DADRIAN-AKCAM BOOK ON THE TURKISH COURTS-MARTIAL NOW IN ITS THIRD EDITION

fatma UCLA Nov 6 2005
Spread the love

fatma UCLA Nov 6 2005
GOCEK, HOVANNESIAN, SAFAK, AKCAM INC.

Genocide Research Zoryan Institute

Despite being based on a taboo topic that is subject to legal
restriction in Turkey, the Dadrian-Akcam book on the Turkish
Courts-Martial titled, “Tehcir ve Taktil:” DivanI Harb-i Ã-rfî
Zabitlar. Ittihad ve Terakki’nin Yargilanmasi, 1919-1922 is now in
its third edition, indicating remarkable interest in the topic of the
Armenian Genocide there. First published some sixteen months ago by
Bilgi University Press in Istanbul, this 732-page volume is a detailed
reconstruction, plus a historical and legal analysis of the post-WWI
Turkish military tribunals prosecuting the perpetrators of “crimes
against the Armenians” during the war, and is based on original
Ottoman sources. Jointly compiled and edited by Professors Vahakn N.
Dadrian, Director of Genocide Research at the Zoryan Institute, and
Taner Akcam, Kaloosdian/Mugar Chair in Armenian Genocide Studies at
Clark University, this compendium is ushered in by a 125pp extensive
introduction by Prof. Dadrian. It explores the criminal prosecution in
the 1919-1921 post-war period of the perpetrators of the wartime
Armenian Genocide. Supported by a succession of post-war but
pre-Kemalist Turkish governments, Turkish Military Tribunals spent
months gathering incriminating evidence as part of their pre-trial
interrogations. As a result, the Mazhar Inquiry Commission was able to
amass, classify and catalogue a wealth of evidence attesting to the
deliberate and planned nature of the wholesale liquidation of the
targeted Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire. Witness
testimonies included disclosures by high-ranking military officers,
governors of several ranks, and Young Turk Ittihad party leaders,
including the extensive affidavit supplied by wartime Third Army
Commander, General Mehmet Vehip.

Several aspects of these trials, unprecedented in Ottoman-Turkish
history, render the resulting documentation of the centrally organized
mass murder invaluable. Foremost among these is the nature of the
evidence-in-

chief, involving secret and top-secret official ciphers
issuing from Talat Pasha, Interior Minister, party chief and the prime
architect of the Armenian Genocide. Equally important, all these
ciphers were authenticated by competent officials from both the
Justice and Interior Ministries before being introduced as prima facie
evidence. Moreover, the defendants were confronted with these
documents asking them to verify the authenticity of their signatures
at the end of these documents.

An English language edition of this very important book is set to be
published by a major American University Press, hopefully before the
end of the year.

========================================================

The man between Müge Göçek and Elif Şafak is Richard Hovannesian, the racist UCLA professor who incited Armenian-American students to bomb the off-campus home of Prof. Stanford J. Shaw in 1977. The photo was taken in November 2005 when Göçek, Şafak and Akçam gave talks at a conference at UCLA in Los Angeles, with Hovannesian as the “moderator.” (There was nothing to moderate). It was a happy get-together for the 3 Turks, and they were the only speakers. They all sang the same tune, and received a loud applause from the audience. At the end of the conference Hovannesian congratulated the speakers and said: “Next time we meet, we will talk about the reparations Turkey will have to pay.” The photo widely circulated among the Armenian websites at that time. I remember well the picture and the piece I wrote at TF about the event at that time.

Ferruh Demirmen


Spread the love

Comments

5 responses to “DADRIAN-AKCAM BOOK ON THE TURKISH COURTS-MARTIAL NOW IN ITS THIRD EDITION”

  1. Huseyin Celik Avatar
    Huseyin Celik

    As this book prepared by Mr. Akcam and Mr. Dadrian will be the as same stories as they published before , This book I hope not as the same as Mr. Andonian’s “”Memories of Naim bey””
    The evidences they will present in this book I hope not the same as that fabricated by Wellington house.Otherwise it will be only a story not a historical evidence presenter.
    By the way, they insist that those what they say were happened 1915 , why they do not bring all the supporting documents put on the table before the Turkish counterparts and prove their case. By Writing stories will not do any good to prove the case they are figthing for.
    Respectfully.

  2. jda Avatar
    jda

    Obviously Celik chooses not to read the book.

    As anyone can tell, this book is a review of Turkish documents. from a Turkish court martial, with testimony from Turkish witnesses, before a Turkish authority.

  3. Huseyin Celik Avatar
    Huseyin Celik

    I have read Mr. Dadrian’s book. Starts with genocide, finishes with genocide, And also increased the number Armenians perished by Ottomans to 1.700.000. I saw their book in Istanbul. Co-authered by Mr. Akcam-Mr. Dadrian. worth not reading. Anything these two and Mr. Balakian writes should be treated as a propoganda not historical meterial.
    Mr. Akcam is deaspora’s stooge, Mr. Dadrian is a good story writer.
    Be happy, stay healthy and keep smiling…….

  4. mok10501 Avatar
    mok10501

    @JDA; Exactly, it is on the TURKISH documents only which are open. What about the Armenian documents? Can anybody produce anything at all from Armenian archives or maybe UK archives? Can you trust UK archives? The blue-book and the fabrications of the so-called genocide stories by the British secret services? Which one do you prefer JDA? Or maybe, you would like to open up and read the court cases of MALTA wouldn’t you?

  5. mok10501 Avatar
    mok10501

    JDA; Exactly, it is on the TURKISH documents only which are open. What about the Armenian documents? Can anybody produce anything at all from Armenian archives or maybe UK archives? Can you trust UK archives? The blue-book and the fabrications of the so-called genocide stories by the British secret services? Which one do you prefer JDA? Or maybe, you would like to open up and read the court cases of MALTA wouldn’t you?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts