Israel May Retaliate Against Turkey

Spread the love

Harut Sassounian

Posted January 13, 2009 | 06:51 PM (EST)

Israel May Retaliate Against Turkey by Recognizing the Armenian Genocide

Enraged by the abrasive tone of Turkey’s condemnation of Israel’s attack on Gaza, Israeli officials and Turkish analysts are now raising the possibility that Tel Aviv may retaliate either by recognizing the Armenian Genocide or refusing to help Turkey to lobby against a congressional resolution on the genocide.

This unexpected turn of events was in response to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan’s continued harsh criticisms, accusing Israel of “perpetrating inhuman actions which would bring it to self-destruction. Allah will sooner or later punish those who transgress the rights of innocents.” Erdogan qualified Israel’s attack on Gaza as “savagery” and a “crime against humanity.” He also refused to take calls from Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and rejected a request by Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni to visit Ankara.

Israel initially downplayed the hostile comments emanating from Turkey. The Jerusalem-based DEBKAfile reported that “a deep crisis in Turkish-Israel relations appears to be the first strategic casualty of Israel’s offensive to suppress Hamas’ rocket campaign.” An Israeli Foreign Ministry official told Turkey’s ambassador to Israel that such harsh words were “unacceptable” among friendly nations. Another Israeli official added: “It would be necessary to evaluate the damage to the relationship that these [Erdogan’s] comments have caused.”

In a January 5 editorial, the Jerusalem Post escalated the level of Israeli displeasure by questioning Turkey’s credibility on passing judgment on other countries: “On balance, we’re not convinced that Turkey has earned the right to lecture Israelis about human rights. While world attention focuses on Gaza, Turkish jets have bombed Kurdish positions in northern Iraq. Over the years, tens of thousands of people have been killed as the radical PKK pursues its campaign for autonomy from Turkey. Kurdish civilians in Iraq complain regularly that Ankara’s air force has struck civilian areas where there is no PKK activity. The next Israeli government should weigh whether Israel can accept as a mediator a country that speaks, albeit elliptically, of our destruction. Meanwhile, if Turkey persists in its one-sided, anti-Israel rhetoric, the Foreign Ministry might consider recalling our ambassador in Ankara for consultations.”

Finally, Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Majalli Whbee angrily lashed back at the Prime Minister of Turkey. Several Turkish media outlets quoted Whbee as stating: “Erdogan says that genocide is taking place in Gaza. We [Israel] will then recognize the Armenian related events as genocide.” Whbee, a member of the Israeli Knesset and a close confidante of Prime Minister Olmert, issued the following warning to Turkey: “We, as Israel, hope that Prime Minister Erdogan’s statements will not damage our relations. But, if Turkey does not behave fairly, this will have its consequences.”

While it is unlikely that Israel would reverse its long-standing refusal to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, it may decide not to accommodate future Turkish requests to have American Jewish organizations to lobby against a congressional resolution on the Armenian Genocide.

Commentator Yigal Schleifer explained in his EurasiaNet article that Erdogan may “find himself walking a tightrope when it comes to distancing Turkey from Israel. Ankara has long depended on Israel to act as a conduit to Washington and to American Jewish organizations who have frequently acted as a kind of surrogate lobby for Turkey in Washington. In the past, Jewish organizations have been instrumental in helping Turkey block efforts to introduce resolutions in Congress recognizing the Armenian genocide of 1915. ‘There is real anger with Erdogan on Capitol Hill and among people who follow Turkey in Washington,’ says a Washington-based consultant who closely monitors Turkish affairs. ‘Nobody is threatening anything right now, or knows if there are going to be repercussions, but this is going to have an effect.’ Adds the consultant: ‘There is a sense that Erdogan has used up a lot of good will.’”

The Turkish newspaper, Hurriyet, in a January 9 editorial, tried to downplay the consequences of the Turkish anger at Israel, by stating that the latter hopes “the Jewish lobby in the United States…will ensure, through its clout on issues such as preventing Armenian genocide bills, that Turkey falls in line…. It is suggested that if Turkey does not fall in line, that same lobby will punish her by refusing to help on this score, or even by ensuring that such bills pass.”

Turkish columnist Barcin Yinanc described in Hurriyet the absurd situation Turkish leaders will find themselves in a couple of months: “When April comes, I can imagine the [Turkish] government instructing its Ambassador to Israel to mobilize the Israeli government to stop the Armenian initiatives in the U.S. Congress. I can hear some Israelis telling the Turkish Ambassador to go talk to Hamas to lobby the Congress. Erdogan’s harsh statements against Israel have certainly not gone unnoticed in Israel…. I am sure the Israeli government as well as the Jewish lobby in America will not forget these statements.”

Turkish leaders may wish to remember that the last time they irritated a prominent Jewish-American congressman, he retaliated by supporting congressional action on the Armenian Genocide. Cong. Tom Lantos, a Holocaust survivor and a staunch opponent of the recognition of the Armenian Genocide, surprised everyone in 2005 when he voted in favor of a congressional resolution on the Armenian Genocide in the House International Relations Committee. Lantos disclosed that he was backing the Armenian resolution in order to teach the Turks a lesson for not supporting the U.S. on the eve of the Iraqi War.

In the coming days, Turkey’s relations with Israel may further deteriorate as Turkish politicians, journalists, and leaders of non-governmental organizations urge Erdogan to go beyond mere words and expel Israel’s Ambassador from Ankara, recall Turkey’s Ambassador from Tel Aviv, cancel all military and economic agreements with Israel, and ban overflights by Israeli pilots in Turkish airspace. Erdogan may resort to such punitive actions in order to appease widespread anti-Israel anger by large segments of the Turkish public prior to local elections which are critical for his ruling political party.

+

======================  COMMENTS ———————–

Anoosh

Don’t the actions of both Turkey and Israel strike anyone else as disturbingly hypocritical? First Erdogan has the unmitigated audacity to complain that through its actions in Gaza, Israel is violating the bibical commandment that “Thou shalt not kill.” Now isn’t that calling the kettle black? The Turkish nation commits a genocide on those members of its population that were Armenian, murders 1.5 million innocent souls and dispossesses an entire nation. Erdogan and his ilk continue the perpetration of this unfathomable crime by denying that it happened and disgracing and dishonoring the dead…and he now storms out of a meeting because of Israel’s actions.

Israel, on the other hand, itself the home to genocide victims, refuses the acknowledge the truth about the Armenian Genocide and formally reocognize it for what it is. Moreover, Israel and Jewish American organizatons actively lobby against US Congressional recognition of the Armenian Genocide because of Israel’s “strategic relationship” with Turkey. And now Israel, too, has the audacity to threaten Turkey with Armenian Genocide recognition unless Turkey shapes up and follows the party line. Its simply disgusting. Israel, more than almost any other nation, should be at the forefront of recognizing the Armenian Genocide.

What ever happened to just doing the correct and moral thing?

Posted 08:51 PM on 02/01/2009

– + gageeandbaba

OMG those Israeli’s are something else. please pass this on b/c this is proof. NO MORE OF OUR TAX MONEY FOR ISRAEL!

Posted 09:53 PM on 01/13/2009

– + alexa07

Why can’t the Turks speak up against what is happening to the Palestinians in Gaza? Are you really suggesting they should be blackmailed into silence by AIPAC manipulative actions? I am ashamed of the American govt’s complicity in these atrocities that are occurring in Gaza. I applaud any nation who has the guts to speak up to the Israelis & say ENOUGH! Regardless of past events. Many nations, have shameful episodes in their history, whether they admit it or not. That doesn’t forbid that we can speak up today against the actions of the Israelis & use of our most ferocious American weapons on a captive population.

Posted 09:39 PM on 01/13/2009

– + akhinaten

So Israel dictates the USA policy not only toward itself but also toward others.

why have a congress when you can have a lobby. How long can this continue.


Spread the love

Comments

2 responses to “Israel May Retaliate Against Turkey”

  1. LETTER: Israel is not a democracy

    February 17, 2009 6:00 AM

    In his recent letter defending Israel’s assault on Gaza (“Hamas seeks only destruction,” Feb. 11), Irving Fradkin again maintains that Israel is blameless for human rights abuses which have received widespread international condemnation. He also attempts to sell Israel as a modern democracy as one reason for Americans to support it.

    Enough has been said about Gaza, but I would like to refute Dr. Fradkin’s rosy image of Israel as a democracy like ours with a few facts.

    Dr. Fradkin claims that “Arabs and Israelis there have equal rights.” Perhaps this is just a Freudian slip, but Arab Israelis are Israelis.

    Palestinians in occupied territories clearly do not enjoy the same human rights as Israelis. However, Fradkin’s portrait of happy Arabs in Israel is totally distorted. Because of institutionalized racism, Arab Israelis do not have the same rights to own property or exercise freedom of speech or assembly. Wages for Arab citizens are 30 percent lower. Nor do Arabs now even have full electoral rights. Two weeks ago, the Central Elections Committee in Israel banned the Arab parties Ta’al and Balad from running in the recent election. Avigdor Lieberman has openly called for revoking Arabs’ citizenship and called for “transfer” — forced deportations of Arabs. This is a more realistic picture of life for Arab Israelis.

    Dr. Fradkin writes that Israel “wants peace and wants to share land peacefully with the Arabs.” But go to the Knesset’s Web site at http://www.knesset.gov.il/elections/knesset15/elikud_m.htm and look at the Likud’s platform: “The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river.” Now look at a map and you’ll notice that all of the West Bank is west of the Jordan River. Where do Israeli hardliners want Palestinians to live? Jordan and Egypt. Forced deportations are not the same as peaceful sharing.

    He writes, “Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East.” First of all, unlike Turkey, a secular democracy which Dr. Fradkin fails to mention, Israel is a theocracy. It has no constitution. Its laws are selectively enforced along racial and religious divisions — or ignored altogether. It has major human rights problems, including the use of torture. Israel has press censorship. If all this is a democracy, then let’s call Pakistan a democracy too.

    DAVID EHRENS

    Dartmouth

    Source: http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090217/OPINION/902170339

  2. “There is no difference between being a good American and being a good Zionist.”
    –Jonathan POLLARD, the spy who played a key role in Israel’s nuclear programme [by stealing secrets from USA]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *