Tokyo, Madrid and Istanbul submit their bids to host 2020 Olympics Games
The International Olympic Committee was offered a choice between a 2020 Games in Asia, Europe or a combination of the two when delegations from Tokyo, Madrid and Istanbul submitted their official candidature files at the IOC’s headquarters in Lausanne on Monday.
By Simon Hart, Athletics Correspondent
The formal handover of the ‘bid books’ marks the start of eight months of intensive lobbying, culminating in a secret ballot to elect the host city at the IOC’s session in Buenos Aires on Sept 7. A new president will be chosen at the same meeting to succeed the outgoing Jacques Rogge.
Tokyo, which was a candidate for the 2016 Games but was beaten in the final vote by Rio de Janeiro, is the bookmakers’ favourite after receiving the highest praise in a preliminary IOC technical report last year, though history shows that the early front-runner in an Olympic host-city campaign does not always land the big prize.
Beijing was a hot favourite to beat Sydney to the 2000 Olympics while Paris was odds on to defeat London in the battle for 2012.
The Japanese capital offers the IOC the safest option at the time of global economic turbulence since most of its venues are already built, though Istanbul’s unique selling point as the first Olympic host city ever to straddle two continents could prove a compelling draw. The idea of uniting East and West chimes perfectly with traditional Olympic values.
Madrid is bidding for the Games for the third successive time but admiration for its persistence is unlikely to outweigh fears about the weakness of its economy with its property sector in meltdown and unemployment running as high as 25 per cent.
Related Articles
Ennis stays put in Sheffield
07 Jan 2013
Legal threat over ‘bogus’ Olympic auction
07 Jan 2013
Matthew earns high praise from Ennis
05 Jan 2013
McIlroy could miss Rio to avoid Irish row
03 Jan 2013
Dai Greene spurred on by 2012 pain
04 Jan 2013
Ben Ainslie’s travelling life
04 Jan 2013
Like Tokyo, it can at least claim to have most of its venues in place, and its bid team are likely to emphasise how hosting the Games would help stimulate the economy.
All three bid books, which run into hundred of pages setting out details of the cities’ budgets, financial and political guarantees, venues, security, accommodation and transportation, will be published today and will come under intense scrutiny when the cities play host to an IOC evaluation commission in March.
The commission, which is chaired by British IOC executive board member Sir Craig Reedie, will produce an evaluation report in June.
The three cities have already survived an initial cull after Baku and Doha were cut from the 2020 race by the IOC last May, while Rome withdrew its candidacy because of the serious economic problems in Italy.
The three candidates to host 2020 Olympic Games
TOKYO
Key selling point: The safest option for the IOC at a time of global economic uncertainty, with many venues already built to very high technical specifications.
Pros
Games would be symbol of regeneration following 2011 earthquake and tsunami.
Asia’s ‘turn’ to host summer Games.
Preliminary technical report praised “very strong application”.
Cons
Struggled to win support of Japanese public when it bid for 2016 Games.
Delivered dreary presentation at final vote for 2016.
Would be second consecutive Games in Far East as South Korea is hosting 2018 Winter Olympics.
Odds 4-6 (William Hill)
——————————–
ISTANBUL
Key selling point: The city’s location straddling Europe and Asia would create a powerful ‘unifying’ message at one with the spirit of Olympism.
Pros
Opens new frontier for IOC as Turkey has never hosted the Olympics.
Boasts a relatively buoyant economy.
A strong supporter of Olympic movement with four previous bids.
Cons
High risk for IOC as many venues would have to be built from scratch.
Corruption fears after scandals involving bribery of public officials.
Shares border with Syria and currently sheltering refugees from civil war.
Odds 5-2
——————————–
MADRID
Key selling point: The Games would be shown as a powerful economic catalyst by stimulating growth and helping the country recover from the ravages of recession.
Pros
Reasonably low risk for IOC as most venues already built.
Existing infrastructure makes it the cheapest bid.
City has demonstrated commitment to Olympics with three successive bids.
Cons
Dire economic problems could affect delivery of Games.
Long period of recession could impact on ticket sales.
Too soon for Games to return to Europe after London 2012.
Odds 3-1
via Tokyo, Madrid and Istanbul submit their bids to host 2020 Olympics Games – Telegraph.
Leave a Reply