ROS-LEHTINEN: Time for Turkey to leave Cyprus in peace

cyprus kibris deniz agac
Spread the love

I. Los Lehtinen hanim Amerikan Kongresindeki Sozde Turk lobi Grubunun Temel direklerinden biri kabul edilmekde idi .. Simdi Yunan ve Israil tarafi oldu oy ve para icin.

It reminds me of the old saying “Turk’un Turk’ten baska dostu yoktur”.

A blatantly biased newspaper opinion piece by Republican Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen which doesn’t even mention the fact that in separate simultaneous referenda held on the Annan Peace Plan in Cyprus on 24 April 2004 the majority Greek Cypriot population voted down the UN Plan (75.38% against), whereas the minority Turkish Cypriot population (including the settlers from Turkey) voted for the Plan (64.91% in favor). Referenda in which 89.18% of the Greek Cypriots and 87% of the Turkish Cypriots voted.

Someone should remind Ros-Lehtinen of the words of US State Department Spokesman Richard Boucher in 2004 after the Greek-Cypriot rejection:

“We think that a Greek Cypriot vote against the settlement means that a unique and historic opportunity was lost. We believe the settlement was fair. It has been accepted by the Turkish Cypriot side. There will not be a better settlement. There is no other deal. There is no better deal available. And we hope that the Greek Cypriots will come to comprehend this in due time.”

We would also do well to remember that Florida, and particularly the southern part of the state,has the second highest Jewish population in the U.S. (the first is in NewYork). Hence, the references by Ros-Lehtinen to Turkey ignoring various Cyprus related UN Resolutions and to Turkey’s position regarding the exploration agreement between Cyprus and Israel; this, despite the numerous UN resolutions Israel has ignored regarding returning to its pre-1967 borders.

As the most senior Republican woman in the House of Representatives (since 1989) and as Chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Ros-Lehtinen has significant influence on bilateral relations between the U.S. and Turkey, and it is highly unlikely that supporting her Democrat rival in November is going to make any difference to her getting re-elected. However,my reaction as a Turkish-American would be to keep my money in my pocket instead of contributing to her future campaigns. Also, it would not hurt to e-mail her to express our disappointment and to point out that alienating Turkey by such unnecessary and one-sided statements might not only effect U.S. interests vis-à-vis Iran and Syria; but might even encourage the initiation of a referandum on the part of the Turkish Cypriots to join Turkey, thus resulting in the very annexation she is seeking to avoid:

Enis PINAR

———————————————-

 

Long-standing occupation amounts to annexation

Since its invasion of Cyprus in 1974, Turkey has claimed that it was acting as a protector and guarantor of the island’s security. But a closer examination of its actions on Cyprus indicates motivations of a very different character. Turkey’s invasion resulted in hundreds of thousands of Greek Cypriot refugees, who have been unable to return to their homes for almost 40 years. The international community has repeatedly condemned the illegal military occupation of Cyprus by Turkish troops. The United Nations Security Council has passed 75 resolutions calling for Turkey to allow Greek Cypriots to return to their homes and to withdraw its troops from Cyprus. Yet Turkey continues its occupation.

More than 40,000 heavily armed Turkish soldiers are occupying the northern part of the country, with one Turkish soldier for every two Turkish-Cypriots. The presence of this overwhelming force cannot be justified by the claims that they are needed to prevent any renewal of violence. In fact, since the 2003 opening of the border between the two communities, more than 17 million intercommunal visits have occurred without conflict.

The result of this occupation by foreign troops is that many Cypriot neighborhoods in the occupied areas remain vacant or in a state of disrepair. One of the most tragic examples is the Varosha region of Famagusta. Once an important commercial and tourism center for the island, Varosha was fenced off following the invasion, and access has been prohibited for all except Turkish military forces. Over the years, this area has become a virtual ghost town.

The desolation of Cypriot properties and cultural sites is not restricted to Varosha but is a reality in all the areas under Turkish military occupation. In fact, an estimated 520 Greek Orthodox churches and chapels, and 17 monasteries in the occupied areas have been pillaged, vandalized or destroyed. Often these religious sites have been converted into stables, bars, nightclubs, casinos or hotels, leaving more than 15,000 religious artifacts unaccounted for. This widespread destruction of Cypriot historic, religious and cultural identity certainly does not seem like the behavior of a “protective guardian.”

Turkey also continues to interfere in the domestic affairs of Cyprus, especially the negotiations on reunification. The goal of these talks is a Cypriot-developed, mutually agreeable settlement based on a bizonal, bicommunal federation with political equality, including a single sovereignty, single citizenship and single international presence. But instead of allowing the representatives from the Turkish-Cypriot community to engage freely in the talks, the Turkish government has imposed its own criteria, which has made an agreement all but impossible.

Turkey also has tried to limit Cyprus’ sovereign rights to develop its energy resources. Despite the island’s critical energy needs, Turkey declared last year that it had “nullified” the exploration agreement between Cyprus and Israel even though it has no right to do so. Turkey escalated the conflict by sending its own ships to the region and even threatened military action if Cyprus continued in its project with Israel. Although from the beginning, Republic of Cyprus President Demetris Christofias guaranteed that any energy resources discovered would be used for the benefit of all Cypriots, Turkish officials claimed their actions were to protect the rights of the Turkish-Cypriots.

Reports by the Turkish-Cypriot media indicate that the Turkish government continues to promote illegal immigration by Turks to the northern occupied areas of Cyprus with the goal of changing the demographic composition of the island. According to people administering the occupied area, there are an estimated 160,000 settlers from Turkey, many of whom occupy the homes of the evicted Greek-Cypriots. However, reports in the Turkish-Cypriot press from Turkish-Cypriots who live among the Turkish settlers put this number between 500,000 and 800,000. A recent “census” in the north indicated that the total population in the north had increased to nearly 300,000 people. Just 88,900 of them were native Turkish-Cypriots, who are outnumbered by illegal Turkish immigrants by a ratio of almost 2-1.

Ankara’s support for these illegal immigrants is not welcomed by the native Turkish-Cypriot community. In fact, Stella Altziman, who resides in that region of Cyprus, wrote in 2010: “Due to constant migration from Turkey, [the northern occupied area] is like a Turkish province” and the native Turkish-Cypriots have become a minority in their own land. Last year, many Turkish-Cypriots protested Turkey’s policies toward Cyprus, with some carrying banners that read, “Ankara, get your hands off our shores.” Yet Turkey continues to flood its areas of occupation with illegal Turkish immigrants. In his visit to Cyprus last year, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan mocked the Turkish-Cypriots, stating, “If you don’t want us to send people, you need to have more babies.”

By its occupation, Turkey is “guaranteeing” nothing but a creeping annexation. It is time for Turkey to withdraw its military troops, end all support for illegal immigration to Cyprus and let the true inhabitants of the island determine their own future. Only then will the long-suffering Cypriot people finally enjoy the peace and security they have been trying so desperately to achieve for decades.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Florida Republican, is chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/15/time-for-turkey-to-leave-cyprus-in-peace/


Spread the love

Comments

One response to “ROS-LEHTINEN: Time for Turkey to leave Cyprus in peace”

  1. V,demirW Avatar
    V,demirW

    CYPRUS IS IN PEACE since 1974 and No more Turkish families and babys are being killed in their bathtubs and thrown to the weels or from the cliffs …. (( easy access to the AP (assosiciated press) genocide photos ))
    ONLY THE ONES ARE SHOWN BELOW ARE NOT IN PEACE and DISSAPOINTED ONES …..
    The SEYTAN ( the Lucifier ) got permit from the God in the begining TO SCREW anybody that WHO DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THAT YET OR STILL IGNORING THAT !!!!
    Seytan,Allah tan onceden izin almis , her kim bunu bilmiyorsa ve umursamiyorsa onlari taciz edebilmesi icin !!!!

    (( Turk lerin.Turk soylarinin ve Dunyanin Tek Dusmani olan Seytan nin tarifnamesi asagidaki formulle izah edilmistir ))
    Anti-moses jews inc.Flarmonic orchestra + ( plus ) anti- jesus christians inc.Flarmonic orchestra = ( equals to ) THE SEYTAN ( the Lucifier – The Lucifier Virus = Seytan Mikrobu )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts