Turkey ‘hawk’ touted as Obama’s man for Europe

Spread the love

By Stefanos Evripidou
THE US Senate Foreign Relations Committee gave President Barack Obama’s next “man in Europe” a grilling over his apparent “pro-Turkish” stance during his confirmation hearing on Thursday.

Obama nominated Philip H. Gordon, a Senior Fellow for US Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington, to replace Daniel Fried as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.

However, during his hearing, Gordon came under fire from Democrat Senator Robert Menendez for his apparent pro-Turkish views, expressed during his career as academic and analyst, and his reported unwillingness to recognise Turkish occupation of a third of Cyprus.

The Senator also raised the issue of Gordon’s opposition to US recognition of the Armenian Genocide, due to the crisis it would stoke in Turkey.

According to the Cyprus News Agency (CNA), the US Senator held a private meeting with Gordon before the hearing which failed to convince the New Jersey senator that his views in office would be impartial and not affected by the apparent pro-Turkish views expressed in the past.

Menendez referred to articles written by Gordon against US recognition of the Armenian Genocide, his reaction to the Greek Cypriot rejection of the Annan Plan in 2004 and his views on Turkey’s role in the world.

During the hearing, Menendez called on Gordon to say whether he agreed with the statement in Obama’s pre-election campaign which referred to a political settlement of the Cyprus issue which will end the Turkish occupation of northern Cyprus and correct the tragic division of the island.

Gordon replied that he agreed. However, he claimed that the view concerning occupation was expressed by the government of Cyprus and some experts.

He went on to claim that there is a Turkish presence in the northern part of Cyprus which is not accepted by the Cyprus government. This is an issue under negotiations for a solution which the US supports, he said.

According to CNA, when Menendez indicated that the occupation was included in Obama’s declaration on Cyprus, Gordon said he has not changed his views on the matter.

Menendez invited Gordon to provide the committee with evidence on the funds which he and the organisations he worked for as analyst received and also whether they come from countries which will be under his jurisdiction as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.

On the issue of the Armenian Genocide, Gordon talked about “a tragedy” that occurred to 1.5 million Armenians which must be recognised by Turkey. In the past, he has written that the US “should stand with Turkey in opposing efforts to punish modern Turkey for an Ottoman ‘genocide’ against Armenians” while encouraging greater honesty about Turkey’s past.

In his testimony before the committee, Gordon said the US had to show leadership in the Balkans. It also “must engage energetically on enduring conflicts in Moldova and Nagorno-Karabakh; support the negotiations on a settlement in Cyprus; promote Turkey’s EU aspirations while encouraging it to improve relations with Armenia, Cyprus and Greece; and vigorously promote the diversification of European energy supplies.”

Gordon noted his time under Bill Clinton on the National Security Council staff, where he was tasked with coordinating US policy toward NATO in the run up to its 50th anniversary. He described NATO as “the closest, most enduring, and most powerful alliance in history”

In contrast to earlier statements, the former analyst said, if confirmed, he looked forward to protecting “national sovereignty and territorial integrity” across the region and resolving the “enduring conflicts that cause needless suffering on a daily basis”.

Given Turkey’s high profile NATO membership, its proximity to the some of the hottest crisis zones in the world, and the key role it plays in Europe’s plans for energy supply diversification, there is little doubt as to Turkey’s importance in US foreign policy.

In her introduction to the hearing, presiding committee chairman, Senator Jeanne Shaheen referred to the “critical relationship” between US and Turkey while noting that NATO relations would be high on Gordon’s agenda.

“Dr. Gordon will also be responsible for managing our relations with Turkey, a valuable NATO ally with a predominantly Muslim population in a dangerous and geopolitically strategic location. How we define our relationship with Turkey over the next decade will have significant repercussions for our long-term interests abroad,” she said.

House President Marios Garoyian said yesterday as far as he knew, Obama’s positions on Cyprus had not changed, suggesting Gordon had come “unprepared” to the hearing.

Government Spokesman Stefanos Stefanou, refrained from commenting, saying he had yet to be briefed on the matter.

Gordon has written extensively on Turkey’s role in the world, most recently in a co-written book called: “Winning Turkey: How America, Europe, and Turkey Can Revive a Fading Partnership.”

The book presents a plan to restore the partnership between Turkey and the West where the authors suggest a series of efforts, including a political settlement in Cyprus and Turkish EU accession, to “anchor Turkey in the West”.

In 2007, Gordon published “Winning the Right War: The Path to Security for America and the World” where he suggests a paradigm shift in the “war on terror”.

One way of fighting the “right war”, Gordon writes, is to “win Turkey back” which requires “new efforts to repair strained relations with Turkey, the most advanced democracy in the Muslim world”.

Regarding the need to make and maintain allies in the greater Middle East, Gordon wrote: “In this regard, no relationship is more important- or more at risk- than the one with the Republic of Turkey.”

On Cyprus, he wrote: “(The US) can make more of an effort to lessen the diplomatic and economic isolation of the Turkish Cypriots, who in 2004 courageously- and with Ankara’s backing- supported a political settlement on the long-divided island that the Greek side rejected.”

In 2006, he wrote that Turkey was “on the brink” of a nationalist backlash, referring to growing nationalist frustration with the US and Europe.
By Stefanos Evripidou
Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2009


Spread the love

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *