statement, Mr. President, is pedagogically unsound, as there are multiple reasons for doubting the Armenian Genocide thesis, including the absence of a court verdict. In addition, hostility towards viewpoints that dispute the Armenian Genocide thesis stifles open and honest discussion, represents viewpoint discrimination, and constitutes a further problem with the First Amendment.  

    Mr. President, your April 24 statement will cause academic freedom to be curtailed as it erroneously presumes that genocide occurred.  On the other hand, the work and research of many distinguished scholars have shown that these genocide claims are nothing more than fabrications and distortions of history. Among the many examples are the scholarly work and publications of professors Bernard Lewis of Princeton University, Gunter Lewy of the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and Justin McCarthy of the University of Louisville, which clearly demonstrated that such a crime did not occur. Dissenting views are educationally valuable, as they expose falsehoods, refine partial truths, and reinforce truths by battle-testing them.  But when your April 24 statement stops all that, education and truth suffer, prejudices and perceptions will continue to dominate.  

    Mr. President, we would like to remind you your own words: “…America is an idea. An idea that is stronger than any army, bigger than any ocean, more powerful than any dictator or tyrant. It gives hope to the most desperate people on earth, it guarantees that everyone is treated with dignity and gives hate no safe harbor…”  We, the people of Turkish-American heritage, are not treated with dignity.  Unfortunately, your April 24 statement does give a safe harbor to hate and does not help build peace as our children are already being bullied in K-12 schools. 

    Most importantly, we are kindly asking you, Mr. President, that you support the initiative by the republics of Türkiye and Armenia to establish a Joint Historical Commission, composed of historians and legal scholars to be selected by Ankara and Erivan. We hope you will contribute earnestly to the realization of this initiative.  

    For this to work, of course, all national archives must be fully open to research.  While Ottoman and Turkish archives are fully open to international research since 1980s, Armenian archives remain closed to scholars critical of genocide claims.

    This is the only way to end this ethno-religious bias and discrimination against Turkish-Americans by those influenced by crude stereotypes of genocide claims that are rooted, in large part, in the deliberate wartime propaganda efforts of the World War I Allies.  

    Mr. President, a Turkish-Armenian Joint Historical Commission to investigate the genocide claims may be the only frank, honest, ethical, logical, and effective way forward.  We believe research and dialogue, not stereotyping and defamation, can build the way to peace, reconciliation, and closure.  

    Respectfully,

    Mazlum Kosma
    President

    Dr. Bulent Basol
    Chairman of the Board of Trustees

    Prof. Dr. Ulku Ulgur
    The Founding President

    Ergun Kirlikovali
    Past President

  • Malta Yok!

    Malta Yok!

    ‘Malta yok effendi’, which stands for ‘Malta does not exist.’

    “I was shocked upon hearing it in a history class in Israel” says one of the comment writers with the nickname skatanic.

    But why in Israel? Then comes this tweet from Lebanon:

    malta yok twit

    Does “Malta yok” really mean “forget about it” in Turkish? Noting among the many Malta-based proverbs and sayings in the Turkish Dictionary of Sayings, such as “Malta eriği” (Maltese plum = loquat), “Malta humması” (Maltese fever = brucellosis), “Malta palamudu” (Maltese bonito = pilot fish), etc., there doesn’t appear to be the term “Malta yok”.

    It seems to be a saying unique to Levantine Arabic, from which it probably entered Israeli Hebrew, with a folk etymology to follow.

    But how did they get there? There are several points of view. The predominant seems to be as follows.

    According to a story, it was the response of an Admiral to the Sultan (Süleyman), who having been sent with a grand army to conquer Malta, failed to do so. 

    map of malta haritasi

    At one time, during the Ottoman Empire, the Sultan dispatched a naval force against Malta. After some time, however, the fleet returned without completing its objective and the Turkish admiral stated ‘Malta Yok’. This is due to the inability of the admiral to read a map of the era. And as if that wasn’t enough, the excuse also came up. According to the admiral, when he went to the charter room to plot a course for Malta, he ordered his adjutant to bring him coffee. So, as he enjoyed his coffee, he moved the cup on the map and, accidently, it covered Malta. As ridiculous as it sounds, it is better than the other excuse that the devil moved the island to another point on the map for the admiral not to be able to spot it.

    Arab historian Nicola Ziyadeh, who passed away 99 years old in June 27 2007, was Eyyâm fî Malta, where he touched upon the phrase “Malta yok”. In his telling, the Sublime Porte receives news that there is an island called Malta in the Mediterranean which could cause great danger unless it is captured. The admiral then is instructed to take over the island post, haste. However, the admiral cannot discover this island even though he travels East, west, north and south across the Mediterranean. He writes to the grand vizier “Malta yok”.

    Another source recontextualized this to the answer the captain gives not for being unable to find the island but for being unable to capture it.

    The Estonian historian Juri Lina, who wrote a book about freemasonry Les Architectes de la déception — l’histoire secrète de la franc-maçonnerie starts a chapter with “Malta yok”. According to the author, the events of 1565 unfolded as follows: the emperor commands his navy to attack the Christian island of Malta. Storms and bad weather conditions stop the navy from reaching the island. The hopeless captain covers up the island of Malta with the wax from a candle he grabs. And then with a victorious air, he turns to his second mate and exclaims, “There is no Malta!” Before turning the fleet to Crete.

    Sources:

    https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-Malta-yok-culture-tradition-of-unabashed-denials-and-lies-develop-in-the-Turkish-people

    https://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/pinker.pdf

  • Is Turkey the reason why the F-35 has become a failure?

    Is Turkey the reason why the F-35 has become a failure?

    Is kicking out Turkey from the F-35 fighter program the reason why the F-35 has become a failure?

    Former Operations Specialist at United States Navy (USN) Eric Wicklund answers this question on quora as:

    The F-35 is far and away the most successful stealth aircraft in the world. There are 890 of them in service with various nations. No other stealth fighter has matched production numbers like that.

    There have been more F-35s placed into service than ALL of the F-22s, Chinese J-20s, Russian Su-57s, B-2s, B-21s, and F-117s…combined!

    f 35 stealth aircraft

    Yes, Turkey should have got some of them, and they would have. The US and NATO asked only that Turkey not import the Russian S-400 air defense system. Easy as that. And to all who claim that NATO members must follow the orders of the USA, well…Turkey is proof positive that NATO members don’t have to listen. Turkey bought the S-400 anyway, and that’s why they’ll not get the F-35. Yet Finland, who only now is joining NATO, already had a signed contract to get the F-35, prior to joining NATO.

    • To all who will claim that the F-35 is too expensive, citing the oft-published 1.5 Trillion price tag, well, that’s the cost of acquisition, maintenance, and upgrades for thousands of aircraft for the next 50 years. You show me another plane that has costs covered over that same period of time, and tell me what the number is. I’ll bet you can’t even find it.
    • Other detractors will mention that one F-16 or Rafale or Typhoon has shot down an F-35 in exercises. Well yeah, they did. There isn’t a single aircraft on this planet, that cannot “ever” be shot down. The West believes in “test until failure.” That means creating scenarios that are harder and harder, until the system of man and machine fails, then figure out how to avoid that failure. Then, once again, test until failure. What no detractor of the F-35 ever mentions is how many F-16s, Rafales, and Typhoons were shot down by the F-35 in exercises in response. Well, the answer is “hundreds.” I don’t have the exact number, but it’s very high, and that’s the whole point. If I shoot down many more of your guys before you shoot down mine, my guys/planes didn’t fail…yours did.
    f35

    So, no, the F-35 is not a failure, it’s a stunning success. And Turkey not receiving the F-35 has no bearing whatsoever on that fact.

    And if you don’t believe it coming from me, listen to Alex Hollings, who’s makes his living studying this stuff. Listen to what he has to say.

    The F-35 is the most SUCCESSFUL stealth aircraft in HISTORY
    The F-35 may have been an acquisition nightmare, but the resulting fighter is the most technologically advanced tactical aircraft ever to fly… and with creeping up on 900 airframes built, it’s also one of the most prolific.
  • VAN MASSACRE OF APRIL 20, 1915

    VAN MASSACRE OF APRIL 20, 1915

    TADA-FEYM WORKING GROUP ANNOUNCEMENT  ON
    VAN MASSACRE OF APRIL 20, 1915

    On the 108 th anniversary of the vicious slaughter of 22,900 innocent Muslims at the provincial center of the City of Van on April 20, 1915 by mutinous Armenian gangs (Hunchak, Dashnak and alike), We, The Turkish People around the world, would like to commemorate our martyrs with compassion and love, bowing down in front of their honorable, loving memory with respect.

    The VAN massacre originates from the mutinous attitude fanatical Armenian gangs acquaired in the depths of history. Similar massacres committed by Armenians were witnessed throughout the Ottoman-Russian Wars of 1828 and 1877-78, due Armenians’ cooperation with the enemy, as well as other major massacres Armenians committed on their own.

    During the early phases of these Russian invasions, aiming the realization of Russia’s historical ambitions, some Armenians who knew the region very well as Ottoman citizens and whose second language was Turkish, led the Russian forces into Turkish territories, causing them to raid Turkish forces and massacre many Muslims. Armenians have repeated similar practices in the VAN MASSACRE.

    Due to the fact that Turkish men were engaged in the war efforts against invading enemy armies on six different battle-fronts during WWI, and that this situation created a vulnerability in the security forces of the region, Armenians who wanted to take advantage of this situation committed wide-scale massacres in Eastern villages and towns of Turkey, against the Muslim population. Armenians’ true intent was to reduce the numbers of the local Muslims, and thereby increase the ratio of the Christian population in the region, against Muslims. 

    Once the Tsarist Russian Army entered Eastern Anatolia, taking advantage of this weakest time of the Ottoman State, Armenians increased their terror activities in the City of Van with the purpose of gaining majority in the population of the city, while once more helping the invading Russian Army. Their massacres in the region peaked on April 20, 1915, at the centre of Van.

    During these massacres where 22,900 Muslims perished, extremely cruel and inhumane acts of murder took place on the Akdamar Island where a historic Armenian Church is located; Armenian gangs also committed all sorts of immoral acts against Muslim women and girls. Many girls and women ended up having to commit suicide by jumping into the Lake of Van in order to protect themselves, their honor and dignity against the Armenians’ sexual violence.

    Perhaps the best response to the groundless Armenian claims came from the Armenian Republic’s First Prime Minister, Hovhannes Katchaznouni, in his 1923 manifesto to the Armenian Revolutionary Federation’s (Dashnaktsutyun) Party Conference, in Bucharest. This manifesto of Katchaznouni, which has been removed from the libraries of the civilized(!) Western World by Armenian propagandists, blamed not the Turks but the Armenians as “the responsible party for the suffering of the Armenians”. He states that “the Armenians rebelled against their own state and committed treason by cooperating with the imperialist countries that occupied the Ottoman Empire”.

    Based on such Armenian confessions and the research of expert historian and demographer Prof. Justin McCarthy, we now know that 1,189,332 Muslims lost their lives in Anatolia during those years, mainly in the hands of rebellious Armenians.

    Considering Johanness Lepsius’ pre-WWI population numbers and numerous archival reports showing the number of Armenians surviving the war, we come to the conclusion that only around 83,000 Armenians lost their lives during the forced relocations of 1915. 

    Despite such true archival information, Armenian propaganda machine resorts to all kinds of intrigue and deceit, telling world public the biggest lie of all times – that 1.5 million Armenians were killed in the hands of Turks! They pursue policies similar to that of Hitler’s Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels. Every year, they engage in political activities to force the politicians around the world to pass meaningless, unbinding resolutions declaring April 24th as Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day.

    On the other hand, we wish the sane, impartial and fair people of the world would at least ask themselves the very question that French historian Prof Yves Bérnard asked himself once, when he gave the following title to one of his books: “Génocide Arménien: Et si on nous avait menti? (Armenian Genocide: What if they have lied to us?)”.

    According to the researches of Prof. McCarthy, apart from the human casualties they caused, the Armenian insurgents also destroyed all 3,400 buildings, except 3, in the province of Van, belonging to the Muslims, and left the region.

    With Regards and Respect,

    Uğur Kara
    Chairman
    TADA – Turkish Anti Defamation Alliance  

    Orhan Tan
    Chairman
    FEYM Group- Disproving False Armenian Claims