KRG confirms South Korea oil deals

Spread the love

By United Press International

South Korea was granted the lead role in two northern Iraq oil projects and increased interest in six others, United Press International has confirmed.

The Korean National Oil Corp. has also pledged $2.1 billion in infrastructure projects in Iraq’s Kurdish region as part of the deal, but $1.5 billion will be withheld until oil exports begin.

Iraq’s central government has called most of the 20-plus oil deals signed by the Kurdistan Regional Government illegal and is pledging to confiscate any oil produced.

The KRG and KNOC have confirmed leaders signed a massive Implementation Agreement for Oil & Gas Infrastructure Projects Thursday in Seoul.

In exchange for the investment in electricity, water, road and other infrastructure — the remaining $1.5 billion will come from KNOC’s earnings from oil exports — KNOC was granted two production-sharing contracts.

The state-owned firm will have an 80-percent ownership of the Qush Tappa block PSC and 60-percent ownership of Sangaw South.

KNOC was also granted interest in existing production contracts: a 15-percent stake in each of Norbest Limited’s K15, K16 and K17 blocks; a 15-percent interest in block K21; and a 20-percent stake in Sterling Energy Ltd.’s Sangaw North block. It also was given 20 percent more of the Bazian block, of which KNOC is the lead company in a consortium that was granted a 60-percent stake last November.

The agreement was seven months in the making, when a memorandum of understanding was reached between the two sides. In June, contracts for oil stakes were agreed to, as well as an investment project. All of the details were negotiated since then and the deals made official Thursday.

Iraq Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani, in a June interview in his Baghdad office, told United Press International all but the four KRG contracts signed before February 2007 would be regarded as illegal.

“That oil will be confiscated; they have no right to work in that part of the country,” he said. “We’ll use a number of measures to stop any violation of Iraqi law. Those contracts have no standing with us, we don’t recognize them and they have no right to do that.”

A draft version of a new oil law for Iraq was approved in February 2007 by the Iraqi Cabinet but was scuttled after changes were made and interpretations varied.

KRG Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani urged Baghdad to concentrate on passing the law instead of condemning the regional government’s contracts.

—

Ben Lando, UPI Energy Editor

Spread the love

More onEnergy

Aylin D. Miller

Turkish Forum, Editör in Chief, if you are writing articles in English, German, Russian or Turkish and want to publish them please contact us. We are also searching for people for our Media Watch Committee.

Comments

One response to “KRG confirms South Korea oil deals”

eamad j mazouri

November 22, 2008

When it comes to oil contracts, the post Saddam Iraq is a federal democratic Iraq according to its constitution of 2005 that was voted on by more than 80% of Iraqi voters and ratified by the democratically elected Iraqi parliament. This constitution is clear on the three areas of exclusive powers of the federal government in Baghdad; the defense, monetary and foreign policies. There are also the shared powers between the federal government and the regions, however if a conflict arise in any of these areas the constitution gives the regional laws an upper hand over the federal ones. We must admit that Oil related articles are vague, while clearly stating oil revenues would be shared by the entire Iraqi population it gives the region implicitly the right over non-current fields. However, it is understood that there should be cooperation and coordination between the federal and regional governments not only on signing oil contracts, but also on other issues such as exploration rights, administration and marketing. The federal ministry of oil has signed as many or more contracts than KRG with international companies without even consulting KRG, even when these contracts are related to oil fields under the jurisdiction of KRG. If KRG contracts are illegal as he claims then the contracts his ministry signed should be illegal as well. At any rate, it is understood that in the absence of a federal hydro-carbon law they both have the right to go ahead with these contracts as long as they serve people and do not violate international standards especially if the country is in dire need for oil generated revenues to support basic services such as clean water, power, communications and decent roads as it is the case now in Iraq. Also as a consequence to that the country is in need of foreign investments specifically in oil industry when it comes to capital, technology and expertise. Nevertheless, if the differences between the two parties reach a certain level then the federal Supreme Court should be the referee not the media as Mr. Shahristani has done.

KRG confirms South Korea oil deals

Comments

One response to “KRG confirms South Korea oil deals”

Leave a Reply