By Markus Jaeger*
IDN-InDepth NewsViewpoint
Turkey’s economic and demographic weight relative to the 27-nation European Union (EU-27) will increase over the coming decades. However, relatively rapid population ageing, a slowdown in the growth of the working-age population and declining outward migration will limit the “demographic dividend” the EU will reap in case of Turkish membership. While there are many reasons – political, economic and strategic – that make Turkish EU membership desirable for both the EU and Turkey, it would do little to alter the fundamental economic and demographic dynamics of the EU. NEW YORK (IDN) – In the wake of the “great risk shift”, which saw risk migrate from the emerging to the advanced economies, and given the continued solid medium-term growth outlook in the emerging markets, one finds an understandable degree of enthusiasm in those countries. Turkey is a case in point, having made economic strides over the past decade.
Following the 2000-2001 crisis, Turkey implemented far-reaching economic reforms (for example floating exchange rate, adoption of an inflation targeting regime and central bank independence, reform of the fiscal policy framework and banking sector reform and recapitalisation). The reforms have significantly improved economic fundamentals and raised economic growth.
Average ten-year real GDP (gross domestic product) growth is running at 4% compared with only 2% in the late eighties and late nineties. Net public debt fell from 70% of GDP (actually higher, pre-GDP revision) to a safe 30% and FX (foreign exchange) reserve accumulation policy has helped lower net FX liabilities. This has resulted in a decline in interest rates and a sizeable increase in bank lending to the private sector, which doubled from 20% to 40% of GDP over the past decade.
Reasons for accelerated growth include a bounce-back following crises in 2000-2001, a “pay-off” from 1980 reforms (for example trade opening, domestic economic liberalisation), a proven commitment to economic stability and structural reforms under a one-party government during the 2000s. It is difficult to disentangle the relative importance of these factors. It remains to be seen to what extent policy discipline will last, should a more fractious multi-party coalition government emerge at some point in the future, absent an external anchor (for example IMF, EU accession negotiations).
Weaknesses
Despite all the impressive progress, significant structural weaknesses persist. First, Turkey has become only moderately more open in terms of trade. Exports of goods and services rose from an average of 19% of GDP in the 1990s to 23% of GDP in the 2000s. Total trade as a percentage of GDP rose from 41% of GDP in the 1990s to 49% of GDP in the 2000s.
Second, Turkey’s export mix has not changed dramatically, either. The share of manufacturing products in total exports has remained unchanged at 90%. High-tech exports have stagnated, accounting for less than 2% of manufacturing exports, half the share of the late 1990s and the same level as in 1989 (and considerably smaller than in other major emerging markets).
Last but not least, low savings and investment rates severely limit Turkey’s growth potential. Intriguingly, the savings rate actually declined from more than 20% of GDP in the 1990s to less than 17% of GDP in the 2000s, in spite of a major rise in public-sector savings. Not surprisingly, Turkey is running a very large current account deficit, making it highly dependent on external financing to sustain 4-5% annual real GDP growth.
In spite of continued vulnerabilities and weaknesses, Turkey’s relative economic weight will continue to increase. Turkish GDP currently amounts to less than 5% of EU-27 GDP [in PPP (purchasing power parity) terms]. Turkish GDP per capita is 50% of the EU average, up from 40% and 30% one and two decades ago, respectively. Under reasonable assumptions, this share could reach 70% by 2030.
This would translate into a Turkish GDP that would just about exceed 10% of total EU GDP. This would leave Turkey as the fourth-largest economy in the EU behind Germany, France and the UK, but likely slightly ahead of Italy.
Naturally, the risks attached to the outlook for the “catch up” economies are greater than for the slowly growing advanced economies. Even at its peak in 2050-2060, Turkish GDP would, under current projections, not exceed 17% – smaller than Germany’s 22% today.
Demographically, Turkey’s population of 73 million is equivalent to 15% of the EU population. While larger than France, Italy and the UK (60-65 million each), it is smaller than Germany (82 million). According to the latest UN projections, Turkey’s population will reach 90 million by 2050 (and gently decline thereafter).
At its peak, Turkey’s population share would be equivalent to Germany’s today (17%). The EU is often thought to benefit from a “demographic dividend” in the event of Turkish EU membership. But this is unlikely to be the case. Turkey’s population of working age will increase by a mere 5 and 10 million over the next 10 and 20 years, respectively, peaking at 61 million in 2040.
Effectively, the working-age population will remain unchanged after 2025. Net migration has dropped very dramatically over the past few decades from its peak period in 1960-1980 and is projected to fall to zero by 2025.
This suggests that even if Turkish EU membership were to grant Turkish citizens complete intra-EU labour mobility, the net flow of workers to the EU-27 would be very limited, perhaps non-existent, and completely inadequate to offset the projected decline in the EU-27 working-age population of 10 million per decade.
Turkey’s economic and, much less so, demographic weight relative to the EU will be growing over the coming decades. While there are many reasons – political, economic and strategic – that make Turkish EU membership desirable for both the EU and Turkey, it would do little to alter the fundamental economic and demographic dynamics of the EU – the “great risk shift” and Turkey’s buoyant medium-term growth prospects notwithstanding.
*Dr. Markus Jaeger is a Director at Deutsche Bank Research in New York, USA. He is responsible for economic, financial, and political risk research, with a special focus on the larger emerging markets. This article appeared online on December 15, 2011 under ‘Talking Point’ in Deutsche Bank Research. [IDN-InDepthNews – January 7, 2012]
2012 IDN-InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters
Picture: The writer | Credit: Deutsche Bank
Leave a Reply