International Conference on Genocide, International Law Concludes in Beirut

armenian kids hate azerbaijan and turkish flag
Spread the love

BEIRUT—A two-day international conference on “The Armenian Genocide and International Law,” organized by Haigazian University and the Armenian National Committee of the Middle East (ANC-ME), concluded on Sept. 4.

A scene from the conference.

The conference drew in 13 experts in genocide and international law from the U.S., Canada, Switzerland, Ireland, Armenia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Lebanon, who joined more than 80 local political scientists, activists, sociologists, historians, religious leaders, educators, international correspondents, journalists, and students in addressing the consequences of the Armenian Genocide and promoting a fair perspective through international law.

It covered such topics as genocide denial and recognition, Turkish nationalism, and the politics of denial, as well as the economic aspect of the genocide and the issue of lands and assets. Within the framework of international law, the conference discussed the general topic of genocide and crimes against humanity, retribution, and the preservation of the Armenian cultural heritage.

More specifically, Dr. George Charaf (University of Lebanon) lectured on the problem of minorities and majorities, discussing the case of the Ottoman Empire. Dr. Ugur Ungor (University of Sheffield) talked about demographic engineering in the Ottoman Empire and the genocide. Dr. Mohammad Rifaat (University of Alexandria) discussed the Armenian Question according to Arab sources. Dr. William Schabas (National University of Ireland) discussed the problems and prospects of the genocide and international law, 60 years after the International Genocide Convention. Dr. Alfred De Zayas (Geneva School of Diplomacy and International Relations) elaborated on the issues of justice and international law regarding the genocide. Khatchig Mouradian (Ph.D. student, Clark University) lectured on the Armenians, Raphael Lemkin, and the UN Convention. Dr. Taner Akcam’s paper, entitled “Turkish Nationalism and the Armenian Genocide Issue in Turkey Today,” was presented in absentia. Dr. Ragip Zarakolu (vice president, Human Rights Association of Turkey) tackled the issue of genocide denial and law in Turkey.

Mouradian, Manoyan, Schabas, and De Zayas.

In the same context, Dr. Seyhan Bayraktar (University of Zurich) covered the evolution of Armenian Genocide denial in the Turkish press. Bilgin Ayata (PhD. Candidate, John Hopkins University) discussed Kurdish-Armenian relations and the Armenian Genocide. Dr. Roger Smith (professor emeritus of government, College of William and Mary) lectured on professional ethics and the denial of the Armenian Genocide. Dr. Henry Theriault (Worcester State College) discussed restorative justice and alleviating the consequences of genocide. And finally, Dr. Richard Hovannisian (UCLA) covered the issue of universalizing the legacy of the Armenian Genocide.

The sessions were moderated by Dr. Arda Ekmekji, Dr. Naila Kaidbey, Giro Manoyan, Dr. Rania Masri, Dr. Joseph Bayeh, Dr. Ohannes Geukjian, Antranig Dakessian, and Dr. Haig Demoyan. Conference organizers have announced that the presentations will be published in a volume.

Rev. Dr. Paul Haidostian, the president of Haigazian University, said that such conferences keep the genocide issue alive and add to the increasingly growing international momentum toward recognition. “The topic of genocide, and this conference in particular, will hopefully open the door to further academic studies and research, activating deeper study in the economic, social, and legal aspects of inter-state relations,” he said.

“The Armenian Genocide is not simply an Armenian problem but essentially an international burden,” he added. “The victim carries a strong sense of ownership of pain, but human civilization cannot be considered as highly developed if it does not embrace a sense of advocacy for the victimized.”

Haidostian spoke about four key points. First, “that injustices of any nation against any other nation are part of the same human manifestation of evil that require joint and effective global action.” Second, “that this international conference convenes in a country, Lebanon, which continues to be a unique land of dialogue and culture despite the ever-present seeds of misunderstanding.” Third, giving the example of Haigazian University, and more specifically the name of Armenag Haigazian, a victim of the genocide, Haidostian emphasized that “our calling has been and continues to be standing up for new life not only for Armenians but especially for our Arab brothers and sisters, and really, all people of the world.” Finally, Haidostian explained that given the fact that the conference was being held at a university no academic community can be value-neutral. “A university may be a neutral medium of dialogue, but it is essentially a forum of passion for deeper knowledge, responsibility, and enlightenment.”

In her message, Vera Yacoubian, the executive director of the ANC-ME, spoke about the efforts of the ANC in highlighting the Armenian community’s role throughout the Middle East, its coexistence with surrounding Arab and Islamic communities, and its efforts in addressing the Armenian Cause.

Yacoubian expressed hope that the conference would provide a significant breakthrough in analyzing the Armenian Genocide, as it brought together a large group of specialists in the arena of genocide and international law.

Regarding Turkish-Armenian relations, Yacoubian noted, “We cannot ignore or disregard recent developments and address these pending issues without resolving past history between the two nations. Indeed, Turkish-Armenian relations carry the heavy burden of the Armenian Genocide and there is high level of doubt and mistrust regarding Turkish intentions.”

Yacoubian concluded by questioning Turkey’s responsibility towards acknowledging the Armenian Genocide and the future of the Armenian Cause.

Marios Garoyan, the president of the House of Representatives of Cyprus, gave the inaugural speech at the conference on Sept. 2. His presence as the guest speaker, he said, was driven by his country’s “commitment to international law, peace, security, and stability, but also the determination to continue to condemn, on every possible occasion, any infringement of international law by acts of genocide.”

“On the one hand, governments and parliaments should act together and closely cooperate in terms of assessing the progress made with regard to the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and identify measures to be taken at all levels,” he said. “On the other hand, it is the states that must cooperate for the prevention and punishment of those responsible for the crime of genocide.”

Garoyian questioned Turkey’s role as mediator, peacemaker, and peacekeeper in the wider Middle East, while Turkey continues to deny the truth of the crimes perpetrated by its Ottoman predecessors.

He noted that Cyprus has always stood by the Armenian people in their struggle for the recognition of the Armenian Genocide. In 1975, the Cyprus House of Representatives was one of the first parliaments in the world to adopt a resolution calling the atrocities inflicted upon the Armenians “genocide.” Garoyian added that Cyprus and its people have many more reasons to understand the injustice of the genocide due to “the implementation of Turkey’s policy of ethnic cleansing against Cyprus’ population during the 1974 invasion and the continuing occupation of 37 percent of Cyprus’ territory.”

Among the capacity audience were Minister Alain Tabourian, representing the Lebanese president, Michel Suleiman; parliament member Hagop Pakradouni, representing the parliament speaker, Nabih Berry; Minister Jean Oghasabian, representing the president of the Council of Ministers, Fouad Sanioura; parliament member Sebouh Kalpakian, representing the appointed president of the Council of Ministers, Saad Rafic Hariri; parliament member Shant Chinchinian; ambassadors of the United Kingdom, Cyprus, Uruguay, and the Czech Republic; the president of the Union of Armenian Evangelical Churches in the Near East, Rev. Megrdich Karagozian; the Prelate of the Armenian Apostolic Church of Lebanon, Bishop Kegham Khatcherian; the president of the Armenian Protestant community in Syria, Rev. Haroutune Selimian; representatives of embassies, Armenian and Lebanese political parties, and cultural associations; former members of parliament; ministers; religious leaders; and guests of the conference.

The inaugural session of the conference took place at the hall of the First Armenian Evangelical Church of Beirut. Public lectures by some of the participants of the conference took place during the first week of September.


Spread the love

Comments

3 responses to “International Conference on Genocide, International Law Concludes in Beirut”

  1. Kufi Seydali Avatar
    Kufi Seydali

    SIR,

    Marios Garoyan, the President of the so-called Republic of Cyprus is the least qualified
    person to speak about the Cyprus problem. First of all, he is probably illegally occupying a sit
    which rightly belongs to a Turkish Cypriot, because the constitution of that entity called “Cyprus Republic” requires that 30% of Parliament sits and the chair of Vice President should be occupied by a Turkish Cypriot.

    It is absolutely no surprise that the Greek Cypriots did what they did both during 1963 – 1974 and
    in 1975. What does Mr. Garoyan remember of those dark years and what the Armenian-Greek alliance did
    to the poor Turkish Cypriots? Don’t remember? Tabula Rassa. may be?

    It would also be no surprise that the Greeks of Cyprus would support the devil if he was only anti- turkish.
    Does Mr. Garoyan remember with which passport the Baby Killer and Chief Terorist, Abdullah Ocalan
    was caught with? Don’t remember? How about a Greek Cypriot Passport?

    Mr. Garoyan is entitled to his opinion and choice of friends, but, he has absolutely no right to speak on
    behalf of all the Cypriots, because 30% of them are Turkish-Cypriots who do not agree with him, and
    whose democratic rights have been asurped from them by the Greeks and Armenians of Cyprus.

  2. Robert Avatar
    Robert

    This whole “conference” is a joke, right? Who in their right minds would allow such a one-sided event without discussing equally the other side of the story! I read nothing about the mass murders, ethnic cleansings and outright genocides committed by dashnak Armenians, Greek-Cypriots, Kurdish PKK terrorists (who, by the way, are trained and funded by financial monies collected and funneled through both Greek and Armenian orthodox churches, mostly here in the US, but in Europe as well) against 518,000 Turks (as well as 2 million other muslim and non-muslim people) before, during and after WWI; as well as the thousands of Turkish-Cypriots who were constantly targeted and treated as second-class citizens, and then murdered by the Greeks on Cyprus, up until the completely LEGAL 1974 liberation by Turkish forces! At which conference will these atrocities against us be discussed? Is this justice…or is it “JUST US”?!!

    Why do you remain in total denial and just admit what the entire planet already knows…YOU ARMENIANS, GREEKS, AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF OTHER AT THIS BS CONFERENCE, AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE EU, ARE NOTHING MORE THAN RACISTS WHO LOVE PLAYING THE RACE AND RELIGION CARDS OVER AND OVER!!!! You exhibit a continuous frustration, envy and jealousy towards Turkey (even the Arabs) due to the fact that the Ottoman Empire had defeated ALL of you and you became their subjects for over five centuries! Ask yourselves if the tables were turned, and Turkey had such a conference, would it even draw a bit of attention by anyone (media or otherwise)? Call this “conference” of yours what it really is, a gathering of HYPOCRITES and WHINERS!! Can you all say SOUR GRAPES? Get over it already and get a life!!!

    Mr. Seydali’s post above was most appropriate in showing this “conference’s” true colors!!

    This conference of hate and one-sided biased racism was nothing more than a sham! Its attendees, nothing more than brainwashed, ignorant denialists! Go ahead and have as many of these “conferences” as you want. By doing so, you’re all simply proving our point, over and over! In reality, you are your own worst enemy!!!

  3. jda Avatar
    jda

    Robert, Robert,

    Take a chill pill. Or maybe three.

    1. On the one hand, you claim that no Armenian, Pontic, Greek or Assyrian Genocides can be said to have occurred, because there was no conviction under the 1948 Convention. [This would come as a surprise to its drafter, LEMKIN, who coined the term “Genocide” with the Armenians and European Jews in mind]. Yet you claim that Greeks and Armenians committed Genocide against Turks. There has been no adjudication of these claims under the treaty as well. HOW can one non adjudicated example not be genocide, but two others are?

    2, Turkish nationalists have risible “conferences” all the time. One is coming up in Utah in two weeks. The Cartoon netork is covering it. WHO CARES? Don’t let a little freedom of speech drive you crazier than you already are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts