Erdogan offers concessions to Turkey’s protesters

Spread the love

 

gezi   03739808-9439

Protests continue in Turkey: Taksim Square was largely cleared of protesters Wednesday, with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan taking harsh action against the demonstrations that have created the biggest crisis in his 10 years in power. Speaking Thursday to a gathering of Turkish mayors in Ankara, Erdogan told “environmentalist” protesters to “get out of there. Leave us head-to-head with those terrorist organizations so that we can clear Gezi Park and give it to its owners.”

By Michael Birnbaum, Friday, June 14, 10:15 AM E-mail the writer

ISTANBUL — Turkey’s leader offered protesters concessions early Friday, officials and protesters said, in a step that may help quiet the demonstrations that have swept the country for two weeks.Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told a delegation of protesters in a closed-door meeting in Ankara that he would be willing to soften his approach to redevelopment in Istanbul’s central Gezi Park, the issue that originally sparked demonstrations. Erdogan said that he will not press ahead with razing the park while a court case to stop the construction is pending, saying that if he wins the court case, he will put the matter to a referendum in Istanbul, according to a spokesman and a member of an umbrella group for protesters.

William Booth 5:24 AM ET

Inaccurate, dilapidated Communist-era display was remade by Israel’s Yad Vashem research center. Protesters hailed the move as a positive step hours after Erdogan had warned that his patience for the demonstrations was running out.“The prime minister said that if the results of the public vote turned out in a way which would leave this area as a park, they will abide by it,” Tayfun Kahraman, a member of Taksim Solidarity, the umbrella protest group told reporters after the meeting, Reuters reported.

“His comments that the project will not be executed until the judiciary makes its decision is tonight’s positive result,” Kahraman said.

Erdogan’s decision was confirmed by a spokesman for his Justice and Development Party.

It was unclear whether the decision would be enough to put an end to the protests, which are largely leaderless and comprised of demands that range far beyond the issue over the park. Many on Thursday said the meeting with representatives from Taksim Solidarity was a positive step, but the group does not speak on behalf of all the protesters. Members of the delegation in Ankara said that they would take the news back to Taksim Square on Friday to see what the thousands of people encamped there thought of the decision.

Many protesters have been skeptical of plans for a referendum, saying that they do not believe elections can be fair when Erdogan holds tight sway over the media. Others mistrust the judiciary, saying that Erdogan controls them too.

Many rejected the idea of a referendum.

“It’s a silly sign of democracy,” said Burcu Gozetici, 30, a dentist. “We’ve seen lots of referendums in Turkey. But we don’t believe the electoral system is fair.”

If one clear winner has emerged in the battle over personal freedoms in Turkey, it may be modern Turkey’s founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

As Erdogan met Thursday for the first time with representatives from some of the main groups behind the protests that have swept his country for two weeks, Ataturk flags fluttered on both sides of the conflict.

For years, Erdogan and his conservative Islamist associates have been unenthusiastic about Ataturk, resentful of his legacy of such strict secularism that until recently women who wear head scarves could not attend college. But with Erdogan on Thursday delivering a “final warning” to protesters, his forces have embraced Ataturk’s image — an effort, critics say, to justify a pending crackdown and to pit the demonstrations against the Turkish nation. Security forces on Wednesday draped a massive banner of Ata­turk’s face over a building facing central Istanbul’s Taksim Square, after clearing it of a jumble of left-wing signs placed there by protesters. Protesters and government alike agree that Ata­turk’s image — out of fashion for years — is again in vogue, although many protesters say that his legacy is far from what unites them. At the protests at Taksim and adjoining Gezi Park, street vendors hawk metal Ataturk statuettes, while Ataturk flags flap from trees.To many of the people in Taksim, the government’s move to embrace the imagery of Ataturk — whose honorific last name means “father of the Turks” — reeks of opportunism.

Offer of concessions in battle over Gezi Park’s redevelopment a step that may help quiet demonstrations.

“They’re trying to make people in Gezi Park look like vandals,” said Aysu Setin, 21, an international relations student who was walking through the protest on Thursday. “I don’t remember their using the image of Ataturk before.”

Setin — a member of a generation barely marked by the military rule that dominated Turkey for decades — said that Ataturk’s legacy was not a major force behind the protests, which were sparked by a plan to raze Gezi Park and to build a replica of an Ottoman-era military barracks there.

“Love for Ataturk is not what binds people here,” she said. Rather, she said, it’s about “freedom.”

Other protesters, though, say that Ataturk’s secular emphasis underpins their conception of Turkey, and some complain that Erdogan has done little to honor that legacy as he has pushed restrictions on alcohol, counseled newlyweds to have at least three children and tightened access to abortions.

Even the plan to rebuild the Ottoman-era barracks has an anti-Ataturk subtext, some say, by honoring a time when Istanbul was the capital of an Islamic empire rather than merely the largest city in a modern, secular Turkey. And just days before the protests started at the end of May, Erdogan gave a speech in which he implicitly called Ata­turk and his successor, Ismet Inonu, alcoholics — a touchy subject given conservative Islam’s ban on drinking.

“Why are the laws crafted by two drunkards respectable while laws dictated by religion are rejected?” Erdogan told a meeting of the Justice and Development Party.

That line was enough to sdrive Aysun Yerlikaya to protest in the fiercely Westernized city of Izmir earlier this week.

“We’re here because he called Ataturk a drunkard. No one can call Ataturk a drunkard,” said Yerlikaya, 23, a biology student. Erdogan “pokes into everything — what you drink., what you eat,” she said, referring to advice he gave earlier this year to eat “genuine wheat bread” with a lot of bran in it.

Ataturk, an Ottoman-era military officer who fought pitched battles to reclaim Turkish land after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I, presided over the creation of the Republic of Turkey in 1923. He ruled with a tight grip until his death in 1938, establishing many of the institutions of the modern country but also, critics say, giving the military outsize power that lasted until Erdogan finally took it back under civilian control.

The long legacy of Erdogan’s less-than-enthusiastic embrace of Ataturk made the decision this week to hang the massive banner of the founder’s image on the empty Ataturk Cultural Center facing Taksim all the more striking, analysts said. Until now, even the way Erdogan and his allies referred to the man — by his name at birth, Mustafa Kemal, rather than by the honorific Ata­turk that was bestowed on him four years before he died — showed a certain reserve about glorifying him.

“The government, by pulling down all these different slogans and putting up the flags and the image of Ataturk, might be saying we are one nation, one flag, under the image of Mustafa Kemal,” said Zafer Uskul, a constitutional law professor at Dogus University who is a former member of the Justice and Development Party and has criticized it for its violent response to the protests.

Just how long Ataturk will retain his newly privileged position is unclear. His image has slowly been retreating from Turkish life under Erdogan’s rule, although it is still common everywhere from offices to subway stations to roadside placards. Erdogan has vowed to tear down the cultural center on which the banner hangs and replace it with an opera house.

And Erdogan’s mixed signals on Thursday — meeting with protesters and offering a referendum for the first time on the plans to raze Gezi Park but also saying that “we have arrived at the end of our patience” — led many protesters to expect clashes similar to those on Tuesday, when riot police swept Taksim Square with tear gas and water cannons in an all-day effort to reestablish control.

After that effort, protesters defiantly turned out in even greater numbers — but the ubiquity of helmets and makeshift gas masks in Gezi Park on Thursday suggested that many people were preparing for the worst.

====================

Discussion Policy | FAQ | About Discussions | About Badges

Comments

redcar

11:21 AM GMT+0300

AKP is the foundamendalist islamic party is a big trouble maker in every field. Erdoğan is one of the mentally sick PM in the earth. The problem is not only the trees in the park, but also everything they touch in the world. Non-educated citizens, good intioned muslums, everybody believes in peace are being cheated by current government, AKP. Erdogan is the PM pampered by the people who abuse the Turkey, and others. They all have been doing and speaking non-sence, already!… Therefore, they really must be stopped, as soon as possible for future generations…

jmwallace2634

11:12 AM GMT+0300

But it’s not about the park. It’s about the guy who said “Democracy is like a streetcar. You ride it until you get where you want to be and then you get off.” Now he wants to get off and implement a (his) brand of theocracy on a secular country. Just what evangelicals in America would like to do. Not going to work, there or here.

GoUSMC

1:31 PM GMT+0300

We are supposed to be a Republic. Remember the words of the Pledge of Allegiance. We are not supposed to be a democracy. Democracies are flawed and are what every Liberal wants.


Spread the love